Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Carsten Schoenert wrote: Hello Phil, Am 13.06.19 um 16:14 schrieb Phil Endecott: ... So the output of the search is mostly correct. I disagree; "Your keyword was too generic" suggests that there must be thousands of packages matching the search term, not zero. well, than you didn't have cli

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Michael, Am 13.06.19 um 16:35 schrieb Michael Kesper: [snip] But there are no backports of the gcc versions available! So the output of the search is mostly correct. > > I think packages.d.o. could be a little bit smarter here. > We _know_ for a fact that stretch-backports is a "

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Phil, Am 13.06.19 um 16:14 schrieb Phil Endecott: ... >> So the output of the search is mostly correct. > > I disagree; "Your keyword was too generic" suggests that there must be > thousands of packages matching the search term, not zero. well, than you didn't have clicked on the link that

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Carsten, On 13.06.19 16:20, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Am 13.06.19 um 15:47 schrieb Michael Kesper: >>> This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so> >>> unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. >> >> Unfortunately, that's

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

l, and I'm afraid I can't see a better choice for discussing issues with the website package search than debian-www, sorry. Specifically, today I found that the version of gcc in Stretch was too old for something, Really? I never did experience such things. So the only thing I can im

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Michael, Am 13.06.19 um 15:47 schrieb Michael Kesper: >> This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenance of them, so> >> unfortunately you are on the wrong list for asking such questions. > > Unfortunately, that's the only address given visibly on the packages.d.o site: > To rep

Re: packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hi Carsten, On 13.06.19 15:39, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Am 13.06.19 um 13:55 schrieb Phil Endecott: >> Dear debian-www@lists.debian.org, >> >> I'm not sure if you're the right contact for this, but if not >> maybe you can redirect me. > > This list is about the Debian websites and the maintenan

packages.d.o: gcc package search is resulting in "Your keyword was too generic"

Hello Phil, you have chosen to create an also really generic subject! :) It a bit ironically as you complaining about the outcome while doing a package search. So I modified the subject to something more specific. Am 13.06.19 um 13:55 schrieb Phil Endecott: > Dear debian-www@lists.debian.

Bug#906114: Suggestion: Add "any" as the default under package search

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, Personally, I tend to always look for packages on packages.debian.org in ANY release (stable, testing, unstable, backports, etc). The default is "stable", only giving you stable results. It would be a nice idea to include "any" by def

Re: Package search engine unusable

On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:37:03 + Brian Potkin wrote: > On Tue 09 Jan 2018 at 13:15:34 +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:27:35 +0100 > > Tomas Pospisek wrote: > > > > > Am 04.01.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer: > > > > > > > I tried to use > > > > https:/

Bug#886792: Package search engine unusable

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important I tried to use https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages to search for the latest linux-image packages. With no luck. At best I find dbg versions https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=linux-image&mode=filename&suite=stable&arch=any

Re: Package search engine unusable

On Tue 09 Jan 2018 at 13:15:34 +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:27:35 +0100 > Tomas Pospisek wrote: > > > Am 04.01.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer: > > > > > I tried to use > > > https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > > > > > to search for the latest linux-i

Re: Package search engine unusable

On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 08:27:35 +0100 Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Am 04.01.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer: > > > I tried to use > > https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > > > to search for the latest linux-image packages. With no luck. At best > > I find dbg versions > > https://packages.

Re: Package search engine unusable

Am 04.01.2018 um 20:21 schrieb Wolfgang Pfeiffer: > I tried to use > https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > to search for the latest linux-image packages. With no luck. At best > I find dbg versions > https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=linux-image&mode=filename&sui

Package search engine unusable

Hi I tried to use https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages to search for the latest linux-image packages. With no luck. At best I find dbg versions https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=linux-image&mode=filename&suite=stable&arch=any With google no problem. Search patterns

Re: probleme d'installation debian package search

Bonjour, Le 11/11/2017 à 06:59, roger bergeron a écrit : > le package debian package search n'est plus a jour ne s'installe pas > sur debian 9 Cette liste est unniquement anglophone et est faite pour l'évolution du site web de Debian. Pour toute demande d'aide, vo

probleme d'installation debian package search

le package debian package search n'est plus a jour ne s'installe pas sur debian 9

Bug#865088: marked as done (www.debian.org: Package search refers to stretch as testing)

Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:58:22 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#865088: www.debian.org: Package search refers to stretch as testing has caused the Debian Bug report #865088, regarding www.debian.org: Package search refers to stretch as testing to be marked as done

Bug#865088: www.debian.org: Package search refers to stretch as testing

Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I notice the package search website ( https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=rust ) still refers to stretch as testing. As Stretch was released as stable yesterday, you might want to update this. -- System Information: Debian

Bug#815239: marked as done (www.debian.org: improving package search forms to be more intuitive)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:51:27 +0200 with message-id <89468bf8-b399-99bd-81fe-5c2e6929a...@gmail.com> and subject line patch applied has caused the Debian Bug report #815239, regarding www.debian.org: improving package search forms to be more intuitive to be marked as done.

Bug#815239: www.debian.org: improving package search forms to be more intuitive

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch The search forms at https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages.en.html have the submit button in the first line. I think it's surprising for a newcomer and providing the submit button at the end for the form fits probably better to visitor's mind.

suggestion for package search page wording (was: Re: Package search function bug)

Hi, In message <20150708110650.ga30...@mraw.org> to debian-project Cyril Brulebois replied thus:: > Hi, > > Vlatko Šurlan (2015-07-08): >> Dear all, >> the package search function >> at https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents >> gives no

Re: Package search broken: "packages that contain files named like this" in unstable

Hi, On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 02:05:03PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote: > the search form at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, when using > the "packages that contain files named like this" option, works for > stable and testing, but not for unstable. Thanks for the notice. The generation of th

Package search broken: "packages that contain files named like this" in unstable

Hi, the search form at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, when using the "packages that contain files named like this" option, works for stable and testing, but not for unstable. Thanks, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: Package search on packages.debian.org giving a 500 error

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Guruprasad wrote: > I tried to do a package search on packages.debian.org The packages site is having trouble, people are working on it: http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/2013/04/msg0.html -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulW

Package search on packages.debian.org giving a 500 error

Hi, I tried to do a package search on packages.debian.org and it returned a 500 error. I thought that it could be with the search I did and tried searching for some common packages like vlc, emacs but still got the same error. Found this address on the site for reporting issues and reporting it

Re: nestopia missing from package search results

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:49:36 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > nestopia is now in the pool (and has been for over a week), is installable > > using apt-get, aptitude and so on, and appears in the PTS. But > > packages.debian.org doesn't know about i

Re: nestopia missing from package search results

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote: > nestopia is now in the pool (and has been for over a week), is installable > using apt-get, aptitude and so on, and appears in the PTS. But > packages.debian.org doesn't know about it: http://lists.debian.org/debian-infrastructure-announce/20

nestopia missing from package search results

Hi, nestopia is now in the pool (and has been for over a week), is installable using apt-get, aptitude and so on, and appears in the PTS. But packages.debian.org doesn't know about it: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=nestopia and http://packages.debian.org/search?su

Bug#631461: marked as done (packages.debian.org: armel is missing in contents package search arch filter)

Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:42:14 + with message-id <20111028054214.ga23...@master.debian.org> and subject line armel has caused the Debian Bug report #631461, regarding packages.debian.org: armel is missing in contents package search arch filter to be marked as done. This

Bug#631461: packages.debian.org: armel is missing in contents package search arch filter

Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages Please add armel to package content search dropdown menu. arm is present, armel isn't. No chance to query packages content on armel arch. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Re: Package search function is failing

Sorry my bad xbmc comes from the marillat sources. PLease disregard my previous email. On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Christian Andersson < christian.andersson...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When searching for "xbmc" in the package search (and selecting unstable) I &

Package search function is failing

Hi, When searching for "xbmc" in the package search (and selecting unstable) I get no results.When i do apt-cache search on my debian unstalbe system i get a package with the name "xbmc". Please investigate. /Chris

Browser incompatibility in package search

Hello, I just installed libstdc++5, so thanks for hosting it. However, oddly enough only the sid link is available at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libstdc%2B%2B5 on Firefox profile A, while the profile B also shows lenny and squeeze. Copying the links from B to A yields a message t

Re: Translation of package search results on packages.debian.org

Hello, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Anyway, looking forward to your patch! Helge has provided to commit the patch (which I posted on debian-l10n-german). Thanks Holger -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Created with Sylpheed 2.5.0 under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 5.0.0

Re: Translation of package search results on packages.debian.org

Hello, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > I thought, these strings should be in the webwml project, but seems to > > be not the case. > > They are, though in git. Please notice that the result is served by > packages.debian.org which is here: > > > > Can a

Re: Translation of package search results on packages.debian.org

Hi! * Holger Wansing [2010-08-11 21:32:41 CEST]: > [Please CC me, as I am not subscribed] Thanks for notice! Was about to remove you because your name is familiar. > About the search-packages dialog/search results on > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages: > > In the

Translation of package search results on packages.debian.org

[Please CC me, as I am not subscribed] Hello, About the search-packages dialog/search results on http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages: In the german translation I found some glitches, and I thought about changing some things there, so I tried to find the files, but I couldn't f

Re: Package search broken due to a "Content Encoding Error"

Hi Simon, On Mon, 02.11.2009 at 12:02:18 +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > I cannot reproduce your problem by searching for vim with german locale and > Iceweasel from Lenny. I usually have the English locale selected, also this time, and I just checked again, and it worked. > Do you still reprod

Re: Package search broken due to a "Content Encoding Error"

Hi Toni, On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > Then I entered a package name and pressed "Search". I got this error > message: > > Content Encoding Error > The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid

Package search broken due to a "Content Encoding Error"

Hi, I wanted to research the Debian package archive, and went to this page: http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages Then I entered a package name and pressed "Search". I got this error message: Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid o

Package Search Problem

Hello, Your package search page has a problem. It requires all search terms to contain at least two characters. This makes it impossible to use 'X' as a search term or package name. Thanks, Graham

Bug#443093: marked as done (p.d.o: Suggested restriction on package search)

Your message dated Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:32:37 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#443093: p.d.o: Suggested restriction on package search has caused the Debian Bug report #443093, regarding p.d.o: Suggested restriction on package search to be marked as done.

Bug#443093: p.d.o: Suggested restriction on package search

Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist I have been frustrated a few times when searching on package name because the "search was too wide". Currently the search will only display exact matches in that case. For example, if I search on "mysql", I get nothing. I would suggest adding one inter

Re: package search problem

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:19:12PM -0500, Andrew Golding wrote: > I got this problem while searching for MySQL packages. This is > certainly a new problem. > > start-- > >> Debian >> Packages >> Package Search Results > > You can try a different searc

package search problem

I got this problem while searching for MySQL packages. This is certainly a new problem. start-- >> Debian >> Packages >> Package Search Results You can try a different search on the Packages search page. You have searched for packages that names contain mysql in all su

bug in package search engine

Hi, I think I found a bug in "Search Package Directories" function. You can reproduce the problem in this way: Page: Packages Section: "Search Package Directories" Keyword: http server Search on: Descriptions Result: "Error: keyword not valid or missing" Bye and thanks for Debian Michele Alessand

package search problem

Hello, I can not find some files in http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents For example, automake. But I'm sure automake is in package automake1.9. Best regards, Dai Yuwen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Re: package search won't do arch=all

Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > It's a bit delayed, but I don't see that you have been answered yet, > so I'm not sure I understand what was going on, especially as I thought it was an Ubuntu-specific server, but it looks OK now anyway. Cheers. -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: package search won't do arch=all

Hi! It's a bit delayed, but I don't see that you have been answered yet, so * Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-10 16:46]: > Searching on packages.debian.org doesn't seem to include the `all' > architecture, e.g. this link from the package's page returns nothing: * Thomas Zande

package search won't do arch=all

Searching on packages.debian.org doesn't seem to include the `all' architecture, e.g. this link from the package's page returns nothing: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelist&word=emacs-goodies-el&version=unstable&arch=all>. Also searching in all packages for a f

[Website] Package search broken for two or more keywords

Folks, "http://packages.debian.org"; Performing two or more keyword searchs causes search results error diagnostics, "Error: keyword not valid or missing", when entered. FYI This has been broken for a long time (> 1 year). Perhaps I am the only one attempting to search for packages using two o

Re: debian package search dedicated machine

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 02:20:23PM -0600, Shannon Eric Peevey wrote: > I have a serverpronto dedicated server that I could offer you guys for > short or long term usage for the package search pages. It's not very sexy: > > · AMD 2000+ > · 256 MB DDR RAM > · 40 GB Hard D

debian package search dedicated machine

Hey y'all, I have a serverpronto dedicated server that I could offer you guys for short or long term usage for the package search pages. It's not very sexy: · AMD 2000+ · 256 MB DDR RAM · 40 GB Hard Drive · 200 GB Traffic · 100Mbps Connection But, let me know if it can be of

RE: Package search fails since days

Hello Adam, Hello Kaare, Hello admins, > > It's often painfully slow. Puhh..and i thought it may be just my imagination (or my network..), because sometimes it works fine.. :) > > saens.debian.org, aka packages.d.o and ftp.d.o is apparently currently > running with a load average in the region

Re: Package search fails since days

On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 14:37 +0100, Kaare Olsen wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:07:20 +0100 > "Alexander Schories" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > e.g. this doesn`t work anymore: > > > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=php5&searchon > > =names&subword=1&version=all&r

Re: Package search fails since days

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:07:20 +0100 "Alexander Schories" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > e.g. this doesn`t work anymore: > > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=php5&searchon > =names&subword=1&version=all&release=all That search works nicely for me: "Found 29 matching pac

Package search fails since days

Hi, While http://packages.debian.org seems to work, once you put in an package name there and tell the system to search for it, the new website freezes. e.g. this doesn`t work anymore: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=php5&searchon =names&subword=1&version=all&rele

Bug#341149: marked as done (Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.)

Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:35:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.

On 11/29/05, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:36:12PM -0500, Joshua Gilbert wrote: > > The following is using the search box at: > > http://www.us.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents > > > > Search for anything with AMD64 as the architecture and testing as

Re: Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:47:13AM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote: > El martes, 29 de noviembre de 2005 02:56, Matt Kraai escribió: > [...] > > I don't think AMD64 is part of the official archive yet, so > > packages.debian.org may not support it. Frank? > > When is this going to be off

Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.

On Monday, November 28, 2005 6:36 PM, Joshua Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Severity: important > > The following is using the search box at: > http://www.us.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents > > Search for anything with AMD64 as the architecture and testi

Re: Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.

El martes, 29 de noviembre de 2005 02:56, Matt Kraai escribió: [...] > I don't think AMD64 is part of the official archive yet, so > packages.debian.org may not support it. Frank? When is this going to be official? Do you know? I think that this must gain priority in some people's TODO

Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:36:12PM -0500, Joshua Gilbert wrote: > The following is using the search box at: > http://www.us.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents > > Search for anything with AMD64 as the architecture and testing as the > distribution. I haven't found any string that yields a

Cannot search contents of Etch AMD64 packages on package search.

http://www.us.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents Search for anything with AMD64 as the architecture and testing as the distribution. I haven't found any string that yields a result. Examples: testing AMD64 bzip2 http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?word=bzip2&searchmode=

Bug#341149: Cannot search contents of testing AMD64 packages on package search.

Package: www.debian.org Severity: important The following is using the search box at: http://www.us.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_contents Search for anything with AMD64 as the architecture and testing as the distribution. I haven't found any string that yields a result. Examples: testing A

Package search doesn't work

I am not able to search for packages from the www.debian.org -> Packages page. The search times out. This has been like that at least for four days. I tried a couple of other mirrors - the same problem. - Sarath -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: section non-US omitted from package search criteria

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:55AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So in short, the section criterion "non-US" is not being processed as > part of my query. Hmm, some digging in the CVS only shows that this has probably never worked since we reactivated the search at the beginning of this year :

section non-US omitted from package search criteria

At http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages, I enter "nvidia-kernel-common" for the keyword, choose Distribution: Any, and Section: non-US. I hit "Search". The results come back with some packages from section contrib, not non-US, and the text at the top of the result says: You

Bug#156794: marked as done (Package search subwords not working)

gt;; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:10 -0400 Received: by shade.durocom.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400 From: Chris Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package search subwords not working Message-ID: <

Re: mirror selection unavailable and package search out of order

* Jej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-27 14:40]: > The mirror selection on debian web site does not work anymore (at leat > since yesterday the 26) Due to the server compromise some services are still not available, please give us some time to restore them and check if they have been tampered with.

Re: package search

* Christopher Mauger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-27 19:23]: > For the last couple of days, I have been unable to > search directories or contents of packages. I go to the > page:http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, put in a keyword > and press search. After that my browser is in ``wa

mirror selection unavailable and package search out of order

Hello, The mirror selection on debian web site does not work anymore (at leat since yesterday the 26) -- Not Found The requested URL /cgi-bin/redirect.pl was not found on this server. -- The package search does not work as well. No answer from the server. I hope that'

package search

Dear Sir/Madam: For the last couple of days, I have been unable to search directories or contents of packages. I go to the page:http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages, put in a keyword and press search. After that my browser is in ``waiting for reply'' mode. You help is v

package search

Hi, you're web-based packages search is screwed up. i cant find or download any packages since three days.  would be fine if you'd fix it. thanks

Bug#156794: marked as done (Package search subwords not working)

CTED]>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:10 -0400 Received: by shade.durocom.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400 From: Chris Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package search subwords not working Message

Bug#156794: marked as done (Package search subwords not working)

PROTECTED]>; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:10 -0400 Received: by shade.durocom.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400 From: Chris Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Package search subwords not working Message

Bug#207095: www.debian.org: no dates from package search

Josip Rodin said: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:55:07AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-25 > > Severity: wishlist > > > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/lynx.html leads to > > "Download Page for lynx_2.8.4.1b-5_i386.deb on Int

Bug#207095: www.debian.org: no dates from package search

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:55:07AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Package: www.debian.org > Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-25 > Severity: wishlist > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/lynx.html leads to > "Download Page for lynx_2.8.4.1b-5_i386.deb on Intel x86 machines" > leads to > ht

Bug#207095: www.debian.org: no dates from package search

Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-25 Severity: wishlist Gentlemen, consider users looking for info on say lynx. http://packages.debian.org/lynx leads to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/lynx.html leads to "Download Page for lynx_2.8.4.1b-5_i386.deb on Intel x86

Re: Bug#202015: marked as done (Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages)

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:18:13PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > I made a patch. It uses the URI::Escape modul which is part of package > > > liburi-perl. > > > > Tested and applied to CVS, thanks. Now if packages.d.o would only > > do a cvs update... > > Someone has done it. Se

Bug#202015: marked as done (Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages)

Your message dated Mon, 21 Jul 2003 19:00:31 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages

On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 01:15:44PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > tags 202015 + patch > thanks > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:30:36PM -0700, Robert Fleming wrote: > > Searching for packages containing files like "g++", the "+" characters > > are properly encoded (by the web browser) in the "wo

Processed: Re: Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 202015 + patch Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages

tags 202015 + patch thanks On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:30:36PM -0700, Robert Fleming wrote: > Searching for packages containing files like "g++", the "+" characters > are properly encoded (by the web browser) in the "word" parameter in the > URL by the search form at http://www.debian.org/distrib

Bug#202015: Package search for "g++" broken for second and subsequent result pages

Package: www.debian.org Searching for packages containing files like "g++", the "+" characters are properly encoded (by the web browser) in the "word" parameter in the URL by the search form at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages as follows: search_contents.pl?word=g%2B%2B ... but the

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:43:53AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > > > [some usefull thoughts skipped] > > > > > > Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can > > > commiting to the CVS without breacking the running sy

Re: Package search improvements

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 06:37:11PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > (On a more subjective note, perhaps we should rip swish++ out and replace it > > with a Perl script as well. >:|) > > I second this. Real subword search should be available at least for the > package name (and perhaps the short

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Making packages.d.o backend first parse all Packages files from all > architectures, sort -u the list, and then go through the data ordering it > per package, would seem to do the trick. Of course it would also track > Architecture fiel

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 06:32:26PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > (On a more subjective note, perhaps we should rip swish++ out and replace it > with a Perl script as well. >:|) I second this. Real subword search should be available at least for the package name (and perhaps the short description). A

Re: Package search improvements

And sorry for the duplicates Pozdrawiam -- Marek 'TamCaP' Łaska Zdrowy rozsądek to zbiór uprzedzeń nabytych do osiemnastego roku życia. - Albert Einstein

Re: Package search improvements

Hullo all... Pewnego dnia (Wednesday 23 of April 2003 10:20), niejak(i/a) Josip Rodin wystukał/a na klawiaturze: JR>Making packages.d.o backend first parse all Packages files from all JR>architectures, sort -u the list, and then go through the data ordering it JR>per package, would seem to do the

Re: Package search improvements

Hullo all... Pewnego dnia (Wednesday 23 of April 2003 10:20), niejak(i/a) Josip Rodin wystukał/a na klawiaturze: JR>Making packages.d.o backend first parse all Packages files from all JR>architectures, sort -u the list, and then go through the data ordering it JR>per package, would seem to do the

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:43:53AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > > [some usefull thoughts skipped] > > > > Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can > > commiting to the CVS without breacking the running system. > > Just test your changes before committing. They require acce

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much > > > cheaper. > > > > Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that > > was briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting >

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:37:53AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > > [some usefull thoughts skipped] > > Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can > commiting to the CVS without breacking the running system. J

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 09:37:53AM +0800, Andrew Shugg wrote: > [some usefull thoughts skipped] Hmm. IMHO it would be good to have a test system, where one can commiting to the CVS without breacking the running system. What do you others think of an alioth project for this? It could start with a

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:51:02AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much > > > cheaper. > > > > Perhaps I sh

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 10:20:48AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much > > cheaper. > > Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that > was briefly m

Re: Package search improvements

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 01:50:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > It's disk space against cpu usage. Clearly the first is much cheaper. Perhaps I should also mention the exact cause of those 500 errors that was briefly mentioned on -www recently -- the MaxClients 300 setting on gluck exceeds th

  1   2   >