[Declude.JunkMail] v1.46 Released

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.46 ( http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm ). It includes several minor fixes and enhancements since the last release. The release notes can be found at http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm . -Scott --- [This

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain setting

2002-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
I guess I really should read the manual once in a while. :-) What about the XINHEADER, XOUTHEADER, XSENDER and XSPOOLNAME in the Global.cfg file? Is there a way to set those per domain? John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Domain setting

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I guess I really should read the manual once in a while. :-) What about the XINHEADER, XOUTHEADER, XSENDER and XSPOOLNAME in the Global.cfg file? Is there a way to set those per domain? No, those only work in the global.cfg file, and apply to all E-mail going through the server.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Dean Zingle, Ipswitch.ca
Huh? Did you read the article John? I may have to re-read the article, but I got the exact opposite out of it ... Dean - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:31 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Madscientist
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.] [NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
Time to start wearing my eye glasses again. John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835 714-578-7999, ext. 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reliancesoft.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claimscourt

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.] OK, I'll bite. This server does in fact have a reverse

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
You may have it set up internally, but look here; http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.88.36.96 Not according to what the Internet can see. NS2.SAVVIS.NET. (an authoritative nameserver for 88.216.in-addr.arpa.) says that there are no PTR records for 216.88.36.96. To get a PTR record,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Todd Holt
When I follow the dnsstuff link that John gave: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.88.36.96 I get varied results. Sometimes, it does come back with a revdns and sometimes not. I have attached the results from 2 attempts. Run it a few times and see the difference. Scott, is there a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claimscourt

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
When I follow the dnsstuff link that John gave: http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.88.36.96 I get varied results. Sometimes, it does come back with a revdns and sometimes not. I have attached the results from 2 attempts. Run it a few times and see the difference. Good catch.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Madscientist
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.] Thanks... I've forwarded that info as well. _M |

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Charles Frolick
The issue is specific to his domain, since I use Savvis for my backbone, I thought it best to check, and everything is fine for my block 209.144.1.0/24 in both servers. Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Madscientist
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.] Today, I have all the luck. %^b _M | -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
Doesn't the SOA automatically increment when a change is made? Or is that only in Windows 2000 DNS? John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835 714-578-7999, ext. 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reliancesoft.com   -Original Message-

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claimscourt

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
Doesn't the SOA automatically increment when a change is made? Some DNS servers will automatically increment the SOA, others do not. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread Todd Holt
And if you do it automatically, then its, well automatic! :-)) Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Madscientist Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
Is it happy hour yet? John Tolmachoff IT Manager, Network Engineer 211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106 Fullerton, CA  92835 714-578-7999, ext. 104 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reliancesoft.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Madscientist

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with some headers.

2002-03-26 Thread Chuck Schick
Scott: When I go to Osirusoft to check for an open relay the Ip does not show up as an open relay except for under xbl.selwerd.cx and then I get the following message. start (127.0.0.4) 204.127.131.29 is DNSbl listed. by xbl.selwerd.cx www.onesitemarket.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with some headers.

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
(127.0.0.4) 204.127.131.29 is DNSbl listed. by xbl.selwerd.cx www.onesitemarket.com ATT signed a pink contract hosting proxy.4esc.net please see http://selwerd.cx/xbl/ this is not a list of open relays What is a pink contract and the hosting proxy mean. Going to Google and entering pink

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with some headers.

2002-03-26 Thread Chuck Schick
So is the answer that these IPs are sites hosted by onesitemarket.com on the ATT backbone? So can I block these without fear of blocking legitimate email from ATT.net? Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. 303-421-5140 www.warp8.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with some headers.

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
So is the answer that these IPs are sites hosted by onesitemarket.com on the ATT backbone? So can I block these without fear of blocking legitimate email from ATT.net? It looks like XBL blacklisted the entire Class B range there, which includes the main @worldnet.att.net mailservers. So

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with some headers.

2002-03-26 Thread Chuck Schick
I just want to block the class C 204.127.131.0-254/ not the class B. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. 303-421-5140 www.warp8.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Help with some headers.

2002-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I just want to block the class C 204.127.131.0-254/ not the class B. XBL seems to have listed the whole Class B. I can't say whether or not that Class C range would have legitimate mail coming from it, but I can almost guarantee you that there would be legitimate mail coming from the Class

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-claims court

2002-03-26 Thread David Stavert
I have been through this s number of times. Savvis will probably just do recursive queries. As I assume they have large blocks of addresses so the root number servers point to Savvis which will then hand off the query to your server. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]