Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org writes:
However, this topic does raise a question: Knowledge transfer. I might
be arguing on something marginally related to the vote at hand, but
anyway, when delegations shift (be it due to burnout, retirement,
rotation or whatever), we should make it as easy as
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
On 03/26/2013 09:28 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
I see
Zack's DPL helpers initiative as a step in this direction, and I'd like
to take it a little further.
How? Make it formal? Have new official positions? Or just push more
people to help and that's it
On 2013-03-25 09:55, Thomas Goirand wrote:
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of
the
people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing
On 2013-03-25 10:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
In his platform, Moray writes:
| I would also like us to take a more pre-emptive approach to such
issues
| by encouraging more turnover of members between different teams
I think that most teams require quite specific skills, and most team
members
Le Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:46:28PM -0600, Moray Allan a écrit :
Stepping down should be seen as a sign of accomplishment. It should
not be seen as losing the ability to provide advice. It should be
seen as an opportunity for someone to use their skills in other
aspects of the project, to
Charles Plessy dijo [Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:54:24PM +0900]:
Hi Moray,
what you wrote here presents the end of a delegation as a final point.
However, I was very interested by your use of rotation, which I was
understanding as a faster turnover where the responsibility of the delegation
is
On 2013-03-28 21:54, Charles Plessy wrote:
what you wrote here presents the end of a delegation as a final
point.
However, I was very interested by your use of rotation, which I was
understanding as a faster turnover where the responsibility of the
delegation
is passed through developers
I thought I'd answered everything again, but then I made the mistake of
mentioning Charles's post to Gunnar
Which reminds me: please tell me if I've missed a question on this list
during the campaign period that you were hoping for me to answer.
On 2013-03-28 22:36, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
On 03/26/2013 09:28 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
I see
Zack's DPL helpers initiative as a step in this direction, and I'd like
to take it a little further.
How? Make it formal? Have new official positions? Or just push more
people to help and that's it (which is ok too...)?
Thomas
--
To
Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org writes:
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of the
people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing
Hi all,
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of the
people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing anything?
Cheers,
Thomas
P.S: I have
On 25/03/13 at 23:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi all,
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of the
people currently holding a position? Why
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
For tasks not currently under
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
A few steps:
1. Talk to the current
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:27:24AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2006-03-12 kello 11:21 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
if a delegation is necessary, make it, by posting the
details to -project, or if necessary, -private.
Why -project and not -devel-announce?
I just wasn't assuming
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060311 20:48]:
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
Well, there are two parts of the answer.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
See also
Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I will delegate only people if they are ready for
it. As some example, if e.g. the policy team asks me to extend
themself by someone, I will (usually) do as requested.
If this is the case, why were you supporting a motion to forcibly
su, 2006-03-12 kello 11:21 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
if a delegation is necessary, make it, by posting the
details to -project, or if necessary, -private.
Why -project and not -devel-announce?
--
Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy. Love the Policy. Obey the
Policy.
--
To
20 matches
Mail list logo
