Title: Message
Scott,
I meant to ask you if the ALLRECIPS functionality was by
design, or was this something you were working on altering. Thanks for the
info.
Keith
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
JohnsonSent: Saturday,
I meant to ask you if the ALLRECIPS functionality was by design, or
was this something you were working on altering. Thanks for the info.
It is by design, so that ALLRECIPS 0 CONTAINS [EMAIL PROTECTED] will catch
both E-mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as well as E-mail to aliases
Has the addition of the TMDA test been discussed with Junkmail/Imail?
http://tmda.net
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
on 3/17/03 9:28 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
Has the addition of the TMDA test been discussed with Junkmail/Imail?
http://tmda.net
I don't know but I wanted to mention that we just started using the Bonded
Sender service at http://www.bondedsender.com/ and it is significantly
reducing false
Has the addition of the TMDA test been discussed with Junkmail/Imail?
http://tmda.net
Actually, that's really more of a feature than a program. Technically, it
is a program (that they think doesn't work on Windows). However, if
something like that were to be implemented in Declude JunkMail,
We are having trouble white-listing a couple of YahooGroup Discussion
Groups.
The messages are not from the group, they are from the group members,
and they often fail our spam tests for various reasons.
How would one go about white-listing a specific YahooGroup (or other)
discussion group?
I have adjusted the spamcop weight from 7 to 10 in the global.cfg file but messages
are still coming thru that have spamcop marked as 7. Any ideas?
Example:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP [7]
Larry French
Marion Computer Center, Inc.
740.382.2881
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
I have adjusted the spamcop weight from 7 to 10 in the global.cfg file but
messages are still coming thru that have spamcop marked as 7. Any ideas?
Example:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP [7]
Were they coming through as X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP [7] before? I'm
guessing they were coming
Hi Scott:
I'm trying to come up with a scheme that lets me whitelist certain IP
addresses PER DOMAIN.
Of course, I probably could use something like that in the default Junkmail
file of a domain folder:
WHITELIST ipfile C:\IMail\Declude\ipwhitelist.txt x -20 0
However, that will not
Hi Scott:
decided to keep a list of all the E-mail addresses that sent
SpamArrest users E-mail, and then started spamming them! Because of that,
a lot of people are leery about responding to confirmation requests.
Which of course is not really an issue. By the time the INITIAL email is
A) an IP whitelist to match the IP blacklist feature
The idea of a BLACKLIST option in the global.cfg file comes up often, but
unfortunately doesn't work.
The problem is that whitelisting and blacklisting, although they sound like
complete opposites of each other, they are not. Whitelisting
This email got through as whitelisted. The dial up IP is not ours but they
have our domain in there. The from domain is in our blacklist, yet this
email shows as being whitelisted:
Received: from StarGazer.TenForward.com [65.161.10.3] by tenforward.com
(SMTPD32-7.14) id A28147C012E; Mon, 17 Mar
This email got through as whitelisted.
Yes, it was whitelisted:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted
So the question here is which one of your whitelists caught this E-mail?
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted
So the question here is which one of your whitelists caught this E-mail?
bottom-line-prices.com is not in either global.cfg or whitelist. txt. It is
in blacklist.txt.
tenforward.com is our own domain and is whitelisted in global.cfg. Could
this be the problem
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted
So the question here is which one of your whitelists caught this E-mail?
bottom-line-prices.com is not in either global.cfg or whitelist. txt. It is
in blacklist.txt.
tenforward.com is our own domain and is whitelisted in global.cfg. Could
this be the problem
The return address of the E-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED], so if you
whitelisted E-mail with a return address that includes @tenforward.com,
this E-mail would be whitelisted. In most cases it is impossible to
detect
whether or not a return address is forged.
I took out @tenforward.com in the
I turned on the iMail Calendar for a client and they responded with an
odd problem. If someone uses the calendar to invite someone else, there
is evidently a javascript popup window that can come from the request
email. This javascript then allows the user to click to respond. It's
this
The return address of the E-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED], so if you
whitelisted E-mail with a return address that includes @tenforward.com,
this E-mail would be whitelisted. In most cases it is impossible to detect
whether or not a return address is forged.
I took out @tenforward.com in the
I turned on the iMail Calendar for a client and they responded with an odd
problem. If someone uses the calendar to invite someone else, there is
evidently a javascript popup window that can come from the request email.
This javascript then allows the user to click to respond. It's this
Sheldon, because you're a service provider and we're a private business, I
don't know if this will help you, but this is what we do.
We whitelist our IMail server by its internal address, as well as the
internal addresses of our internal mail hosts.
We do not whitelist by our domain name, for
Scott,
Is outbound scanning limited to per-domain rules (using the folder/subfolder method)
or can per-user config files placed within the domain folders still be used?
Here's the overall question:
We are considering setting up a 2nd IMail server as a gateway to accomplish the
following:
1.
21 matches
Mail list logo
