Le mardi 28 octobre 2008 à 20:38 +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
> So either we, the project, a) work with them and try to convince them of
> the merits of alternate proposals, or b) we could force a system they
> aren't convinced of upon them using a GR - probably not something that
> will work v
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> This completely ignores that now there are other proposals, like the ones of
> Lars and Raphaël, and suggest that the only path we want to explore it the one
> drafed by Joerg.
Well. Joerg and Christoph (and maybe James*) are the delegated DAMs
under
Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:21:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
>
> I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> The text I'm thinking about is currently this:
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes th
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 01:12:11PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> > > | We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce
> > > | mailinglist is not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large
> > > | part of our community.
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > | We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce
> > | mailinglist is not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large
> > | part of our community. We invite the DAM to further develop his ideas
> > | in close coordinatio
Hi
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:21:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
Thank you for proposing this option. I really like it's constructive tone.
>
> Th
I have a problem with this part:
> | We invite the DAM to further develop his ideas
> | in close coordination with other members of the project, and to present
> | a new and improved proposal on the project's mailinglists in the future,
> | at least two weeks prior to any planned implementation.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:21:57AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> The text I'm thinking about is currently this:
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 09:21, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
> so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
Good call.
> The text I'm thinking about is currently this:
[..]
> This is not a call for seconds
also sprach Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.10.28.0921 +0100]:
> | We thank Joerg Jaspert for exploring ideas on how to involve
> | contributors more closely with the project so that they can get both
> | recognition and the necessary tools to do their work.
The problem I have with this
Hi,
I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
The text I'm thinking about is currently this:
| The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
| not working withing established fram
11 matches
Mail list logo
