Wouldn't you want to send the support request to the developers of
incredimail? They are the ones who are generating the invalid header.
Declude is only warning you about it.
Dean
On Dec 3, 2007 7:47 AM, Mon Mariola - Rubén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The program "incredimail" generates subjects
Maybe I explained poorly. I want to send the request to Incredimail
technical support.
My doubt is that the Declude manual says that according to section 3.2.3 of
RFC822, it is not valid to
have such lines, and I not located in RFC822 that section.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html
After
The 'Blank Folding' vulnerability may be allowed by the RFC, but that
doesn't make them the right thing to do. The problem is that virus scanners
don't scan for attachments that could be embedded into the headers in one of
these lines but Outlook would still execute them.Just because no vir
I agree with all your comments, but if so, I ask the team declude correct
the Declude manual to reflect the truth.
Now I read in the Declude manual that RFC does not allow such lines.
It will be difficult to convince the Incredimail technical support to solve
this problem if I can not find a s
Sorry for the off topic post but I know someone here will have a easy answer
to this question.
I currently host DNS records for our Active Directory domain on our domain
controller (Win 2003 with local domain "COMMARTS.LAN") and want to create a
local only NON-AUTHORITATIVE "A" and associated "PTR
You seem to have failed to ask the actual question here.
If you create the domain locally, you must create all records on the
public domain for full DNS functionality to be maintained. Just
creating one record will result in lookup failures for all other records
on that domain.
Matt
Mich
Gents and the occasional lady:
You all are the smartest network folks I interact with. If you'd be so kind
as to give me your opinion / suggestions on the following, I'd be forever
grateful.
We're trying to increase the level of uptime and redundancy for our service.
To that end, we're looking t
Rob,
As far as DNS goes, the best way to do this is to use Simple DNS Plus
with a server in a second location. Simple DNS does full server
replication instead of individual secondaries, and if you have a lot of
domains, it is nice to just manage one installation. If you have a
smaller numbe
Forgot to add the most important part regarding Simple DNS. They have
an add-on monitoring piece that will switch DNS records automatically,
and this can be used to automatically switch over to the backup.
Matt
Matt wrote:
Rob,
As far as DNS goes, the best way to do this is to use Simple
