I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
super majority to pass.
I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
Rationale
=
During the vote for GR_2021_002o, several developers said they were
uncomfortable voting because under the process at that time, their name
I wanted to give a diff from what I published as the second round to
what I formally proposed.
The changes should be removal of the text about putting secretary
decisions on hold and some indentation fixes in the rationale.
@@ -40,22 +40,20 @@ Summary of Changes
outcome requires a 3:1 majori
Sam Hartman writes:
> I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
> super majority to pass.
> I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
I sponsor the resolution quoted below.
> Rationale
> =
> During the vote for GR_2021_002o, several developers said they were
I sponsor the resolution quoted below.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:19:20AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
>I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
>super majority to pass.
>I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
>
>Rationale
>=
>
>During the vote for GR_2021_
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:19:20AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>
> I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
> super majority to pass.
> I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
>
I sponsor the resolution quoted below.
> Rationale
> =
>
> During the vote
Greetings,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 10:19:20AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
super majority to pass.
I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
I sponsor the resolution below.
Sincerely,
Filippo
Rationale
=
Durin
On Wed 23 Feb 2022 at 10:19AM -07, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
> super majority to pass.
> I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
I sponsor this resolution. Thanks Sam!
> Rationale
> =
>
> During the vote for GR_2021_002o
I sponsor the resolution quoted below.
Sam Hartman wrote on 23/02/2022 at 18:19:20+0100:
> I propose the followiwng general resolution, which will require a 3:1
> super majority to pass.
> I'm seeking sponsors for this resolution.
>
> Rationale
> =
>
> During the vote for GR_2021_002o, s
> "Pierre-Elliott" == Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
Pierre-Elliott> I sponsor the resolution quoted below.
I haven't gone and checked signatures, but unless someone's signature is
bad or something, I think that gives us more than enough sponsors.
--Sam
I propose a ballot option for the GR
"Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote"
that makes the following changes to the constitution.
1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote public.
6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification
> "Judit" == Judit Foglszinger writes:
Judit> Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without
Judit> needing to additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly
Judit> related constitution changes; for example for the change of
Judit> mode of voting from email to somethin
Seconded/sponsored.
Scott K
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:44:34 PM EST Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> I propose a ballot option for the GR
> "Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote"
> that makes the following changes to the constitution.
>
> 1) Do not make the identity of a vote
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 6:22:00 PM EST Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Judit" == Judit Foglszinger writes:
> Judit> Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without
> Judit> needing to additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly
> Judit> related constitution changes; for ex
* Sam Hartman [2022-02-23 16:22]:
> Even if you don't want to move toward some different voting system, do
> we really want to require a constitutional amendment if say the
...
Sam, I haven't followed the discussion closely, but when I read your
ballot I was *immediately* concerned about 3) and 4
> "Martin" == Martin Michlmayr writes:
Yes, I think 3) and 4) are much more important in hidden votes.
Even without 2, the constitution gives the secretary significant
flexibility in how the voting system is set up.
With hidden votes, several of us believe it is more likely that people
coul
I propose the following amendment to this ballot option, which if
rejected I propose as its own option:
modified english/devel/constitution.wml
@@ -266,7 +266,8 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.
-Votes are cast in a manner suitable to the Secretary.
+Votes are cast
Don Armstrong writes:
> I propose the following amendment to this ballot option, which if
> rejected I propose as its own option:
Just for clarity's sake for everyone following, since this process is now
a bit different, there is no longer a formal amendment process like this.
You just propose a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I like this option. Let's place it on the ballot. Thanks!
Kind regards,
Felix Lechner
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 5:44:34 PM EST Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> I propose a ballot option for the GR
> "Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Par
18 matches
Mail list logo
