Sres listeros,
Necesito AYUDA con este problema que estoy teniendo con sendmail.
Resulta que tengo que utilizar un SMART HOST que requiere autenticación,
al agregar:
define(`SMART_HOST', `[mail.dominio.com]')
al sendmail_test.mc (luego m4 sendmail_test.mc sendmail_test.cf) intento
enviar un
El vie, 17-08-2007 a las 15:32 -0300, Gabriel Bueno escribió:
Salta el error: Deferred: Name server: mail.dominio.com.: host name
lookup failure
http://www.google.com/search?q=sendmail+++%22host+name+lookup+failure
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Deferred%3A+Name+server
http
Saludos:
On 8/17/07, Gabriel Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A alguien se le ocurre que es lo que puede estar pasando ???
Agradezco enormemente su ayuda.
Gabriel
Recuerda tambien hacer definiciones en el archivo
/etc/mail/submit.mc y regenerar el submit.cf. Ya sabes donde obtener
mas
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 20:49 +0200, Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote:
P.D. ¿por qué no postfix?
Siendo usuario de postfix, da igual. ¿Por qué no el predeterminado,
exim? Da igual, dales chance.
--
David Moreno Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.damog.net/
Pero el bono sexenal nunca se traspapela.
Hi community
I have an authenticated sendmail. I want to modifiy it in order to:
*All mail sent to mydomain.com is not authenticated
*All mail sent to any domain different as mydomain.com be authenticated
(TLS included).
How can I do that? (I don't refer to complete procedure, but how can I do
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi community
ehlo
I have an authenticated sendmail. I want to modifiy it in order to:
*All mail sent to mydomain.com is not authenticated
*All mail sent to any domain different as mydomain.com be authenticated
(TLS included).
Is that what you
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi community
Hello
I have to authenticate Sendmail using openldap (I can't choose another SMTP is
for my job, also I've already got cyrus-imap using sasl and openldap).
I use sendmail/openldap/dovecot
Should I SASL in order to integrate both
Hi community
I have to authenticate Sendmail using openldap (I can't choose another SMTP is
for my job, also I've already got cyrus-imap using sasl and openldap). Should
I SASL in order to integrate both sendmail and openldap. Or does another way
exist of performing this task?
Thanks
* be used for mail addresses or remote logins.
I did not know /usr/include/sysexits.h. ;-)
If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt
doesn't come back and there is no message
Migrate to postfix.
Couldn't help it,
N.-
For the moment, I use sendmail. ;)
--
Shams Fantar (http://snurf.info)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007, Shams Fantar wrote:
If there is truly nothing in /var/log/mail.log, it implies that sendmail
saw the mail recipient as being local, and as such, refused to accept
the mail for a non-existant local user.
Yes, you are right.
As if that was ever in question :)
But, what
Hello,
I have used Google to have the answers at my problem, but I did not
find anything.
The problem is that I can't use the function mail() of php.
If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't
come back and there is no message. But if I make 'mail -s testing
Shams Fantar wrote:
Hello,
I have used Google to have the answers at my problem, but I did not
find anything.
The problem is that I can't use the function mail() of php.
If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't
come back and there is no message. But if I make
for mail addresses or remote logins.
If I make 'sendmail -s testing [EMAIL PROTECTED]', the prompt doesn't come
back and there is no message. But if I make 'mail -s testing
[EMAIL PROTECTED]', I have an error message : Can't
On 7/2/07, Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Shams Fantar wrote:
I have used Google to have the answers at my problem, but I did not find
anything.
You need more practice, the 1st page of my only search turned up this:
init---atd
+-bash
+-cron---firebird
¦ +-sendmail
+-cron---cron---sendmail
¦ +-sh---curl
+-dhclient
+-exim4
Como posso descobrir o que o sendmail e o exim4 andam fazendo?
Para quem eles enviam mensagens num servidor quem não tem, teoricamente
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/08/2007 06:00 PM, Valdir Marcos wrote:
init─┬─atd
├─bash
├─cron─┬─firebird
│ └─sendmail
├─cron───cron─┬─sendmail
│ └─sh───curl
├─dhclient
├─exim4
Como posso descobrir o que o
init---atd
+-bash
+-cron---firebird
¦ +-sendmail
+-cron---cron---sendmail
¦ +-sh---curl
+-dhclient
+-exim4
How can I discover what sendmail and exim4 are doing in my Debian Sarge?
Tho whom they send messages in a server that, theoricaly
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:04:42PM -0300, Valdir Marcos wrote:
init---atd
+-bash
+-cron---firebird
¦ +-sendmail
+-cron---cron---sendmail
¦ +-sh---curl
+-dhclient
+-exim4
How can I discover what sendmail and exim4 are doing in my
Hola a todos.
estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando
voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro:
m4:/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:18: ERROR: end of file in string
alguien me puede decir que significa y como puedo solucionarlo?
gracias por su
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:20:10 -0700, Miguel Hernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola a todos.
estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando
voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro:
m4:/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:18: ERROR: end of file in string
alguien
El 28/04/07, Octavio Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:20:10 -0700, Miguel Hernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola a todos.
estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando
voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro:
m4:/etc
El 28/04/07, Miguel Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
El 28/04/07, Octavio Alvarez [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:20:10 -0700, Miguel Hernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola a todos.
estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando
voy
.
estoy configurando un servidor de correos con sendmail, pero cuando
voy a reconstruir el sendmail.cf me sale el siguiente errro:
m4:/etc/mail/sendmail.mc:18: ERROR: end of file in string
Dice que tienes un problema con sendmail.mc en la línea 18.
Qué dice esa línea? (y las 3 líneas
Olá
Tenho aqui um servidor Sendmail e uma conexão ADSL, preciso fazer com que o
Sendmail utilize o SMTP do meu provedor para enviar e-mails, mas ele é
autenticado. Como proceder? Não tenho a mínima idéia.
Obrigado!
--
Luciano Sobue
Debian GNU/Linux #444722
O futuro pertence àqueles que
Buenas lista, como están? Lamentablemente debo configurar sendmail por
necesidades de trabajo en debian, mi tema es el siguiente:
Desde configurar SendMail para que mande mails a través de un servidor STMP
de correo con postfix con dirección ip 10.100.xxx.xxx
Según sé SendMail es bastante difícil
El Jueves, 19 de Abril de 2007, Néstor Flores escribió:
Buenas lista, como están? Lamentablemente debo configurar sendmail por
necesidades de trabajo en debian, mi tema es el siguiente:
Desde configurar SendMail para que mande mails a través de un servidor STMP
de correo con postfix con
Micha Borrmann schrieb:
I've one problem with sendmail. I'm using a certificate based relaying.
The clients are verified from the system, but the SMTP connection are
not used to sent mail.
In /var/log/mail.info the following lines are logged:
Apr 12 12:47:50 etch sm-mta[13211]: STARTTLS
Zitat von Micha Borrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've one problem with sendmail. I'm using a certificate based relaying.
The clients are verified from the system, but the SMTP connection are
not used to sent mail.
In /var/log/mail.info the following lines are logged:
Apr 12 12:47:50 etch sm-mta
Hello,
yesterday I've updated a sarge system to etch.
I've one problem with sendmail. I'm using a certificate based
relaying. The clients are verified from the system, but the SMTP
connection are not used to sent mail.
In /var/log/mail.info the following lines are logged:
Apr 12 12:47:50
Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Jeff D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has
hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded
sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of
sendmail will break them. I tried to get him to use
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 11:12:18AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
How many times do I have to tell you this is not my decision to make?
If it was up to my I'd use Exim4. I've used it successfully in the past
with applications that specifically called for sendmail, but the person
I'm
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded
sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of sendmail
Jeff D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has
hard-coded sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4
instead
I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie
that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I
am not quite sure as to how to proceed.
It appears that the confDOMAIN_NAME variable is the M4 variable to set
to configure sendmail if it cannot figure
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie
that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I
am not quite sure as to how to proceed.
Out of curiousity, if you are a total
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I see this has been asked before, but being the total sendmail newbie
that I am, and that Debian uses sendmailconfig to configure sendmail I
am not quite sure as to how to proceed.
Out
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:53:57AM -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Not my choice. I'm setting this up for someone else who has hard-coded
sendmail into his apps and is afraid that using exim4 instead of
sendmail will break them. I tried to get him to use exim4 but he wasn't
about
Hola a [EMAIL PROTECTED], intentaré cumplir las normas de la lista, es la
primera vez
que escribo en una pero me he leído las reglas.
Mi consulta es referente a sendmail que solo quiero que envié. Tengo un
pequeño apache domestico (Debian testing)en el que alojo mi blog
personal.Cuando los
El mié, 21-03-2007 a las 22:39 +0100, Guille G. M. escribió:
Hola a [EMAIL PROTECTED], intentaré cumplir las normas de la lista, es la
primera
vez que escribo en una pero me he leído las reglas.
Mi consulta es referente a sendmail que solo quiero que envié. Tengo
un pequeño apache domestico
Iñigo Tejedor Arrondo wrote:
El mar, 13-03-2007 a las 10:21 -0300, Federico Alberto Sayd escribió:
Hola a todos
Trato de instalar Sendmail con Mailscanner en Etch. El problema es que
la documentación de Etch sobre Mailscanner es bastante escasa, lo unico
que proporciona es un
Hola a todos
Trato de instalar Sendmail con Mailscanner en Etch. El problema es que
la documentación de Etch sobre Mailscanner es bastante escasa, lo unico
que proporciona es un sendmail.conf y un script de inicio retocado para
poner en /etc/init.d, para luego correr sendmailconfig para que
El mar, 13-03-2007 a las 10:21 -0300, Federico Alberto Sayd escribió:
Hola a todos
Trato de instalar Sendmail con Mailscanner en Etch. El problema es que
la documentación de Etch sobre Mailscanner es bastante escasa, lo unico
que proporciona es un sendmail.conf y un script de inicio
Holas,
tengo un server doméstico con debian 3.1 ,apache, mysql, samba, ftp y
sendmail. El problema es que sendmail no envia correos. He leido que para
que envie mails solo es necesario tener instalado el paquete, pero no
consigo que funcione. No quiero que haga de servidor de correo, solo que
Saludos:
On 3/8/07, Guille G. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mar 7 20:22:05 HAMLET sm-mta[360]: l27JA42C000358: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, ctladdr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0/0), delay=00:12:01, xdelay=00:12:00,
mailer=esmtp, pri=120320, relay=gsmtp163.google.com. [ 64.233.163.27],
dsn=4.0.0,
On 3/8/07, Guille G. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holas,
tengo un server doméstico con debian 3.1 ,apache, mysql, samba, ftp y
sendmail. El problema es que sendmail no envia correos. He leido que para
que envie mails solo es necesario tener instalado el paquete, pero no
consigo que funcione
On 3/8/07, Guillermo Garron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/8/07, Guille G. M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holas,
tengo un server doméstico con debian 3.1 ,apache, mysql, samba, ftp y
sendmail. El problema es que sendmail no envia correos. He leido que para
que envie mails solo es necesario
Bonjour,
Je n'arrive pas à configurer sendmail (avec Mutt + Procmail) pour récupérer les
messages de plusieurs listes de diffusion. Je reçois les messages des
différentes listes mais je ne parviens pas à écrire. La solution
consiste-t-elle à modifier /etc/mail/genericstable et si oui pouvez
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 03:31:21PM +0100, Philippe BERNARD wrote :
Bonjour,
Je n'arrive pas à configurer sendmail (avec Mutt + Procmail) pour récupérer
les messages de plusieurs listes de diffusion. Je reçois les messages des
différentes listes mais je ne parviens pas à écrire. La solution
][ wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't able to use sendmail recently. I've now track it down that the
hostname that my Sendmail uses is wrong. How can I fix it?
% /usr/sbin/sendmail -bi
WARNING: local host name (;; connection timed out; no servers could be
reached) is not qualified; see cf/README
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/2007 12:43 PM, Vinicius de Lima wrote:
Pessoal,
Estou com um debian instalado em um pc e instalei uma aplicação que
utiliza o sendmail e estava funcionando normal, mas muito devagar.
O sendmail MTA ou o sendmail binário pra
Pessoal,
Estou com um debian instalado em um pc e instalei uma aplicação que utiliza o
sendmail e estava funcionando normal, mas muito devagar.
Agora tive que colocar essa máquina em outra rede, essa rede não consigo
utilizar o sendmail, pois não está configurado.
Mas tem uma máquina nessa
Salut la liste,
Je voudrais solliciter votre savoir pour m'aider à configurer sendmail pour
qu'il utilise un annuaire LDAP comme annuaire de mails afin de ne pas être
obligé de créer des utilisateurs UNIX à chaque fois.
voilà j'ai configuré le fichier sendmail.cf en utilisant le fichier
/etc
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote:
I would like to reject mails from IPs without reverse DNS
with sendmail: ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN line in
/etc/hosts.allow. (Mail originating from such IPs is
almost exclusively spam).
A rule like ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN will not permit
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:05:05AM -0600, Amal Phadke wrote:
I would like to reject mails from IPs without reverse DNS
with sendmail: ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN line in
/etc/hosts.allow. (Mail originating from such IPs is
almost exclusively spam).
A rule like ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN
Hi all,
It seems to me that sendmail in Etch doesn't honor hosts.allow/deny
even though TCP wrapper support is enabled. I would like to reject mails
from IPs without reverse DNS with sendmail: ALL EXCEPT UNKNOWN line in
/etc/hosts.allow. (Mail originating from such IPs is almost
Oi pessoal, ói eu novamente...
Desculpem o off-topic
Seguinte, estou com um problema no sendmail que está enchendo o meu
spool/mqueue.
o queue timeout está configurado para 5 dias, mas os e-mails do queue
estão com mais do que isso, não estão sendo eliminados da fila. Alguma
sugestão (além de
Greetings all,
I've been trying to set up an anti-spam measure called greylisting on my
Debian 3.1 box with sendmail.
milter-gris from snertsoft.com comes highly recommended but it claims
there is a version mis-match between sendmail and makemap (I can't figure out
from which package
Pessoal,Como eu levanto o sendmail no debian?Estou dando:
O Yahoo! está de cara nova. Venha conferir!
Pessoal,Como eu levanto o sendmail no debian?Estou dando: debian:~# sendmailExim is a Mail Transfer Agent. It is normally called by Mail User Agents,not directly from a shell command line. Options and/or arguments controlwhat it does when called. For a list of options, see the Exim
Em 06/11/06, Vinicius de Lima[EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Pessoal,
Como eu levanto o sendmail no debian?
Estou dando:
debian:~# sendmail
# /etc/init.d/sendmail start
Exim is a Mail Transfer Agent. It is normally called by Mail User Agents,
not directly from a shell command line. Options
debian spamd[3740]: processing message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for
**:1005.
Nov 1 08:45:16 debian sm-mta[4058]: k9VLgoek004054: timeout waiting
for input from local during Draining Input
I'm running sarge with the default installation of sendmail
(8.13.4-3sarge3) and spamassassin (3.0.3-2sarge1). I have
Hi Folks,
I'm running postfix on my box, but a while back I installed then
uninstalled sendmail.
Something seems to have been left behind in an obscure location. When I
reboot the machine, something creates a cron job (/etc/cron.d/sendmail).
Whatever is doing this leaves the following
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Note that I did leave /etc/mail in place, but I ran apt-get remove
sendmail, removed the init files, and so forth. Apparantly I missed
something.
You should run dpkg --purge sendmail to remove all traces of the
package
Steve Kemp wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Note that I did leave /etc/mail in place, but I ran apt-get remove
sendmail, removed the init files, and so forth. Apparantly I missed
something.
You should run dpkg --purge sendmail to remove all
Hola, tengo configurado un servidor debian con sendmail con autentificacion
con sasl2 y me funciona bien el correo los usuarios locales de la maquina
solo son los que pueden enviar correo. Pero tengo el siguiente problema
cuando desde una cuenta exterior se intenta mandar un correo a los usuarios
OLa estou tentando permitir que um IP externo mande e-mail através de
meu servidor smtp... Acontece que quando faço isso o relay não é apenas
aberto para o ip que especifico no arquivo relay-domains mas sim para
toda a internet . Fazendo com que meu servidor entre numa black list de
spams...
What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs?
I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but
then I've had more experience with Sendmail than most.
The Debian package installers in Sarge and Etch contain a serious flaw
in the setup scripts that place FEATURE
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, T.J. Duchene wrote:
What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs?
Yes, bugs, or directly to the maintainer
I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but then
I've had more experience with Sendmail than most.
A flaw, but a cosmetic one
T.J. Duchene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the appropriate list for this? Bugs?
I'm not sure if you would really consider this a flaw or not. I do, but
then I've had more experience with Sendmail than most.
The Debian package installers in Sarge and Etch contain a serious flaw
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
maybe they should try courier, it is very similar to qmail
On 08.09.06 14:04, Matej Cepl wrote:
I thought mainly about .qmail-* configuration files -- does courier uses
them as well?
CITE
Courier's .courier may seem to be exactly like Qmail's .qmail, but
that
looks like qmail but no longer is.
All in all though, just say no. Save yourself pain and choose Exim,
Sendmail or Postfix.
Oh and I love how the qmail-pop3 client logs where a connection came
from but not what account it attempted to access or any other useful
info. Wooo! Go BAYBE. Ye HAW
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
the most annoying parts are accept-then-bounce behaviour
This is a serious flaw, IMHO. I had to deal with a qmail system in a
production environment. A few dozen domains hosted on a single box times a
few dozen boxes. Because of the mail policies of the
CaT wrote:
Qmails logging is horrendous. There is no link between logs of
connections and the source and destination of an email. This makes
tracking an IP of a single hit to many destinations a right rotten pain
in the arse if not impossible. Its internal message ids are recycled so
if you
On Thursday 07 September 2006 18:51, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting
licensing issues, but has a large user community and
Cameron L. Spitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting
licensing issues, but has a large user community and excellent
qmail with ten-feet pole is vendor lock-in. With reasonably
complicated configuration of sendmail/postfix/exim you can switch between
each other with reasonable amount of work. With qmail (in either direction)
you just have to start from scratch. Binaries in /var/qmail/bin (which is
fixed in Debian
Andrei Popescu wrote:
I don't know too much about MTAs, but after your mail I
find it strange that both my previous and current ISP use qmail.
It USED to be the best alternative to sendmail (although I am not sure what
is older -- postfix or qmail) and now many huge installations of qmail
On 07.09.06 23:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 07 September 2006 18:51, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote:
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting
licensing
Andrei Popescu wrote:
I don't know too much about MTAs, but after your mail I
find it strange that both my previous and current ISP use qmail.
On 08.09.06 13:06, Matej Cepl wrote:
It USED to be the best alternative to sendmail (although I am not sure what
is older -- postfix or qmail)
I
Matej Cepl wrote:
Aside from DJB (which is big reason enough for me), the biggest reason why
Just to elaborate on this -- I have no problems to believe that DJB is a
genius, his IQ may be really enormous, but unfortunately he was hurt by the
problem many geniuses are hurt as well --
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
maybe they should try courier, it is very similar to qmail
I thought mainly about .qmail-* configuration files -- does courier uses
them as well?
Matěj
--
23 Marion St. #3, Cambridge, MA 02141, (617) 876-1259
http://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, map
), the biggest reason why I
wouldn't touch qmail with ten-feet pole is vendor lock-in. With reasonably
complicated configuration of sendmail/postfix/exim you can switch between
each other with reasonable amount of work. With qmail (in either direction)
you just have to start from scratch.
qmail
On Friday 08 September 2006 10:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
the most annoying parts are accept-then-bounce behaviour and mail
unbundling (mail to more recipients at the same place will be delivered for
each recipient extra)
OK, before I avoided qmail because like everything else DJB,
On Friday 08 September 2006 10:06, Matej Cepl wrote:
Andrei Popescu wrote:
I don't know too much about MTAs, but after your mail I
find it strange that both my previous and current ISP use qmail.
It USED to be the best alternative to sendmail (although I am not sure what
is older
[This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.]
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting
licensing issues, but has a large user community and excellent
documentation (www.lifewithqmail.org, qmail.org). It runs
configuration file...
... is over-engineered. Over-engineering leads to brittleness.
Sendmail up and running and doing wicked fancy things is pretty nifty.
But CHANGING sendmail configurations without a backup in a production
environment is brittle. Very very brittle. (Brittle
T wrote:
Why? You'll have better support. Recently I need to config my MTA to use
smarthost to talk to my ISP. For several weeks, I tried to do it with
Exim. Then another several weeks on postfix, I searched and asked, all
efforts ended no where.
Not sure why anyone who needs just a
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:29:28 -0700, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Friday 01 September 2006 19:48, John Kelly wrote:
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:33:38 -0700, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I follow debian-security and I used to follow Bugtraq fairly closely.
What's the ratio of sendmail
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 00:36 +0200, T wrote:
My suggestion, speaking from my heart breaking experiences, is that if you
are a normal user, not a mail expert or system admin who need to play with
mail configuration as you full time job, stick with sendmail, and keep
away with postfix, exim, etc
anything.
Sendmail is not the best solution for every need. But the OP asked
for experience, and facts.
As I said earlier: sendmail has the best integration with cyrus imapd
via socket maps, and postfix's milter interface shows that postfix is
a poor argument against monolithic design.
Now if anyone
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 00:28:34 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Interesting. I also mam a non-mailgeek, but got Postfix working as a
Smarhost within an hour. dpkg-reconfigure postfix plus a little
Googling and it worked. (Note, though, that my ISP's smtp server is
unauthenticated.)
On Fri, 01 Sep
Steve Lamb wrote:
Not sure why anyone who needs just a smarthost would use a
full-featured MTA.
Here's my entire configuration...
smtp.dmiyu.org smtp --port=25
One term -- internal messages. forwarding messages to some special users is
so fun (like mail2news gateway posting to
T wrote:
Problem is, the above setting doesn't cover my case, in which the
smarthost server requires username and password for SMTP SSL
authentication.
No, but it is also not everything nullmailer can do. I was just giving a
simple example of a simple case, no more, no less. The point
Matej Cepl wrote:
One term -- internal messages. forwarding messages to some special users is
so fun (like mail2news gateway posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Then that is, by definition, not a smarthost, is it? Smarthost = handle
all my mail, kkthxbye.
--
Steve C. Lamb |
if you want to configure a smarthost, and even if you say no...
You could have solved this on your own in a minute.
Start accusation without even trying to understand what others are trying
to do is not a good way to help.
Just because you know sendmail much better than the other MTAs (if you
Steve Lamb wrote:
Then that is, by definition, not a smarthost, is it? Smarthost =
handle all my mail, kkthxbye.
No, that's nullmailer. Smarthost is send all my Internet/external/non-local
mail to one SMTP server.
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964
, stick with sendmail, and
keep away with postfix, exim, etc.
I don't understand your logic. An full time mail admin would easily get
his head around any MTA, and might opt for sendmail because of it's
configurability. But an ordinary user who don't know much about how
mail works?
Even
On Saturday 02 September 2006 01:51, John Kelly wrote:
The OP asked for information without religious dogma. And since dogma
is all you have to offer, goodbye.
You get what you give. Sorry you can't take what you dish.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
301 - 400 of 3010 matches
Mail list logo
