This is precisely what we do, although not to the tune of 150k messages
a day. Imail and Declude make an AWESOME gateway mail server. Only when
external contact is required ( in or out ) do we actually have to touch
the Imail/declude box. Our internal Exchange server isn't bothered with
all the ext
To send an alert email to multiple recipients, the syntax is:
To: %MAILFROM%, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Courtesy Email From %LOCALHOST%
If this is correct, I get the [EMAIL PROTECTED] emails for monitoring
purposes with no problem, but the %MAILFROM% never gets the alert.
The free version of IMail is for one domain. Can it be used with JM and
Virus?
As far as I know, it should work fine with all the Declude
programs. However, I believe that it has store and forward disabled, which
would prevent it from being used as a gateway.
The free version of IMail is for one domain. Can it be used with JM and
Virus?
Doug
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
typ
To send an alert email to multiple recipients, the syntax is:
To: %MAILFROM%, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, the IMail1.exe program that Declude uses to send the E-mail won't
accept that, because of the space in there (it is very picky!). If you
change it to:
To: %MAILFROM%,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
th
Scott,
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache
for Declude? I think the results Kami is seeing is because Ipswitch
included a DNS cache in the new Queue Manager, and their ip4r test may
be using it instead of the DNS. Declude could definitely benefit from
it since
a-so
thank you master
grasshopper
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Alert Emails
>
>
>
> >To send an alert emai
Is that all? Do I enter something like:
TESTNAME WARN **(or HOLD or DELETE)
somewhere in the body of the global.cfg?
It seems like it still isn't filtering out messages that should have been
pulled.
At 12:39 05.27.2003, you wrote:
Hello - what is the proper syntax for using a blacklist (i.e.
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache
for Declude?
This is something that we have been thinking about doing for some time.
However, if the DNS server is on the local network, there would be little
benefit from doing this (as the local DNS server will cache the in
Imgate http://imgate.meiway.com/ was specifically made to address these
problems.
The setup process isn't very cute, but the performance gains are phenomenal.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng.
(Karl Drugge)
Sent: Wednesday,
Is that all? Do I enter something like:
TESTNAME WARN **(or HOLD or DELETE)
somewhere in the body of the global.cfg?
You'll need that line in the \IMail\Declude\$default$.JunkMail file (for
incoming E-mail) and/or the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file (for outgoing
E-mail), if you want the filte
> >To send an alert email to multiple recipients, the syntax is:
> >
> >To: %MAILFROM%, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Actually, the IMail1.exe program that Declude uses to send the
> E-mail won't
> accept that, because of the space in there (it is very picky!). If you
> change it to:
>
> To: %MAILFRO
> Actually, the IMail1.exe program that Declude uses to send the
> E-mail won't
> accept that, because of the space in there (it is very picky!). If you
> change it to:
>
> To: %MAILFROM%,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> then it should work.
I removed the space, save the .eml file and still no luck.
This is
Hi Chuck:
"are you running the DNS cache in IMail 8?"
Yes and per your request I disabled it and will let you know how it goes.
But also per Scott's recent comment:
- we are running the dns locally and they are part of the same active
directory. So it may not matter much.
Regards,
Kami
-
Hi:
>> "ORDB hatte für den Open-Relay-Check zwei GMX-Adressen verwendet, die
nicht auf SMTP-Auth konfiguriert waren." In der eigenen
Open-Relay-Definition beschreibe ORDB ein solches System aber als einen
Mail-Server, der Nachrichten weiterleite, "bei denen weder der Sender noch
der Empfänger ein
>Imgate http://imgate.meiway.com/ was specifically made to address these
>problems.
We're already running IMGate on the front end and getting ready to run it on
the delivery end as well
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came fr
- Original Message -
From: "David Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)
> Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions?
>
> We've got an Imail server on a Dell
Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed changes?
We are doing some thinking on ways to improve performance. Although we
have very few reports of performance issues with Declude JunkMail, we like
our software to be as efficient as possible.
v1.70 will have a "PREWHITE
Will this work with the AUTOWHITELIST feature?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: "R. Scott Perry"
Sent: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:26:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)
>Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed changes?
We are doing som
Will this work with the AUTOWHITELIST feature?
No, just "WHITELIST FROM" and "WHITELIST IP". The problem is that the
AUTOWHITELIST feature is dependent upon the recipients, but the recipient
list isn't processed until after the spam tests are run.
We have just released Declude JunkMail v1.69 (beta). See
http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm . Notable changes since the
last beta include:
o COMMENTS test will now also work with any made-up tag beginning with "
o SPAMDOMAINS test will now allow an alias (IE "hotmail.com msn.com" to
That should be "v1.70".
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Hi Scott:
>> o SPAMDOMAINS test will now allow an alias (IE "hotmail.com msn.com"
to
check @hotmail.com, <<
Exactly ONE alias, or can it be:
netscape.com aol.com compuserve.com
(@netscape.com, allowing either of the three RDNS)?
>> o PREWHITELIST ON option to automaticall
>> o SPAMDOMAINS test will now allow an alias (IE "hotmail.com msn.com"
to check @hotmail.com, <<
Exactly ONE alias, or can it be:
netscape.com aol.com compuserve.com
(@netscape.com, allowing either of the three RDNS)?
No. The file for the SPAMDOMAINS test can now contain either 1
Hi Scott:
Could you explain: DOSENDERACTIONS ON
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.69 (beta) released
Could you explain: DOSENDERACTIONS ON
When this is set (with a line "DOSENDERACTIONS ON" in the
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file), Declude JunkMail will attempt to take
actions on an E-mail based on the sender (as well as any
recipients). Declude JunkMail will treat the sender as if it was a
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)
>
> >Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed
changes?
>
> We are doing some
Scott,
I am confused,
How do I find out about SPAMDOMAINS test? DOSENDERACTIONS etc..I cannot find
anything about any of this in the manual.
Darryl Koster
~~
Status Technologies Inc. President/Owner
"Let Us Help You Get Th
We've been getting a lot of spam in the last week or so that bypasses all
our spam filters -- they are all copied to the postmaster@ account for our
domain. Apparently, they are taking advantage of the common practice of
whitelisting the postmaster and the inability of spam filtering programs to
s
> > Does anyone that doesn't agree with Bill have any suggestions?
>
> Scott, I'm just wondering what your thoughts are on these proposed
changes?
FWIW, I have been extremely busy so far this week. I am in the midst of a 3
day Windows Server 2003 training class. Therefore, I have not been able to
> I know it has been asked for before and said to be "impossible"
(programmer
> speak, for don't want to do it -- I know, being one), but PLEASE consider
> creating multiple copies of messages that arrive for multiple recipients,
so
> that the spam filters can operate (yes, this means some complica
Check the footer of these list messages and you will see a link to the
Declude JunkMail archive site:
http://www.mail-archive.com (I notice that the site is down right
now)
Then do a search on SPAMDOMAINS and DOSENDERACTIONS and you will find
Scott's explanations on how to implement and
Title: Message
Hi..
I have not been
able to figure out how I can have a message delivered and yet an automatic
response also be sent to the sender with the original email.
I thought we can
do this with JM but the only action that I see can send the email with the
original message is boun
Title: Message
Kami,
I know this sounds
a little primitive but you could forewarn users at the point when they make
a payment that an automated acknowledgment will be sent but may be blocked if
challenge/response is implemented by their ISP/IT dept.
What happens in
challenge/response whe
Title: Message
Hi
Dave:
Yes.. I
agree.
I wonder how this
is handled with Vacation Notices or Auto Responses by IMail. Since all it
takes is someone with a vacation notice email someone else with vacation
notice...
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma
I know it has been asked for before and said to be "impossible" (programmer
speak, for don't want to do it -- I know, being one), but PLEASE consider
creating multiple copies of messages that arrive for multiple recipients, so
that the spam filters can operate (yes, this means some complications,
I have not been able to figure out how I can have a message delivered and
yet an automatic response also be sent to the sender with the original email.
It sounds like you want to use the ALERT action, which is the same as the
BOUNCE action except that the E-mail will be delivered rather than del
In the interim, a less complex method might be to have a setting which
will ignore a white list entry for an address if more than one recipient
is specified. This might take the form of a special kind of whitelist
entry. Most valid messages to postmaster, for example, only have
postmaster as the re
Scott:
I think this has the potential to solve our problem...I did not think of
Alert.. We might be able to solve the problem with challenge response
issues with automatic web responses.
A new market for JM :)
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
[Please send any responses to the Declude JunkMail mailing list]
Does anyone have a good example of what and where the white list command
should look like in the global.cfg file.
They can go anywhere in the file, so you could have lines such as:
WHITELIST FROM[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WHITELIST
40 matches
Mail list logo
