As far as I know, Imail can only be configured for one port at
a a time for SMTP service. Let's say it's the standard port 25.
You can use a proxy server like WinGate or any email
antivirus gateway software to convert requests for a specfic port to port
25.
- Original Message
Can IMAIL be configured to both port 25 and
another.
If not can my Cisco Router be configured to do
this.
Fred
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Doherty
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:08
AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comcas
Hi Matt-
click... click... click...
So here we go again. The old broken record.
If Comcast and RoadRunner blocked port 25, they
would be down many millions of messages per day.
If you really feel the need to provide outbound mail service
for your clients, why not do it on a different
If my memory serves me right, there was a little more than 14,000 mail
hosts identified in SenderBase for comcast.net exactly one month ago.
Guess what...
http://www.senderbase.org/search?searchString=comcast.net
I believe that says 26,217, over a 90% increase in the last month.
That's
So far, it's bull. After 1 week, my logs show no reduction in junk traffic
from ComCast reverse DNS addresses.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comcast Update
Now, I'm confused as to what is generating the X-RBL warnings.
Those are generated by the WARN action. If an E-mail fails any spam test
that uses the WARN action, the X-RBL-Warning: header gets added.
I'm also confused about what the XINHEADER does.
It adds a customized header to all incoming E
Title: Whitelist warning headers?
It appears that we need an XOUTHEADER to
make it work. Perhaps this is because we use Declude as gateway to our
Exchange server. The XINHEADER apparently had no affect.
I’m not sure what the difference is….have
to re-read the docs.
Thanks for you
We only had the XINHEADER entry, not the XOUTHEADER.I'm not sure how
we lost that. I've always thought the the X-RBL Warning header showed a
the result the XINHEADER entry.
I added the XOUTHEADER and it works as you describedthanks. This
makes a HUGE difference.
Now, I'm confused as t
#4's a tricky one I've been watching for some time. Turns out its a generic
server failure such that were a filter in place to look for it and you had a
real server failure, every message would trip the filter.
What's needed is a way to prevent the errors, which seems to be easier said
than done.
http://australianit.news.com.au/articles/0,7204,8901975%5e15388%5e%5enbv%5e,
00.html
Spam zombies on the rise
Anick Jesdanun
MARCH 08, 2004
NEXT time you're looking for a culprit for all that junk mail flooding your
inbox, have a glance in the mirror.
Spammers are increasingly exp
Title: Whitelist warning headers?
This entry: XINHEADER
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
is in my global.cfg file.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Agid, Corby
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:09
PM
To: [EMA
Here's a sample of headers from a test. Below the headers is a snip
from the log file that shows the whitelist is invoked.
But you do not have an X-Spam-Tests-Failed: header at all -- that's why
"Whitelist" isn't showing up. Do you have the following lines in your
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg fil
Here's a sample of headers from a test. Below the headers is a snip
from the log file that shows the whitelist is invoked.
headers begin here
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from msx.renoairport.com ([192.168.1.246]) by
msx.renoairport.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.
I've never seen "whitelisted" in a header. I just made a simple
whitelist rule for testing, and it doesn't seem to add the header.
What does the header show if the E-mail is whitelisted?
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam soluti
We are running 1.75.
I've never seen "whitelisted" in a header. I just made a simple
whitelist rule for testing, and it doesn't seem to add the header.
Perhaps some other misconfiguration is preventing this?
Corby
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Title: Whitelist warning headers?
I just looked and it seems we have that
line by default in the config file, but whitelisted messages don’t get
the header you showed. Did you do something in addition to that entry?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
I just looked and it seems we have that line by default in the config
file, but whitelisted messages don t get the header you showed. Did you
do something in addition to that entry?
Are you running an old version of Declude JunkMail (v1.58 or earlier -- you
can type "\IMail\Declude -diag" from
Title: Whitelist warning headers?
Where did you put this? It sounds like it
might do the trick.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of marc catuogno
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:10
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Whitelist war
Title: Message
Instead of using the
whitelist option you could use a filter file like the blacklist with negative
weights. this will add a header. this also allows for more info to be added to
the header like why that address was whitelisted to begin
with
-Original Message-From
Title: Whitelist warning headers?
Something
like this:
XINHEADER X-Spam-Tests-Failed:
%TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
Which puts this header in:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]
This works for me for anything whitelisted
through Declude.
Marc
-Original Messa
Is there anyway to add warning headers to email when they pass a whitelist
rule?
Unfortunately, I cannot think of any way to do that (although the
%TESTSFAILED% variable will return "Whitelisted" for E-mail that is
whitelisted).
I tried adding WHITELIST WARN, to the $default$.JunkMail file,
Title: Whitelist warning headers?
Hello,
Is there anyway to add warning headers to email when they pass a whitelist rule?
I tried adding WHITELIST WARN, to the $default$.JunkMail file, but that didn’t do anything.
Recently, I’ve had problems diagnosing problems and eventually discovered
> 1. I know this has been mentioned before: the ability to
> have a space in the filter. I'd like to filter (space)cialis.
> Rather than +10 c_alis -10 spec_alist
In the meantime you can try www.spamchk.com as external test for declude.
In the ini-file you can specify a space-char (usually "#
23 matches
Mail list logo
