Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-06 19:11, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > I will test some stuff on my > etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds > with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK? Tested pdf for ro on etch (with the dblatex backport) and it looks fine to me. (And of course, it looks better

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Eddy Petrișor : > About the backport, do you already have a backport for all the needed > packages? I know dblatex and xmlroff are needed, but IIRC some of the > tex stuff was necessary, too (for UTF-8 support, for example). Or am I > confusing etch release build system with lenny's? I do

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread Eddy Petrișor
(keep me CC-ed) 2009/2/6 W. Martin Borgert : > Quoting Eddy Petrișor : >> Still, I am wondering, why wasn't Romanian using dblatex in the first place? > > To be honest: I don't remember. I will test some stuff on my > etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds > with dblatex (backpo

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Eddy Petrișor : > Still, I am wondering, why wasn't Romanian using dblatex in the first place? To be honest: I don't remember. I will test some stuff on my etch chroot anyway, so I will also check whether ro builds with dblatex (backport from lenny) on etch, OK? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread Eddy Petrișor
(-doc and -www, please CC me) 2009/2/6 Eddy Petrișor : >>> - Should lenny's release notes be compilable on etch? >>=20 >> Yes. > > Thanks for the info, but currently we're having trouble compiling > *cleanly* the pdf version even on lenny. OK, after looking at the German PDF and seeing the diffe

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Jens Seidel : > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:41:44AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote: > > > PS: Building the last Release Notes took more than 12 hours on > www-master. > > > > dblatex is much faster on lenny than on etch. Also, po4a seems > > to eat

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread Jens Seidel
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:41:44AM +, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote: > > I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed > > completely > > different. But at least the content seems to be included. > > Most languages can work with d

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2009-02-06 10:14, Jens Seidel wrote: > I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed > completely > different. But at least the content seems to be included. Most languages can work with dblatex, some not. They have to use xmlroff, which is OK, but the layout does no

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-06 Thread Jens Seidel
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:38:57AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > Thanks for the info, but currently we're having trouble compiling > *cleanly* the pdf version even on lenny. I compared the Romanian PDF file with the German one and it looks indeed completely different. But at least the content see

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-05 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Thanks for the info, but currently we're having trouble compiling *cleanly* the pdf version even on lenny. It seems we have hit an xmlroff bug which prevents us from compiling the thing appropriately. The bug seems to be this: http://xmlroff.org/ticket/68 Here is what happens (after a make cl

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > What is not clear: > - Should lenny's release notes be compilable on etch? Yes. > - On which distro will lenny's release notes be built? Etch or Lenny? The build for www.debian.org will be performed on www-master.debian.org, whic

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-02 Thread Simon Paillard
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > The Romanian team has worked to update the release-notes for both > lenny and etch. Now is clear to me/us that there are 2 sets of release > notes: > > - one for etch > - one for lenny > > Since we are a small team, we are mostly in

Re: release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-02 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Please keep me (I am not subscribed) and the debian-l10n-romanian list in CC. 2009/2/2 Eddy Petrișor : > Hello, > > The Romanian team has worked to update the release-notes for both > lenny and etch. Now is clear to me/us that there are 2 sets of release > notes: > > - one for etch > - one for len

release notes clarification and the situation for Romanian

2009-02-02 Thread Eddy Petrișor
Hello, The Romanian team has worked to update the release-notes for both lenny and etch. Now is clear to me/us that there are 2 sets of release notes: - one for etch - one for lenny Since we are a small team, we are mostly interested in the lenny release notes. We know that there are some encod