I ran this command on my laptop, and the returned list includes:
gdb-doc - The GNU Debugger Documentation
?Why the hell is gdb-doc not free?
Kjetil
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 06:36, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mi, 27 apr 11, 12:09:56, Klistvud
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:50:07 -0400 kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran this command on my laptop, and the returned list includes:
gdb-doc - The GNU Debugger Documentation
?Why the hell is gdb-doc not free?
I was wondering the same thing about the gcc-doc package.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011
* On 2011 27 Apr 08:55 -0500, Mike Viau wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:50:07 -0400 kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran this command on my laptop, and the returned list includes:
gdb-doc - The GNU Debugger Documentation
?Why the hell is gdb-doc not free?
I was wondering the same
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 09:02:38 Huang, Tao wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Klistvud quotati...@aliceadsl.fr wrote:
Dne, 27. 04. 2011 12:36:03 je Andrei Popescu napisal(a):
On Mi, 27 apr 11, 12:09:56, Klistvud wrote:
Seems a quite reasonable policy to me. Of course, we all wish
in this free software world.
Ah, you meant is not in the list of the FSF's free GNU/Linux
distributions. That's another different thing.
My beginner question is, why doesn't Debian remove the proprietary
software hosted on it's servers? Don't they want to follow the FSF word?
I'd say no linux
Nate Bargmann wrote:
* On 2011 27 Apr 08:55 -0500, Mike Viau wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:50:07 -0400 kjetil1...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran this command on my laptop, and the returned list includes:
gdb-doc - The GNU Debugger Documentation
?Why the hell is gdb-doc not free?
I was wondering
On Mi, 27 apr 11, 08:58:49, Nate Bargmann wrote:
Some searches of the Web will reveal the complete back story. The short
story is that the GNU Free Document License (GFDL) allows invariant
sections in a document which violates the DFSG.
Just to clarify a bit for the archives: the fact that
On Mi, 27 apr 11, 10:11:28, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
Thank you for the hint. I tried Liberation sans instead of Arial. It
is not the same.
AFAIU it is not meant to be the same (it couldn't anyway, due to
licensing issues), but with the same *metrics*. If I understand this
right, it would mean
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 11:56:30 Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mi, 27 apr 11, 10:11:28, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
Thank you for the hint. I tried Liberation sans instead of Arial. It
is not the same.
AFAIU it is not meant to be the same (it couldn't anyway, due to
licensing issues)
Yep, sure,
software because users have the option to install
proprietary software from debian's server and this is a bit confusing for
beginners in this free software world.
My beginner question is, why doesn't Debian remove the proprietary software
hosted on it's servers? Don't they want to follow the FSF word
objects to, BTW.
My beginner question is, why doesn't Debian remove the proprietary software
hosted on it's servers? Don't they want to follow the FSF word?
No, we don't want to follow the FSF word. Debian has a good relationship
with the FSF, but we don't agree on everything. We are not followers
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
Non ASCII fonts with diacritical signs do not render correctly on-
screen.
Do you mean characters? I'm guessing a bug report would be appreciated
if you can reproduce the issue.
Yes, non ASCII characters - sorry.
...
I'll file a bug
On Wednesday 27 April 2011 15:50:17 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Eike Lantzsch wrote:
Non ASCII fonts with diacritical signs do not render correctly on-
screen.
Do you mean characters? I'm guessing a bug report would be appreciated
if you can reproduce
On Ma, 26 apr 11, 00:14:52, Jasper Noe wrote:
I think it is still another key:
/apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir
(follow-up on -offtopic please)
Maybe it's just me, but showing $HOME instead of $HOME/Desktop by
default seems like a bad idea.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 00:14:52 +0200, Jasper Noe wrote:
Maybe you are searching for another key:
/apps/nautilus/preferences/show_desktop [ ]
If you toogle this off all your icons will vanish.
I think it is still another key:
/apps/nautilus/preferences/desktop_is_home_dir
Well, I think
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:36:47 +, Camaleón wrote:
- To graphically turn off your desktop icons (while they're still
available via nautilus) one has to enable /apps/nautilus/preferences/
^^
Small error: that should be disable.
show_desktop
Greetings,
location.
It should be possible to add and remove trusted certificates with the
keytool command, but I have to specify the keystore.
Any idea where OpenJDK might have it's default keystore?
Or am I looking the wrong way at that problem?
I think the policy tool can tell you what it's using
. From there you can remove trusted
certificates.
--
Liam O'Toole
Cork, Ireland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnirdu8n.enl.liam.p.otoole
Hi, everyone
From onetime ago, In my desktop screen,
the icons of direcotry and files in my home folder appears.
When I remove the icon in my desktop screen,
the folder of that icons is removed really.
I do not like the icons of my folder appears in default desktop screen.
How can I remove
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 22:35 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
Hi, everyone
From onetime ago, In my desktop screen,
the icons of direcotry and files in my home folder appears.
When I remove the icon in my desktop screen,
the folder of that icons is removed really.
I do not like the icons of my
2011년 04월 25일 22:49, Steven 쓴 글:
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 22:35 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
Hi, everyone
From onetime ago, In my desktop screen,
the icons of direcotry and files in my home folder appears.
When I remove the icon in my desktop screen,
the folder of that icons is removed really.
I do
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
2011년 04월 25일 22:49, Steven 쓴 글:
Assuming gnome:
start gconf-editor (start with terminal or the menu: Applications -
System tools - Configuration editor)
go to apps - nautilus - desktop
There you can find check boxes to enable/disable
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 23:16:39 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote:
2011? 04? 25? 22:49, Steven ? ?:
Assuming gnome:
start gconf-editor (start with terminal or the menu: Applications -
System tools - Configuration editor)
go to apps - nautilus - desktop
There you can find check boxes to
you
checked that box for a signed applet in Iceweasel.
(Shooting from the hip, here, but, ...) I think the quickest way is to
remove the corresponding certificate.
You go to the settings item in the edit menu, I don't remember the
name of the group in English, but it should be something like
Hi,
how can you undo the permission Always Trust this Publisher, once you
checked that box for a signed applet in Iceweasel. The applet is being
loaded with the IcedTea6 Plugin and run by OpenJDK-6-JRE.
iceweasel 3.5.16-6
icedtea6-plugin 6b18-1.8.3-2
openjdk-6-jre 6b18-1.8.3-2+squeeze1
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 6:06 PM, adris adr...@t-online.de wrote:
Hi,
how can you undo the permission Always Trust this Publisher, once you
checked that box for a signed applet in Iceweasel.
(Shooting from the hip, here, but, ...) I think the quickest way is to
remove the corresponding
from the hip, here, but, ...) I think the quickest way is to
remove the corresponding certificate.
You go to the settings item in the edit menu, I don't remember the
name of the group in English, but it should be something like
miscellaneous or high-level or advanced or something. It's
Please post the full output of 'apt-get dist-upgrade' here, otherwise we
can only guess.
I waited a few days and did an apt-get update and dist-upgrade and the
manually installed packages that were previously a problem were no longer
going to be removed. So the problem is solved but I do
On Jo, 24 mar 11, 12:52:03, James Robertson wrote:
I am running Sid.
while doing a dist-upgrade apt-get wants to remove a number of packages that
are manually installed.
One example is rxvt-unicode which I manually installed. I have run apt-get
unmarkauto rxvt-unicode to ensure it's set
James Robertson j...@mesrobertson.com wrote:
JR I am running Sid.
JR while doing a dist-upgrade apt-get wants to remove a number of packages that
JR are manually installed.
JR How can I prevent apt from removing my manually installed packages?
i've made apt-get ignore packages
I am running Sid.
while doing a dist-upgrade apt-get wants to remove a number of packages that
are manually installed.
One example is rxvt-unicode which I manually installed. I have run apt-get
unmarkauto rxvt-unicode to ensure it's set to manual but it keeps wanting
to remove it during dist
On 02/07/2011 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core upgrade.
Any word on this? (The rest of X seems
On 2011-02-27 09:04 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/07/2011 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core
On 02/27/2011 02:41 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-27 09:04 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/07/2011 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core upgrade.
I installed
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
Hugo
Well, it don't take Guru to tell you that's not a good idea, their just
separating the Men from the Boy's. ;-)
--
Jimmy Johnson
Debian Wheezy - AMD64 - EXT4
Hi,
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iip6vm$87e$1
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Hi,
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
Hugo
It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away later, or if it's
due to a change in xorg package... xserver
On Monday 07 February 2011, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Hi,
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
Hugo
It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away
On 2011-02-07 17:45 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away later, or if it's
due
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-02-07 17:45 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom hvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 February 2011, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de was heard
to say:
The problem is that the drivers got uploaded but were automatically
rejected, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2011/02/msg00360.html for more
information.
I'm afraid
Amen to that. I run apticron to see what installed packages have
updates available, but always, _always_ upgrade by hand. Anything else
is begging for trouble at/near release time or during ABI changes...
--b
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Curt Howland howl...@priss.com wrote:
This has
Brad Alexander wrote:
Amen to that. I run apticron to see what installed packages have
updates available, but always, _always_ upgrade by hand. Anything else
is begging for trouble at/near release time or during ABI changes...
and do a backup before this next upgrade...
Hugo
--
To
On 02/07/2011 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 17:45 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkomhvw59...@care2.com wrote:
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
It's a dependency thing
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core upgrade.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hugo Vanwoerkom:
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
That's why I always preach not to run dist-upgrades (or full-upgrades,
as aptitude calls them) but simple upgrades. That way you won't have to
fear removing half of your system.
J
autoremove' will offer to
remove them from your.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
false;
If you're lucky aptitude or/and 'apt-get autoremove' will offer to
remove them from your.
That APT configuration variable only affect *installation*. If you want to
encourage *auto-removal* you need to fiddle with a different one:
APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant false;
If you use
Hi,
Is there a way to find all recommended packages that were automatically
installed? It appears aptitude now installs recommended packages by default.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
a package which has recommended dependencies and you
later remove the package which sucked in the extra packages, it is
possible to remove the packages which are not required by issuing:
apt-get autoremove
--
elbbit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
In 462154.23638...@web45807.mail.sp1.yahoo.com, S D wrote:
Is there a way to find all recommended packages that were automatically
installed? It appears aptitude now installs recommended packages by
default.
Not exactly, but something like (aptitude search '~M!~R~i') should get you
close.
That
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:32:02 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-28 07:12 +0100, Joe Riel wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
with Debian squeeze)?
If you have used the Debian
On 2011-01-28 16:26 +0100, Joe Riel wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:32:02 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-28 07:12 +0100, Joe Riel wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:02:50 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-28 16:26 +0100, Joe Riel wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:32:02 +0100
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-01-28 07:12 +0100, Joe Riel wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Joe Riel j...@san.rr.com wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
with Debian squeeze)?
I tried modifying xorg.conf and
removing /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-kernel-common.conf
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:42:30 +0100
Thierry Chatelet tchate...@free.fr wrote:
On Friday 28 January 2011 07:12:43 Joe Riel wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
with Debian squeeze)?
I tried
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
with Debian squeeze)?
I tried modifying xorg.conf and
removing /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-kernel-common.conf; that
partially worked, however, glx didn't work because
On 2011-01-28 07:12 +0100, Joe Riel wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
with Debian squeeze)?
If you have used the Debian packages in non-free, definitely. If you
have run NVidia's installer, I'm
On Friday 28 January 2011 07:12:43 Joe Riel wrote:
Is there a nice way to remove the nvidia driver and replace
it with the nouveau driver (which was originally installed
with Debian squeeze)?
I tried modifying xorg.conf and
removing /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-kernel-common.conf; that
partially
not been removed from the CUPS database. Is there any way that I can
remove it? This isn't much of a problem of course, I just don't find
any reason for traces of a machine to be there since i've gotten rid
of it.
Please CC me as I am not on the list.
Thanks,
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
previous Business Inkjet 1000 printer.
(...)
You can try directly with Cups web interface.
Open your browser and go to localhost:631. Login as root user when
prompted and open Printers tab. Check if both HP printers are listed
there and remove the older one.
Sending CC to your e-mail
and go to localhost:631. Login as root user when
prompted and open Printers tab. Check if both HP printers are listed
there and remove the older one.
Sending CC to your e-mail, as requested.
Thank you Camaleon, the CUPS web interface worked just fine.
Glad it worked :-)
Greetings
Hi,
I am trying to build a .udeb for reiser4progs. I got it source from
`apt-get source reiser4progs`. And modified the debian/control and
debian/rules files as below. But still, dh build configured with
readlines option. What should I do? Thanks.
~/reiser4progs-1.0.7$ more debian/control
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 03:44, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
Tom Browder wrote:
...
When I try to use the Add/Remove Applications it chugs for a while,
you are using a GUI wrapper around apt. Because it is a wrapper there
may be errors that you are not seeing. Let me recommend that you
Tom Browder wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
What are the contents of your /etc/apt/sources.list file?
$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ lenny main
deb http://security.debian.org/ lenny/updates main
deb-src
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:59, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
...
I have no idea what is happening in that subsystem. I never use it.
Good luck!
Thanks, Bob.
Regards,
-Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Tom Browder wrote:
On my freshly installed Lenny 5.0.5 box. I have my network working
enough to get new packages, browse, and ssh to other hosts, but i am
having trouble with some administrative GUI apps.
Good!
When I try to use the Add/Remove Applications it chugs for a while,
you
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 03:44, Bob Proulx b...@proulx.com wrote:
...
Bob, thanks for answering. I can't give detailed reply tight now, but
I will later.
Regards,
-Tom
Thomas M. Browder, Jr.
Niceville, Florida
USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On my freshly installed Lenny 5.0.5 box. I have my network working
enough to get new packages, browse, and ssh to other hosts, but i am
having trouble with some administrative GUI apps.
When I try to use the Add/Remove Applications it chugs for a while,
then, after I enter the password, it opens
On 6/11/2010 6:44 PM, Joe Prince wrote:
I have new email address and wish to cancel the old number. My old
address was beaujo...@gmail.com. My new address is drjp...@gmail.com.
My name is Dr. Joseph Prince and I do not want any mail from the old
address nor do I want old mail. Please help
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/c46d0134-9a26-4de3-9710-35a5d52ec...@gmail.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 06/12/2010 01:15 AM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
On 6/11/2010 6:44 PM, Joe Prince wrote:
I have new email address and wish to cancel the old number. My old
address was beaujo...@gmail.com. My new address is drjp...@gmail.com.
My name is Dr. Joseph Prince and I do not want any mail from the old
I have new email address and wish to cancel the old number. My old
address was beaujo...@gmail.com. My new address is
drjp...@gmail.com. My name is Dr. Joseph Prince and I do not want
any mail from the old address nor do I want old mail. Please help me
rid that address completely.
On 3 June 2010 03:33, Karl Vogel voge...@bsd118.wpafb.af.mil wrote:
Here are some good pages on sed and awk one-liners:
http://www.catonmat.net/blog/sed-one-liners-explained-part-one/
Famous Sed One-Liners Explained, Part I: File Spacing, Numbering and
Text Conversion and Substitution
Here are some good pages on sed and awk one-liners:
http://www.catonmat.net/blog/sed-one-liners-explained-part-one/
Famous Sed One-Liners Explained, Part I: File Spacing, Numbering and
Text Conversion and Substitution
Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:00:00 -0400
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Fri,28.May.10, 15:19:21, Dotan Cohen wrote:
sed or awk. But I've been reading sed and awk tutorials for two hours
and I cannot figure out how to remove line N from the file without
creating a second file. If I'm already going through the hassle of
creating
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
A very wise barrister once advised - Don't put anything into writing that you
wouldn't be prepared to see used
directly agianst you in a court of law Possibly a little excessively dramatic
but still excellent advice :)
Eliot Spitzer said it better, 2006, pre getting
On Monday 31 May 2010 03:07:05 Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
elfie...@aol.com :
Hi! The following 2 posts (pages) contain my name. Can you please
remove them or make them unsearchable?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/1998/08/msg00568.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-user
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:14:04PM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Monday 31 May 2010 03:07:05 Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
elfie...@aol.com :
Hi! The following 2 posts (pages) contain my name. Can you please
remove them or make them unsearchable?
http://lists.debian.org/debian
On 05/29/2010 08:18 AM, elfie...@aol.com wrote:
Hi! The following 2 posts (pages) contain my name. Can you please remove them
or make them unsearchable? I was involved in this over 12 years ago when I
didn't know better. I am now a business woman and it's embarrassing.
http://lists.debian.org
elfie...@aol.com :
Hi! The following 2 posts (pages) contain my name. Can you please
remove them or make them unsearchable? I was involved in this over 12
years ago when I didn't know better. I am now a business woman and
it's embarrassing.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/1998/08/msg00568
checking but I'd like to just remove line 44 from
~/.ssh/known_hosts. Easy to do in VIM, probably even easier to do in
sed or awk. But I've been reading sed and awk tutorials for two hours
and I cannot figure out how to remove line N from the file without
creating a second file. If I'm already going
On Fri,28.May.10, 15:19:21, Dotan Cohen wrote:
sed or awk. But I've been reading sed and awk tutorials for two hours
and I cannot figure out how to remove line N from the file without
creating a second file. If I'm already going through the hassle of
creating then moving a second file then I
On 28 May 2010 15:27, Andrei Popescu andreimpope...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri,28.May.10, 15:19:21, Dotan Cohen wrote:
sed or awk. But I've been reading sed and awk tutorials for two hours
and I cannot figure out how to remove line N from the file without
creating a second file. If I'm already
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 15:19 +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
snip
I'd like to just remove line 44 from
~/.ssh/known_hosts. Easy to do in VIM, probably even easier to do in
sed or awk.
snip
The -i option edits files in place, so...
sed -i 44d ~/.ssh/known_hosts
--
Tixy
On 28 May 2010 15:38, Tixy debianu...@tixy.myzen.co.uk wrote:
The -i option edits files in place, so...
sed -i 44d ~/.ssh/known_hosts
Thanks, I was simply missing the -i option. My weekend starts in less
than one hour, must be related.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://gibberish.co.il
strict checking.
Host key verification failed.
Now, I need strict checking but I'd like to just remove line 44 from
~/.ssh/known_hosts. Easy to do in VIM, probably even easier to do in
sed or awk. But I've been reading sed and awk tutorials for two hours
and I cannot figure out how to remove
On 28 May 2010 15:45, François TOURDE fra...@tourde.org wrote:
Don't use sed nor awk...
man ssh-keygen say:
-R hostname
Removes all keys belonging to hostname from a known_hosts file.
This option is useful to delete hashed
hosts (see the -H option above).
and you have requested strict checking.
Host key verification failed.
Now, I need strict checking but I'd like to just remove line 44 from
~/.ssh/known_hosts. Easy to do in VIM, probably even easier to do in
sed or awk. But I've been reading sed and awk tutorials for two hours
and I
/known_hosts:44
RSA host key for domain has changed and you have requested strict checking.
Host key verification failed.
Now, I need strict checking but I'd like to just remove line 44 from
~/.ssh/known_hosts. Easy to do in VIM, probably even easier to do in
sed or awk. But I've been
/.ssh/known_hosts to get rid of this
message.
Offending key in /home/user/.ssh/known_hosts:44
RSA host key for domain has changed and you have requested strict
checking.
Host key verification failed.
Now, I need strict checking but I'd like to just remove line 44 from
., ssh-keygen -R [comp1.mycompany.com]:222
How to remove _all_ ip's from hosts with a dynamic IP such as dyndns
hosts?
Elimar
--
what IMHO then?
IMHO - Inhalation of a Multi-leafed Herbal Opiate ;)
--posting from alex in debian-user--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
with such a dangerous application), the host must be specified as
[hostname]:port, e.g., ssh-keygen -R [comp1.mycompany.com]:222
How to remove _all_ ip's from hosts with a dynamic IP such as dyndns
hosts?
snip
I'm not sure I understand the question. If you mean how to remove all
entries in known_hosts
-standard port (which we regularly do for security
with such a dangerous application), the host must be specified as
[hostname]:port, e.g., ssh-keygen -R [comp1.mycompany.com]:222
How to remove _all_ ip's from hosts with a dynamic IP such as dyndns
hosts?
snip
I'm not sure I understand
that all the time for similar reasons. One caveat
- if you use a non-standard port (which we regularly do for security
with such a dangerous application), the host must be specified as
[hostname]:port, e.g., ssh-keygen -R [comp1.mycompany.com]:222
How to remove _all_ ip's from
Hi! The following 2 posts (pages) contain my name. Can you please remove them
or make them unsearchable? I was involved in this over 12 years ago when I
didn't know better. I am now a business woman and it's embarrassing.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/1998/08/msg00568.html
http
Hi Kevin,
Thanks,
Hi Deephay,
Here is an UNTESTED hack I just made:
apt-get remove $(apt-get --simulate build-dep xxx|grep ^Inst|awk '{print
$2}')
This way wont works because once dependencies are installed apt-get build-dep
won't list them anymore. Either with --reinstall
Since
Kevin Ross wrote:
From: Sthu Deus [mailto:sthu.d...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:31 AM
In the case of KDE, since no programs are using GTK, OOo would have to load
the GTK libraries fresh, which slows things down.
...
AFAIK: that 's fairly to the point (since
On 04/22/2010 12:31 PM, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
I run Sid.
Aha! - I run testing OO - even not whole my system.
Note also that OOo depends on Gtk, which might need also to be
loaded by KDE, but not by GNOME or XFce.
Could You please extend this Your
901 - 1000 of 3257 matches
Mail list logo
