/Conflicts
can help streamline the process.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
igned to shorewall-doc is correct. In that
case, the source package association of shorewall-doc will change, but
its bugs will still belong to shorewall-doc (the binary package). If
you think about it, this must be the case, as closed and archived bugs
would end up being orphaned otherwise.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
lities so that you have have all
the source packages in view at the same time.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
lly dormant for some time):
https://gitlab.com/shorewall
It might make sense to consider if there is any overlap and if any of
the Salsa work might be better house under the Shorewall Gitlab group.
I'll try to jump in a bit more helpfully next week.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:33:47AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> But the Salsa project page says the repository is empty. I will push
> the code I have shortly.
>
I have pushed everything to the Salsa repository, including all branches
(master, upstream, pristine-tar) and ta
e shortly.
> The work can be found at https://ccel.org/ccel/henry.
>
> ThML sources are at https://ccel.org/ccel/henry/mhc{,1,2,3,4,5,6}.xml
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
It seems to be in NEW but cannot find it elsewhere
>
> https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mongo-cxx-driver_3.4.0-1.html
>
> Best.
> C
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
he spirit in which it was intended: to help you
produce a better free software tool and to improve as a developer.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
identified, even if it has never manifested itself in
the real world. If you doubt that, please review the recent news
surrounding the SPECTRE and MELTDOWN vulnerabilities.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
he RC bug upstream.
>
The only person from upstream with whom I had regular contact has moved
on a couple of years ago. I would recommend just approaching them
through whatever normal public channels they have available.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if repo I just published,
you will see a repack.sh script. That script removes upstream's debian/
directory and a non-free RFC text that they ship in their tarball.
Let me know if you have any other questions or if you require any
additional information.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánc
ou have any
questions about the package please don't hesitate to ask.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] https://mentors.debian.net/
[1] http://www.connexer.com/articles/debcustomize
[2] https://www.debian.org/devel/
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111217225432.ga27...@connexer.com
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 07:02:35PM -0430, Luis Alejandro Martínez Faneyth wrote:
On 17/12/11 18:24, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
What you have done is reinvent the wheel, and badly at that.
I coudn't find any other user friendly interface to manage user accounts
from an LDAP.
I should
, and that bug (#485827) does not appear on the WNPP page. The bug
you mention has been closed and is now archived.
It is, in fact, the same cpuset (same upstream author), so I have
unarchived it, reopened it, and merged the two bugs.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
as hwloc. Beyond that, I am
not sure how it compares, having never used hwloc.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, just send me your gpg key.
This mail is signed with my GPG key, but the 0xB2B97BB1 if you need
that. My key is in the Debian keyring.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
have a completed package? Would
you be willing to turn over or share maintenance of this package?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
repository for the packages?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
., there is no NAT in IPv6 and IPsec is part
of the spec instead of requiring encapsulation).
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to
support this. So, will you package this under the pkg-ruby-extras
repository? I'm in for it.
I know what you mean. It was very easy and quick to package, though,
and it is currently waiting in NEW.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
and listed easily.
I'm curious about something. I use ditrack and I am wondering what
differences/advantages cil has over ditrack. Are you aware of any?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I have maintained releaseforge in svn the whole time I have been
maintainer. If someone interested in adopting would like the entire svn
history, please let me know and I would be glad to provide it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
I have maintained vncsnapshot in svn the whole time I have been
maintainer. If someone interested in adopting would like the entire svn
history, please let me know and I would be glad to provide it.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 10:49:56AM -0700, Sebastien Delafond wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastien Delafond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libruby-rack
I believe the convention would indicate that the proper name is
librack-ruby.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
some sort of common language repository like
CPAN or CRAN or whatever if OCaml has something similar, it is probably
good to have some sort of common naming scheme.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description
not.
Incidentally, Joey Hess already packaged this and it is in NEW, so I
have closed the ITP.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and start looking for a sponsor.
If it us just a ruby script, is it sensible to use an entire package
for it? What about trying to get it included in another package that
has similar functionality already?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
will contact them before I do anything else. Thanks for the
info.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that the information in the old bug log is not lost.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/311597
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/366285
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/435219
[3] http://packages.debian.org/ajaxterm
[4] http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rote.html
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
Don't worry. I don't feel like my toes were stepped on. I just did not
want for you to have to unnecessarily pass the same headaches I did.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jose,
I saw that you have taken ownership for the wxPerl ITP. Do you have any
idea how soon we can expect the packages in Debian? If not, I'd like to
know if I can help or create some official packages myself.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
PROTECTED]
* URL : http://siahe.com/zekr
* License : Only free for non-commercial purposes
Mesh with this^
??
Am I missing something?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
Anyone adopting Dillo should also keep in mind that upstream is
basically dead, or at least in a very deep freeze.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
... and compiles it to iptables code?!)
The sh for the -perl package was a mistake.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:59:06PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
Programming Lang: sh
Description : Shoreline Firewall, Netfilter configurator (perl-based)
Let's make that perl so that it makes sense :-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
of Shorewall is not in the standard upgrade path.
However, it will still be available to those who would like to switch.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a 3.4 release of Shorewall when Lenny releases. This package
will provide the upgrade path to those who are using the current
shorewall 3.x packages.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
them to relicense eaccelerator. If that
rewrite is complete, then the software may be distributable. However, I
have not looked into it for quite a while.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:15:38PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Given the great abundance of revision control systems already packaged
for Debian, what is the point of adding another?
I don't see the relevance
it is
non-free.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the bugs. Based on that, I am going to
guess that the bugs are pretty well already triaged. Is that a fair
assessment?
If there is anything else that I have missed in order to get started,
please let me know.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http
This is a ping to my WNPP bugs. I am still alive, but have been
recently been tasked with quite a bit of travel for work. My time to
work on these will be limited in the coming weeks, but I still plan on
getting to them.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
. Overtime I can grant new
developers commit access based upon the quality of their
contributions.
That sounds OK. But again, I still think that the ultimate goal should
be a move to Alioth.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
/balance.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Surprisingly successful load balancing solution and
generic tcp proxy
I would remove Surprisingly successful from the short and long
descriptions.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http
: iceweasel-linky
I was thinking something similar. I am sponsoring Arnaud Renevier for
his noscript package. Initially, he called it just noscript. It was
rejected by the ftp-masters as too generic. Arnaud renamed it to
mozilla-noscript and that was accepted.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C
) [0] for the xl2tpd package. My
intent is have that one conflict/replace the l2tpd package. The only
thing left for me to implement is handling the migration of the
configuration and secrets.
Regards,
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/427113
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
long. Try this:
a groupware platform offering access via the web and standard protocols
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:11:23AM +0200, arno wrote:
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
I looked at your GPG key. However, it does not appear to be signed by a
Debian developer. Are you able to get your key signed? By your email
it looks like you are in France. There are quite a few
that
you run these three tools on all your packages.
If you fix up these issues, I would be happy to sponsor this package for
you.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
at your GPG key. However, it does not appear to be signed by a
Debian developer. Are you able to get your key signed? By your email
it looks like you are in France. There are quite a few keysigning
offers there: https://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Arno,
My accounts were recently created and so I am now able to sponsor
uploads. Do you still need sponsorship?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to something useful based on user
feedback.
That makes me think that the answer is no. If I have missed something,
please let me know.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in my previous mail. It appears to me that the perl source
package's included build system won't build the HTML documentation.
Again, if I misread or overlooked something, please let me know. (I am
still a Perl newbie :-)
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com
plan to have more time to
dedicate to this soon. Thanks for your interest. I'll let you know.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
name? I know that there is no strict policy on
the matter, but I think it has the potential to cause confusion.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
59 matches
Mail list logo
