Hi Junkmail-users,
We've prepared a website where you can read more about SpamChk.
http://www.riedmann.it/spamchk/
There is a distribution archive, a installation guide for declude-users
and a history.
Some additional notes and recommendations:
The tests, actions and keywords are well tested.
One problem with held or bounced mail that notifies the intended
recipient that it was blocked, is, you did not elimiate the spam, only
change it's contents to hundreds of notifications of unwanted mail.
This will get very old, very fast, and lead to the blacklists you are
trying to avoid.
Reply to: Charles Frolick
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain? on Friday 9:35:39 AM
We already capture most spam and virus using weights in Declude,
so the user would only be hit with border line emails. I see this
as an ideal scenario for those that would want such a
That makes sense, a mixture of the two. In that case you would not want
to use CATCHALLMAILS, but use the border line weights to notify, and
let the customer decide to allow.
Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoNet, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
on 1/16/03 6:57 PM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I think I mentioned this to you
earlier, Scott; If you could have the user edit their addressbook in
Imail web mail as a whitelist, and Declude used this, then the user
could manage their own whitelist.
This is something that we are also
A week or two ago you had me upgrade to 1.65i14, which supposedly was fixing
the
That's an old interim release. :)
1.66 should be out later today, which will likely take care of the issue.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Scott,
would you like for me to downloaded a new interim release to CONFIRM that it
has since been fixed (you apparently thought back then, that it had been
fixed already)?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
---
[This E-mail was scanned for
Reply to: Charles Frolick
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WhiteList Per User or Domain? on Friday 11:05:37 AM
That's why I was making the inquiry earlier about using weights. The
whole weights model is easier to abide by and set upper and lower
parameters or limits for almost
would you like for me to downloaded a new interim release to CONFIRM that it
has since been fixed (you apparently thought back then, that it had been
fixed already)?
Sure, you can download the latest interim release at
http://www.declude.com/release/165i/declude.exe .
Hi,
then - sorry - but i21 still doesn't appear to work:
01/17/2003 13:41:51 Q4e6d4dac00e4e077 WEIGHTFILTER:-20 . Total weight = -20
01/17/2003 13:41:51 Q4e6d4dac00e4e077 E-mail whitelisted - automatically
passing all spam tests [63.107.174.]
01/17/2003 13:41:51 Q4e6d4dac00e4e077 Subject: Test
then - sorry - but i21 still doesn't appear to work:
01/17/2003 13:41:51 Q4e6d4dac00e4e077 WEIGHTFILTER:-20 . Total weight = -20
01/17/2003 13:41:51 Q4e6d4dac00e4e077 E-mail whitelisted - automatically
passing all spam tests [63.107.174.]
01/17/2003 13:41:51 Q4e6d4dac00e4e077 Subject: Test
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.66 (beta). See
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm . Notable changes since the
last beta include:
o Adds per-user whitelisting
o Adds whitelisting based on reverse DNS entry
o Reduces number of DNS lookups
o Can now define an
Scott, do you have an ETA guesstimate on how long the interval is between
the beta and RTM release?
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail
Scott, do you have an ETA guesstimate on how long the interval is between
the beta and RTM release?
No.
My best guess would be anywhere from about a month to several
months. We're very early in the beta cycle, as this is the first beta
since the last released version. We'll likely be
Scott:
Just to ask the obvious but to be sure...
Now the whitelist is a different file- just like fromfile?
WHITELIST WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\Whitelist.txt x
0 0
Is this the format?
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to ask the obvious but to be sure...
Now the whitelist is a different file- just like fromfile?
WHITELIST WHITELISTFILE D:\IMail\Declude\Whitelist.txt x
0 0
Is this the format?
Sorry, I should have specified.
The per-user/per-domain whitelisting works by adding
When the next official release comes out, and this whitelist.txt file
isn't beta anymore, does this mean the old way of doing it won't work
anymore?
In other words, am I going to have to take all my whitelisted addresses
and create a whitelist.txt file?
TIA,
Sharyn
We are the worldwide
Could I possibly ask another question?
This is replacing the
Whitelist FROM?
Whitelist TO?
Long day... Kind of slow..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL
Could I possibly ask another question?
This is replacing the
Whitelist FROM?
Whitelist TO?
No, those will still work as they have. The WHITELISTFILE option is a new
option (for the .junkmail files).
New releases are designed to work with older configuration files in almost
all cases.
Something just broke with 1.66. I have reverted.
Everyone check your log please.
I am investigating.
John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA
IT Manager, Network Engineer
RelianceSoft, Inc.
Fullerton, CA 92835
www.reliancesoft.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
Something just broke with 1.66. I have reverted.
Everyone check your log please.
There is an issue with v1.66 for people using Declude JunkMail Pro, who do
not have outgoing actions defined for all the spam tests. There is an
interim release at
While we're beating this into the ground like a tentpeg:
including, or specifically excluding, $default$.junkmail?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, 17 January 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
The new WHITELISTFILE option works with any file ending in .junkmail,
including the $default$.JunkMail file(s).
-Scott
At 04:34 PM 1/17/2003, you wrote:
While we're beating this into the ground like a tentpeg:
including, or specifically excluding,
23 matches
Mail list logo
