Re: [freetelecom.fr #1698607] Réponse Automatique: information

2004-07-18 Thread lesthibault
j'ai un abonnement free50heures.Le prélèvement de juin a été fait.Je reçois une facture de france télécom qui me demande 55heures37 en 273 appels sur internet du 8/05/04 au 7/07/04.j'ai voulu consulter ma cosomation sur mon forfait free et il apparait 0 heure.Jai l'impression de payer un forfait po

Re: A FIFO DAM, was: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

2004-07-18 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-07-17 18:37:17 +0100 David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:26:28AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: Is queue-jumping desirable? [...] Yes, it's definitely desirable. For instance, a person maintaining an important library that a lot of other packages depend on, is more

Cheap originial soft 0606

2004-07-18 Thread Tammy Boldosser
Dis(50e4c1908e5)con(1fe5e9d)tinue 9dwq20hI7de.g/o/51CrI2a1lcDiR1ruQMP1DhI9r/otwqT0 To bear other people's afflictions, everyone has courage and enough to spare.,For what avail the plough or sail, Or land or life, if freedom fail?,When I get a little money, I buy books and if any is left I buy f

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

2004-07-18 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-07-18 09:41:28 +0100 "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is the kind of thing you need in any GR long before I am willing to agree to it. You have lept to the GR strategy, failing to realize that the GR strategy should *presume* that you have done this work. This is my

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

2004-07-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Getting that information or getting amd64 added to sid would be the >> point of the revised GR. It would have to be worded in a way that >> forces ftp-master to add amd64 in a reasonable timefr

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

2004-07-18 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Getting that information or getting amd64 added to sid would be the > point of the revised GR. It would have to be worded in a way that > forces ftp-master to add amd64 in a reasonable timeframe unless he can > give reasons not to. It is the Proj

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

2004-07-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The only thing that can belong on vote (after being put in a revised >> GR) is the inclusion in sid [if it has to come to that]. That would be >> a GR to overturn the ftp-master decision (by in

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64

2004-07-18 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 05:16:10AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: [Big snip - Raul Miller wrote] > > If we release an amd64 in sarge, we're committing to supporting it. > > If the current port paints us into a corner, that's a good reason to > > not start supporting it yet. > > [Goswin replied]