Sendmail Deferred: Name server: mail.dominio.com.: host name lookup failure

2007-08-17 Thread Gabriel Bueno
Sres listeros, Necesito AYUDA con este problema que estoy teniendo con sendmail. Resulta que tengo que utilizar un SMART HOST que requiere autenticación, al agregar: define(`SMART_HOST', `[mail.dominio.com]') al sendmail_test.mc (luego m4 sendmail_test.mc sendmail_test.cf) intento enviar un

Re: Sendmail Deferred: Name server: mail.dominio.com.: host name lookup failure

2007-08-17 Thread Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo
El vie, 17-08-2007 a las 15:32 -0300, Gabriel Bueno escribió: Salta el error: Deferred: Name server: mail.dominio.com.: host name lookup failure http://www.google.com/search?q=sendmail+++%22host+name+lookup+failure http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Deferred%3A+Name+server http

Re: Sendmail Deferred: Name server: mail.dominio.com.: host name lookup failure

2007-08-17 Thread Alonso Caballero Quezada / ReYDeS
Saludos: On 8/17/07, Gabriel Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A alguien se le ocurre que es lo que puede estar pasando ??? Agradezco enormemente su ayuda. Gabriel Recuerda tambien hacer definiciones en el archivo /etc/mail/submit.mc y regenerar el submit.cf. Ya sabes donde obtener mas

Re: Sendmail Deferred: Name server: mail.dominio.com.: host name lookup failure

2007-08-17 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 20:49 +0200, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote: P.D. ¿por qué no postfix? Siendo usuario de postfix, da igual. ¿Por qué no el predeterminado, exim? Da igual, dales chance. -- David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/ Pero el bono sexenal nunca se traspapela.

No auth and nonauth sendmail in same config.

2007-08-16 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi community I have an authenticated sendmail. I want to modifiy it in order to: *All mail sent to mydomain.com is not authenticated *All mail sent to any domain different as mydomain.com be authenticated (TLS included). How can I do that? (I don't refer to complete procedure, but how can I do

Re: No auth and nonauth sendmail in same config.

2007-08-16 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi community ehlo I have an authenticated sendmail. I want to modifiy it in order to: *All mail sent to mydomain.com is not authenticated *All mail sent to any domain different as mydomain.com be authenticated (TLS included). Is that what you

Re: Sendmail +SASL +openldap

2007-08-14 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi community Hello I have to authenticate Sendmail using openldap (I can't choose another SMTP is for my job, also I've already got cyrus-imap using sasl and openldap). I use sendmail/openldap/dovecot Should I SASL in order to integrate both

Sendmail +SASL +openldap

2007-08-13 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi community I have to authenticate Sendmail using openldap (I can't choose another SMTP is for my job, also I've already got cyrus-imap using sasl and openldap). Should I SASL in order to integrate both sendmail and openldap. Or does another way exist of performing this task? Thanks

Re: Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-03 Thread Shams Fantar
* be used for mail addresses or remote logins. I did not know /usr/include/sysexits.h. ;-) If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't come back and there is no message

Re: Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-03 Thread Shams Fantar
Migrate to postfix. Couldn't help it, N.- For the moment, I use sendmail. ;) -- Shams Fantar (http://snurf.info) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-03 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Shams Fantar wrote: If there is truly nothing in /var/log/mail.log, it implies that sendmail saw the mail recipient as being local, and as such, refused to accept the mail for a non-existant local user. Yes, you are right. As if that was ever in question :) But, what

Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-02 Thread Shams Fantar
Hello, I have used Google to have the answers at my problem, but I did not find anything. The problem is that I can't use the function mail() of php. If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't come back and there is no message. But if I make 'mail -s testing

Re: Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-02 Thread Shams Fantar
Shams Fantar wrote: Hello, I have used Google to have the answers at my problem, but I did not find anything. The problem is that I can't use the function mail() of php. If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't come back and there is no message. But if I make

Re: Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-02 Thread Richard A Nelson
for mail addresses or remote logins. If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't come back and there is no message. But if I make 'mail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', I have an error message : Can't

Re: Problem with sendmail, error code 67.

2007-07-02 Thread Nelson Castillo
On 7/2/07, Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Shams Fantar wrote: I have used Google to have the answers at my problem, but I did not find anything. You need more practice, the 1st page of my only search turned up this:

sendmail e exim4

2007-05-08 Thread Valdir Marcos
init---atd +-bash +-cron---firebird ¦ +-sendmail +-cron---cron---sendmail ¦ +-sh---curl +-dhclient +-exim4 Como posso descobrir o que o sendmail e o exim4 andam fazendo? Para quem eles enviam mensagens num servidor quem não tem, teoricamente

Re: sendmail e exim4

2007-05-08 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/08/2007 06:00 PM, Valdir Marcos wrote: init─┬─atd ├─bash ├─cron─┬─firebird │ └─sendmail ├─cron───cron─┬─sendmail │ └─sh───curl ├─dhclient ├─exim4 Como posso descobrir o que o

sendmail and exim4

2007-05-08 Thread Valdir Marcos
init---atd +-bash +-cron---firebird ¦ +-sendmail +-cron---cron---sendmail ¦ +-sh---curl +-dhclient +-exim4 How can I discover what sendmail and exim4 are doing in my Debian Sarge? Tho whom they send messages in a server that, theoricaly

Re: sendmail and exim4

2007-05-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:04:42PM -0300, Valdir Marcos wrote: init---atd +-bash +-cron---firebird ¦ +-sendmail +-cron---cron---sendmail ¦ +-sh---curl +-dhclient +-exim4 How can I discover what sendmail and exim4 are doing in my

problema con sendmail

2007-04-28 Thread Miguel Hernandez
Hola a todos. estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro: m4:/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:18: ERROR: end of file in string alguien me puede decir que significa y como puedo solucionarlo? gracias por su

Re: problema con sendmail

2007-04-28 Thread Octavio Alvarez
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:20:10 -0700, Miguel Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola a todos. estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro: m4:/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:18: ERROR: end of file in string alguien

Re: problema con sendmail

2007-04-28 Thread Miguel Hernandez
El 28/04/07, Octavio Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:20:10 -0700, Miguel Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola a todos. estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro: m4:/etc

Re: problema con sendmail

2007-04-28 Thread Miguel Hernandez
El 28/04/07, Miguel Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: El 28/04/07, Octavio Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:20:10 -0700, Miguel Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola a todos. estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando voy

Re: problema con sendmail

2007-04-28 Thread Octavio Alvarez
. estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro: m4:/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:18: ERROR: end of file in string Dice que tienes un problema con sendmail.mc en la línea 18. Qué dice esa línea? (y las 3 líneas

Sendmail + Smart Host Autenticado

2007-04-24 Thread Luciano Sobue
Olá Tenho aqui um servidor Sendmail e uma conexão ADSL, preciso fazer com que o Sendmail utilize o SMTP do meu provedor para enviar e-mails, mas ele é autenticado. Como proceder? Não tenho a mínima idéia. Obrigado! -- Luciano Sobue Debian GNU/Linux #444722 O futuro pertence àqueles que

Configuración de Sendmail

2007-04-19 Thread Néstor Flores
Buenas lista, como están? Lamentablemente debo configurar sendmail por necesidades de trabajo en debian, mi tema es el siguiente: Desde configurar SendMail para que mande mails a través de un servidor STMP de correo con postfix con dirección ip 10.100.xxx.xxx Según sé SendMail es bastante difícil

Re: Configuración de Sendmail

2007-04-19 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Jueves, 19 de Abril de 2007, Néstor Flores escribió: Buenas lista, como están? Lamentablemente debo configurar sendmail por necesidades de trabajo en debian, mi tema es el siguiente: Desde configurar SendMail para que mande mails a través de un servidor STMP de correo con postfix con

Re: upgrade sarge2etch: sendmail doesn't work correctly

2007-04-17 Thread Micha Borrmann
Micha Borrmann schrieb: I've one problem with sendmail. I'm using a certificate based relaying. The clients are verified from the system, but the SMTP connection are not used to sent mail. In /var/log/mail.info the following lines are logged: Apr 12 12:47:50 etch sm-mta[13211]: STARTTLS

Re: upgrade sarge2etch: sendmail doesn't work correctly

2007-04-15 Thread Micha Borrmann
Zitat von Micha Borrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've one problem with sendmail. I'm using a certificate based relaying. The clients are verified from the system, but the SMTP connection are not used to sent mail. In /var/log/mail.info the following lines are logged: Apr 12 12:47:50 etch sm-mta

upgrade sarge2etch: sendmail doesn't work correctly

2007-04-12 Thread Micha Borrmann
Hello, yesterday I've updated a sarge system to etch. I've one problem with sendmail. I'm using a certificate based relaying. The clients are verified from the system, but the SMTP connection are not used to sent mail. In /var/log/mail.info the following lines are logged: Apr 12 12:47:50

(Solved) Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-24 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Freddy Freeloader wrote: Jeff D wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of sendmail will break them. I tried to get him to use

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:12:18AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: How many times do I have to tell you this is not my decision to make? If it was up to my I'd use Exim4. I've used it successfully in the past with applications that specifically called for sendmail, but the person I'm

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Jeff D
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of sendmail

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Jeff D wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead

sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I am not quite sure as to how to proceed. It appears that the confDOMAIN_NAME variable is the M4 variable to set to configure sendmail if it cannot figure

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I am not quite sure as to how to proceed. Out of curiousity, if you are a total

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Freddy Freeloader
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I am not quite sure as to how to proceed. Out

Re: sendmail hostname configured as an empty string

2007-03-23 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote: Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of sendmail will break them. I tried to get him to use exim4 but he wasn't about

sendmail con rechazo de correos

2007-03-21 Thread Guille G. M.
Hola a [EMAIL PROTECTED], intentaré cumplir las normas de la lista, es la primera vez que escribo en una pero me he leído las reglas. Mi consulta es referente a sendmail que solo quiero que envié. Tengo un pequeño apache domestico (Debian testing)en el que alojo mi blog personal.Cuando los

Re: sendmail con rechazo de correos

2007-03-21 Thread Angel Claudio Alvarez
El mié, 21-03-2007 a las 22:39 +0100, Guille G. M. escribió: Hola a [EMAIL PROTECTED], intentaré cumplir las normas de la lista, es la primera vez que escribo en una pero me he leído las reglas. Mi consulta es referente a sendmail que solo quiero que envié. Tengo un pequeño apache domestico

Re: Sendmail y Mailscanner en Etch

2007-03-14 Thread Federico Alberto Sayd
Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote: El mar, 13-03-2007 a las 10:21 -0300, Federico Alberto Sayd escribió: Hola a todos Trato de instalar Sendmail con Mailscanner en Etch. El problema es que la documentación de Etch sobre Mailscanner es bastante escasa, lo unico que proporciona es un

Sendmail y Mailscanner en Etch

2007-03-13 Thread Federico Alberto Sayd
Hola a todos Trato de instalar Sendmail con Mailscanner en Etch. El problema es que la documentación de Etch sobre Mailscanner es bastante escasa, lo unico que proporciona es un sendmail.conf y un script de inicio retocado para poner en /etc/init.d, para luego correr sendmailconfig para que

Re: Sendmail y Mailscanner en Etch

2007-03-13 Thread Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo
El mar, 13-03-2007 a las 10:21 -0300, Federico Alberto Sayd escribió: Hola a todos Trato de instalar Sendmail con Mailscanner en Etch. El problema es que la documentación de Etch sobre Mailscanner es bastante escasa, lo unico que proporciona es un sendmail.conf y un script de inicio

sendmail

2007-03-08 Thread Guille G. M.
Holas, tengo un server doméstico con debian 3.1 ,apache, mysql, samba, ftp y sendmail. El problema es que sendmail no envia correos. He leido que para que envie mails solo es necesario tener instalado el paquete, pero no consigo que funcione. No quiero que haga de servidor de correo, solo que

Re: sendmail

2007-03-08 Thread Alonso Caballero Quezada / ReYDeS
Saludos: On 3/8/07, Guille G. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mar 7 20:22:05 HAMLET sm-mta[360]: l27JA42C000358: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED] , ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0/0), delay=00:12:01, xdelay=00:12:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=120320, relay=gsmtp163.google.com. [ 64.233.163.27], dsn=4.0.0,

Re: sendmail

2007-03-08 Thread Guillermo Garron
On 3/8/07, Guille G. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Holas, tengo un server doméstico con debian 3.1 ,apache, mysql, samba, ftp y sendmail. El problema es que sendmail no envia correos. He leido que para que envie mails solo es necesario tener instalado el paquete, pero no consigo que funcione

Re: sendmail

2007-03-08 Thread Guillermo Garron
On 3/8/07, Guillermo Garron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/8/07, Guille G. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Holas, tengo un server doméstico con debian 3.1 ,apache, mysql, samba, ftp y sendmail. El problema es que sendmail no envia correos. He leido que para que envie mails solo es necesario

sendmail

2007-02-11 Thread Philippe BERNARD
Bonjour, Je n'arrive pas à configurer sendmail (avec Mutt + Procmail) pour récupérer les messages de plusieurs listes de diffusion. Je reçois les messages des différentes listes mais je ne parviens pas à écrire. La solution consiste-t-elle à modifier /etc/mail/genericstable et si oui pouvez

Re: sendmail

2007-02-11 Thread Philippe BERNARD
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Philippe BERNARD wrote : Bonjour, Je n'arrive pas à configurer sendmail (avec Mutt + Procmail) pour récupérer les messages de plusieurs listes de diffusion. Je reçois les messages des différentes listes mais je ne parviens pas à écrire. La solution

Re: Sendmail hostname error

2007-02-08 Thread Paul Johnson
][ wrote: Hi, I wasn't able to use sendmail recently. I've now track it down that the hostname that my Sendmail uses is wrong. How can I fix it? % /usr/sbin/sendmail -bi WARNING: local host name (;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached) is not qualified; see cf/README

Re: Sendmail em outro servidor

2007-01-27 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/26/2007 12:43 PM, Vinicius de Lima wrote: Pessoal, Estou com um debian instalado em um pc e instalei uma aplicação que utiliza o sendmail e estava funcionando normal, mas muito devagar. O sendmail MTA ou o sendmail binário pra

Sendmail em outro servidor

2007-01-26 Thread Vinicius de Lima
Pessoal, Estou com um debian instalado em um pc e instalei uma aplicação que utiliza o sendmail e estava funcionando normal, mas muito devagar. Agora tive que colocar essa máquina em outra rede, essa rede não consigo utilizar o sendmail, pois não está configurado. Mas tem uma máquina nessa

sendmail + LDAP

2007-01-12 Thread Tahar
Salut la liste, Je voudrais solliciter votre savoir pour m'aider à configurer sendmail pour qu'il utilise un annuaire LDAP comme annuaire de mails afin de ne pas être obligé de créer des utilisateurs UNIX à chaque fois. voilà j'ai configuré le fichier sendmail.cf en utilisant le fichier /etc

Re: TCP wrapper and sendmail

2007-01-04 Thread Jon Dowland
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote: I would like to reject mails from IPs without reverse DNS with sendmail: ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN line in /etc/hosts.allow. (Mail originating from such IPs is almost exclusively spam). A rule like ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN will not permit

Re: TCP wrapper and sendmail

2007-01-04 Thread Amal Phadke
Jon Dowland wrote: On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote: I would like to reject mails from IPs without reverse DNS with sendmail: ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN line in /etc/hosts.allow. (Mail originating from such IPs is almost exclusively spam). A rule like ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN

TCP wrapper and sendmail

2007-01-03 Thread Amal Phadke
Hi all, It seems to me that sendmail in Etch doesn't honor hosts.allow/deny even though TCP wrapper support is enabled. I would like to reject mails from IPs without reverse DNS with sendmail: ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN line in /etc/hosts.allow. (Mail originating from such IPs is almost

[OT] Problemas com o sendmail

2006-12-11 Thread chmod000
Oi pessoal, ói eu novamente... Desculpem o off-topic Seguinte, estou com um problema no sendmail que está enchendo o meu spool/mqueue. o queue timeout está configurado para 5 dias, mas os e-mails do queue estão com mais do que isso, não estão sendo eliminados da fila. Alguma sugestão (além de

Greylisting with sendmail - anyone?

2006-11-17 Thread Brett Charbeneau
Greetings all, I've been trying to set up an anti-spam measure called greylisting on my Debian 3.1 box with sendmail. milter-gris from snertsoft.com comes highly recommended but it claims there is a version mis-match between sendmail and makemap (I can't figure out from which package

Sendmail

2006-11-06 Thread Vinicius de Lima
Pessoal,Como eu levanto o sendmail no debian?Estou dando: O Yahoo! está de cara nova. Venha conferir!

Res: Sendmail

2006-11-06 Thread Vinicius de Lima
Pessoal,Como eu levanto o sendmail no debian?Estou dando: debian:~# sendmailExim is a Mail Transfer Agent. It is normally called by Mail User Agents,not directly from a shell command line. Options and/or arguments controlwhat it does when called. For a list of options, see the Exim

Re: Sendmail

2006-11-06 Thread Guilherme Rocha
Em 06/11/06, Vinicius de Lima[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Pessoal, Como eu levanto o sendmail no debian? Estou dando: debian:~# sendmail # /etc/init.d/sendmail start Exim is a Mail Transfer Agent. It is normally called by Mail User Agents, not directly from a shell command line. Options

Sendmail: timeout waiting for input from local during Draining Input

2006-11-01 Thread Robert S
debian spamd[3740]: processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] for **:1005. Nov 1 08:45:16 debian sm-mta[4058]: k9VLgoek004054: timeout waiting for input from local during Draining Input I'm running sarge with the default installation of sendmail (8.13.4-3sarge3) and spamassassin (3.0.3-2sarge1). I have

weird sendmail problem

2006-10-31 Thread Miles Fidelman
Hi Folks, I'm running postfix on my box, but a while back I installed then uninstalled sendmail. Something seems to have been left behind in an obscure location. When I reboot the machine, something creates a cron job (/etc/cron.d/sendmail). Whatever is doing this leaves the following

Re: weird sendmail problem

2006-10-31 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Note that I did leave /etc/mail in place, but I ran apt-get remove sendmail, removed the init files, and so forth. Apparantly I missed something. You should run dpkg --purge sendmail to remove all traces of the package

Re: weird sendmail problem

2006-10-31 Thread Miles Fidelman
Steve Kemp wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: Note that I did leave /etc/mail in place, but I ran apt-get remove sendmail, removed the init files, and so forth. Apparantly I missed something. You should run dpkg --purge sendmail to remove all

sendmail con sasl2

2006-09-28 Thread Alonso Gomez
Hola, tengo configurado un servidor debian con sendmail con autentificacion con sasl2 y me funciona bien el correo los usuarios locales de la maquina solo son los que pueden enviar correo. Pero tengo el siguiente problema cuando desde una cuenta exterior se intenta mandar un correo a los usuarios

Sendmail. - Relay

2006-09-18 Thread LITLE TUX
OLa estou tentando permitir que um IP externo mande e-mail através de meu servidor smtp... Acontece que quando faço isso o relay não é apenas aberto para o ip que especifico no arquivo relay-domains mas sim para toda a internet . Fazendo com que meu servidor entre numa black list de spams...

Sendmail in Sarge and Etch

2006-09-14 Thread T.J. Duchene
What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs? I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but then I've had more experience with Sendmail than most. The Debian package installers in Sarge and Etch contain a serious flaw in the setup scripts that place FEATURE

Re: Sendmail in Sarge and Etch

2006-09-14 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, T.J. Duchene wrote: What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs? Yes, bugs, or directly to the maintainer I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but then I've had more experience with Sendmail than most. A flaw, but a cosmetic one

Re: Sendmail in Sarge and Etch

2006-09-14 Thread Andrei Popescu
T.J. Duchene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs? I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but then I've had more experience with Sendmail than most. The Debian package installers in Sarge and Etch contain a serious flaw

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-11 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: maybe they should try courier, it is very similar to qmail On 08.09.06 14:04, Matej Cepl wrote: I thought mainly about .qmail-* configuration files -- does courier uses them as well? CITE Courier's .courier may seem to be exactly like Qmail's .qmail, but

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-09 Thread CaT
that looks like qmail but no longer is. All in all though, just say no. Save yourself pain and choose Exim, Sendmail or Postfix. Oh and I love how the qmail-pop3 client logs where a connection came from but not what account it attempted to access or any other useful info. Wooo! Go BAYBE. Ye HAW

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-09 Thread Steve Lamb
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: the most annoying parts are accept-then-bounce behaviour This is a serious flaw, IMHO. I had to deal with a qmail system in a production environment. A few dozen domains hosted on a single box times a few dozen boxes. Because of the mail policies of the

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-09 Thread Steve Lamb
CaT wrote: Qmails logging is horrendous. There is no link between logs of connections and the source and destination of an email. This makes tracking an IP of a single hit to many destinations a right rotten pain in the arse if not impossible. Its internal message ids are recycled so if you

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thursday 07 September 2006 18:51, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting licensing issues, but has a large user community and

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Andrei Popescu
Cameron L. Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting licensing issues, but has a large user community and excellent

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Matej Cepl
qmail with ten-feet pole is vendor lock-in. With reasonably complicated configuration of sendmail/postfix/exim you can switch between each other with reasonable amount of work. With qmail (in either direction) you just have to start from scratch. Binaries in /var/qmail/bin (which is fixed in Debian

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Matej Cepl
Andrei Popescu wrote: I don't know too much about MTAs, but after your mail I find it strange that both my previous and current ISP use qmail. It USED to be the best alternative to sendmail (although I am not sure what is older -- postfix or qmail) and now many huge installations of qmail

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 07.09.06 23:04, Paul Johnson wrote: On Thursday 07 September 2006 18:51, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting licensing

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Andrei Popescu wrote: I don't know too much about MTAs, but after your mail I find it strange that both my previous and current ISP use qmail. On 08.09.06 13:06, Matej Cepl wrote: It USED to be the best alternative to sendmail (although I am not sure what is older -- postfix or qmail) I

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Matej Cepl
Matej Cepl wrote: Aside from DJB (which is big reason enough for me), the biggest reason why Just to elaborate on this -- I have no problems to believe that DJB is a genius, his IQ may be really enormous, but unfortunately he was hurt by the problem many geniuses are hurt as well --

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Matej Cepl
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: maybe they should try courier, it is very similar to qmail I thought mainly about .qmail-* configuration files -- does courier uses them as well? Matěj -- 23 Marion St. #3, Cambridge, MA 02141, (617) 876-1259 http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, map

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Scott Gifford
), the biggest reason why I wouldn't touch qmail with ten-feet pole is vendor lock-in. With reasonably complicated configuration of sendmail/postfix/exim you can switch between each other with reasonable amount of work. With qmail (in either direction) you just have to start from scratch. qmail

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Friday 08 September 2006 10:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: the most annoying parts are accept-then-bounce behaviour and mail unbundling (mail to more recipients at the same place will be delivered for each recipient extra) OK, before I avoided qmail because like everything else DJB,

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Friday 08 September 2006 10:06, Matej Cepl wrote: Andrei Popescu wrote: I don't know too much about MTAs, but after your mail I find it strange that both my previous and current ISP use qmail. It USED to be the best alternative to sendmail (although I am not sure what is older

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-07 Thread Cameron L. Spitzer
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting licensing issues, but has a large user community and excellent documentation (www.lifewithqmail.org, qmail.org). It runs

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Nate Duehr
configuration file... ... is over-engineered. Over-engineering leads to brittleness. Sendmail up and running and doing wicked fancy things is pretty nifty. But CHANGING sendmail configurations without a backup in a production environment is brittle. Very very brittle. (Brittle

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Steve Lamb
T wrote: Why? You'll have better support. Recently I need to config my MTA to use smarthost to talk to my ISP. For several weeks, I tried to do it with Exim. Then another several weeks on postfix, I searched and asked, all efforts ended no where. Not sure why anyone who needs just a

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread John Kelly
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:29:28 -0700, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 01 September 2006 19:48, John Kelly wrote: On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:33:38 -0700, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] I follow debian-security and I used to follow Bugtraq fairly closely. What's the ratio of sendmail

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Hans du Plooy
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 00:36 +0200, T wrote: My suggestion, speaking from my heart breaking experiences, is that if you are a normal user, not a mail expert or system admin who need to play with mail configuration as you full time job, stick with sendmail, and keep away with postfix, exim, etc

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread John Kelly
anything. Sendmail is not the best solution for every need. But the OP asked for experience, and facts. As I said earlier: sendmail has the best integration with cyrus imapd via socket maps, and postfix's milter interface shows that postfix is a poor argument against monolithic design. Now if anyone

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread T
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:28:34 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: Interesting. I also mam a non-mailgeek, but got Postfix working as a Smarhost within an hour. dpkg-reconfigure postfix plus a little Googling and it worked. (Note, though, that my ISP's smtp server is unauthenticated.) On Fri, 01 Sep

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Matej Cepl
Steve Lamb wrote: Not sure why anyone who needs just a smarthost would use a full-featured MTA. Here's my entire configuration... smtp.dmiyu.org smtp --port=25 One term -- internal messages. forwarding messages to some special users is so fun (like mail2news gateway posting to

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Steve Lamb
T wrote: Problem is, the above setting doesn't cover my case, in which the smarthost server requires username and password for SMTP SSL authentication. No, but it is also not everything nullmailer can do. I was just giving a simple example of a simple case, no more, no less. The point

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Steve Lamb
Matej Cepl wrote: One term -- internal messages. forwarding messages to some special users is so fun (like mail2news gateway posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Then that is, by definition, not a smarthost, is it? Smarthost = handle all my mail, kkthxbye. -- Steve C. Lamb |

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread T
if you want to configure a smarthost, and even if you say no... You could have solved this on your own in a minute. Start accusation without even trying to understand what others are trying to do is not a good way to help. Just because you know sendmail much better than the other MTAs (if you

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Matej Cepl
Steve Lamb wrote: Then that is, by definition, not a smarthost, is it? Smarthost = handle all my mail, kkthxbye. No, that's nullmailer. Smarthost is send all my Internet/external/non-local mail to one SMTP server. Matěj -- GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Johnson
, stick with sendmail, and keep away with postfix, exim, etc. I don't understand your logic. An full time mail admin would easily get his head around any MTA, and might opt for sendmail because of it's configurability. But an ordinary user who don't know much about how mail works? Even

Re: (OT) Prejudice against sendmail?

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 02 September 2006 01:51, John Kelly wrote: The OP asked for information without religious dogma. And since dogma is all you have to offer, goodbye. You get what you give. Sorry you can't take what you dish. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >