I don't want to see the
Mozilla print dialog at all - hence my use of the word 'directly'.
Hopefully QT builds in the future will do this though.
Ditto here. kprinter would be a perfect solution, if it weren't for
having to click through the useless Moz print dialog first.
--
To
* Andrew Schulman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Dec 01 15:50 -0600]:
I don't want to see the
Mozilla print dialog at all - hence my use of the word 'directly'.
Hopefully QT builds in the future will do this though.
Ditto here. kprinter would be a perfect solution, if it weren't for
having
On 23 Nov 2004, Nate Bargmann wrote:
* Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 16:38 -0600]:
It seems that the page I can't print with firefox (with or without
xprt) prints fine with mozilla-browser. I tried firefox with xprt and
postscript and it continues to crash, without printing.
On 23 Nov 2004, Andrew Schulman wrote:
For now I will adopt if it ain't broke, don't fix it approach. I am
unsure of what removing x-window-system entails ... something to explore
when I have more time ;)
This shouldn't be hard. Just 'apt-get remove x-window-system', and see
what it
On (24/11/04 12:08), Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 23 Nov 2004, Andrew Schulman wrote:
For now I will adopt if it ain't broke, don't fix it approach. I am
unsure of what removing x-window-system entails ... something to explore
when I have more time ;)
This shouldn't be hard. Just
On Wed 24 November 2004 00:06, Brad Sims wrote:
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 9:14 pm, David P James wrote:
just wish I could pass print jobs off to kprinter directly and not
have to bother with Mozilla's annoying print system. Then again, I
mainly use Konq now and that's all I use to print.
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
Anyway, if someone could explain or point me to a document or thread
(which I couldn't find) that explains why we need xprint, how it fits
in, and what programs it replaces, I'd appreciate it.
I'm probably not alone ;-).
There was a
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
Anyway, if someone could explain or point me to a document or thread
(which I couldn't find) that explains why we need xprint, how it
fits in, and what
On (23/11/04 08:52), Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
Anyway, if someone could explain or point me to a document or thread
(which I couldn't find) that explains why we
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
Anyway, if someone could explain or point me to a document or thread
(which I couldn't find) that
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:15:14 +
Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (23/11/04 08:52), Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
Anyway, if someone could explain or
On (23/11/04 10:46), Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:15:14 +
Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On (23/11/04 08:52), Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 06:12 -0600]:
Anyway, if someone could
For now I will adopt if it ain't broke, don't fix it approach. I am
unsure of what removing x-window-system entails ... something to explore
when I have more time ;)
This shouldn't be hard. Just 'apt-get remove x-window-system', and see
what it wants to take out with it. You can always say
Probably not without a bit of work. x-window-system seems to be a meta
package that doesn't really provide anything, it just depends on a bunch
of other stuff - all the things that developer thought should be in a
basic x-window-system - including xprt.
I don't have
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:01:21AM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Printing has been working great in Mozilla-browser and galeon for me, as
well. No complaints at all.
I'm running Sarge, btw.
did you (or anyone else)
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bill Wohler [EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:52:03 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:28:40 +0100
Martin Lorenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:01:21AM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Printing has been working great in Mozilla-browser and galeon for
me, as
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:52:03 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Topa wrote:
| Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
|
|On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:52:03 -0500
|Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
|
|On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
|Wayne
* Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 16:38 -0600]:
It seems that the page I can't print with firefox (with or without
xprt) prints fine with mozilla-browser. I tried firefox with xprt and
postscript and it continues to crash, without printing. This is with
with the Debian package
* Jacob S [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 16:27 -0600]:
Actually, that's not true. apt-cache show mozilla-firefox reveals that
xprt is now only in the recommended line, instead of the Depends line.
In mozilla-browser it's in the Suggests line. I have been following the
latest Mozilla browser
On (23/11/04 15:52), Wayne Topa wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:17:29 -0500
Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:41:32 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 16:53:04 -0600
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Jacob S [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004 Nov 23 16:27 -0600]:
Actually, that's not true. apt-cache show mozilla-firefox reveals
that xprt is now only in the recommended line, instead of the
Depends line. In
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 1:28 pm, Martin Lorenz wrote:
did you (or anyone else) experience problems when printing pages which
contain non-latin-1 characters like this one:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C3%9Ftheorie
Nope worked just great here; but then I /do/ have a real
postscript
Juergen Fiedler([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wayne Topa wrote:
| Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
|
|On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:52:03 -0500
|Wayne Topa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
|
|Jacob S([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Clive Menzies([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
http://www.capital.net/~brittman/puppypic/puppies.html
for those that might want to try it for themselves.
It prints fine here on sid (firefox 1.0) ps/cups
Clive
Thanks Clive Nate. This is really strange. I'm using cups
and
On Tue 23 November 2004 19:34, Brian Nelson wrote:
Nate Bargmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There was a long thread about this a few months back. After
reading it and the bug reports the only technical reason that I
read was that xprt did a better job printing glyphs from other
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 9:14 pm, David P James wrote:
just wish I could pass print jobs off to kprinter directly and not
have to bother with Mozilla's annoying print system. Then again, I
mainly use Konq now and that's all I use to print.
Er under Mozilla does going to Print,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:19:33PM -0600, Jacob S wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:28:40 +0100
Martin Lorenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
did you (or anyone else) experience problems when printing pages which
contain non-latin-1 characters like this one:
Can someone please explain why we need xprint? Yeah, I'm frustrated that
a recent update broke my printing, but I'm using Sarge so I accept
change. In this case, I don't understand it.
Xprint seems to duplicate some of what we already have. Is it supposed
to be the new, shiny car on the block to
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:17:09 -0800
Bill Wohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please explain why we need xprint? Yeah, I'm frustrated
that a recent update broke my printing, but I'm using Sarge so I
accept change. In this case, I don't understand it.
Xprint seems to duplicate some of
33 matches
Mail list logo
