On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:20:16PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Jamin W. Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030304 18:30]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
Moving target or not, I think 200+ day uptimes
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 03:11, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:20:16PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Jamin W. Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030304 18:30]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:11:29AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:20:16PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Jamin W. Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030304 18:30]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:31:57PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
Moving target or not, I think 200+ day uptimes ina 24x7 production
environment say something about teh :stability of the testing release.
Therfore it appears to me to be the
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:44:41PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
* stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030304 13:11 PST]:
My point is that the testing release ahs proven to be stable in a
production environemnt (for me at least), and has, for example, much more
current perl modules, than stable. This is
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:53:18PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:11:02PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:30:05PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:04:48PM -0500, stan wrote:
Not idael at all. As a matter of fact, it makes the
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:08:21PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:53:18PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:11:02PM -0500, stan wrote:
Well, then shouldn't it allow stable to be released often enough that it
acn be used in production For instance
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:04:49PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:11:02PM -0500, stan wrote:
Well, then shouldn't it allow stable to be released often enough that it
acn be used in production For instance how old are the prel modules, and
devlopment environment in
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:17:50PM -0500, Travis Crump wrote:
stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:15:02AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
sigh Someone else running testing in a production environment.
And my choices are?
As I see them.
2. Run stable and have 1970's versions of
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:58:37AM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:04:49PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
Desktops are mostly RedHat
6 or so, with some potato, a very little woody, or X terminals
connected to a potato server. I have yet to receive a single
complaint from any
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:53:16AM -0500, stan wrote:
Is it possible that some mechanisim could be set up such that a package
which has recieved a security related update in stable, could become the
latest package for testing?
I'm trying to think of a way to leverage the fact the security
Colin Watson wrote:
the new safe signals implementation has caused some problems which mean
that the next upstream release will allow them to be turned off.
Argh.
Do you know if that is a compile-time switch or a run-time switch? I've
had some very fun debugging sessions based on perl's signal
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:05:05PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
the new safe signals implementation has caused some problems which mean
that the next upstream release will allow them to be turned off.
Argh.
Do you know if that is a compile-time switch or a run-time switch?
Hi there,
I'm in the process of upgrading Sendmail on a batch of servers - no surprise
there, I'm sure - and I've run into trouble on a few of them.
On some of them, with an older version of libc (2.1.3), everything works
fine; it all compiles, links, installs and runs without a hitch
Never mind - new packages are now out, including a patch for 8.9.3, so my
day has now improved! - Simone
_
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
http://messenger.msn.co.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
I did apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade on some of my machines running
testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched sendmail binaries, based
upon the announcement of a vulnerability in it yesterday.
What's the story?
--
They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:37:02AM -0500, stan wrote:
I did apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade on some of my machines running
testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched sendmail binaries, based
upon the announcement of a vulnerability in it yesterday.
What's the story?
http
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:37:02AM -0500, stan wrote:
I did apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade on some of my machines running
testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched sendmail binaries, based
upon the announcement of a vulnerability in it yesterday.
Testing doesn't have security
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:15:02AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:37:02AM -0500, stan wrote:
I did apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade on some of my machines running
testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched sendmail binaries, based
upon the announcement
patched
sendmail binaries, based upon the announcement of a vulnerability
in it yesterday.
Testing doesn't have security updates, and has never been advertised as
having security updates. Are you volunteering?
sigh Someone else running testing in a production environment.
And my
of my
machines running testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched
sendmail binaries, based upon the announcement of a vulnerability
in it yesterday.
Testing doesn't have security updates, and has never been advertised as
having security updates. Are you volunteering
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:04:48PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:02:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
That's a hopeless exaggeration; I run stable happily on my home server.
Anyway, if you run testing you need to manage the security yourself by
backporting patches. I don't
update and apt-get dist-upgrade on some of my
machines running testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched
sendmail binaries, based upon the announcement of a vulnerability
in it yesterday.
Testing doesn't have security updates, and has never been advertised as
having
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:04:48PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:02:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
That's a hopeless exaggeration; I run stable happily on my home server.
Anyway, if you run testing you need to manage the security yourself by
backporting patches. I don't
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, stan wrote:
[snip]
13:58:15 up 249 days, 5:48, 1 user, load average: 0.35, 0.32, 0.36
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/debian_version
testing/unstable
[snip]
That's certainly stab;eenough for em. And it gets apt-get dist-upgraded
pretty much every weekday morning.
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:18:27PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:04:48PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:02:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
That's a hopeless exaggeration; I run stable happily on my home server.
Anyway, if you run testing you
, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:37:02AM -0500, stan wrote:
I did apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade on some of my
machines running testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched
sendmail binaries, based upon the announcement of a vulnerability
in it yesterday.
Testing
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:30:05PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:04:48PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:02:10PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
That's a hopeless exaggeration; I run stable happily on my home server.
Anyway, if you run testing you need to
stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:15:02AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
sigh Someone else running testing in a production environment.
And my choices are?
As I see them.
2. Run stable and have 1970's versions of software/
woody has the exact same versions[except with security updates] of
running testing, and I was surprised to not [pull patched
sendmail binaries, based upon the announcement of a vulnerability
in it yesterday.
Testing doesn't have security updates, and has never been advertised as
having security updates. Are you volunteering?
sigh Someone else
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
Moving target or not, I think 200+ day uptimes ina 24x7 production
environment say something about teh :stability of the testing release.
Therfore it appears to me to be the best choice for a production machine,
assumng that you need
* stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20030304 13:11 PST]:
My point is that the testing release ahs proven to be stable in a
production environemnt (for me at least), and has, for example, much more
current perl modules, than stable. This is required for our software to
work.
Okay, so even if you've
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:18:27PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Testing is almost always a moving target. Stable on the other hand is
not. Ideally, at some point security support for testing would be a
good thing to have. However,
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:53:18PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:11:02PM -0500, stan wrote:
Well, then shouldn't it allow stable to be released often enough that it
acn be used in production For instance how old are the prel modules, and
devlopment environment in it?
* Jamin W. Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030304 18:30]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:18:27PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
Testing is almost always a moving target. Stable on the other hand is
not. Ideally, at some point security
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:11:02PM -0500, stan wrote:
Well, then shouldn't it allow stable to be released often enough that it
acn be used in production For instance how old are the prel modules, and
devlopment environment in it? Ancinet by modern standards.
Heh... I never can quite figure
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0500, Hall Stevenson wrote:
* Jamin W. Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030304 18:30]:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 04:05:37PM -0500, stan wrote:
Moving target or not, I think 200+ day uptimes ina 24x7 production
environment say something about teh :stability
I've been looking for the Debian response to the recently found sendmail flaw
and corresponding fix (http://www.sendmail.org). Can someone point me to
where I can find this information?
TIA,
--
Mike M.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
Mike M wrote:
I've been looking for the Debian response to the recently found
sendmail flaw and corresponding fix (http://www.sendmail.org). Can
someone point me to where I can find this information?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/debian-security-announce-2003/msg00039.html
Mike M said:
I've been looking for the Debian response to the recently found sendmail
flaw and corresponding fix (http://www.sendmail.org). Can someone point
me to where I can find this information?
curious that security.debian.org has not been updated.
the advisory I recieved is archived
Mi ISP es telefónica en españa, el cual supongo que pastará en el mismo redil
que terra..
espero que no sea ese el problema, aunque conozco gente que usa smtp con terra
que no tiene este problema, sin embargo con telefónica no puedo confirmar si
van por ahí los tiros...
Acabo de reenviar mi
B. Pixot escribió::
No se que pasa, desde hace unos días que no consigo enviar correo, de repente sendmail
devuelve stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with elhostquesea.com a todos
los emails salientes, hasta ahora no había tenido problemas, y la configuración no se ha
tocado, por lo que
No se que pasa, desde hace unos días que no consigo enviar correo, de repente
sendmail devuelve stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with elhostquesea.com a
todos los emails salientes, hasta ahora no había tenido problemas, y la
configuración no se ha tocado, por lo que supongo que será un
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:37:57AM +0800, B. Pixot wrote:
No se que pasa, desde hace unos días que no consigo enviar correo, de repente
sendmail devuelve stat=Deferred: Connection timed out with elhostquesea.com
a todos los emails salientes, hasta ahora no había tenido problemas, y la
Thanks a lot Oliver, seems I have to look mor frequently at the faq.
Chainy.
El mar, 25-02-2003 a las 07:22, Oliver Fuchs escribió:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Calber Chainy wrote:
Hello list,
I have problems with sendmail. I searched for a forum, mail list or
some other help where I can
Hello list,
I have problems with sendmail. I searched for a forum, mail list or
some other help where I can ask some questions but failed.
Does anyone know of any list, forum or something like it about sendmail?
Thanks a lot.
Down here I post my question, maybe someone knows the answer
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Calber Chainy wrote:
Hello list,
I have problems with sendmail. I searched for a forum, mail list or
some other help where I can ask some questions but failed.
Does anyone know of any list, forum or something like it about sendmail?
From the sendmail faq:
Q2.1
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Calber Chainy wrote:
Hello list,
I have problems with sendmail. I searched for a forum, mail list or
some other help where I can ask some questions but failed.
Does anyone know of any list, forum or something like it about sendmail?
From the sendmail faq:
Q2.1
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 07:09:03PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:51:25AM -0800, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
I've recently installed Debian 3.0 on my SPARC. Initial install went fine
however since updating and upgrading my packages, sendmail fails to start
I've recently installed Debian 3.0 on my SPARC. Initial install went fine
however since updating and upgrading my packages, sendmail fails to start with
the following error:
sendmail: relocation error: sendmail: undefined symbol: __umoddi3
Searched around the archives and on google with leads
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:51:25AM -0800, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
I've recently installed Debian 3.0 on my SPARC. Initial install went fine
however since updating and upgrading my packages, sendmail fails to start
with the following error:
sendmail: relocation error: sendmail: undefined
Je viens de passer de potato à woody, et par la meme occasion à sendmail 8.12.2
Depuis, mon serveur refuse de délivrer du courrier pour des adresses
purement numériques:
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 550 5.1.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hola Lista:
queria saber si alguien tiene experiencia en la
instalacion de sendmail +amavis +fprot.
desde ya agradesco cualquier
comentario
hola lista:
alguien de la lista tiene experiencia en la
instalacion de sendmail +amavis +fprot
desde ya agradesco cualqueir
comentario
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rodriguez Hugo wrote:
|
| Hola Lista:
|
| queria saber si alguien tiene experiencia en la instalacion de
| sendmail +amavis +fprot.
No, lo siento. Pero en cambio te aconsejo utilizar Kaspersky Antivirus
(con Sendmail o cualquier otro servidor de
Aupa!
El Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:39:46 +0100
papapep [EMAIL PROTECTED] comentaba:
| queria saber si alguien tiene experiencia en la instalacion de
| sendmail +amavis +fprot.
No, lo siento. Pero en cambio te aconsejo utilizar Kaspersky Antivirus
(con Sendmail o cualquier otro servidor de correo
instalacion de sendmail
+amavis +fprot.
desde ya agradesco cualquier comentario
Hi folks,
I am running sendmail on my Debian Linux box. We are receiving all
incoming mail on this box and forwarding it Exhange server (NT). Lately
we are having some problem in connectivity between the two.
we were getting following error messages in mail.info log on 2 different
occasions
försöker få igång sasl + sendmal så man kan köra smtpauth har det körandes på
en annan maskin, men när jag skall ha igång det på den nya maksinen så händer
följande.
Kör /usr/share/sendmail/update_auth För att uppdatera och få igång det.
men det skriptet stannar på
antingen denna rad
echo
Hola:
Estoy intentando mandar correo desde otro dominio mediante un sendmail,
en el access tengo:
192.168.0 RELAY
casa.netRELAY
ardilla.RELAY
10.42.2 RELAY
Hallo,
weiss jemand, ob der Sendmail der testing gegen die SASL 2 gebaut ist?
Hintergrund: Ich habe mir den cyrus21 backport für die woody (
http://people.debian.org/~hmh/ ) installiert, der jedoch zur
Autentifizierung SASL 2 mitbingt. Der Sendmail der woody ist aber gegen
SASL 1 gebaut
Hi,
I installed Henrique's ( http://people.debian.org/~hmh/ ) woody backport
for cyrus21. Problem is that woody's sendmail is build with SASL 1 and
cyrus21 with SASL 2. Now I have two different user databases. SASL 1 is
used for sendmail's SMTP_AUTH, SASL 2 is used for cyrus21
authentication
# ... define this only if sendmail cannot automatically determine your domain
#Dj$w.Foo.COM
Djpuerto-lobo.jazzfree.com
He tardado tanto en confirmar porque habia estado realizando algunas
pruebas, hasta que he dado con la buena, además ya he comprobado en el
archivo de los usuarios de mldonkey que ha
Rubén Gómez Antolí, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:28:25(+0100):
Te voy a decir una cosa, tal como esta el asunto con la LSSI, prefiero
que se queda tal y como esta y que entregue el correo sendmail como
buenamente pueda, paso de que mi ISP guarde mis correos, por lo menos
los que yo mande
máquinas antes de salir al mundo exterior. La única solución, al
menos mientras no sea ilegal, es encriptarlo *todo*.
Cifrarlo, por favor.
Santiago Vila, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:13:14(+0100):
menos mientras no sea ilegal, es encriptarlo *todo*.
Cifrarlo, por favor.
Gracias :^).
--
David Serrano [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Linux Registered User #87069
/014561.html
El caso es que no se donde puedo variar este nombre en la configuración
de sendmail.
Este es el nombre que utilizo en la red local, que por supuesto no esta
registrado ni nada de eso, pero no es el de mi cuenta de correo. Hasta
ahora no me habia importado porque todavía no me habia
es que no se donde puedo variar este nombre en la configuración
de sendmail.
Este es el nombre que utilizo en la red local, que por supuesto no esta
registrado ni nada de eso, pero no es el de mi cuenta de correo. Hasta
ahora no me habia importado porque todavía no me habia pasado nada de
Mira a ver si lo de dyndns.org te puede ayudar..
Pepe.
--
José Marcos Chalmés García - Public key ID: 0x6FDE933B
www.polinux.upv.es - www.debian.org - www.gnu.org - www.bsd.org - ...
I use free software | Utilitze programari lliure | Uso software libre
Buenas,
Pepe Chalmes Garcia wrote:
Mira a ver si lo de dyndns.org te puede ayudar..
Pues no se, me parece a mi que no.
Pepe.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Error en correo con sendmail
Date: 23 Jan 2003 17:13:08 +0100
From: Manuel Durán Aguete [EMAIL PROTECTED
lo que significa el error a base de tirar de google:
http://www.linuxchix.org/pipermail/techtalk/2002-July/014561.html
El caso es que no se donde puedo variar este nombre en la configuración
de sendmail.
Este es el nombre que utilizo en la red local, que por supuesto no esta
registrado ni
nombre a mi maquina puerto_lobo.redfrio.es? ¿Y no seria
mas conveniente llamarle puerto_lobo.jazzfree.com? Mi correo es de
jazzfree.com, vamos yo es que de sendmail y sus amigos no tengo ni la
mas remota idea, lo unico que quiero es poder enviar ese correo, porque
creo que hay un fallo en el
.
Saludos.
Pues no se, el que se instalo por defecto, pero vamos que me da igual
uno que otro con tal de que el correo funcione.
Con respecto al correo de Victor:
De /etc/mail/sendmail.cf
# my official domain name
# ... define this only if sendmail cannot automatically
I am using a single mail account to download mail
from a different server and then forward it to a group of people.For
some reason I keep getting 25 of these in error messages in my mailbox
everyday.
Reporting-MTA: dns;
somewhere.somewhere.comReceived-From-MTA: DNS; localArrival-Date:
lleguen los correos.
La pregunta es: ¿pongo sendmail o postfix? ¿cuál es más sencillo? ¿y más
seguro? ¿podrá hacer lo que yo quiero? ¿otras ideas?
Por supuesto, deberá también hacer relay del correo que salga de mis servidores
internos...
Un saludo y gracias por vuestra ayuda.
CARLOS
¡Yep!
Yo tengo Postfix. Según lo que he leido y estoy intentando poner en
marcha, gestionar varios dominios con Postfix es sencillo. Con Sendmail
supongo que también se podrá hacer, pero yo quería alguna garantía más
en cuanto a seguridad, no necesito funciones que sólo tiene sendmail y
además
que he leido y estoy intentando poner en
marcha, gestionar varios dominios con Postfix es sencillo. Con Sendmail
supongo que también se podrá hacer, pero yo quería alguna garantía más
en cuanto a seguridad, no necesito funciones que sólo tiene sendmail y
además mi máquina va bastante justita de
Depende de ti, por ahi dicen que la seguridad depende
del administrador, el software ayuda pero no
determina.
Tambien puedes tomar en cuenta la libertad, postfix no
es muy libre su licencia es mas restrictiva que la de
sendmail.
Ambos sirven para lo que quieres.
Bye.
--
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003
Hola,
Existe un servidor de correo tipo sendmail más orientado a la seguridad,
se llama qmail. No lo he probado, pero es lo que he leido al respecto.
Un saludo
El lun, 20-01-2003 a las 21:14, Erick Lopez Carreon escribió:
Depende de ti, por ahi dicen que la seguridad depende
del
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 14:14, Erick Lopez Carreon wrote:
Depende de ti, por ahi dicen que la seguridad depende
del administrador, el software ayuda pero no
determina.
Tambien puedes tomar en cuenta la libertad, postfix no
es muy libre su licencia es mas restrictiva que la de
sendmail
servidor
de correo en una DMZ, que coja el correo que se me mada desde Internet y
lo mande a mi servidor interno. Es posible que tenga en el futuro que dividir
entre varios servidores según el dominio al que lleguen los correos.
La pregunta es: ¿pongo sendmail o postfix? ¿cuál es más sencillo? ¿y más
:
Depende de ti, por ahi dicen que la seguridad depende
del administrador, el software ayuda pero no
determina.
Tambien puedes tomar en cuenta la libertad, postfix no
es muy libre su licencia es mas restrictiva que la de
sendmail.
Ambos sirven para lo que quieres.
Bye.
--
On Mon, Jan
that
are not in the GPL.
For example, it requires certain patent licenses be
given that the GPL does not require. (We don't think
those patent license requirements are inherently a bad
idea, but nonetheless they are incompatible with the
GNU GPL.)
En cuanto a sendmail:
http://www.sendmail.org/license-info.html
Hallo allerseits,
habe heute Nacht einen Sendmail mit AntiSpam und Amavis-Antivir
aufgesetzt...
Sendmail und Amavis-Antivir rennen soweit...
Doch der Cyrus Imap macht mir Probleme.
Mit telnet komme ich drauf, keinProblem
Sobald ich /usr/bin/cyradm localhost , nach Username und Password
Moin,
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:15:38AM +0100, Wolfgang Steinhauer wrote:
[...]
Sobald ich /usr/bin/cyradm localhost , nach Username und Password, kommt
diese Fehlermeldung:
application-spezific initialization failed; authentication faild
ich weiss nicht, wie Cyrus arbeitet, aber bei z.B.
Sendmail mit AntiSpam und Amavis-Antivir
aufgesetzt...
Sendmail und Amavis-Antivir rennen soweit...
Doch der Cyrus Imap macht mir Probleme.
Mit telnet komme ich drauf, keinProblem
Sobald ich /usr/bin/cyradm localhost , nach Username und Password, kommt
diese Fehlermeldung:
application
n'arrive pas a utiliser les fichiers .forward (meme en specifiant
l'option ForwardFilePath dans sendmail). Or j'avais ecrit des cgi pour que
les utilisateurs puissent configurer leur messagerie en cas d'absence.
Existe-t-il une alternative pour garder sendmail ? Pourquoi sendmail
s'evertue-t-il
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 21:52, Steve Mayer wrote:
Riccardo,
Try adding your local machines hostname and IP address in here. Not
just the localhost entry. Sendmail is hanging because it cannot
resolve your hostname.
I am not in a local network, my machine is a laptop and I access
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Riccardo Gusso wrote:
On Wed, 2003-01-15 at 21:52, Steve Mayer wrote:
Riccardo,
Try adding your local machines hostname and IP address in here. Not
just the localhost entry. Sendmail is hanging because it cannot
resolve your hostname.
I am
Hei,
kann mir vielleicht jemand seine Konfigurationsfiles zumailen, um im
woody sendmail SMTP_AUTH gegen saslb zu aktivieren?
Was ist bist jetzt tat:
sendmail.mc:
TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `LOGIN PLAIN')dnl
Die Anleitung auf sendmail.org (
http
Hello,
during the boot my sid hangs for some minutes
starting sendmail; then it completes the boot without error messages or
warning, and sendmail works correctly.
I have noticed that when sometimes the ethernet card is not seen by the
kernel at the startup (it happens sometimes, I don't know
Riccardo Gusso said:
Where could the cause of the problem be?
most often in my experience the case of sendmail hanging on boot is it
cannot resolve the host name(s) it is responsible for. Check sendmail's
configuration(/etc/mail) and be sure your name resolution is working. if
your NIC isn't
Hallo zusammen,
Ich habe einen sendmail Server und ich möchte das sich User
über eine Website ihre eMail aussuchen können.
also z.B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wie kann ich das am besten realisieren? Gibt es da
bereits eine Software für, die das handlen kann. Ich
hoffe ihr wisst was ich meine, so ein usr
Hi,
für SMTP-Auth mit Sendmail benötigst Du das cyrus-sasl Paket. Dies ist
IMHO nicht als Debian-Package verfügbar. Kann mich da aber auch irren
(Ein apt-get install cyrus-sasl funzt bei mir nicht) Sendmail muß für
SMTP-Auth allerdings neu übersetzt werden. Also brauchst Du eh die
Quellen.
Mach
09.41 schrieb Nico Hofmann:
Hallo zusammen,
Ich habe einen sendmail Server und ich möchte das sich User
über eine Website ihre eMail aussuchen können.
also z.B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wie kann ich das am besten realisieren? Gibt es da
bereits eine Software für, die das handlen kann. Ich
hoffe ihr
.
Ansonsten gibt es zu Sendmail sowie zum Thema Mail insgesamt Tonnen von
Doku im Netz, die Du Dir reinziehen kannst.
cu,
Uwe
--
Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ):
http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/
Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mit dem
Zum Beispiel diese hier:
http://twiggi.sourceforge.net/
Das ist nicht das was ich bräuchte. Ich brauch eine Möglichkeit,
dass sich ein User eine eMail Adresse aussucht auf einen
Senden Button klickt und die eMailadresse angelegt wird.
Wie bei GMX. oder halt Puretec.
Ein Webmailsystem
Hallo,
ich habe mittels apt-get install sendmail in verbindung mit amavis installiert.
Ich möchte nun SMTP AUTH (SASL/PAM) authentication for access/relay control
installieren. Ist das bei den neueren Versionen schon automatisch dabei (falls ja, was
muss noch gemacht werden, damit es
Que antivirus para sendmail me pueden recomendar
--
Pablo Ariel Dilullo.
Gerencia Sistemas y Comunicaciones.
Amirante Guillermo Brown S.R.L.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El jue, 02-01-2003 a las 20:15, Pablo Ariel Dilullo escribi:
Que antivirus para sendmail me pueden recomendar
Nosotros tenemos kaspersky antivirus para 150.000 correos diarios (cerca de 7 gigas) y sin problemas...
Saludos
--
Pablo Ariel Dilullo.
Gerencia Sistemas y Comunicaciones
1301 - 1400 of 3010 matches
Mail list logo
