On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 15:40:19 -0200, Rogerio Brito writes:
On Dec 06 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
I still use a 2.0.38-kernel (that box is only apt-get upgrade´d, not -
dist-upgraded, to potato) because of some legacy-software, so for me
it´s essential that kernel-version-dependencies are
On Tue, 05 Dec 2000 21:20:00 -0200, Rogerio Brito writes:
On Dec 05 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
Shouldn´t samba 2.0.7 depend on a kernel = 2.2 then? This seems
like a bug to me (I ran into the same problem but have put samba on
hold since then).
Well, that would be a problem for people
On Dec 06 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
I still use a 2.0.38-kernel (that box is only apt-get upgrade´d, not -
dist-upgraded, to potato) because of some legacy-software, so for me
it´s essential that kernel-version-dependencies are correct ;-)
Oh, I see. But I think that I read
On Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:55:26 CST, Phil Brutsche writes:
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
I thought I saw some sort of posting here or elsewhere that mentioned
that 2.0.7 works with kernels 2.2.x but not 2.0.x (mine) ?
If you're trying to use the distributed samba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
Shouldn?t samba 2.0.7 depend on a kernel = 2.2 then? This seems like a
bug to me (I ran into the same problem but have put samba on hold since
then).
IMO that would break when you don't
On Dec 05 2000, Robert Waldner wrote:
Shouldn´t samba 2.0.7 depend on a kernel = 2.2 then? This seems
like a bug to me (I ran into the same problem but have put samba on
hold since then).
Well, that would be a problem for people that don't use a
Debian packaged kernel (or
On 12/4/00 4:55 PM, Phil Brutsche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If 2.0.5 works I would say stick with it. You only really need 2.0.7 if
you have any Win2k machines that need to connect to the samba server.
Ah. Actually, we're starting work with a few consultant types who
come in with Win2K
I was upgrading various packages and upped samba from 2.0.5 to 2.0.7
while maintaining the original smb.conf. Although the upgrade went off
without a hitch, I was never able to reconnect my Win9x machines back to
the server. When I got rid of 2.0.7 and replaced it back with 2.0.5,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
I thought I saw some sort of posting here or elsewhere that mentioned
that 2.0.7 works with kernels 2.2.x but not 2.0.x (mine) ?
If you're trying to use the distributed samba 2.0.7 on a
9 matches
Mail list logo
