On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 14:30 +0200, Ludovico Grossi wrote:
Hi,
i created a new header for your website (very similar to the actual
one), and i want to give to you.
I love it!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 15:17 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2004-04-16 15:09:07 +0100 Alexander Winston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that I should add that a new date format has now appeared
A patch would probably be better.
I was under the impression that one would be unwelcome. Would
I have attached a patch for the proper description of the pronunciation
of Debian that is listed on http://www.debian.org/intro/about. It is
written using the International Phonetic Alphabet.
Index: english/intro/about.wml
===
RCS
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:22 +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
Alexander Winston:
I have attached a patch for the proper description of the
pronunciation of Debian that is listed on
http://www.debian.org/intro/about. It is written using the
International Phonetic Alphabet.
The English
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 20:02 +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
Alexander Winston:
Will they be converted to UTF-8 anytime soon? It seems silly to keep
around such deprecated encodings.
Maybe around the same time Debian is 100% UTF-8 compatible :-)
I haven't found any compatibility issues
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 22:04 +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
Anyway, this is off-topic for this list... Back to the patch, it does
indeed need to have the non-latin-1 characters encoded as NCRs.
Gotcha. I've attached the updated one.
Index: english/intro/about.wml
There are too many date and time notations used on the Debian Web site,
especially the main page. Toward the beginning of
http://www.debian.org/, the April 13th, 2004 format is used. Further
down, the 13 Apr 2004 format is used repeatedly. The Tue, Apr 13
00:30:00 UTC 2004 format is at the very
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 20:03 -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 03:20:14PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
Index: vote/2000/leadership_debate/transcript.wml
===
RCS file:
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 20:29 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, can you tell me if Debian is compliant with LSB (linux standard
base) and LFH (Linux filesystem heirarchy) ? The reason I'm asking the www
email address is because I haven't been able to find that on the site's
about
On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 02:26 +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
Hi,
I found the following typo which should be fixed by native speakers:
$ grep -ri vunerab .
./english/News/weekly/1999/32/index.wml:and no Debian packages are vunerable.
Announcements were also made about an
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 10:43, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Alexander Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-12 17:38]:
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:38, Alexander Winston wrote:
Currently, on http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/, we have a list of
things to be done that users and developers can work
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 08:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lun 12/01/2004 à 20:38, Alexander Winston a écrit :
Currently, on http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/, we have a list of
things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are
fairly limited to developers. I propose
Currently, on http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/, we have a list of
things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are
fairly limited to developers. I propose adding
http://debian.vitavonni.de/packagebrowser/ and especially
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:38, Alexander Winston wrote:
Currently, on http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/, we have a list of
things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are
fairly limited to developers. I propose adding
http://debian.vitavonni.de/packagebrowser
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 16:05, Peter Karlsson wrote:
Hi!
Half a year ago I said that I was working on weeding out outdated
translations from the web site. Outdated, in this context, means
translations that has not been updated along with their original
documents for several months.
Finally
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 09:34, Luca Monducci wrote:
Hi,
i'm a italian translator of Debian website. I'm working on
ports/sparc/porting.wml and i find out this:
If you want to be an official porter, you must be a registered Debian
developer. That is, your private key must appear in the
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 02:53, Denis Barbier wrote:
Hi,
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/tidy/
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/validate/
are generated again.
Josip, when will you make lessoften run? The l10n stuff is running
on gluck, I did not yet ask admins access to non-us, so
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 02:57, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:12:48PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
[...]
Japanese translators requested many times that English text (at least
text which is embedded in all languages) use plain ASCII (with entities
if needed) and not ISO
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 17:53, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 08:53:14AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
Hi,
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/tidy/
http://people.debian.org/~barbier/validate/
are generated again.
The following pages cannot be checked because there are
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 09:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I heard some days ago that your servers got violated.
I asume that is why i cant reach MANY of your pages.
If you got some kind of standard information about this, whats going on,
when everything might be back to normal, etc i would
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 11:43, Lluís Padró wrote:
Hi
I've been trying for the last couple of weks to get the images
to test the beta debian-installer from gluck.debian.org, but
the server appears to be down...
Best
Lluis Padro
Yes, Gluck is down.
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 08:40, Šourek Petr wrote:
Hi,
I have one question about debian. Exactly its not about the system itself. I
am relatively new in the Linux os, but as I tried few distributions, I begun
to like Debian, but I am not writing to you and telling you how the system is
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 10:20, Olly Betts wrote:
I would file a bug, but the BTS still seems to be down...
http://www.debian.org/ section Getting Started says:
The latest stable release of Debian is 3.0r1. The last update to this
release was made on December 16th, 2002.
This should be
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 08:17, Ernest Lergon wrote:
Hi,
FYI: http://packages.debian.org seems to be offline.
The following is from an earlier e-mail by Gerfried Fuchs (I'm lazy):
Just in case you didn't notice (not really meant too sarcastic, there
still seem to be people not having noticed
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 16:56, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2003-11-26 21:12:57 + Alexander Winston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
November 21, 2003 (without the ordinal suffixes) would be best.
ITYM 21st November, 2003 :^)
No, I mean November 21, 2003.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 11:00, Scott Hathcock wrote:
Maintainer,
I can not reach the package pages directly or
through the search.
Please read
URI:http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/fw/debian-security-20031121.txt.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:19, Alexander Winston wrote:
The Debian Web pages all use the document type declaration '!DOCTYPE
HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN,' which, while not
invalid, is considered bad form and fails to trigger standards
compliance mode in Internet Explorer
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 16:48, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Debian Web pages all use the document type declaration
'!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN,'
which, while not invalid, is considered bad form and fails to
On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 19:38, Dennis Stampfer wrote:
Hi!
While browsing through http://www.debian.org/CD/artwork/, I found the
following dead link:
http://www.autistici.org/marc0/sdcdc.html
(editable shell and Gimp Scheme scripts)
Maybe remove it or try to reach the Author
The Debian Web pages all use the document type declaration '!DOCTYPE
HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN,' which, while not
invalid, is considered bad form and fails to trigger standards
compliance mode in Internet Explorer and Mozilla (Gecko, really)
derivatives. I have attached a
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 23:32, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:46:15PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 22:19, Colin Watson wrote:
--- testing.wml 18 Sep 2003 16:07:07 - 1.17
+++ testing.wml 9 Nov 2003 03:15:20 -
@@ -300,6 +300,10
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 22:19, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:11:30PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-25
Severity: wishlist
It's a great resource, I think it should be linked to.
Is there any reason not to
It seems that the de facto debian-www style guide stipulates that
dates be written in the following form: January 1st, 2004. However,
almost all professionally written works follow this style: January 1,
2004. Are there objections to the latter?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 15:00, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2003-11-07 19:27:18 + Alexander Winston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
almost all professionally written works follow this style: January 1,
2004. Are there objections to the latter?
Yes. I think it should be 1st January 2004 or 2004, January
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 05:49, MJ Ray wrote:
On 2003-11-02 23:29:28 + Alexander Winston
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless of how commonplace this usage is, it should not be
accepted.
If I understood the posted references correctly, you are objecting to
the use of the native
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 16:23, Joey Hess wrote:
Alexander Winston wrote:
Hello. It has come to my attention that you have requested English
proofreading from native English speakers. While I have not looked over
the Web site in great detail yet, a large error I have noticed that
punctuation
What exactly needs to be done with concern to the GIF-PNG conversion? I
am able to convert the GIFs to PNGs using gif2png, then minimize their
file size using optipng -zc1-9 -zm1-9 -zs0-2 -f0-5. Would a patch for
this be welcomed?
On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 04:14, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
* Alexander Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-10-21 01:38]:
What exactly needs to be done with concern to the GIF-PNG conversion? I
am able to convert the GIFs to PNGs using gif2png, then minimize their
file size using optipng -zc1-9 -zm1-9
38 matches
Mail list logo
