[Declude.JunkMail] Is this a known SPAM campaign

2005-05-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Or is one of my clients really really lucky :( What is happening is this one e-mail address is getting a ton of postmaster bounces from one web hosting company. I put in a very specific filter and within minutes I had a number of these messages. When part of the original message is returned it is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A program to match T* and D* files

2005-05-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Thanx Darin, I will expand my auto cleanup routine to handle these files as well. Goran Jovanovic The LAN Shoppe > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 6:00 PM > T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] A program to match T* and D* files

2005-05-06 Thread Darin Cox
T* files are left over when the SMTP connection gets dropped before the message is completely delivered. Most of the time this is caused by a reboot, or just stopping the SMTP process. Since the message was not completely delivered you should be able to safely delete it, as the sending server kno

[Declude.JunkMail] A program to match T* and D* files

2005-05-06 Thread Goran Jovanovic
Hi, Does anyone know of a program that will match old T*.SMD file to their corresponding D*.SMD and then five you the option of deleting the pair? I get leftover files like this occasionally and would love to use a program to get rid of them. Or perhaps I should ask the question: After how many

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Running Declude from another program

2005-05-06 Thread Matt
I really, really don't think you want to do this.  Declude is rather sophisticated and it's not likely that you can build a stable in-process interface with IMail.  Check out the following page for just a hint at one aspect of what Declude does that IMail doesn't even handle well:     IMail's

[Declude.JunkMail] Running Declude from another program

2005-05-06 Thread David Hayes-Moats
I know I asked this question earlier, I'm still having the same problem.   I created a program that that needs to run before Declude.  It looks at the message and then either moves it to another directory or passes it on to Declude to process.  On my test machine (no Declude) I can do this j

[Declude.JunkMail] Data Execution Prevention (DEP) in Windows 2003 SP1 causes load

2005-05-06 Thread Matt
...or so it would seem. I completely disabled mine and saw about a 20% relative improvement in CPU utilization on similar traffic comparing one full day to another. I track this stuff with SNMP CPU monitoring every minute so the numbers are fairly hard. I've had some other variability recent

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread Matt
Yes, this works great in Outlook Express, but plain Outlook will edit out much of the useful information when you forward as attachment. Matt David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ] wrote: Not sure about Outlook. Outlook Express cuts off most headers if you use the Forward icon. Instead, select Message

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, This one has a version for OE and Outlook: http://www.daesoft.com/SpamSourceOE/index.htm Best Regards Andy Schmidt Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding

2005-05-06 Thread David Barker
It depends a few factors: 1. If you have the PRO version you have the ability to do outbound scanning 2. If you are using WHITELIST AUTH or Whitelisting your domains or Whitelisting your IP anything originating from your domain will not be stopped. 3. Declude can be configured to catch spam on y

[Declude.JunkMail] Forwarding

2005-05-06 Thread A. Clausen
This is probably a fairly stupid question, but I was wondering whether or not if you forwarded a local user to another external address (ie. Yahoo or AOL) would Declude still catch spam via the accounts's junkmail file? -- A. Clausen --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread David Franco-Rocha [ Declude ]
Not sure about Outlook. Outlook Express cuts off most headers if you use the Forward icon. Instead, select Message from the top-level menu and then select Forward As Attachment. The forwarded email will have all the headers intact. David Franco-Rocha Declude Technical Support - Original Mess

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread Fritz Squib
Try http://www.xintercept.com/pkpeek.htm, only works with Oultook though. I've posted the link here a couple of times before. Fritz Frederick P. Squib, Jr. Network Operations Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg http://www.wpa.net () ascii ribbon campaign - against html email /\

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread Nick
On 6 May 2005 at 12:45, Marc Catuogno wrote: Hi Marc - > Anyone have any ideas how to give challenged users a really easy way > to get the headers out of Outlook or Outlook express and forward them > to my spam account? This may or may not help :) This is the page I have that help me with m

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
For Outlook users, I tell them to create a new message to me, then go to the toolbar, pull down Insert, then choose Item, and find the spam message, and click OK. This is much easier to describe than right-clicking, and much easier to describe than dragging and dropping the spam message into a new

[Declude.JunkMail] OT - headers script for Outlook or Express

2005-05-06 Thread Marc Catuogno
Anyone have any ideas how to give challenged users a really easy way to get the headers out of Outlook or Outlook express and forward them to my spam account? As soon as I start talking to most of them about right clicking, copying, pasting etc they get this strange blank look on their face... Al

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] bug in jm 2.0.6

2005-05-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
We are using the hold action with a directory under 2.0.6 and it is working fine. WEIGHTHOLD HOLD F:\SPAM-HOLD\%DATE% Darrell invURIBL - Intelligent URI Filtering - Stops 85%+ of SPAM with the default configuration. T

[Declude.JunkMail] bug in jm 2.0.6

2005-05-06 Thread Goebbels, Bernd \(LDS\)
hi, this morning, we updated from 2.0.5 to 2.0.6. the hold action doesn't work properly. in $default.$junkmail, we selected a special directory for those mails who failed a certain test, this worked great with 2.0.5. 2.0.6 moves these mails to the hold directory under spool. the manual says: "The