On Vi, 12 mar 21, 11:41:11, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> I hope this is going to the list and not to Andei directly.
It did go to me :)
Putting it back on list now.
> It worked.
> di -hx --max-depth=1 /home/directory |sort -h|less
>
> I found a 295G .vnc/WORKSTATION:5904.log file
> which gave me so
On Vi, 12 mar 21, 17:42:48, Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 18:13 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > My personal favorite:
> >
> > du -hx --max-depth=1 | sort -h
> >
>
> You can use the short option -d instead of --max-depth, and make it's
> parameter '1' come straight after [1], so
> du -hd1 | sort -h
> then 'cd' into a likely candidate directory and repeat.
Hmmm here's what I do instead:
du | sort -n | tail -n 100
-- Stefan
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 18:13 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 12 mar 21, 09:02:23, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
> > Mitchell Laks wrote:
> >
> > > I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home
> > > partition
> > > filled.
> >
> > I find "du | sort
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:13:51 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 12 mar 21, 09:02:23, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
> > Mitchell Laks wrote:
> >
> > > I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition
> > > filled.
> >
> > I find "du | sort -n"
On Vi, 12 mar 21, 10:45:22, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition filled.
>
> I then adjusted tune2fs -m 3 /dev/md1 to give myself 20 G of space.
> Did nothing and next day already filled /home 100% again.
Please show us.
(the output
On Vi, 12 mar 21, 09:02:23, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
> Mitchell Laks wrote:
>
> > I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition
> > filled.
>
> I find "du | sort -n" useful in such situations. Start at /home and
> work your way down.
My per
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition
> filled.
I find "du | sort -n" useful in such situations. Start at /home and
work your way down.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
ht
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition filled.
>
> I then adjusted tune2fs -m 3 /dev/md1 to give myself 20 G of space.
> Did nothing and next day already filled /home 100% again.
> Same thing happened when i did -m2.
>
> Ok how to find th
>
> tried du -sh on /home/username /* etc.
>
and what was the output?
I use
$ du -d1 | sort -n
Also, try "ncdu".
Hi,
I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition filled.
I then adjusted tune2fs -m 3 /dev/md1 to give myself 20 G of space.
Did nothing and next day already filled /home 100% again.
Same thing happened when i did -m2.
Ok how to find the culprit ?
A long long time ago, t
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 6:13 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
> > Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/in
On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/saned ...
update-inetd: warning: cannot add service, /etc/inetd.conf d
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 12:38 AM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 15:14, Default User wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> >> On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> >>> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> The following packages have unm
On 01/09/2018 15:14, Default User wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is i
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> > On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> >> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >> libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
> >> libsane : Depe
On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be ins
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 15:19 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> > Running sid (Debian Unstable).
> > For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
> > updates work as normal:
> > user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
> > [sudo]
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
Running sid (Debian Unstable).
For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:
user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libs
Running sid (Debian Unstable).
For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:
user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libsane1{ab}
The following packages will be
Running Debian Sid quite long and never had such "unstable" issue.
After upgrading package ppp from 2.4.7-1+4 to 2.4.7-2+1 cannot start ppp-oe
connection, requests to my ISP are failing with: MS-CHAP authentication
failed: Authentication failure
Nothing was changed in config/connection settings.
Le 17/10/2017 à 23:01, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
> On 18/10/17 07:38, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 16.10.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Pétur Viljamson:
>>> I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
>> It's the latest freetype upgrade causing this for users which use
>> subpixel
On 18/10/17 07:38, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 16.10.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Pétur Viljamson:
I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It's the latest freetype upgrade causing this for users which use
subpixel antialiasing. Thunderbird needs to be updated to cope with the
Am 16.10.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Pétur Viljamson:
> I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It's the latest freetype upgrade causing this for users which use
subpixel antialiasing. Thunderbird needs to be updated to cope with the
changes in freetype 2.8.1
see https://bu
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:08:11PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Is there an obvious place where this file is documented? 'man
> environment' is the only thing that springs to my mind, barring Google
> searches, and that turns up no entries.
pam_env(8)
You may also want to try "grep -r pam_env /et
On 2017-10-17 at 11:49, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:44:20AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> The /etc/environment setting only specifies the default
>> environment; in order to make it take effect, you'd have to
>> reboot.
>
> No, you just have to login again (or trigger wha
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:44:20AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> The /etc/environment setting only specifies the default environment; in
> order to make it take effect, you'd have to reboot.
No, you just have to login again (or trigger whatever else you're doing
that uses the pam_env module). Unle
On 2017-10-17 at 11:29, Pétùr wrote:
> Le 17/10/2017 à 05:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
>
>> I am using Xfce on sid and do not see any font corruption in
>> thunderbird. What are your desktop font settings?
>>
>> I am using Liberation Sans for desktop and GUI, full hinting, and in
>> /etc/envi
Le 17/10/2017 à 05:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
>>
>
> I am using Xfce on sid and do not see any font corruption in
> thunderbird. What are your desktop font settings?
>
> I am using Liberation Sans for desktop and GUI, full hinting, and in
> /etc/environment I have:
> "
Thanks for the answer
On 17/10/17 09:50, Pétur Viljamson wrote:
I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It happens both in the body of mail (received and sent) and in the
interface. The problem is also present on my second computer with
different hardware but some software (Xfce + Debian s
I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It happens both in the body of mail (received and sent) and in the
interface. The problem is also present on my second computer with
different hardware but some software (Xfce + Debian sid).
This mail was rejected by the Debian
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:26:32 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> No immediate mention of the libstdc++6 which had been a constant in
> the issues I've had, but that "libboost-date-time1.55.0" was regularly
> referenced side-by-side with it in the brick walls I kept hitting
> here.
serious bugs of li
On 2015-08-10 06:01:14 -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Spoke too soon.. Should have tried running the whole list before
> sending this out.. Apt-get's now instead trying to autoremove
> *inkscape*, another of the very few packages I install by *_CHOICE_*
> after debootstrapping Debian each time...
On 8/10/15, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> Hi, All.. May be false hope, but I just ran apt-get update and found
> libreoffice in there again. Besides being the program EVERYTHING kept
> trying to autoremove, libreoffice flat out had disappeared out of any
> "needs to be updated" lists I was seeing. Oth
Hi, All.. May be false hope, but I just ran apt-get update and found
libreoffice in there again. Besides being the program EVERYTHING kept
trying to autoremove, libreoffice flat out had disappeared out of any
"needs to be updated" lists I was seeing. Others of you were seeing
similar problems with
Hi,
After a recent upgrade of Jessie/sid I experience some network
disconnections (of both wired and wireless interface).
Does anyone else have this problem and is this line have a particular
meaning :
NetworkManager[582]: [1408629866.746297]
[platform/nm-linux-platform.c:1714] add_object():
On 12/10/2013 08:54 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Due to my recent sid upgrade, the following symlink
> /etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
> has been re-added, when I wanted it removed (I had deleted it).
>
> The problem: now my xterms have HUGE fonts, and are not supporting
>
On 12/10/13, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013, 18:46:16 schrieb Zenaan Harkness:
>> OK, previously, I added to /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-evdev.conf
>> :
>> Section "InputClass"
...
>> EndSection
>>
>> Now my recent s
hDevicePath "/dev/input/event*"
> Driver "evdev"
> Option "ButtonMapping" "1 8 3 4 5 6 7 2 2"
> Option "EmulateWheel" "true"
> Option "EmulateWheelButton" "8"
> Opti
Due to my recent sid upgrade, the following symlink
/etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
has been re-added, when I wanted it removed (I had deleted it).
The problem: now my xterms have HUGE fonts, and are not supporting
bitmap fonts (like my personally personalized custom super-special
quot;1 8 3 4 5 6 7 2 2"
Option "EmulateWheel" "true"
Option "EmulateWheelButton" "8"
Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
Option "XAxisMapping" "6 7"
Option "Emulate3Buttons" &qu
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:14:01 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Le 12/09/2013 20:51, Brian a écrit :
> > On Thu 12 Sep 2013 at 19:44:46 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> >
> >> I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
>
> >> Summary:
> >> libklibc(1 bug), debhelper(1 bug), d
Le 12/09/2013 20:51, Brian a écrit :
> On Thu 12 Sep 2013 at 19:44:46 +0200, François Patte wrote:
>
>> I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
>> Summary:
>> libklibc(1 bug), debhelper(1 bug), dh-python(1 bug), upower(1 bug)
>>
>> is it safe to proceed or shall I wai
On Thu 12 Sep 2013 at 19:44:46 +0200, François Patte wrote:
> I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
>
> grave bugs of upower (0.9.21-2 -> 0.9.21-3)
> #722474 - upower: on update fails with critical glib errors & doesn't
> work properly after reboot
Please read the
Bonjour,
I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
grave bugs of upower (0.9.21-2 -> 0.9.21-3)
#722474 - upower: on update fails with critical glib errors & doesn't
work properly after reboot
serious bugs of libklibc (2.0.1-3.1 -> 2.0.2-1)
#720290 - klibc: FTBFS on m
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:44:46 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
>
> grave bugs of upower (0.9.21-2 -> 0.9.21-3)
> #722474 - upower: on update fails with critical glib errors & doesn't
> work properly after reboot
> se
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:30 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/16/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > On 7/16/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >> http://wiki.debian.org/Xinitrc
> >>
> >> exec startxfce4
> >
> > Is there any advantage to prefixing startxfce4 with exec?
Yes, after exec the script is finishe
On 7/16/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 7/16/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:41 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
>>> gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
>>> line, all start u
On 7/16/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:41 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
>> gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
>> line, all start up gnome classic.
>>
>> Now my laptop cpu f
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:41 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
> gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
> line, all start up gnome classic.
>
> Now my laptop cpu fan fires up 2 or 3 times a minute, my e
Hi, I'm stuck in Gnome3 classic.
I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
line, all start up gnome classic.
Now my laptop cpu fan fires up 2 or 3 times a minute, my external
screen is below res and my
Morten Bo Johansen writes:
> On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> I have problem only in the console ( that is not in X Window System ).
>
>> There Midnight Commander ( mc )beeps every time when I use arrow keys,
>> and I heare beep when start mc too.
>
> If mc on the console is the only problem
On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
> I have problem only in the console ( that is not in X Window System ).
> There Midnight Commander ( mc )beeps every time when I use arrow keys,
> and I heare beep when start mc too.
If mc on the console is the only problem remaining, then try to
use the Options
Morten Bo Johansen writes:
> On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> I can give some informations more.
>
>> On the console ( not on X Window System ) when I start Midnight
>> Commander ( mc ) I can hear right after mc start a beep, which I never
>> heared before. Moreover, when I use arrow keys in
On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
> I can give some informations more.
> On the console ( not on X Window System ) when I start Midnight
> Commander ( mc ) I can hear right after mc start a beep, which I never
> heared before. Moreover, when I use arrow keys in mc, I heare every time
> a beep, whic
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2013-07-14 22:08 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> Sven Joachim writes:
>>
>>> The postinst does rewrite /etc/console-setup/cached_UTF-8_del.kmap.gz
>>> however, which might explain the problem. Does it help to move that
>>> file out of the way and recreate it with "setupc
On 2013-07-14 22:08 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
>> The postinst does rewrite /etc/console-setup/cached_UTF-8_del.kmap.gz
>> however, which might explain the problem. Does it help to move that
>> file out of the way and recreate it with "setupcon --save"?
>
> It doesn't help
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2013-07-14 20:49 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> Sven Joachim writes:
>>
>>> On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>>
>>> What does "setupcon -v" print?
>>
>> It prints the followings:
>> Configuring /dev/tty1 /dev/tty2 /dev/tty3 /dev/tty4 /dev/tty5 /dev/tty6
>> T
On 2013-07-14 20:49 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
>> On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>
>> What does "setupcon -v" print?
>
> It prints the followings:
> Configuring /dev/tty1 /dev/tty2 /dev/tty3 /dev/tty4 /dev/tty5 /dev/tty6
> The charmap is UTF-8
> BackSpace is
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> Sven Joachim writes:
>>
>>> On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>>
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Sven Joachim writes:
>
>> On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
>>>
>>> In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
>>> XKBMODEL="pc105"
>>> XKBLAYOUT="hu,
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
>>
>> In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
>> XKBMODEL="pc105"
>> XKBLAYOUT="hu,hr,rs"
>> XKBVARIANT="nodeadkeys"
>> XKBOPTIONS="grp:rwin_
On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
>
> In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
> XKBMODEL="pc105"
> XKBLAYOUT="hu,hr,rs"
> XKBVARIANT="nodeadkeys"
> XKBOPTIONS="grp:rwin_toggle,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,grp_
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
XKBMODEL="pc105"
XKBLAYOUT="hu,hr,rs"
XKBVARIANT="nodeadkeys"
XKBOPTIONS="grp:rwin_toggle,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,grp_led:scroll"
BACKSPACE="guess"
This setup works sofar, but to
Claudius Hubig wrote:
> Dear Joel,
>
> Joel Roth wrote:
> > The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
> > Fn-F4).
> >
> > I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
>
> Cool. Does pm-suspend (a wrapper that does some funky things before
> calling s2ram) work, too
Dear Joel,
Joel Roth wrote:
> The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
> Fn-F4).
>
> I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
Cool. Does pm-suspend (a wrapper that does some funky things before
calling s2ram) work, too?
> Any idea against which package I shou
Hi all,
Instead of letting my sid install age until something
breaks, I've been going through regular upgrade/dist-upgrade
cycles.
The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
Fn-F4).
I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
Any idea against which package I shoul
On 18/04/12 02:42 PM, hvw59601 wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 18/04/12 12:57 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
wit
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 18/04/12 12:57 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
with digit update-initramfs:
Generating /b
On 18/04/12 12:57 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
with digit update-initramfs:
Generating /boot/initrd.img-v dpkg: w
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
with digit update-initramfs:
Generating /boot/initrd.img-v dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax:
version
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:57:33 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
Running Sid and just did a dist-upgrade.
Use google-chrome-beta as browser and after the upgrade the tabs are
"slow": when you click one with mouse or kbd, there is a slight
hesitation before the page is selected that wasn't t
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:57:33 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
Running Sid and just did a dist-upgrade.
Use google-chrome-beta as browser and after the upgrade the tabs are
"slow": when you click one with mouse or kbd, there is a slight
hesitation before the page is selected that wasn't t
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:57:33 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
> Running Sid and just did a dist-upgrade.
>
> Use google-chrome-beta as browser and after the upgrade the tabs are
> "slow": when you click one with mouse or kbd, there is a slight
> hesitation before the page is selected that wasn't there befo
Hi,
Running Sid and just did a dist-upgrade.
Use google-chrome-beta as browser and after the upgrade the tabs are
"slow": when you click one with mouse or kbd, there is a slight
hesitation before the page is selected that wasn't there before.
Anyone notice the same?
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:31:21 -0600
Seb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my sid system on my desktop and laptop this morning and
> restarted only to find out I get straight into a console login, not
> the usual KDM login window. The upgraded included the latest kernel
> image package (3.2.0) and thou
31/01/2012 21:52, Seb wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:36:09 +0100,
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
>> Hi Seb
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:31:21PM -0600, Seb wrote:
>>> I upgraded my sid system on my desktop and laptop this morning and
>>> restarted only to find out I get straight into a console
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:36:09 +0100,
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Seb
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:31:21PM -0600, Seb wrote:
>> I upgraded my sid system on my desktop and laptop this morning and
>> restarted only to find out I get straight into a console login, not
>> the usual KDM login windo
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 20:36, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
>> Is anyone else experiencing this?
How about checking X's log? Or kdm's?
--
"On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi Seb
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 02:31:21PM -0600, Seb wrote:
> I upgraded my sid system on my desktop and laptop this morning and
> restarted only to find out I get straight into a console login, not the
> usual KDM login window. The upgraded included the latest kernel image
> package (3.2.0) and
Hi,
I upgraded my sid system on my desktop and laptop this morning and
restarted only to find out I get straight into a console login, not the
usual KDM login window. The upgraded included the latest kernel image
package (3.2.0) and thought that might be the culprit so installed the
previous vers
I had persistent problems
errors were encountered while processing:
texlive-base
texlive-latex-base
feynmf
texlive-latex-recommended
texlive-fonts-recommended
pdfjam
texlive
texlive-generic-recommended
texlive-luatex
texlive-metapost
texlive-pictures
texmacs
ie the following
Reading database ..
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 10:58:44 +0100
Dom wrote:
> On 23/10/11 09:32, David Baron wrote:
> > Recent Sid upgrade rendered the system unbootable. Probably lvm packages. I
> > get put into an initramfs shell. I rebooted to the previous kernel which had
> > its initramfs
On 23/10/11 09:32, David Baron wrote:
Recent Sid upgrade rendered the system unbootable. Probably lvm packages. I
get put into an initramfs shell. I rebooted to the previous kernel which had
its initramfs apparently untouched.
Anyone else had this? No error was cited against lvm2.
How do I fix
Recent Sid upgrade rendered the system unbootable. Probably lvm packages. I
get put into an initramfs shell. I rebooted to the previous kernel which had
its initramfs apparently untouched.
Anyone else had this? No error was cited against lvm2.
How do I fix this? Wait for next upgrade and hope
On 02/27/2011 02:41 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-27 09:04 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 02/07/2011 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-
On 2011-02-27 09:04 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
>>> libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
>>
>> No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-x
On 02/07/2011 12:40 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core upgrade.
Any word on this? (The rest of X seems to
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
Hugo
Well, it don't take Guru to tell you that's not a good idea, their just
separating the Men from the Boy's. ;-)
--
Jimmy Johnson
Debian Wheezy - AMD64 - EXT4 at sda1
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:31PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
> > libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
>
> No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core upgrade.
I installed xo
Hugo Vanwoerkom:
>
> Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
> packages. Wait a bit?
That's why I always preach not to run dist-upgrades (or full-upgrades,
as aptitude calls them) but simple upgrades. That way you won't have to
fear removing half of your system.
J.
-
On 2011-02-07 19:33 +0100, Ron Johnson wrote:
> The problem for me is that dist-upgrade wants to install
> libdrm-nouveau1, which blasts nvidia-glx.
No, nvidia-glx is broken by the xserver-xorg-core upgrade.
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 02/07/2011 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2011-02-07 17:45 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
packages. Wait a bit?
It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away
Brad Alexander wrote:
Amen to that. I run apticron to see what installed packages have
updates available, but always, _always_ upgrade by hand. Anything else
is begging for trouble at/near release time or during ABI changes...
and do a backup before this next upgrade...
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Amen to that. I run apticron to see what installed packages have
updates available, but always, _always_ upgrade by hand. Anything else
is begging for trouble at/near release time or during ABI changes...
--b
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Curt Howland wrote:
> This has happened many times in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 07 February 2011, Sven Joachim was heard
to say:
> The problem is that the drivers got uploaded but were automatically
> rejected, see
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2011/02/msg00360.html for more
> information.
>
> I'm afraid this won'
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-02-07 17:45 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>> Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
>>> packages. Wait a bit?
>>
>> It's a dependency thing, no
On 2011-02-07 17:45 +0100, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
>> packages. Wait a bit?
>
> It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away later, or if it's
> due to a change in
On Monday 07 February 2011, Javier Vasquez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
> > packages. Wait a bit?
> >
> > Hugo
>
> It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away later, o
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Doing a dist-upgrade in Sid this morning wants to remove all xserver
> packages. Wait a bit?
>
> Hugo
It's a dependency thing, not sure if it'll go away later, or if it's
due to a change in xorg package... xserver-xorg-core now is
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
