This looks like a possible mixup with SmarterMail code?? SmarterMail useses
HDR file and EML files instead of Q and D files.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 10:53 PM
To:
Can anyone confirm this is also happening or not happening on their
2.0.6 installation? COPYFILE is critical to my install and it would be
helpful to know if this is happening elsewhere or not.
Thanks,
Matt
Kevin Bilbee wrote:
This looks like a possible mixup with SmarterMail code??
Hi all,
Running Declude Junkmail Pro 2.0.6 on Imail 8.15. I upgraded Declude to
2.0.6 from 2.0.5 on 4/15 and have gotten a few of these seemingly
randoml log errors every day since. Nothing else on the server changed
but Declude.
04/15/2005 11:19:37 QDB810281006E1D24 ERROR: Could not move
Title: Message
I
useCOPFYILE for tens of thousands of messages every day, and I am not
seeing this. I tested by checking for *.hdr files and for q*.smd files that were
too large. No indications that this is happening on my
system.
Andrew
8)
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL
In your $default$.junkmail where you have a HOLD as an Action try putting a
%DATE% after eg:
WEIGHT20HOLD %DATE%
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Ryan
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2005 11:57 AM
To:
In your $default$.junkmail for the hold action you would like to move what
is the syntax that you are using. It appears as if the path might be wrong.
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for
Title: Message
Yes, the correct file is being used.
When I do the manual install, I then rename the Declude for Imail.exe to
Declude.exe and copy that file. The way I verify this is by running declude diag
from the command prompt in the Imail directory, and verifying that there is
still a
I haven't seen this issue visited for a while.
Our service agreement is expiring for IMail and Symantec antivirus. We are
looking into our options for an upgrade path. The price difference between
purchasing Declude antivirus and renewing our Imail service agreement only
or going with the
This is primarily meant for Declude's support, but I am sending it to
the list in the event that the broader scrutiny might be beneficial.
I'm currently running Declude 1.82 and Windows 2003 SP1. It appears
that under heavy load I am seeing errors from both Declude Virus and
Declude JunkMail,
Title: Message
Hi
Matt:
While
I was beta testing 2.0.6, I was also suffering from some distributed dictionary
attacks - and I was scrutinizing the log files much more closely (to look for
possible beta errors).
I
don't know WHICH of these three factors were critical (2.x vs. load vs.
Title: Message
Andy,
Thanks for the information. There is no doubt that you could limit the
processes and never reach this overloaded condition and that would mask
the issue, and gateway validation should also prevent overloaded
conditions if you were formerly being bombarded. What I'm
I submitted a support ticket this morning about problems I seen under 2.0.6
with high load. This weekend while doing some maintenance I ran into some
load issues when I brought one of the servers down I maintain. When I bring
one of the servers offline I know the other server will start dropping
Matt,
I had this same exact issue, with exact same
symptoms(Win 2000 SP4) and I called Declude on it a few weeks ago.
Eventually, I just copied in a new Declude 1.82.exe file and reinstalled my
scanners and the issue went away. I saw the same Error starting scanner
and the Error 183. I
FYI: I've running v1.82 on a Win2003 server and since SP1 is installed I've
had problems multiple times with the queue manager and also popup messages
for declude.exe. One problem could be the new SP1 application execution
protection.
This problem appears only some days but can also happen
Markus et. al,
This is my first full day on SP1, but I have seen double processing
before in D files stranded in the spool going back maybe a year or more
and on Win2K as well. I was only able to nail this down to a load
issue because the 1:30 a.m. mailing is a daily occurrence and I see
I don't have a HOLD action in $default$.junkmail. I use REDIRECTs for
individual accounts. One of the redirect files named level2.junkmail has
SPAMBOUNCEHOLD
AgainI did not change ANYTHING except upgrade declude.exe from 2.0.5
to 2.0.6. And I HOLD hundreds of messages every day. But
I'm not familiar with the %DATE% parameter. It must be new. But why
would it make a difference? I've always just had:
TESTNAMEHOLD
And it's worked fine until now.
--Todd.
David Barker wrote:
In your $default$.junkmail where you have a HOLD as an Action try putting a
%DATE% after eg:
17 matches
Mail list logo
