Yeah, I have seen about 10 of those in the last 24 hours.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08,
We switched to an older version (7.13) at 0001 on 5 July due to the sharp
increase in spool size and the Queue manager stopping. We decided it was
looking like a cascading failure of the entire system and that Imail was not
compatible with 2003. FYI - 2003 registry is not transportable to NT 4.0.
Our server is as follows:
Super Micro X5DPL -8 motherboard with Adaptec 2010S RAID card.
2 Intel Xeon processors
2GB RAM
5 SCSI HDD in RAID 5 with sixth drive in hot standby.
The OS - Applications and Spool are on the same RAID system (drive C).
The spool started running well for the first two d
Can I have Declude COPY the lesser valued mail to the SPAM folder in the
spool? So I can review it with Spamreview? If so, what's the way to do it?
That's the HOLD action. Although you can use it, the HOLD action will
prevent the E-mail from being delivered. So if you use the HOLD action,
the
Thanks for the info, finally got the command to turn it off should we decide
to do so. We've heard both sides of the issue with PIX and can't find the
definitive answer one-way or the other. What kinds of problems does having
this enabled produce?
Last I checked, this was seriously broken -- speci
Windows 2003 has proven to be very stable. Our problem is with Imail. The
spool queue in particular. It grows at an outrageous rate. It got to be
almost 4GB in size. Imail was not handling mail correctly and appeared to be
just leaving mail in the queue.
There are known issues with IMail v8's queu
Hi Terry:
Do you have 5-DISK SCSI configuration for everything? You mean you have 5
disks that has OS, spool, mailboxes all in one RAID array?
I am not sure if this is the best of configurations.
This is how we have ours:
System: OS + Applications: 2 SCSI Drives - RAID 0+1 [Mirrored]
Spool:
That would REALLY be helpful. Thank you!!!
Windows 2003 has proven to be very stable. Our problem is with Imail. The
spool queue in particular. It grows at an outrageous rate. It got to be
almost 4GB in size. Imail was not handling mail correctly and appeared to be
just leaving mail in the queue.
Thanks for the info, finally got the command to turn it off should we decide
to do so. We've heard both sides of the issue with PIX and can't find the
definitive answer one-way or the other. What kinds of problems does having
this enabled produce? Our issue is with the enormous build up of the spoo
Well, after using the same Declude setup since we started back in October, I
finally just changed the weight system to weight ranges, and altered what is
done to the mail. I've also installed Spamreview, and hope to cut down on
mail copied for review. Here's my question / setup:
here is the setup:
Terry,
Like others have stated, I don't know exactly what you mean by stable. But,
I notice you still have your PIX's "SMTP fixup protocol" enabled. You *will*
have e-mail problems with this enabled. :-) You should turn this off.
According to the archives, this was recommended to you back on the 26
Anybody running Imail with Declude under Windows 2003? We're having a VERY
DIFFICULT time getting stable performance out of this.
What do you mean by stable?
Does that mean that services are crashing? E-mails not being
delivered? Very slow performance?
What type of server is it? How many E-m
DJM has officially caught the best piece of spam I have ever seen.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: Dimensional Warp Generator Needed al eoscip r qch
Greetings,
We need a vendor who can offer immediate
Terry:
We also use: F-Prot & AVG anti-virus.
We do not use Hijack.
I guess when you say having a hard time getting stable performance.. What do
you mean by that?
Stable performance out of Declude or Windows 2003?
I will email you our config files off list.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Mess
In addition to your list we're running Declude Hijack and F-Prot.
Can you send me your config and setup files so I can compare? I know there's
just something I've got set wrong somewhere.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sen
Disregard my previous reply. I went to DNSSTUFF and checked. I had the
server itself assigned to that IP. I've changed it to match the email
domain. My original issue remains. We have not been able to get stability
from Imail in the past three months.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAI
My DNS servers show reverse DNS entries in the system. How do I test this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Parks
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Declude. Virus-owner; 'Declude. JunkMail
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail + Dec
Hi;
Yes... We have been running for almost 2 months now..
- IMail 8.1
- Declude JM
- Declude Virus
- Windows 2003 Standard Edition
It has been very stable and solid as a rock..
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks
S
[NOTE: Your mail server [64.68.203.121] is missing a reverse DNS entry. All Internet
hosts are required to have a reverse DNS entry. The missing reverse DNS entry will
cause your mail to be treated as spam on some servers, such as AOL.]
Anybody running Imail with Declude under Windows 2003? We'
Sorry to interject but this might help: Our flow rates analysis does
show a change in the last week or so. Where the spam/ham ratio was
generally 75%, it is now consistently 78% or more. This is very recent.
http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Performance/FlowRates.jsp
This _may_ be attribu
Anyone else seeing an unusually large attack from Hotmail IP addresses?
My log files have tripled in the last 12 hours. Here's a snippet from
today's log:
07:08 00:00 SMTPD(0D96028C) [65.54.165.29] RCPT
TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07:08 00:00 SMTPD(0D96028C) [65.54.165.29] ERR mail.promit.com invalid
u
Yep, we did too. A couple of them. Can't wait to sign up for this one ;-)
On 07/08/03 1:17am you wrote...
>Anyone else get this?:
>
>
>=Dear Sir/Madam
>
>I would like to inquire if you would be interested in incorporating
>email postage support to your product. It will al
I've seen as much as a doubling over the last 3 months but nothing in particular over
the last week. Is your total/total up, or just the stuff getting through?
Dan
On Monday, July 7, 2003 9:48, Koree A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Was just curious if anyone else is seeing the HUGE increa
Anyone else get this?:
==
Dear Sir/Madam
I would like to inquire if you would be interested in incorporating
email postage support to your product. It will allow your customers to
enforce payment for emails that are not on their white list, or have a
certain level of spam
24 matches
Mail list logo
