For example, database-backed sites whose database can be open for
writing at only one site are a *helluva* lot harder to balance.
You're right about that. There is some interactivity on the site, but it all
results in emails to the office, so no db sync'ing issues here.
-d
---
This
Another option to consider ... www.ultradns.com has a service that does
this. I've never priced it, so it may be pricey.
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTE
Side ntoe:
UltraDNS has been having some issues the last couple of days due to the blue
security ordeal -> http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/05/18/2158227.shtml
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail,
mxGuard,
UltraDNS is back in business after the kind of DoS they are supposed to
be in business to defend against.
Check out Brian Kreb's article here, from May-17-2006:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/05/blue_security_surrend
ers_but_s.html
Specifically this snippet:
"Well, UltraDNS mar
Has anyone else seen an increase of spam since Blue Security wet offline??
We have seen an increase and we did not even use the software/service.
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(805) 520-5800 x7332
Changing the way
I have noticed more stuff has been getting through. I don't know whether
that represents a general increase or new spammer techniques.
-d
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JunkMail Declude"
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 1:33 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMai
Same here
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:01 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
I have noticed more stuff has been getting through. I don't know whether
On Friday, May 19, 2006, 1:33:06 PM, Kevin wrote:
KB> Has anyone else seen an increase of spam since Blue Security wet offline??
KB> We have seen an increase and we did not even use the software/service.
We've noted a few bursts today but nothing completely out of the
ordinary.
_M
---
This E-m
One thing that we noticed a few hours ago was a new image spam that
has quite a bit of bandwidth behind it and all new zombies - perhaps
that's a piece of it.
_M
On Friday, May 19, 2006, 3:30:33 PM, Rick wrote:
RB> Same here
RB> Rick
RB> -Original Message-
RB> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R
Yes, that looks to be what I have been seeing get through.
John T
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 12:41 PM
> To: Rick Baranowski
I've been seeing a lot more of that headers-at-the-bottom stuff lately where
the message gets scanned but no action occurs. A lot of it doesn't have
broken GIFs, just text.
-d
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Dave,
You might want to look at the NOCRTEST. See:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg28884.html
The problem is that the messages have no carriage returns. I am guessing
here and that guess is based on a lot of circumstantial evidence that
Declude was written in Visual B
You might want to look at the NOCRTEST.
Thanks! I'll try it out.
-d
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> ...a lot of circumstantial evidence that Declude was written in
> Visual Basic...
Er, what evidence was that?
Declude.exe was *not* written in VB, as a quick Dependency Walker
check would tell you. It's clearly always been a Win32 C/C++ app.
As far as the CRLF issue goes, it'
Sandy,
Shrug. Never felt the desire to run dependency walker on it. I said it was a
guess. I said it was circumstantial. Maybe in the end, I was hoping it was
some silly language limitation that they didn't know how to get around
rather than think it was a bug or even a bad assumption on the part
15 matches
Mail list logo