I have been through this s number of times. Savvis will probably just do
recursive queries. As I assume they have large blocks of addresses so the
root number servers point to Savvis which will then hand off the query to
your server.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
Scott:
To follow up on this thread - does anyone know how to get a hold of someone
at spamcop and find out why their parsing does not nab the ATT address and
the offending IP? They are doing us a tremendous disservice if that is the
case.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
>I just want to block the class C 204.127.131.0-254/ not the class B.
XBL seems to have listed the whole Class B.
I can't say whether or not that Class C range would have legitimate mail
coming from it, but I can almost guarantee you that there would be
legitimate mail coming from the Class
I just want to block the class C 204.127.131.0-254/ not the class B.
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
>So is the answer that these IPs are sites hosted by onesitemarket.com on the
>ATT backbone? So can I block these without fear of blocking legitimate
>email from ATT.net?
It looks like XBL blacklisted the entire Class B range there, which
includes the main @worldnet.att.net mailservers. So bl
So is the answer that these IPs are sites hosted by onesitemarket.com on the
ATT backbone? So can I block these without fear of blocking legitimate
email from ATT.net?
Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
303-421-5140
www.warp8.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
>(127.0.0.4) 204.127.131.29 is DNSbl listed. by xbl.selwerd.cx
>
>www.onesitemarket.com
>AT&T signed a pink contract
>hosting proxy.4esc.net
>please see http://selwerd.cx/xbl/
>this is not a list of open relays
>
>What is a pink contract and the hosting proxy mean.
Going to Google and entering "
Scott:
When I go to Osirusoft to check for an open relay the Ip does not show up as
an open relay except for under xbl.selwerd.cx and then I get the following
message.
start
(127.0.0.4) 204.127.131.29 is DNSbl listed. by xbl.selwerd.cx
www.onesitemarket.com
Is it happy hour yet?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Madscientist
Sent:
And if you do it automatically, then its, well automatic! :-))
Todd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Madscientist
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL:Spammers lose in small-c
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
That all depends on how you're managing your DNS... If you
>Doesn't the SOA automatically increment when a change is made?
Some DNS servers will automatically increment the SOA, others do not.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMa
Doesn't the SOA automatically increment when a change is made?
Or is that only in Windows 2000 DNS?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From
>The issue is specific to his domain, since I use Savvis for my backbone, I
>thought it best to check, and everything is fine for my block 209.144.1.0/24
>in both servers.
Actually, it doesn't seem specific to his domain. It's specific to all
Savvis reverse DNS entries in the 216.88.0.0/16 Cla
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
Today, I have all the luck. %^b
_M
| -Original Messag
The issue is specific to his domain, since I use Savvis for my backbone, I
thought it best to check, and everything is fine for my block 209.144.1.0/24
in both servers.
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
Thanks... I've forwarded that info as well.
_M
| -Ori
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
Once upon a time they had done this... Long ago... Somebod
>When I follow the dnsstuff link that John gave:
>
>http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.88.36.96
>
>I get varied results. Sometimes, it does come back with a revdns and
>sometimes not. I have attached the results from 2 attempts. Run it a few
>times and see the difference.
Good catch.
When I follow the dnsstuff link that John gave:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.88.36.96
I get varied results. Sometimes, it does come back with a revdns and
sometimes not. I have attached the results from 2 attempts. Run it a few
times and see the difference.
Scott, is there a d
You may have it set up internally, but look here;
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.88.36.96
Not according to what the Internet can see.
NS2.SAVVIS.NET. (an authoritative nameserver for 88.216.in-addr.arpa.)
says that there are no PTR records for 216.88.36.96.
To get a PTR record, you
>[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All
>Internet hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing
>reverse DNS entry will cause your mail to be treated as spam on some
>servers, such as AOL.]
>
>
>OK, I'll bite. This server does in fact have a re
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a revers
Time to start wearing my eye glasses again.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
[NOTE: Your mail server [216.88.36.96] is missing a revers
I am still waiting for his response.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don
I have to agree, John. I thought this was a step in the right direction.
Not to be negative, but...
Are these fines large enough to stop SPAMmers that could potentially make
much more than the fines. In essence, they could be a cost of doing
business for the SPAMmers. Does anyone know how much
Hehe!
Whack with the return receipt sender clue-stick! Next...
As soon as I saw it - I thought of the wrath of Len!
-Don S.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:
Huh? Did you read the article John? I may have to re-read the article, but
I got the exact opposite out of it ...
Dean
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DORKZTL
Great. One more court decision making our life hard.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] O
OK, ready for the onslaught of comments.
Sorry.
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com
>I guess I really should read the manual once in a while. :-)
>
>What about the XINHEADER, XOUTHEADER, XSENDER and XSPOOLNAME in the
>Global.cfg file? Is there a way to set those per domain?
No, those only work in the global.cfg file, and apply to all E-mail going
through the server.
I guess I really should read the manual once in a while. :-)
What about the XINHEADER, XOUTHEADER, XSENDER and XSPOOLNAME in the
Global.cfg file? Is there a way to set those per domain?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-799
>Is there a way to configure Declude not to scan/process all mail on a
>single virtual domain?
You can see the "Per-domain Configuration" section of the manual for
details on how to set this up.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http
Is there a way to configure Declude not to scan/process all mail on a
single virtual domain?
John Tolmachoff
IT Manager, Network Engineer
211 E. Imperial Hwy., Suite 106
Fullerton, CA 92835
714-578-7999, ext. 104
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for virus
>I am getting a lot of spam from a particular class C (204.127.131.0-254)
>and when I process it through spam cop it never shows those IPs as the
>offenders.
I'm not sure why it doesn't show those IPs as the offenders:
>Received: from mtiwgwc26.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.29] by
>mail.integra
I am getting a lot of spam from a particular class C (204.127.131.0-254)
and when I process it through spam cop it never shows those IPs as the
offenders. I was hoping that one of the spam experts on this list could
tell me what is going. I am asking because I am considering blocking that
Class
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.46 (
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm ). It includes several minor
fixes and enhancements since the last release. The release notes can be
found at http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm .
-Scott
---
[This E-ma
38 matches
Mail list logo
