On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:23:11PM +, . . wrote:
> Hi everyone I'm tring to build Xfree 4.3 on my debian system because I need
> a patch to the siliconmotion driver that has only been committed in 4.3.99.
>
> I'm trying two separate paths, and I'm stuck in either.
Hi everyone I'm tring to build Xfree 4.3 on my debian system because I need
a patch to the siliconmotion driver that has only been committed in 4.3.99.
I'm trying two separate paths, and I'm stuck in either.
First I'm trying to build a deb binary package from xfree86_4
Hello
James Hosken (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I've just installed woody for the first time and I can't get X to run.
> It was surgested that I upgrade to xfree V4.2.1-6 from
> http://people.fsn.hu/~pasztor/debian
> I did that and still it will not run.
&g
I've just installed woody for the first time and I can't get X to run.
It was surgested that I upgrade to xfree V4.2.1-6 from
http://people.fsn.hu/~pasztor/debian
I did that and still it will not run.
I've tried running
dpkg-recomfigure xserver-xfree86
xf86config
Hardware: Matrox
blem took place when I entered dselect in order to
REALLY configure my system. There was a LOT of conflicts. And I
couldn't make head or tails out of these things.
Maybe the problems manifasted themselves when I installed a new kernel
and a new testing version of XFree 3.2.
How should I fi
st the touch.)
>
> I also downloaded XFree 4.3.0 and it looks like this worked somewhat.
> I am no able to start X by issuing the X command. But no mouse is
> found, from /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
>
> (EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device /dev/input
recompile the kernel often in the old days, but I
seem to have lost the touch.)
I also downloaded XFree 4.3.0 and it looks like this worked somewhat.
I am no able to start X by issuing the X command. But no mouse is
found, from /var/log/XFree86.0.log:
(EE) xf86OpenSerial: Cannot open device
At 07 Oct 2003 14:53:42 +0200,
Jon Haugsand wrote:
>
> * Matthias Hentges
> > There is nothing wrong to see here. Please post the complete log.
> > Or try starting X manually:
> >
> > $ X
> > $ export DISPLAY=:0
> > $ xterm
> >
> > If you have a working X with a xterm running now, there is proba
* Matthias Hentges
> There is nothing wrong to see here. Please post the complete log.
> Or try starting X manually:
>
> $ X
> $ export DISPLAY=:0
> $ xterm
>
> If you have a working X with a xterm running now, there is probably a
> problem with your windowmanager (KDE, Gnome?) or Displaymanager
On 6 Oct 2003, Jon Haugsand wrote:
>
> The Dell C400 is troublesome, in particular with Debian since its
> policy of conservative upgrades. Anyway, I have downloaded the
> following packages:
>
> XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Debian 4.3.0-0ds2.0.0woody1 20030307145421 marcelo@)
> kernel-source-2.4.22
Well, if RH works, why not just steal the XF86Config file it
generates! Thats how I got my first non RPM system working!
I guess you dont have either NVIDIA or ATI but some onboard VGA chip.
I've never used this one, so my config file is probably useless to you.
Naitik.
On 07 Oct 2003 08:17:43 +
* Naitik Shah
> What graphics card are you using? Nvidia or ATI? Did you install the
> appropriate drivers? Did you change the driver setting in your
> XF86Config ? There's a dell laptop users mailing list on yahoo groups
> which is where I figured out how to get my inspiron to work. Go through
> t
What graphics card are you using? Nvidia or ATI? Did you install the
appropriate drivers? Did you change the driver setting in your
XF86Config ? There's a dell laptop users mailing list on yahoo groups
which is where I figured out how to get my inspiron to work. Go through
their archives and files
Am Mon, 2003-10-06 um 16.37 schrieb Jon Haugsand:
> The Dell C400 is troublesome, in particular with Debian since its
> policy of conservative upgrades. Anyway, I have downloaded the
> following packages:
>
> XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Debian 4.3.0-0ds2.0.0woody1 20030307145421 marcelo@)
> kernel-sou
The Dell C400 is troublesome, in particular with Debian since its
policy of conservative upgrades. Anyway, I have downloaded the
following packages:
XFree86 Version 4.3.0 (Debian 4.3.0-0ds2.0.0woody1 20030307145421 marcelo@)
kernel-source-2.4.22
The kernel recompiled with settings as recommende
ute
apt-get upgrade
and
Instead of upgrading Xfree, it tells me
The following packages have been kept back
x-window-system-core xserver-common xserver-sfree86
0 packaes upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded
What am I doing wrong?
As always, I am grateful for assistance.
So
deb file:/root xfree4/
to /etc/apt/sources.list
I execute
apt-get update
it returns
Reading Package List... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
I execute
apt-get upgrade
and
Instead of upgrading Xfree, it tells me
The following packages have been kept back
x-window-system-core xserver-com
skippi wrote:
I will not mention how I stupidly fdisked the drive with all my
personal/important data on it. Good thing I learned about making backups on a
regular basis.
Checkout parted. It will recover deleted partitions (assuming you have
not already repartitioned and put new data on ther
Thank all of you for the responses.
I think I see what I'm doing wrong, and I'm going to go about trying to fix
it. I will naturally let the list know how it turns out.
Again, thank you all for helping me with my frustration. I mean I was
seriously ticked off today
I will not mention how
v
>
> Can anyone advise me on these packages?? Please, please, please...
>
> I'm glad my Windoze install is working. I think I'm going to fire up a game
> and kill something.
>
> Thank you in advance for any and all assitance. Oh, and for those of you just
> jo
skippi wrote:
= Original Message From Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
skippi wrote:
Thank you in advance for any and all assitance. Oh, and for those of you
just
joining in, I'm trying to build, or install, XFree v4.3. I have the files
to
build it, also the deb files to
>= Original Message From Travis Crump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> =
>skippi wrote:
>> Thank you in advance for any and all assitance. Oh, and for those of you
just
>> joining in, I'm trying to build, or install, XFree v4.3. I have the files
to
>> build it, al
skippi wrote:
Thank you in advance for any and all assitance. Oh, and for those of you just
joining in, I'm trying to build, or install, XFree v4.3. I have the files to
build it, also the deb files to install it, but I can't upgrade as the
packages are kept back. I would surmise th
onfig1-dev
fontconfig
libxft2-dev
libxrender-dev
libxcursor-dev
Can anyone advise me on these packages?? Please, please, please...
I'm glad my Windoze install is working. I think I'm going to fire up a game
and kill something.
Thank you in advance for any and all assitance. Oh, a
; >>controller is Intel Extreme Graphics 2, 82865G Graphics and Memory Controller
> >>Hub, 865G chipset. Is this supported under the Xfree that comes with Woody?
> >>Or am I going to be having to do lots of building from source? I have found a
> >
> >
>
r the Xfree that comes with Woody?
Or am I going to be having to do lots of building from source? I have found a
have a look at:
http://support.intel.com/support/graphics/linux/graphics.htm
It says you'll need X 4.3, but it also said this to my i845G VGA,
and yet it works fine on my SID
n) when it was time
to select what type of video card/chip set you have, do you recall what you
selected? I just put my system together yesterday and installed the base
Debian system. I installed Xfree and tried to configure it, but evidently my
first choice (and I actually don't rec
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:08:23AM -0600, skippi wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I have acquired a new motherboard. It's an Intel D865GBF. The onboard video
> controller is Intel Extreme Graphics 2, 82865G Graphics and Memory Controller
> Hub, 865G chipset. Is this supported
Greetings all.
I have acquired a new motherboard. It's an Intel D865GBF. The onboard video
controller is Intel Extreme Graphics 2, 82865G Graphics and Memory Controller
Hub, 865G chipset. Is this supported under the Xfree that comes with Woody?
Or am I going to be having to do lo
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Russell Shaw
> > often). Some of these errors may go away if you put this in apt.conf:
> >
> > APT::Default-Release "testing";
> > APT::Cache-Limit 1000;
>
> I do not seem to have any apt.conf, but I do have an
> /etc/apt/apt.c
On ש', 2003-09-20 at 17:45, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Russell Shaw
> > >>Also, put an official "testing" source into sources.list too.
> > For testing:
> >deb ftp://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>
> But I still cannot g
* Russell Shaw
> often). Some of these errors may go away if you put this in apt.conf:
>
> APT::Default-Release "testing";
> APT::Cache-Limit 1000;
I do not seem to have any apt.conf, but I do have an
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d directory. Should I make the file
/etc/apt/apt.conf, or should I put th
* Russell Shaw
> >>Also, put an official "testing" source into sources.list too.
> For testing:
>deb ftp://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
But I still cannot get XFree 4.3 into my Debian, look:
X -version
This is a pre-release version of XFre
Greetings. I would like to try installing X3 and see if it works better than X4 with
my box. I have found this to be the case with Mandrake, and while X4 works under
Debian, it's a bit slow.
Now, I attempted this once and managed to screw up everything. Not only did X3 not
work, but I couldn
Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Russell Shaw
dpkg --audit
or
dpkg --yet-to-unpack
dpkg --audit
The following packages are only half configured, probably due to problems
configuring them the first time. The configuration should be retried using
dpkg --configure or the configure menu option in dselect:
c
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 04:51:57PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> >
> > Try: apt-get install -t testing --fix-broken console-common
>
During the last upgrade to testing I too faced the same problem with
console-common. Yesterday I noticed that versions in testing had
changed. Even apt-cach
* Russell Shaw
>
> dpkg --audit
> or
> dpkg --yet-to-unpack
dpkg --audit
The following packages are only half configured, probably due to problems
configuring them the first time. The configuration should be retried using
dpkg --configure or the configure menu option in dselect:
console-common
Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Russell Shaw
Hmm, I still have problems:
apt-get install -t testing xfree86-common xbase-clients xserver-xfree86 xlibs
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Sorry, xfree86-common is already the newest version.
Sorry, xbase-clients is already the newest versio
* Russell Shaw
Hmm, I still have problems:
apt-get install -t testing xfree86-common xbase-clients xserver-xfree86 xlibs
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Sorry, xfree86-common is already the newest version.
Sorry, xbase-clients is already the newest version.
Sorry, xserver-xf
Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Russell Shaw
E: Sorry, broken packages
I think by setting up apt-get "pinning" or something, these
dependancies
can be downloaded and installed automatically. However, i haven't figured
that out, so i resolve these problems manually (it doesn't happen very
often). Some of the
* Russell Shaw
> >> E: Sorry, broken packages
> > I think by setting up apt-get "pinning" or something, these
> > dependancies
> > can be downloaded and installed automatically. However, i haven't figured
> > that out, so i resolve these problems manually (it doesn't happen very
> > often). Some of
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 04:59:15PM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> * Russell Shaw
> ># XFree86 4.3:
> >deb http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/experimental/ ./
> >
> > (i have sources for "testing" distro too)
> >
> > apt-get update
> > apt-get install -t testing xfree86-common xbas
Russell Shaw wrote:
Jon Haugsand wrote:
...
E: Sorry, broken packages
I think by setting up apt-get "pinning" or something, these dependancies
can be downloaded and installed automatically. However, i haven't figured
that out, so i resolve these problems manually (it doesn't happen very
often).
Jon Haugsand wrote:
* Russell Shaw
# XFree86 4.3:
deb http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/experimental/ ./
(i have sources for "testing" distro too)
apt-get update
apt-get install -t testing xfree86-common xbase-clients xserver-xfree86 xlibs
xserver-xfree86 xlibs
Reading Package List
* Russell Shaw
># XFree86 4.3:
>deb http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/experimental/ ./
>
> (i have sources for "testing" distro too)
>
> apt-get update
> apt-get install -t testing xfree86-common xbase-clients xserver-xfree86 xlibs
>
xserver-xfree86 xlibs
Reading Package Lists
David Z Maze wrote:
Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
my Woody laptop.
IMHO, you'll run into too many problems if you try to go the backport
route; lots of things depend on the X libraries (which, fundam
Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
> my Woody laptop.
IMHO, you'll run into too many problems if you try to go the backport
route; lots of things depend on the X libraries (which, fundamentally,
* Colin Watson
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
>> My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
>> my Woody laptop. Trying:
>>
>> apt-get install x-window-system=4.3
>
> You can't make up version
* Paul Johnson
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
>> My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
>> my Woody laptop. Trying:
>
> Look for a backport on apt-get.org or upgrade to sid.
That's what I did:
deb htt
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
> my Woody laptop. Trying:
>
> apt-get install x-window-system=4.3
You can't make up version numbers like that, in general; you need to
lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Jon Haugsand wrote:
> My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
> my Woody laptop. Trying:
Look for a backport on apt-get.org or upgrade to sid.
- --
.'
* Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030829 18:09]:
> * Nick Hastings
> > apt-get install xserver-xfree86
>
> Why did it work to write:
>
> apt-get install x-window-system
Because x-window-system is a meta-package that depends on
x-window-system-core, which is another meta-package which depends o
* Nick Hastings
> apt-get install xserver-xfree86
Why did it work to write:
apt-get install x-window-system
--
Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.norges-bank.no
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Jon Haugsand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030829 16:01]:
> My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
> my Woody laptop. Trying:
>
> deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
> deb http://people.debian.org/~mmag
My Dell Latitude needs XFree 4.3, but I'm not sure how to get it for
my Woody laptop. Trying:
apt-get install x-window-system=4.3
Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
E: Version '4.3' for 'x-window-system' was not found
This is my sources.list:
deb
Louie Miranda declaimed:
> btw, Matrox G450 is working under 4.1.0-16 (xfree-86 - stable package from
> debian)
> Its working on my machine now.. :D hehe.
You've probably figured this out by now, but just to state a couple of
points explicitly:
The HorizSync and VertRefresh rang
btw, Matrox G450 is working under 4.1.0-16 (xfree-86 - stable package from
debian)
Its working on my machine now.. :D hehe.
--- -
Thanks,
Louie Miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Louie Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi, based on the xfree.org website, (btw, my xfree86 version is 4.1.0-16)
so.. on the
website of xfree, G450 is already supported using the mga driver.
http://www.xfree.org/4.1.0/Status18.html#18 - mga driver info
--- -
Thanks,
Louie Miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Bob P
Louie Miranda wrote:
> (EE) MGA: Failed to load module "mga_hal" (module does not exist, 0)
> (II) MGA(0): Matrox HAL module not found - using builtin mode setup instead
This is not a complete answer. Just another data point.
That is the Hardware Abstraction Layer and is part of the matrox
drive
it w/ me what did you put on ur BusID, etc?
I'm looking for it at matrox website, but could not find it.
--- -
Thanks,
Louie Miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Louie Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednes
ks i'll try it now. Email you guys again,
wait..
What's type is your maxtrox card?
--- -
Thanks,
Louie Miranda
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: xf
.
>
> I also choose on xf86config the list of chips, i choose matrox
> millennium G400, i dont know
> if it had a problem if my M-G450 im using.
>
> Error below, and full xf86 log attached.
>
> -- error generated by xfree, when starting startx
> (EE) VE
0 im using.
Error below, and full xf86 log attached.
-- error generated by xfree, when starting startx
(EE) VESA(0): No matching modes
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvgahw.a
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
Fatal server error:
no screens f
Hi there,
I am looking for an configuration for my L1810B Flatscreen.
My system is a Woody one with default installation (Xfree86 4.2)
--
Rene Schrader-Boelsche renevilla-cossio.com
Heidberg 12www.villa-cossio.com
D-24641 Stuvenborn +49 (0)4194 988570
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi
Hello
I Read a message you posted last year , and I have the same problem.
If I use xdm or startx, fvwm crashes with an error about font loading. It only works
with gdm.
Even if I launch an xterm, and than call fvwm, it dies with the same error.
Did you solve the problem?
Do you have an answ
Hi,
Yeah that was exactly it, I found the patch on the rage forum, applied
it to the drivers, and now everything works fine!
Thanks very much for your help!
Rus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Nick wrote:
> Sorry for chiming in late...
>
> With standard 2.4.x kernel drivers, AGP 8x isn't supported for that
> chipset,
> so 4x is strictly necessary, but I couldn't change it from the BIOS.
> However,
> there's a way around this. On the Rage3D (www.rage3d.com) board,
someone
> posted a pa
Sorry for chiming in late...
On Sunday 27 July 2003 21:41, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Nick wrote:
> > I get the same error when it comes to the board being third party, but
> > everything still works fine. I also recently upgraded to the July 22
> > driver, and it works fine too. Seems they fixed Xx supp
Nick wrote:
> I get the same error when it comes to the board being third party, but
> everything still works fine. I also recently upgraded to the July 22
> driver, and it works fine too. Seems they fixed Xx support.
>
> I don't know why you are getting that error. Did you compile agpgart
> inot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Jul 26, 2003 at 12:11:52PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> >Ah, cool. Any gotchas like kernel modules I'll have to deal with?
> >
> >
> >
> The 2 scripts will build and install the modules for you. Is that what
> you mean?
Yeah, but thankfully
Hiyall & Nick & Paul,
who typed
Nick Lidakis wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:28:10PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Check out the release notes for the driver. They provide specific
instructions on how to get the RPM install
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:28:10PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote:
Check out the release notes for the driver. They provide specific
instructions on how to get the RPM install with Debian. I got it going
ina few minutes using alien
Rus Hughes wrote:
Sorry for not replying sooner but I've only just now had time to try it
out. I did exactly as you said, although they updated the driver on the
site to: Driver Version X4.2.0-2.9.13 on July 22 (I also downgraded to
the 2.4.21 kernel) and the fglrx module compiled and installed
pe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:28:10PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> Check out the release notes for the driver. They provide specific
> instructions on how to get the RPM install with Debian. I got it going
> ina few minutes using alien and dpkg.
Ah, c
> After installing the .deb you should cd into
> /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/ and edit the file make.sh.
>
> You should see something like:
>
> # assing default location of linux kernel headers
> # *** adapt to your individual setup if needed ***
> #linuxincludes=/usr/include# no config info
Paul Johnson wrote:
Anything's gotta be better than what I've got right now...anybody know
the ETA of seeing this in Debianized form?
Check out the release notes for the driver. They provide specific
instructions on how to get the RPM install with Debian. I got it going
ina few minutes usi
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:25:23PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote:
I thought someone on the list might want to know that ATI released
updated drivers for their Radeon Fire GL and consumer 8500 series and
above video cards.
Anything's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:25:23PM -0500, Nick Lidakis wrote:
> I thought someone on the list might want to know that ATI released
> updated drivers for their Radeon Fire GL and consumer 8500 series and
> above video cards.
Anything's gotta be bette
Nick Lidakis wrote:
I thought someone on the list might want to know that ATI released
updated drivers for their Radeon Fire GL and consumer 8500 series and
above video cards.
The release notes are exactly the same as the previous version, but I
thought I might give them a spin since Xv was a bi
I thought someone on the list might want to know that ATI released
updated drivers for their Radeon Fire GL and consumer 8500 series and
above video cards.
The release notes are exactly the same as the previous version, but I
thought I might give them a spin since Xv was a bit broken in the last
On Sunday 13 July 2003 00:15, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Thanks, I just tried this and it works, which is great! \o/ The
> performance is utterly lousy though, moving windows about and scrolling
> in epiphany etc but I assume the DRI thing will sort that out if I get
> it sussed.
Did you leave "no_accel"
Rus Hughes wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
(version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
installed it. I rolled my own kernel (2.5.73), and tried to build the
Fir
4:23
> To: Debian User Listie
> Subject: Re: Hercules 9800 Pro and XFree under unstable.
>
>
>
> Hi Yall & Rus,
>
> who is having some grief with his Radeon 9800 under Tux.
>
> Yeah, I've been down that road too & now have my 9500 Pro up with full
> 3D,
> Until you get the DRM module to compile, try
>
> Option "no_dri" "yes"
>
> and disable loading the dri module in your XF86Config. That way, it
should
> not
> be dependent on DRM.
Thanks, I just tried this and it works, which is great! \o/ The
performance is utterly lous
Hi Yall & Rus,
who is having some grief with his Radeon 9800 under Tux.
Yeah, I've been down that road too & now have my 9500 Pro up with full
3D, on a nForce2 board
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haralambos]$ glxgears
13880 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2776.000 FPS
17298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3459.600 FPS
On Saturday 12 July 2003 18:57, Rus Hughes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
> (version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
> the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
> installed it. I rolled my own k
Rus Hughes wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
(version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
installed it. I rolled my own kernel (2.5.73), and tried to build the
Fire
Hi,
I'm trying to get a Hercules Radeon 9800 Pro running with XFree86
(version 4.2.1) in Debian Unstable. After reading the readmes, I turned
the fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.9.13.i586.rpm into a deb with alien and
installed it. I rolled my own kernel (2.5.73), and tried to build the
FireGL kernel modules
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 06:08, Voicu Liviu wrote:
> Hi debians :-)
> I'm pretty new on debian so please understand me :-)
>
> I have installed the base system of STABLE ver 3.
>
> I also made the /etc/apt/sources.list file with my local mirrors.
> Now I try to run:
> #
ans :-)
> I'm pretty new on debian so please understand me :-)
>
> I have installed the base system of STABLE ver 3.
>
> I also made the /etc/apt/sources.list file with my local mirrors.
> Now I try to run:
> #apt-get install xfree
> and I get not found, also the same
Voicu Liviu wrote:
> Hi debians :-)
> I'm pretty new on debian so please understand me :-)
>
> I have installed the base system of STABLE ver 3.
>
> I also made the /etc/apt/sources.list file with my local mirrors.
> Now I try to run:
> #apt-get install xfree
&g
That remarkable Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 08:08, Voicu Liviu wrote:
>
> I also made the /etc/apt/sources.list file with my local mirrors.
> Now I try to run:
> #apt-get install xfree
> and I get not found, also the same message for gnome.
hi,
if you
apt-cache search xfree
one
On Monday 30 June 2003 07:08, Voicu Liviu wrote:
> Hi debians :-)
> I'm pretty new on debian so please understand me :-)
>
> I have installed the base system of STABLE ver 3.
>
> I also made the /etc/apt/sources.list file with my local mirrors.
> Now I try to run:
> #
Hi debians :-)
I'm pretty new on debian so please understand me :-)
I have installed the base system of STABLE ver 3.
I also made the /etc/apt/sources.list file with my local mirrors.
Now I try to run:
#apt-get install xfree
and I get not found, also the same message for gnome.
Please, any
LeVA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
L> There is a section named Modules in the XF86Config-4 file. Has
L> somebody a howto, or doc page where is some explanation about
L> the modules? For example "dbe" "ddc" "vbe" "dri" "extmod"
L> "glx" "pex5" "record" "xie" "xtrap" "speedo" "type1" "GLcore"
L> "bitm
Hi!
There is a section named Modules in the XF86Config-4 file. Has somebody
a howto, or doc page where is some explanation about the modules?
For example "dbe" "ddc" "vbe" "dri" "extmod" "glx" "pex5" "record" "xie"
"xtrap" "speedo" "type1" "GLcore" "bitmap" "dbe" "ddc" "freetype"
"int10" "vbe" etc
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 08:19, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:51:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It does if you have read-edit, mdetect, and discover installed.
> ^
It's a typo; read-edid is correct
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 08:19:02AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:51:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It does if you have read-edit, mdetect, and discover installed.
> ^
> What package? I can't seem to find this.
read-edid
--
Colin Watson
Joey Hess writes:
> It does if you have read-edit, mdetect, and discover installed.
I assume that "read-edit" above should be "read-edid"?
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 11:51:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It does if you have read-edit, mdetect, and discover installed.
^
What package? I can't seem to find this.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
201 - 300 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo
