On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> > ^^^
> > sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
>
> But does i
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 01:00:58PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> > ^^^
> > sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
>
> But does i
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> ^^^
> sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
But does it sound better than "in future", e.g., "In future, the
Americans should try ha
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:54:49AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> For what it's worth, "in the future" sounds right to me,
> ^^^
> sounds better to my ear than "...future release..." :)
But does it sound better than "in future", e.g., "In future, the
Americans should try ha
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:10:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:49:27AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > By the way, Branden, there's a minor grammatical error in the new xprt
> > description. It should read something like
> >
> > "Improvement of XFree86's version of
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:10:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:49:27AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > By the way, Branden, there's a minor grammatical error in the new xprt
> > description. It should read something like
> >
> > "Improvement of XFree86's version of
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:10:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Thanks, fixed. Or I could imitate a silly Commonwealther and say "in
> future".
You're the one who typoed in the first place, seppo boy.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trin
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:10:32AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled:
> Thanks, fixed. Or I could imitate a silly Commonwealther and say "in
> future".
You're the one who typoed in the first place, seppo boy.
--
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer, Trin
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:49:27AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> By the way, Branden, there's a minor grammatical error in the new xprt
> description. It should read something like
>
> "Improvement of XFree86's version of the Xprint server is expected in a
> future release."
>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 03:49:27AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> By the way, Branden, there's a minor grammatical error in the new xprt
> description. It should read something like
>
> "Improvement of XFree86's version of the Xprint server is expected in a future
>release."
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:36:10AM -0500, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> > As noted in #xfree86, I only ran across one minor issue when
> > upgrading from 4.2.1-4: xprt-common wasn't installed when I tried
> > to upgrade xprt, so configuration of both xprt and x-window-
> > system failed. That has been
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:36:10AM -0500, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
>
> As noted in #xfree86, I only ran across one minor issue when
> upgrading from 4.2.1-4: xprt-common wasn't installed when I tried
> to upgrade xprt, so configuration of both xprt and x-window-
> system failed. That has been tempora
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:36:10AM -0500, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
> > As noted in #xfree86, I only ran across one minor issue when
> > upgrading from 4.2.1-4: xprt-common wasn't installed when I tried
> > to upgrade xprt, so configuration of both xprt and x-window-
> > system failed. That has been
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:36:10AM -0500, Daniel T. Chen wrote:
>
> As noted in #xfree86, I only ran across one minor issue when
> upgrading from 4.2.1-4: xprt-common wasn't installed when I tried
> to upgrade xprt, so configuration of both xprt and x-window-
> system failed. That has been tempora
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> See attached .changes file, and please test.
>> >> Format: 1.7
>> >> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:57:13 -0500
>> >> Sou
Only resend.
I forget to send this mail to debian-sparc list.
Please feedback about this to debian-x list.
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See attached .changes file, and please test.
>>
>> Note that I no longer own a working i386 box.
>> For
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ISHIKAWA Mutsumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> See attached .changes file, and please test.
>> >> Format: 1.7
>> >> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003
Only resend.
I forget to send this mail to debian-sparc list.
Please feedback about this to debian-x list.
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See attached .changes file, and please test.
>>
>> Note that I no longer own a working i386 box.
>> For
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See attached .changes file, and please test.
>>
>> Note that I no longer own a working i386 box.
>> Format: 1.7
>> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:57:13 -0500
>> Source: xfree86
(snip)
>> Architecture: source powerpc a
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> See attached .changes file, and please test.
>>
>> Note that I no longer own a working i386 box.
>> Format: 1.7
>> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:57:13 -0500
>> Source: xfree86
(snip)
>> Architecture: source powerpc a
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> See attached .changes file, and please test.
Built fine in a Sid chroot on i386 and am running it right now:
XFree86 Version 4.2.1.1 (Debian 4.2.1-4pre5v1 20030110080452 root@) / X Window S
ystem
As noted in #xfree86, I only ran across one minor iss
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> See attached .changes file, and please test.
Built fine in a Sid chroot on i386 and am running it right now:
XFree86 Version 4.2.1.1 (Debian 4.2.1-4pre5v1 20030110080452 root@) / X Window S
ystem
As noted in #xfree86, I only ran across one minor iss
See attached .changes file, and please test.
Note that I no longer own a working i386 box.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Measure with micrometer,
Debian GNU/Linux | mark with chalk,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cut with axe,
http://pe
See attached .changes file, and please test.
Note that I no longer own a working i386 box.
--
G. Branden Robinson| Measure with micrometer,
Debian GNU/Linux | mark with chalk,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cut with axe,
http://pe
24 matches
Mail list logo
