> I believe this to be the first of many emails trying desperately to
> tweak every last feature of IMail and Declude to get the performance
> that I need. Please let me know anything you might need from me.
Performance Monitor will help you figure out whether only the CPU is
being pegged,
That is a good question. In my initial testing it looks as if the email is
deleted and not delivered to either user.
This is not a real good situation, but I don't think there is any way around
it. If I understand correctly, a single email sent to multiple recipients on
the same domain is not cop
I just thought this might be of interest to the group:
Dear Optimum Online Subscriber,
In just a few days you'll notice something very different about your
Optimum Online Inbox - where's the spam?
That's right. The annoying clutter of unsolicited e-mail will just about
vanish from your inbox, t
That is a good question. In my initial testing it looks as if the email is
deleted and not delivered to either user.
This is not a real good situation, but I don't think there is any way around
it. If I understand correctly, a single email sent to multiple recipients on
the same domain is not copie
First, we are here to help. :))
Have you made any performance tweaks, such as static page file and turning
off index services?
What is your partition setup on the server?
Are there any very large .mbx files?
I am sure you have no Anti-Virus scanning the mail boxes and Imail files,
including the
Imp about at the end of my rope. :) I have three gateways feeding my IMail
server which is running at 95% of its CPU capacity. I am running dual
Pentium 4 1.8 Ghz processes. I am currently hosting over 1500 domains with
around 13000 accounts not including alias's. I am filtering as much content
a
Imp about at the end of my rope. :) I have three gateways feeding my IMail
server which is running at 95% of its CPU capacity. I am running dual
Pentium 4 1.8 Ghz processes. I am currently hosting over 1500 domains with
around 13000 accounts not including alias's. I am filtering as much content
as
>Yeah I will at some point. I just want them stopped for now. I am
trying to read the archive to figure out how to use the filters
better. I will be moving any other questions to the Junkmail list.
>anyone have a list of good e - c a r d companies???
How can you tell the good bad and
<>
Just a quick note that we just received a call and a supoena from the
SEC Enforcement Division in Washington and they are actively going
after a spammer we had sign up here but Declude Hijack quickly halted.
The spammer is well known and commonly uses an account name
margaret_thomas
>The email that was sent matched the body text above 100%
Why would i need to block on the domain name also??
Not saying i don't need to just trying to see why.
Filter does not work with spaces. I think Scott, (Or I should say his huge
team of programmers) is working on a fix for that.
Examp
Dan,
Thanks I got it up and running with your direction to those threads.
One question I do have is if mail to more then one recipient and we are
deleting on the allrecips test will the other recipients receive the
mail?
Darrell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
That is exactly what I am doing and it works great. The thread was titled
"Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?" on 11/11/02. Also
the thread "allrecips function in ver 1.63" from yesterday
It uses the filter function and a .txt file.
You must have the version 1.63 and it must b
I seen a thread very similar to what I need to do awhile back, but I was
unable to key on it searching the archives.
We use the "nobody" alias and have had several users leave and their
mailboxes have been removed. Is there an easy way to bounce the mail
that is incoming from them with declude?
Thanks to those that have sent me test messages so far. (If you have not
sent one, please do so indicating what version on Exchange on what OS.)
So far, from the test messages I have seen, this only affects messages
created using OWA on Exchange 2000. Exchange 5.5 appears to be OK.
Here is what I
Sure thing, John. An OWA message is coming right up, from OWA for Exchange
5.5 SP4.
-Original Message-
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OWA and BASE64
If some one has access t
If some one has access to an account on OWA, can you please send a test
message to me via OWA?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Beh
Is any one else seeing that messages created/formatted in OWA are being
caught with BASE64?
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
-
But the comment I'm trying to add never matches up; I get a partial line
at some random part of the comment and then a carriage return/line feed
and then some more characters, like:
11/25/2002 19:28:19 Qea51019c009eaf11 Msg failed BENTALLIPBL (24
). Action=HOLD.
It turns out this is a glitch
19 matches
Mail list logo
