Re: what's the better mta?

1997-08-01 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Jul 29, George Bonser wrote: If you have one system that is your all-around linux box, I would suggest that you go with cnews. Is this really necessary? If you have only little news traffic, you should consider the leafnode package. It is a zero-admin news server... easy to configure, and

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-08-01 Thread George Bonser
On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: Is this really necessary? If you have only little news traffic, you should consider the leafnode package. It is a zero-admin news server... easy to configure, and very small. I would suggest newsX in that case instead of leafnode but cnews allows

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-08-01 Thread jghasler
George Bonser writes: ...cnews allows you to easilly spool a few groups to a neighbor via UUCP. I also find it to require zero administration. -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED]Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-31 Thread Johnie Ingram
jghasler == jghasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: jghasler Perhaps someone who has gotten into sendmail could write a jghasler sendmail.cf generator? I know about m4. It helps, but not jghasler enough. Actually this is precisely what Debian's sendmailconfig is supposed to do, at least for the

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-31 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Wed, Jul 30, 1997 at 11:48:25AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Manoj Srivastava writes: : Hacking sendmail.cf is a mindset. Once you get into it (lord help me, : I've been there), there is an elegant simplicity about the rules. : : Perhaps someone who has gotten into sendmail could write

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread George Bonser
On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Jason Costomiris wrote: The problem with smail is that you are vulnerable to being used as a spam relay. Unles you put something like Blackmail ( ftp.bitgate.com) in front of it. With sendmail, qmail or exim, I can turn that off. Here's a sample sendmail .mc

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, George == George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: George All that gibberish that you posted concerning rulesets is one George of the main reasons that I trashed sendmail after using for George about a year. George If I had a smtp only site, I would use exim. The relay policy George is very

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread George Bonser
You sound just like my wife, bless her heart. She advances equally cogent (near identical, in fact) arguments detailing to me exactly why Microsoft operating sytems are so much, much better than the garbage that Unix puts out. Now, now. I was not talking about being brain dead,

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread Martin Schulze
Jason Costomiris writes: On Tue, Jul 29, 1997 at 08:52:47AM -0700, George Bonser wrote: : : I use smail. It is a lot easier to get configured than sendmail and there : have been fewer security problems with it. If you have a small site, run : it out of inetd and use your hosts.allow and

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, George == George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You sound just like my wife, bless her heart. She advances equally cogent (near identical, in fact) arguments detailing to me exactly why Microsoft operating sytems are so much, much better than the garbage that Unix puts out. George Now,

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Jul 29, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote I'm installing a linux box as mail server, and would like to know what is the better MTA to use. I'm thinking about smail, but I guess sendmail is most popular. Anyway, I don't discard another mta, since it's realy good. I use exim and have been happy with

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread Adrian Bridgett
On Jul 29, George Bonser wrote If you have one system that is your all-around linux box, I would suggest that you go with cnews. If you are setting up a dedicated news machine, use INN and load it with as much RAM as you can afford plus a little more. From inn's description: INN is

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread jghasler
Manoj Srivastava writes: Hacking sendmail.cf is a mindset. Once you get into it (lord help me, I've been there), there is an elegant simplicity about the rules. Perhaps someone who has gotten into sendmail could write a sendmail.cf generator? I know about m4. It helps, but not enough. --

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-30 Thread George Bonser
On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote: I have just installed my own newsserver running inn. Why is cnews better? Less resource hungry? Easier to setup? It is MUCH less resource hungry for a small site that must have its systems wear many hats. I use cnews+nntpd+msgidd (msgidd comes with

what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Bruno O. M. Simoes
Hi I'm installing a linux box as mail server, and would like to know what is the better MTA to use. I'm thinking about smail, but I guess sendmail is most popular. Anyway, I don't discard another mta, since it's realy good. Do you have any sugestion? thank you Bruno -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS

what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Bruno O. M. Simoes
Hi As I asked before, I also would like to know if there's a recomended _news_ server Regards Bruno -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Martin Schulze
On Jul 29, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote I'm installing a linux box as mail server, and would like to know what is the better MTA to use. I'm thinking about smail, but I guess sendmail is most popular. Anyway, I don't discard another mta, since it's realy good. Do you have any sugestion? Using

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Bruno O. M. Simoes
Hi Joey Using Debian GNU/Linux you are able to use some different MTAs. I know this... You shoul depend your decision which one to use on you personal experiences and your needs. You're right. The question 'which is the better mta' can't be answered. It's the same as with 'is emacs better than

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Martin Schulze
On Jul 29, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote If you're not familiar with any mta it would be a good idea to install one and try to configure it. If you fail, purge it and install the next one. You'll find the mta you like best. So my question is wich is the most used, principally because I want to

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread George Bonser
If you have one system that is your all-around linux box, I would suggest that you go with cnews. If you are setting up a dedicated news machine, use INN and load it with as much RAM as you can afford plus a little more. On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote: Hi As I asked before,

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread George Bonser
I use smail. It is a lot easier to get configured than sendmail and there have been fewer security problems with it. If you have a small site, run it out of inetd and use your hosts.allow and hosts.deny to manage access if you are connected to the net full time. On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Bruno O.

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Tue, Jul 29, 1997 at 12:03:15PM -0300, Bruno O. M. Simoes wrote: : So my question is wich is the most used, principally because I want to have : a good support, anyway. I would take some like exim that must to be good, : but a small people know it. Sendmail is definitely the most popular/best

Re: what's the better mta?

1997-07-29 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Tue, Jul 29, 1997 at 08:52:47AM -0700, George Bonser wrote: : : I use smail. It is a lot easier to get configured than sendmail and there : have been fewer security problems with it. If you have a small site, run : it out of inetd and use your hosts.allow and hosts.deny to manage access : if