On Vi, 12 mar 21, 11:41:11, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> I hope this is going to the list and not to Andei directly.
It did go to me :)
Putting it back on list now.
> It worked.
> di -hx --max-depth=1 /home/directory |sort -h|less
>
> I found a 295G .vnc/WORKSTATION:5904.log file
> which gave me
On Vi, 12 mar 21, 17:42:48, Tixy wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 18:13 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > My personal favorite:
> >
> > du -hx --max-depth=1 | sort -h
> >
>
> You can use the short option -d instead of --max-depth, and make it's
> parameter '1' come straight after [1], so
> du -hd1 | sort -h
> then 'cd' into a likely candidate directory and repeat.
Hmmm here's what I do instead:
du | sort -n | tail -n 100
-- Stefan
On Fri, 2021-03-12 at 18:13 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 12 mar 21, 09:02:23, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
> > Mitchell Laks wrote:
> >
> > > I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home
> > > partition
> > > filled.
> >
> > I find "du | sort
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:13:51 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 12 mar 21, 09:02:23, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
> > Mitchell Laks wrote:
> >
> > > I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition
> > > filled.
> >
> > I find "du | sort -n"
On Vi, 12 mar 21, 10:45:22, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition filled.
>
> I then adjusted tune2fs -m 3 /dev/md1 to give myself 20 G of space.
> Did nothing and next day already filled /home 100% again.
Please show us.
(the output
On Vi, 12 mar 21, 09:02:23, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
> Mitchell Laks wrote:
>
> > I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition
> > filled.
>
> I find "du | sort -n" useful in such situations. Start at /home and
> work your way down.
My
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:22 -0500
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition
> filled.
I find "du | sort -n" useful in such situations. Start at /home and
work your way down.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition filled.
>
> I then adjusted tune2fs -m 3 /dev/md1 to give myself 20 G of space.
> Did nothing and next day already filled /home 100% again.
> Same thing happened when i did -m2.
>
> Ok how to find
>
> tried du -sh on /home/username /* etc.
>
and what was the output?
I use
$ du -d1 | sort -n
Also, try "ncdu".
Hi,
I recently upgraded a system that uses sid and the /home partition filled.
I then adjusted tune2fs -m 3 /dev/md1 to give myself 20 G of space.
Did nothing and next day already filled /home 100% again.
Same thing happened when i did -m2.
Ok how to find the culprit ?
A long long time ago,
Bonsoir Jérôme,
jerome moliere, on 2021-02-10 18:30:33 +0100:
> Bonjour
> d'apres le support System76 la these de la panne materielle semble la plus
> probable.
Ce ne serait pas surprenant.
> Je vais donc commander une carte et tester
> Vous avez des references a conseiller en la matiere,
Bonjour
d'apres le support System76 la these de la panne materielle semble la plus
probable.
Je vais donc commander une carte et tester
Vous avez des references a conseiller en la matiere, compatibles si
possible Linux libre ?
chipsets ath9k ou ath10k . D'autres ?
Quelles references
Bonjour a tous,
merci Etienne de cete reponse...
Alors OUI le souci n'est pas specifique a une distro il se produit pour
toutes les distros testees (environ 7 ou 8 avec des versions de kernel et
de packages linux-firmware differentes)
J'ai voulu teste GhostBSD mais la machine est recente et il ne
Bonsoir Jérôme,
jerome moliere, on 2021-02-08 18:12:11 +0100:
> Dans les logs du kernel on voit qu'il y a un souci de chargement du
> firmware:
> sudo dmesg|grep -i iwlwifi
Les numéros de version ci-après :
> [4.769596] iwlwifi :00:14.3: minimum version required: (efault)198
Bonjour a tous,
je suis victime d'un souci sournois sur 1 laptop System76 lemur pro dote de
composants Intel 11eme generation.
Suite a l'upgrade du kernel en 5.10-2 (et 3 depuis) je n'ai plus de wifi:
- lspci voit toujours la carte lspci -nnk
lspci -nnk|grep -i network
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 6:13 PM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
> > Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
> > Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
> > Installing new version of config file
On 02/09/2018 08:33, Default User wrote:
Setting up libsane1:amd64 (1.0.27-1) ...
Setting up sane-utils (1.0.27-1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/user/saned ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/saned ...
update-inetd: warning: cannot add service, /etc/inetd.conf
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 12:38 AM Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 01/09/2018 15:14, Default User wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> >> On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> >>> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> The following packages have
On 01/09/2018 15:14, Default User wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018, 21:00 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> > On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> >> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >> libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
> >> libsane :
On 30/08/2018 07:18, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libsane1 : Breaks: libsane (< 1.0.27-1) but 1.0.25-4.1 is installed
libsane : Depends: libsane-common (= 1.0.25-4.1) but
1.0.27-1~experimental6 is to be
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018, 15:19 Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
> > Running sid (Debian Unstable).
> > For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
> > updates work as normal:
> > user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
> >
On 30/08/2018 03:46, Default User wrote:
Running sid (Debian Unstable).
For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:
user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
Running sid (Debian Unstable).
For several weeks, one particular update seems to be stalled. All other
updates work as normal:
user@domain:~$ sudo aptitude -Pvv full-upgrade
[sudo] password for default:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libsane1{ab}
The following packages will be
Running Debian Sid quite long and never had such "unstable" issue.
After upgrading package ppp from 2.4.7-1+4 to 2.4.7-2+1 cannot start ppp-oe
connection, requests to my ISP are failing with: MS-CHAP authentication
failed: Authentication failure
Nothing was changed in config/connection settings.
Le 17/10/2017 à 23:01, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
> On 18/10/17 07:38, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 16.10.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Pétur Viljamson:
>>> I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
>> It's the latest freetype upgrade causing this for users which use
>> subpixel
On 18/10/17 07:38, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 16.10.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Pétur Viljamson:
I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It's the latest freetype upgrade causing this for users which use
subpixel antialiasing. Thunderbird needs to be updated to cope with the
Am 16.10.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Pétur Viljamson:
> I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It's the latest freetype upgrade causing this for users which use
subpixel antialiasing. Thunderbird needs to be updated to cope with the
changes in freetype 2.8.1
see
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:08:11PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> Is there an obvious place where this file is documented? 'man
> environment' is the only thing that springs to my mind, barring Google
> searches, and that turns up no entries.
pam_env(8)
You may also want to try "grep -r pam_env
On 2017-10-17 at 11:49, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:44:20AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> The /etc/environment setting only specifies the default
>> environment; in order to make it take effect, you'd have to
>> reboot.
>
> No, you just have to login again (or trigger
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:44:20AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> The /etc/environment setting only specifies the default environment; in
> order to make it take effect, you'd have to reboot.
No, you just have to login again (or trigger whatever else you're doing
that uses the pam_env module).
On 2017-10-17 at 11:29, Pétùr wrote:
> Le 17/10/2017 à 05:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
>
>> I am using Xfce on sid and do not see any font corruption in
>> thunderbird. What are your desktop font settings?
>>
>> I am using Liberation Sans for desktop and GUI, full hinting, and in
>>
Le 17/10/2017 à 05:00, Ben Caradoc-Davies a écrit :
>>
>
> I am using Xfce on sid and do not see any font corruption in
> thunderbird. What are your desktop font settings?
>
> I am using Liberation Sans for desktop and GUI, full hinting, and in
> /etc/environment I have:
> "
Thanks for the
On 17/10/17 09:50, Pétur Viljamson wrote:
I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It happens both in the body of mail (received and sent) and in the
interface. The problem is also present on my second computer with
different hardware but some software (Xfce + Debian
I have ugly fonts in thunderbird after updating my Debian sid today.
It happens both in the body of mail (received and sent) and in the
interface. The problem is also present on my second computer with
different hardware but some software (Xfce + Debian sid).
This mail was rejected by the Debian
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 05:26:32 -0400
Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
No immediate mention of the libstdc++6 which had been a constant in
the issues I've had, but that libboost-date-time1.55.0 was regularly
referenced side-by-side with it in the brick walls I kept hitting
here.
Hi, All.. May be false hope, but I just ran apt-get update and found
libreoffice in there again. Besides being the program EVERYTHING kept
trying to autoremove, libreoffice flat out had disappeared out of any
needs to be updated lists I was seeing. Others of you were seeing
similar problems with
On 8/10/15, Cindy-Sue Causey butterflyby...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All.. May be false hope, but I just ran apt-get update and found
libreoffice in there again. Besides being the program EVERYTHING kept
trying to autoremove, libreoffice flat out had disappeared out of any
needs to be updated
On 2015-08-10 06:01:14 -0400, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
Spoke too soon.. Should have tried running the whole list before
sending this out.. Apt-get's now instead trying to autoremove
*inkscape*, another of the very few packages I install by *_CHOICE_*
after debootstrapping Debian each time...
Hi,
After a recent upgrade of Jessie/sid I experience some network
disconnections (of both wired and wireless interface).
Does anyone else have this problem and is this line have a particular
meaning :
NetworkManager[582]: error [1408629866.746297]
[platform/nm-linux-platform.c:1714]
7 2 2
Option EmulateWheel true
Option EmulateWheelButton 8
Option ZAxisMapping 4 5
Option XAxisMapping 6 7
Option Emulate3Buttons true
EndSection
Now my recent sid upgrade (had not upgraded for about 2 months I
think) has evidently overwritten
On 12/10/13, Hans-J. Ullrich hans.ullr...@loop.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013, 18:46:16 schrieb Zenaan Harkness:
OK, previously, I added to /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-evdev.conf
:
Section InputClass
...
EndSection
Now my recent sid upgrade (had not upgraded for about 2 months I
On 12/10/2013 08:54 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
Due to my recent sid upgrade, the following symlink
/etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
has been re-added, when I wanted it removed (I had deleted it).
The problem: now my xterms have HUGE fonts, and are not supporting
bitmap fonts (like my
Option ZAxisMapping 4 5
Option XAxisMapping 6 7
Option Emulate3Buttons true
EndSection
Now my recent sid upgrade (had not upgraded for about 2 months I
think) has evidently overwritten this.
So, do I just create my own .../xorg.conf.d file, to protect against upgrades?
TIA
Due to my recent sid upgrade, the following symlink
/etc/fonts/conf.d/70-no-bitmaps.conf
has been re-added, when I wanted it removed (I had deleted it).
The problem: now my xterms have HUGE fonts, and are not supporting
bitmap fonts (like my personally personalized custom super-special
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 23:14:01 +0200
François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
Le 12/09/2013 20:51, Brian a écrit :
On Thu 12 Sep 2013 at 19:44:46 +0200, François Patte wrote:
I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
Summary:
libklibc(1
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:44:46 +0200
François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote:
Bonjour,
I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
grave bugs of upower (0.9.21-2 - 0.9.21-3) unfixed
#722474 - upower: on update fails with critical glib errors
Bonjour,
I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
grave bugs of upower (0.9.21-2 - 0.9.21-3) unfixed
#722474 - upower: on update fails with critical glib errors doesn't
work properly after reboot
serious bugs of libklibc (2.0.1-3.1 - 2.0.2-1) unfixed
#720290 -
On Thu 12 Sep 2013 at 19:44:46 +0200, François Patte wrote:
I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
grave bugs of upower (0.9.21-2 - 0.9.21-3) unfixed
#722474 - upower: on update fails with critical glib errors doesn't
work properly after reboot
Please read
Le 12/09/2013 20:51, Brian a écrit :
On Thu 12 Sep 2013 at 19:44:46 +0200, François Patte wrote:
I made an attempt to upgrade sid (amd64); apt-get report some bugs:
Summary:
libklibc(1 bug), debhelper(1 bug), dh-python(1 bug), upower(1 bug)
is it safe to proceed or shall I wait untill
O apt-get não remove dependências órfãs se você não passar os parâmetros,
já o apititude remove por padrão, desde que seja instalado com ele também.
Eu sempre uso o aptitude.
O aptitude é uma evolução do apt-get, e embos usam por baixo o dpkg.
Caros,
com o Debian Sid instalado e rodando normalmente, para atualizá-lo devo
utilizar *apt-get upgrade* ou *apt-get dist-upgrade*?
No Sid, qual é a diferença prática entre os dois?
- - - ·
Atenciosamente,
Márcio Vinícius Pinheiro
http://goo.gl/RGKGgo
Upgrade apenas atualiza todos os pacotes instalados que não tenham
necessidade de instalar ou remover outros pacotes para satisfazer as
dependências.
Dist-upgrade fará atualizações instalando pacotes novos caso necessário.
Jack Pogorelsky Junior
*Engº Mecânico (CREA-RS 136845)
*Tel: +55 (51)
On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
I can give some informations more.
On the console ( not on X Window System ) when I start Midnight
Commander ( mc ) I can hear right after mc start a beep, which I never
heared before. Moreover, when I use arrow keys in mc, I heare every time
a beep, which I
Morten Bo Johansen m...@spamcop.net writes:
On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
I can give some informations more.
On the console ( not on X Window System ) when I start Midnight
Commander ( mc ) I can hear right after mc start a beep, which I never
heared before. Moreover, when I use arrow
On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
I have problem only in the console ( that is not in X Window System ).
There Midnight Commander ( mc )beeps every time when I use arrow keys,
and I heare beep when start mc too.
If mc on the console is the only problem remaining, then try to
use the Options -
Morten Bo Johansen m...@spamcop.net writes:
On 2013-07-15 Csanyi Pal wrote:
I have problem only in the console ( that is not in X Window System ).
There Midnight Commander ( mc )beeps every time when I use arrow keys,
and I heare beep when start mc too.
If mc on the console is the only
Hi, I'm stuck in Gnome3 classic.
I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
line, all start up gnome classic.
Now my laptop cpu fan fires up 2 or 3 times a minute, my external
screen is below res and
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:41 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
line, all start up gnome classic.
Now my laptop cpu fan fires up 2 or 3 times a minute, my
On 7/16/13, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:41 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx from command
line, all start up gnome classic.
Now
On 7/16/13, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
On 7/16/13, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 12:41 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
I usually use startx, and after my upgrade (from sid 12th July) now
gnome classic and xfce sessions from lightdm, and startx
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:30 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
On 7/16/13, Zenaan Harkness z...@freedbms.net wrote:
On 7/16/13, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.net wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/Xinitrc
exec startxfce4
Is there any advantage to prefixing startxfce4 with exec?
Yes,
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
XKBMODEL=pc105
XKBLAYOUT=hu,hr,rs
XKBVARIANT=nodeadkeys
XKBOPTIONS=grp:rwin_toggle,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,grp_led:scroll
BACKSPACE=guess
This setup works sofar, but today
On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
XKBMODEL=pc105
XKBLAYOUT=hu,hr,rs
XKBVARIANT=nodeadkeys
XKBOPTIONS=grp:rwin_toggle,terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp,grp_led:scroll
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
XKBMODEL=pc105
XKBLAYOUT=hu,hr,rs
XKBVARIANT=nodeadkeys
On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
XKBMODEL=pc105
XKBLAYOUT=hu,hr,rs
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 19:22 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Hi,
my system is Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid).
In the file /etc/default/keyboard the followings setup is present:
On 2013-07-14 20:49 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
What does setupcon -v print?
It prints the followings:
Configuring /dev/tty1 /dev/tty2 /dev/tty3 /dev/tty4 /dev/tty5 /dev/tty6
The charmap is UTF-8
BackSpace is
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 20:49 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 19:52 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
What does setupcon -v print?
It prints the followings:
Configuring /dev/tty1 /dev/tty2 /dev/tty3 /dev/tty4 /dev/tty5
On 2013-07-14 22:08 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
The postinst does rewrite /etc/console-setup/cached_UTF-8_del.kmap.gz
however, which might explain the problem. Does it help to move that
file out of the way and recreate it with setupcon --save?
It doesn't
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
On 2013-07-14 22:08 +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes:
The postinst does rewrite /etc/console-setup/cached_UTF-8_del.kmap.gz
however, which might explain the problem. Does it help to move that
file out of the way and recreate
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 à 20:02, maderios a écrit :
Bonjour
Bonjour,
Pour les mises à jour délicates, Aptitude n'arrange rien . C'est un
frontal bâti sur apt, donc un intermédiaire de plus.
J'ai eu le cas d'une de mes machines pour laquelle la mise-à-jour (Squeeze =
Wheezy) avec apt-get (telle
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 à 18:41, Cyrille a écrit :
qu'aptitude upgrade ne m'upgrade rien alors que apt-get upgrade me trouve
des mises à jour .
root@trollfest:/home/cyrille# aptitude upgrade
Résolution des dépendances…
Aucun paquet ne va être installé, mis à jour ou
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 à 14:40 +0200, Gabriel Euzet a écrit :
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions
dans Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 - 4.10). Dans
aptitude il explose sur les dépendance et ne me propose que d'enlever
xfce4 (ou aucun upgrade
Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 08:09:39, Bruno Muller a écrit :
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 à 14:40 +0200, Gabriel Euzet a écrit :
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions
dans Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 - 4.10). Dans
aptitude il explose sur les
le 24/05/2013 10:45, Klaus Becker a écrit:
$ apt-cache policy xfce4
xfce4:
Installé : 4.8.0.3
Candidat : 4.10.1
Table de version :
4.10.1 0
500 ftp://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
*** 4.8.0.3 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Salut,
Le vendredi 24 mai 2013 à 08:45 +, Klaus Becker a écrit :
Si, ce matin j'ai :
Tu es plus au courant que les mainteneurs de xfce
(http://www.corsac.net/?rub=blogpost=1553 et
http://www.corsac.net/?rub=blogpost=1554). Chapeau !
Je te laisse expliquer comment installer la version 4.10 à partir
Bonjour,
Petit problème facilement résolu par vous :-)
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions dans
Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 - 4.10). Dans aptitude il
explose sur les dépendance et ne me propose que d'enlever xfce4 (ou aucun
upgrade ...).
Bonjour,
il faut être patient, toutes les dépendances ne sont pas encore descendues...
Gabriel Euzet a écrit :
Bonjour,
Petit problème facilement résolu par vous :-) Depuis la sortie de wheezy et
donc la descente de nouvelles versions dans Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à
jour xfce (4.8 -
Ok. Merci bien.
Je croyais que tout descendait à la fois. Me suis fourvoyé :-)
Le 23 mai 2013 14:52, Bernardo bernardo.s...@siorat.net a écrit :
Bonjour,
il faut être patient, toutes les dépendances ne sont pas encore
descendues...
Gabriel Euzet a écrit :
Bonjour,
Petit problème
Le Thu, 23 May 2013 14:40:45 +0200,
Gabriel Euzet geu...@sqli.com a écrit :
Bonjour,
Petit problème facilement résolu par vous :-)
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions
dans Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 - 4.10). Dans
aptitude il explose sur
On Thursday 23 May 2013 14:40:45 Gabriel Euzet wrote:
Petit problème facilement résolu par vous :-)
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions dans
Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 - 4.10). Dans aptitude il
explose sur les dépendance et ne me propose que
On Thu, 23 May 2013 17:31:28 +0200
andre_deb...@numericable.fr wrote:
Mais dans Sid, je sais pas.
C'est en cours, la MàJ d'avant-hier voulait me désinstaller la moitié
de XFCE.
--
@anoname: En fait un taser c'est juste un moyen de faire passer
le courant entre les flics et la
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 15:31:28, andre_deb...@numericable.fr a écrit :
On Thursday 23 May 2013 14:40:45 Gabriel Euzet wrote:
Petit problème facilement résolu par vous :-)
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions dans
Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 -
Bonsoir
$ apt-cache policy xfce4
xfce4:
Installé : (aucun)
Candidat : 4.10.1
Table de version :
4.10.1 0
500 ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
Donc 4.10 dans Sid
Bizarre, je suis sous SID (enfin je pense)
et
# aptitude show xfce4
Paquet : xfce4
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 16:16:11, Cyrille a écrit :
Bonsoir
$ apt-cache policy xfce4
xfce4:
Installé : (aucun)
Candidat : 4.10.1
Table de version :
4.10.1 0
500 ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian/ unstable/main amd64 Packages
Donc 4.10 dans Sid
Bizarre, je suis sous
Je suis sous Sid aussi. Essaye avec ftp.nerim.net/debian, on dirait qu'il n'y
a pas la même version sur les 2 serveurs. As-tu fait un update de tes sources
? On ne sait jamais...
Je ne suis pas sur que ce soit une question de mirroir,
je viens de voir
qu'aptitude upgrade ne m'upgrade rien
qu'aptitude upgrade ne m'upgrade rien alors que apt-get upgrade me trouve des
mises à jour .
root@trollfest:/home/cyrille# aptitude upgrade
Résolution des dépendances…
Aucun paquet ne va être installé, mis à jour ou enlevé.
0 paquets mis à jour, 0 nouvellement
Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 16:38:47, Cyrille a écrit :
Je suis sous Sid aussi. Essaye avec ftp.nerim.net/debian, on dirait qu'il
n'y a pas la même version sur les 2 serveurs. As-tu fait un update de tes
sources ? On ne sait jamais...
Je ne suis pas sur que ce soit une question de mirroir,
On 05/23/2013 02:40 PM, Gabriel Euzet wrote:
Bonjour,
Petit problème facilement résolu par vous :-)
Depuis la sortie de wheezy et donc la descente de nouvelles versions
dans Sid, je n'arrive pas à mettre à jour xfce (4.8 - 4.10). Dans
aptitude il explose sur les dépendance et ne me propose que
J'utiliserais directement Apt ou/et Dpkg.
Je vais suivre ce conseil :-)
--
Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question :
http://wiki.debian.org/fr/FrenchLists
Pour vous DESABONNER, envoyez un message avec comme objet unsubscribe
vers debian-user-french-requ...@lists.debian.org
En cas
Hi all,
Instead of letting my sid install age until something
breaks, I've been going through regular upgrade/dist-upgrade
cycles.
The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
Fn-F4).
I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
Any idea against which package I
Dear Joel,
Joel Roth wrote:
The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
Fn-F4).
I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
Cool. Does pm-suspend (a wrapper that does some funky things before
calling s2ram) work, too?
Any idea against which package I should
Claudius Hubig wrote:
Dear Joel,
Joel Roth wrote:
The latest upgrade has broken hot-key suspend-to-ram (invoked by
Fn-F4).
I find that s2ram *does* work, as well as hibernate.
Cool. Does pm-suspend (a wrapper that does some funky things before
calling s2ram) work, too?
yes, that
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 18/04/12 12:57 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
with digit update-initramfs:
Generating
On 18/04/12 02:42 PM, hvw59601 wrote:
Frank McCormick wrote:
On 18/04/12 12:57 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
with digit update-initramfs:
Generating /boot/initrd.img-v dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax:
version
On 18/04/12 12:57 AM, Frank McCormick wrote:
This is what I saw after the last upgrade on my Sid installation:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
dpkg: warning: version 'v' has bad syntax: version number does not start
with digit update-initramfs:
Generating /boot/initrd.img-v dpkg:
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 13:57:33 -0500, hvw59601 wrote:
Running Sid and just did a dist-upgrade.
Use google-chrome-beta as browser and after the upgrade the tabs are
slow: when you click one with mouse or kbd, there is a slight
hesitation before the page is selected that wasn't
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
