[Declude.JunkMail] Optional IP4r logging?

2004-06-28 Thread Markus Gufler
Would it be possible to have an optional parameter like IP4RLOGING ON If enabled it will write a separate logfile containing only response times from the different IP4r tests. So we can determine periodicaly what ip4r tests has the longest response times or maybe are also timing out. And all this

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAMWT40:Attn:Urgent Sales Verification!Act now!

2004-06-28 Thread Admin
BUY CHEAP DRUGS,OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Hung/zombie Declude Processes

2004-06-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
>>Does _Declude_ run from the command line (against a Q file, not just >>on its own)? If so, check that the IMail service accounts have >>permissions equivalent to the interactive (Administrator?) session. > Great idea but I'll probably have wait to hear from Scott if this is > possible. Of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hung/zombie Declude Processes

2004-06-28 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
>>So until I figure out why my program causes Declude to never return >>I was wondering if there is a command line switch for Declude to >>cause it to flush itself out of the process queue. >> >> >This, if it existed, would be scarcely different from ending the task >using Task Manager

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hung/zombie Declude Processes

2004-06-28 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> I'm writing a new TEST (actually it is a handler that pretends to be > a TEST.) No diff, obviously. > So until I figure out why my program causes Declude to never return > I was wondering if there is a command line switch for Declude to > cause it to flush itself out of the process queue.

[Declude.JunkMail] Hung/zombie Declude Processes

2004-06-28 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
It's happened twice today. Declude hangs. That's the short and not very flattering story. So for the rest of the story read-on. I'm writing a new TEST (actually it is a handler that pretends to be a TEST.) Since I don't have access to a C/C++ compiler right now I thought I'd proto-type it usin

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Imail Admin
Hi Scott, That's just what I needed. I took the script from someone else's earlier reply to my questions about CMDSPACE. I guess the email message reformatted the text, so the way I read it was to put the filter name inside the filter file instead of inside the global.cfg file. Now that I've fi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a second question: we have clients that are getting hit with the REVDNS test. Is this because their ISP has no reverse DNS entry for that IP? Correct. If we want to fix this problem, then do we need to have our clients talk to their access ISP about setting up a reverse DNS entry? Correct.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] fromfile test gone bad.

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a fromfile test that we have been using for the past 2 years. In the last two weeks we have had a couple of clients complain about missed emails, when I have checked the Declude log it shows that it had failed our fromfile test. When I search the fromfile I do not find the offending from

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
1. I put a reference to the filter in the global.cfg file (e.g., c:\imail\declude\cmdspacefilter.txt x 0 0). Notice that I gave the filter a weight of zero. Is that "MYTESTNAME filter c:\imail\declude\cmdspacefilter.txt x 0 0" (good) or just "c:\imail\declude\cmdspacefilter.txt x 0 0" (bad)?

[Declude.JunkMail] fromfile test gone bad.

2004-06-28 Thread Chuck Schick
I have a fromfile test that we have been using for the past 2 years. In the last two weeks we have had a couple of clients complain about missed emails, when I have checked the Declude log it shows that it had failed our fromfile test. When I search the fromfile I do not find the offending from d

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Imail Admin
Thanks for your patience Scott. I think I understand now, although my actual test doesn't seem to be working. Perhaps you can tell me where I'm going wrong? 1. I put a reference to the filter in the global.cfg file (e.g., c:\imail\declude\cmdspacefilter.txt x 0 0). Notice that I gave the filte

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
Imail Admin wrote: >Sorry Scott, I just realized I was being Monday-morning befuddled. The >inclusion of the filter line in the global.cfg file only defines the test, >just as all the other tests are defined there. It's only when I put the >reference in the $default$.junkmail file to that test

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I must really be slow today, so my apologies in advance... Applying actions for different tests for different users/domains is fine. If I put "YOURTESTNAME DELETE" into a per-domain junkmail file, then messages that fail that test will be deleted. Correct (but only for E-mail to that one domain)

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Imail Admin
I must really be slow today, so my apologies in advance... Applying actions for different tests for different users/domains is fine. If I put "YOURTESTNAME DELETE" into a per-domain junkmail file, then messages that fail that test will be deleted. However, what about weighting? If I define a fi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Imail Admin
Sorry Scott, I just realized I was being Monday-morning befuddled. The inclusion of the filter line in the global.cfg file only defines the test, just as all the other tests are defined there. It's only when I put the reference in the $default$.junkmail file to that test name that the test is act

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
So where in the filter file do I apply per-domain settings? Per-user/per-domain settings are not handled in the filter file -- check the "Per-user settings" and "Per-domain settings" sections of the manual at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm for details on per-user/per-domain settings

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
What do you mean by "apply to certain users?" If the recipient's config file has "YOURTESTNAME DELETE", the E-mail will be deleted for that user. If the recipient's config file has no line beginning with "YOURTESTNAME", the test will still be run, but no action will be taken (so the test does

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Imail Admin
Hi Scott, Thanks for the quick reply. What do you mean by "apply to certain users?" If I add a line to a filter to the global.cfg file, it runs for everyone. So where in the filter file do I apply per-domain settings? For example, in the REMOTEIP code I was looking at, it seems the REMOTEIP test

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs

2004-06-28 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Message Yesterday's summary:   SORBS...5,061...47.70%SORBS-BADCONF..220.21%SORBS-DUHL..3,273...30.85%SORBS-HTTP..1,119...10.55%SORBS-MISC4764.49%SORBS-SMTP.790.74%SORBS-SOCKS.1,157

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Global configs

2004-06-28 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Yesterday's summary:   SORBS...5,061...47.70%SORBS-BADCONF..220.21%SORBS-DUHL..3,273...30.85%SORBS-HTTP..1,119...10.55%SORBS-MISC4764.49%SORBS-SMTP.790.74%SORBS-SOCKS.1,157.

[Declude.JunkMail] Global configs

2004-06-28 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Global configs I'm looking over the Global.cfg file from my current version, 1.75 and comparing it to the Global.cfg of the 1.79 beta. Are all those Sorbs tests still active? Are they worth adding into my old cfg? Thanks, Sharyn

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm a little confused, mainly because I really haven't worked with filters. In reading the manual about filters, it seems you apply weights both inside the filter and in the filter file line in the global.cfg file. In the example given in the manual, weights are assigned to several tests (such as

[Declude.JunkMail] working with filters

2004-06-28 Thread Imail Admin
I'm a little confused, mainly because I really haven't worked with filters. In reading the manual about filters, it seems you apply weights both inside the filter and in the filter file line in the global.cfg file. In the example given in the manual, weights are assigned to several tests (such as

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this message get through

2004-06-28 Thread Keith Purtell
You know at one time I actually did read the manual. But this time I didn't remember it! Thank you Scott. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Corporation (Kansas City office) Voice: (816) 801-5200 Fax: (816) 880-4776 Toll-free: (800) 525-1101 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SPF records

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
We receive a lot of spam that looks like it's coming from our own domain (which it really isn't). If I set up an SPF record for my own domain ( todhunter.com) and upgrade to the latest Declude beta, enable the SPF test, etc, will Declude nab spam that is sent to my domain, with a spoofed send

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How did this message get through

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a "problem user" who is not only set up for a certain type of negative weighting (to avoid missing any client email), but also has apparently responded to spam. Now I have spammers using her negative-weighted return address to spam us. However, they don't know her real name, so I set up

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SPF records

2004-06-28 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Declude and SPF records We receive a lot of spam that looks like it's coming from our own domain (which it really isn't). If I set up an SPF record for my own domain ( todhunter.com)  and upgrade to the latest Declude beta, enable the SPF test, etc, will Declude nab spam that is sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How HTML is parsed

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
In the title bar in the message there is a space (more than one in fact). That's probably because the E-mail uses HTML tables, which separates various groups of text into different boxes (so it may appear that there is a space where there is not). How come then you strip out the HTML codes the

[Declude.JunkMail] How did this message get through

2004-06-28 Thread Keith Purtell
I have a "problem user" who is not only set up for a certain type of negative weighting (to avoid missing any client email), but also has apparently responded to spam. Now I have spammers using her negative-weighted return address to spam us. However, they don't know her real name, so I set up a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How HTML is parsed

2004-06-28 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Scott, In the title bar in the message there is a space (more than one in fact). How come then you strip out the HTML codes the space disappears? Or maybe I should ask the question how does the space show up in the mail message in the first place? Thanx Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How HTML is parsed

2004-06-28 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can you confirm that it is because the HTLP code looks like: TD Part#Mfr Part#Qty ShpdUnit $Ext $HEWLETT PACKARD CANADA And so the $ from the Unit $ is getting put together with the Ext and thereby getting a $ex out of it? Why would JunkMail not see the space that is shown in the Heading abov

[Declude.JunkMail] How HTML is parsed

2004-06-28 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi,   The following heading in an HTLP message tripped the $ex body filter.   Manufacturer/Description TD Part# Mfr Part# Qty Shpd Unit $ Ext $               Can you confirm that