Package: xkb-data
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
(please refer to
https://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/projects/jcdubacq/wiki/FixKeyboard#TheLogitechEliteKeyboard
for context, esp. starting from Using USB connexion...
)
The Logitech Elite keyboard works now sufficiently good out of the box
the maintainance for many different
machines almost all with nvidia GPU.
--
Jean-Christophe Dubacq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba0aef3.7070...@free.fr
Gabriel Filion a écrit :
Hello,
I run Debian unstable and I also happen to own a Logitech Elite
Keyboard. The howtos that I've found on google showed me that to make
the keys on the upper part of the keyboard to work, I have to modify
three files in /usr/share/x11/xkb -- namely symbols.dir
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.1.0-5
Severity: normal
Xfree86 config files were left behind in /etc/X11/Xsession.d
As a result: they do not belong to any more packages; and ssh-agent is
launched twice (and various wrappers could have strange effects). Plus,
it is not elegant.
I do not know
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.8-5
Followup-For: Bug #276143
I have a patch that modifies altwin:meta_win to leave Right-Alt
untouched. It also gives explanation to what happens to Left-Alt key.
-- patch included below --
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.8-5
Severity: normal
/usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base{.lst,.xml} do not match the content of
/usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols{.dir,/inet}
For example, logidak is defined in /usr/share/X11/xkb/rules/base.*
but nowhere else in /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/inet.
This causes this
I have a MGA G550 and find that the DRI is disabled in the latest
update to experimental.
According to Xorg.0.log, everything goes fine until the drm fails to
map DMA buffers.
Any idea?
uname -r is 2.6.14-2-686 (stock debian linux kernel)
xorg.0.log attached
xorg.conf probably not interesting
Hello,
I have Xorg 6.8.2 and a matrox G550 AGP. Since the last upgrade of
Xorg in unstable (which, alas for the gods of Debugging, happened to
be at the same time as my upgrade to kernel 2.6.14), my screen
sometimes freezes (well, always freezes, but unpredictably).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
Hello,
I would like to make my own customized keyboards for my lab (we have
some keyboards not supported in Xorg (logitech Elite keyboard for
example)) and the trouble is, I need to change the xorg.lst file and
some others under /etc/X11/xkb.
I would like to know how it is possible to do this
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 06:26:17PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
Are there new files created by the driver that need to be shipped? What
issue are you describing exactly?
I need to compile with IGNORE_MANIFEST_CHANGES=1. I think there is a new
file with shadow in its name.
My access to the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:49:11AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin
wrote:
- Move driver backports to -6 release. The i810 seems to be serious
enough to warrant a backport, and if people already provided patches
then we can likely drop them in too, since it involves
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:45:20AM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Hello, Drew. We know that the i810 Xserver included in X.Org 6.8.2 is
old and
does not support newer chips, so probably the problem will be in the X.Org
packages. We are currently working in the upcoming 6.9 X.Org
Hello,
I wrote some time ago about my recent import of CVS Head of the i810
driver. Following some advice from Michael Daenzer (if I am not
mistaken), I managed to build those two small patches. They replace the
debian/patches/000_stolen_from_HEAD_i810.diff. I did separate a very
minor one
Hello,
I made my own HEAD grabbing of the i810 driver to have a working
i82915G (included in Dell GX280 as integrated card). I replaced the
whole 000_stolen_from_HEAD_i810 patch with sources from HEAD, but
since I did not check the history of all patches (including checking
at which
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Thank you. I think I fell on something a bit complex with the i810
driver, and I do not know it this is my fault or the fault of the
driver. The screen I try to use is a 19 DELL 1905FP that can do
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
Trying to build Xorg from svn (trunk) (I think I found something wrong
in 000_stolen_from_HEAD_i810, but need to test), I cannot recompile
because some files are added (.svn files) and causes an error due to
MANIFEST.i386. Any tips on how to build from svn?
--
JCD
--
To
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:19:25PM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
Regardless, my proposal is simply to have Xft always default to 96
DPI, independent of the DPI value you put in X.
I read your proposal, and find it is a good one (well argued and
everything). However, this means that the real dpi
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:49:12PM +0900, Mike Hommey
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:26:38AM -0600, Billy Biggs
3. DPI becomes more complicated given different display devices such
as data projectors.
I don't see why. The only problem that could happen is that when
plugging in the new
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 10:18:42PM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
Right now, GNOME users default to 96 DPI, xdm users default to 100
DPI, and other users are randomly assigned DPIs anywhere in the range of
75-133. I believe that right now, we should adopt the GNOME standard
everywhere as the
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 10:12:08AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
The best scenario would be if X + Desktop Environment picked up on the
actual DPI of the screen(s) and adjusted for that automatically.
I disagree. If I hook my laptop up to a data projector, I do not want
all of my fonts to
Hi!
Warning: This might be a packaging issue only.
I developed my own keyboard mapping for XKB (based on my keyboard,
however I did add a lot of fancy chars that I needed so type spanish,
italian and other european languages on a regular basis via AltGr+key,
I could fit in most of latin-9
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:11:29PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
If the default Unicode fonts are incomplete enough that they lack this
character, then that is probably worthy of a bug (and this one could just
be reassigned), but I fail to see why the application should be expected to
do something
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:08:34PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
Hey if you fix trivial bugs, I will be unable to help ;)
(And yes I am still interested, but am RTFMing to learn how 4.3.0 does work).
Your commit also fixes #185663.
There are several other similar bugs (e.g. #53782 and
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:07:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:03:36AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 200933
Bug#200933: xlibs-data: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias does not contain
all
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:07:04PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:03:36AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
close 200933
Bug#200933: xlibs-data: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias does not
contain all
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:22:04PM +0200, Jan Paul Schmidt wrote:
Am So, 2003-09-28 um 03.38 schrieb Branden Robinson:
Can you explain why you are using the @euro modifier with the UTF-8
charset, and why you feel this behavior is a bug?
Similarly, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid locale,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:22:04PM +0200, Jan Paul Schmidt wrote:
Am So, 2003-09-28 um 03.38 schrieb Branden Robinson:
Can you explain why you are using the @euro modifier with the UTF-8
charset, and why you feel this behavior is a bug?
Similarly, if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a valid locale,
Can I interest people in bug #208137?
The patch is provided, bug is easy to fix. However, bug has been merged
with #200256 which is really more specific about korean locale (ko_KR).
My problem is with all euro-enabled variants of european languages.
Form [EMAIL PROTECTED] was understood by X11
Can I interest people in bug #208137?
The patch is provided, bug is easy to fix. However, bug has been merged
with #200256 which is really more specific about korean locale (ko_KR).
My problem is with all euro-enabled variants of european languages.
Form [EMAIL PROTECTED] was understood by X11
Since I switched from xfree-4.3.0-ds4, I do not have the colored cursors
any more (I use experimental packages instead).
I do have a ~/.icons/default/index.theme:
[Icon Theme]
Inherits=whiteglass
I have the whiteglass files (locate whiteglass returns many results)
My XF86Config-4 uses HWCursor
Since I switched from xfree-4.3.0-ds4, I do not have the colored cursors
any more (I use experimental packages instead).
I do have a ~/.icons/default/index.theme:
[Icon Theme]
Inherits=whiteglass
I have the whiteglass files (locate whiteglass returns many results)
My XF86Config-4 uses HWCursor
Package: xlibs-data
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental patch
Hello,
Since libc now enforces for the [EMAIL PROTECTED] the format
[EMAIL PROTECTED] format, some aliases should be added to
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias. Here is what I added:
# Corrections
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:27:34AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Hi!
I run XFree 4.3.0. I tested the new libc (2.3.2-3) and accordingly new
locale package (and new gdm package). For european countries, LANG is
now set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] (instead of the former
[EMAIL
Hi!
I run XFree 4.3.0. I tested the new libc (2.3.2-3) and accordingly new
locale package (and new gdm package). For european countries, LANG is
now set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] (instead of the former
[EMAIL PROTECTED]). Xlib does not recognize this kind of locale. More
important,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:27:34AM +0200, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
Hi!
I run XFree 4.3.0. I tested the new libc (2.3.2-3) and accordingly new
locale package (and new gdm package). For european countries, LANG is
now set to something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] (instead of the former
[EMAIL
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 08:03, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Since I upgraded to 4.3.0-0pre1 (in experimental this morning), coming
from ds4, I
On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 12:34:38PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-17 at 08:03, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 10:57:06PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jean-Christophe Dubacq
Since I upgraded to 4.3.0-0pre1 (in experimental this morning), coming
from ds4, I
Since I upgraded to 4.3.0-0pre1 (in experimental this morning), coming
from ds4, I do not have DRI enabled any more. No need to insist on all
consequences. I attach XFree log, XF86Config, installed packages
(no trace of ds4 remains in /var/lib/dpkg/status):
x-window-system-core
Since I upgraded to 4.3.0-0pre1 (in experimental this morning), coming
from ds4, I do not have DRI enabled any more. No need to insist on all
consequences. I attach XFree log, XF86Config, installed packages
(no trace of ds4 remains in /var/lib/dpkg/status):
x-window-system-core
When trying to insert my personal modmap, I stumbled on the following
problem (xfree 4.3 from ds4): X suddenly took 100% of CPU (even tough
top indicated only 50%), and after a while the computer became totally
non-reactive (for a while, the server kept on moving the mouse).
I am competent enough
When trying to insert my personal modmap, I stumbled on the following
problem (xfree 4.3 from ds4): X suddenly took 100% of CPU (even tough
top indicated only 50%), and after a while the computer became totally
non-reactive (for a while, the server kept on moving the mouse).
I am competent enough
When I launch galeon, if I have xfs first in my fontpath, Xfree just
restarts (thanks to gdm -- with startx, it just stops).
adobe-helvetica-iso8859-1 is the font used on my start page.
Shoud I investigate this some more ?
Btw the antialiasing is terrible with some fonts. Did anything special
Hello,
Some more testing of Xfree 4.3 led me to find that crack-attack
doesn't work any more. It doesn't even compile anymore.
The trouble is with function glActiveTextureARB, found not declared.
Apparently this is not the first time this is the problem. Google lead
me to
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:57:13PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Which driver? Seems to work fine with the r200 driver from 4.3 here.
mga
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218 maybe? Have you tried
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-trunk yet?
Looks similar. But I don't get garbled colors, I get
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218 maybe? Have you tried
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-trunk yet?
Looks similar. But I don't get garbled colors, I get segfaults...
I am not quite willing to play with cvs free... (had enough
Hello,
Some more testing of Xfree 4.3 led me to find that crack-attack
doesn't work any more. It doesn't even compile anymore.
The trouble is with function glActiveTextureARB, found not declared.
Apparently this is not the first time this is the problem. Google lead
me to
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:12:48PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Some more testing of Xfree 4.3 led me to find that crack-attack
doesn't work any more.
Which driver? Seems to work fine with the r200 driver from 4.3 here.
mga
It doesn't even compile anymore.
The trouble is
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:57:13PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Which driver? Seems to work fine with the r200 driver from 4.3 here.
mga
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218 maybe? Have you tried
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-trunk yet?
Looks similar. But I don't get garbled colors, I get
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218 maybe? Have you tried
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-trunk yet?
Looks similar. But I don't get garbled colors, I get segfaults...
I am not quite willing to play with cvs free... (had enough
Hello,
I decided to test Daniel Stone's packages (4.3.0-0ds4) because I have
a rotating LCD screen. Everything worked altogether except two things:
- Sawfish (windows manager) didn't recognise the Alt key any more (it
was called Mod1). I do not know why, and since all other applications do
fine
Hello,
I decided to test Daniel Stone's packages (4.3.0-0ds4) because I have
a rotating LCD screen. Everything worked altogether except two things:
- Sawfish (windows manager) didn't recognise the Alt key any more (it
was called Mod1). I do not know why, and since all other applications do
fine
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:19:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you come up with, and test, a patch to the stock Debian
/etc/X11/XftConfig file that would work well with xfonts-scalable?
Please generate a diff -u of the original and patched file, and mail
that diff to this bug
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:19:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you come up with, and test, a patch to the stock Debian
/etc/X11/XftConfig file that would work well with xfonts-scalable?
Please generate a diff -u of the original and patched file, and mail
that diff to this bug
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have been investigation a few problems with Xft, and the first one is
the default configuration. Currently, if a font is unkown (and since
there is no Sans and Serif and Monospace fonts as used e.g. in Gnome2,
or no Helvetica anti-aliased
retitle 166335 Bad default configuration for XftConfig
In some other line of thought, maybe including the following line
would help the work between Defoma and Xft:
dir /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I have been investigation a few problems with Xft, and the first one is
the default configuration. Currently, if a font is unkown (and since
there is no Sans and Serif and Monospace fonts as used e.g. in Gnome2,
or no Helvetica anti-aliased
retitle 166335 Bad default configuration for XftConfig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In some other line of thought, maybe including the following line
would help the work between Defoma and Xft:
dir /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
59 matches
Mail list logo
