RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis

2004-02-23 Thread Dan Spangenberg
test -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 5:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis - Original Message - From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Howev

[Declude.JunkMail] Email addresses on a company webpage?

2003-09-15 Thread Dan Spangenberg
e info to their customers if it isn't listed on the webpage? Dan Spangenberg --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], a

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist own IP or domain

2003-07-28 Thread Dan Spangenberg
mail that does originate from us to not get caught? Would removing the domain and whitelisting only the IP help? Any other creative options? Dan Spangenberg --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

RE: Re[2]: DSN:Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] A Question of Ethics

2003-02-27 Thread Dan Spangenberg
a company policy for email/internet use that they would be willing to share? I believe ours needs some updating. Dan Spangenberg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Stavert > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:50 AM

[Declude.JunkMail] copy all inbound/outbound mail

2003-02-07 Thread Dan Spangenberg
user admin, but not sure how to accomplish it for outgoing. And not sure how to do it for an entire domain. Our need is to monitor a couple of specific imail users, and secondly we are considering archiving all email for a domain. Is there anything in declude to help me with this? Thank

[Declude.JunkMail] Error Code 32?

2003-02-04 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I was investigating a spam email as to why it got through declude and found that the header clearly shows that it failed sufficient tests to be held, yet it was not. The declude log shows an error: ERROR: Could not move spam to hold! Code: 32 What is Code: 32? I checked my old logs and can only fi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forum List Problems?

2003-01-15 Thread Dan Spangenberg
clude junkmail and virus and also KVM templates. I'd ask the imail list, but... Thanks Dan Spangenberg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:47 PM > To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Questions/Suggestions

2003-01-14 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Please post it to the list, I'm sure many of us could use it. I never have the time to tweak my filters > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Questions/Suggestions

2003-01-14 Thread Dan Spangenberg
n and alter filter lists, so this works well for me. Anyone else find this with sniffer? Dan Spangenberg > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kris McElroy > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:52 AM > To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Move/copy Lock/unlock errors

2003-01-03 Thread Dan Spangenberg
good idea. I'll upgrade and keep ou posted if I see them again... Thanks > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Move/copy Loc

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Move/copy Lock/unlock errors

2003-01-03 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I am running version 1.64 I do not have an on-access scanner running nor am I running Hijack. Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:03 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declu

[Declude.JunkMail] Move/copy Lock/unlock errors

2003-01-03 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I was looking at the header of a suspected spam email, and it didn't have any declude headers added. I thought this very strange so I looked at the declude spam logs and found that the email had generated this error. Looks like it sailed right through without getting looked at. Any idea why it coul

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Email without any declude headers?

2002-12-03 Thread Dan Spangenberg
That does make sense. The system that had the trouble was a Skytel account going to a pager enabled messenger watch. You would think that they would be stripping those headers out. I'll do some more testing, maybe it was just a fluke. Thanks Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECT

[Declude.JunkMail] Email without any declude headers?

2002-12-03 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Is there any way to eliminate the aDditional declude header info on one email, but not all? I have a few users that send email to a pager or phone (text messaging) that limits the # of characters, and the entire message is filled up with headers. Dan Spangenberg --- [This E-mail was scanned for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Deleting Mail Inbound Mail

2002-11-27 Thread Dan Spangenberg
That would be good. Is the issue the same for filtering using a single text file as it is for the per-user configuration? I assume that would change it so that if one recipient on a mutilple recipient email got flagged, you would just remove that one recipient from the header and the email would st

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Deleting Mail Inbound Mail

2002-11-26 Thread Dan Spangenberg
ther recipients receive the > mail? > > Darrell > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Spangenberg > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Deleting Mail In

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Deleting Mail Inbound Mail

2002-11-26 Thread Dan Spangenberg
That is exactly what I am doing and it works great. The thread was titled "Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?" on 11/11/02. Also the thread "allrecips function in ver 1.63" from yesterday It uses the filter function and a .txt file. You must have the version 1.63 and it must b

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Getting held mail delivered?

2002-11-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
FWIW I have seen them sit in there quite a while when I manually move them also. Doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to it thoughwatched pot never boils? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smart Business > Lists > Sent: Monday, No

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] allrecips function in ver 1.63

2002-11-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
and also I have this in $default$.junkmail WEIGHT100 HOLD > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Spangenberg > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 3:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] all

[Declude.JunkMail] allrecips function in ver 1.63

2002-11-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Wouldn't you know it Scott, you no sooner release a new beta version and now you have to support it... :-) I can't seem to get the filter function to work. This is what I have in my global.cfg WEIGHT10weight x x 10 0 WEIGHT20weight x x

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] beta version 1.63

2002-11-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
So I shouldn't d/l it and try it? Oops...I already did. Guess I'll test it now and let you know how it goes. Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 1:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sub

[Declude.JunkMail] beta version 1.63

2002-11-25 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Spangenberg > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky? > > > Great! Do you think you can get it to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fromfile Status 11/12/02- Image`fx

2002-11-13 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Are the messages from this particular thread getting caught by sniffer for everyone else? How does sniffer work and why is it catching this email? Something with the wide variety of domains listed? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.c

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-13 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Great! Do you think you can get it to work on aliases rather than just intended recipients like you mentioned? Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 6:15 PM > To: [EM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-12 Thread Dan Spangenberg
> >I resent an email and declude has now gone somewhat wacky. The > imail server > >was acting loaded, so I checked the task man and there are 6 or > 8 instances > >of declude running - taking up all of the cpu cycles. Ther are > also about > >15-20 .~md and .smd files in the spool dir and three

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Sorry, yes a typo. The filename did match the global.cfg line. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Bill Landry Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:57 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone wh

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
It doesn't look like you got the earlier message. Here it is: I was in the middle of testing the filters, and initially go a couple of errors in the log that said it could not open my filter file. I rechecked the configuration for a typo and everything looked OK. I sent a couple more emails and no

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude gone whacky?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I renamed global.cfg go global.bak and rebooted. Everything started OK, so I renamed it bak to global.cfg and now declude is doing the same thing. It clearly doesn't like something with the filters. Here is what I have in the global.cfg WEIGHT10weight x x 10 0 WE

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Scott, I am trying out the per user config and trying the catchallmails function. I can only get it to work if there is a valid imail user. If there is no imail user then the email is still getting routed to my root directory where the misaddressed mail goes. I was hoping to be able to have it wor

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
So there is two ways to do this, filters and per user config? If I used a Filter file like this: ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ALLRECIPS 0 IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] Would I need to put the entire email addy? And is it only going to look at the entire thing or will it find "user" or "r2" out of the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Smart Business Lists Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:44 AM To: Dan Spangenberg Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist? Dan, Monday, November 11, 2002

[Declude.JunkMail] Is this possible with the filter function or blacklist?

2002-11-11 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Also Imail's rules.ima are processed after declude so they don't help any. Ideas anyone? Dan Spangenberg --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniffer Confidence

2002-11-08 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I've been playing with sniffer a bit, and one thing I have noticed is that it will catch many adult emails that do not fail any other declude tests and that have been getting through my current setup. The problem is that if I want to catch them, I have rely only on sniffer and put sniffer at a wei

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and order of things?

2002-03-19 Thread Dan Spangenberg
I know this item has been mentioned before, I just can seem to find it. In terms of rules and processing, where does declude sit in the order? Do any of the rules take place before declude processes the message? What I want to do is this; We are a small sales oriented compnay with around 100 ima

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Program

2002-01-27 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Great program? Are you ready for some feedback and a few ideas/suggestions? I would like a way to shut off the delete confirmation. It would be nice to be able to resize the windows. I like to see the subject line and it is always down a ways so you have to scroll to see it. A button to move to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adult content test?

2002-01-21 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Wow...read my mind. That is exactly what I was thinking this morning. I turned up several of the filters, so I have been focussing on the spam hold folder thinking about the best way to look at all these held emails. Redirecting would be a very easy way to manage it. Can we see that as part of be

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adult content test?

2002-01-20 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Seems like there should be someway to view these held files in an interface much like outlook, with each message on a line. If I could see to, from and the subjct, I could determine validity much quicker than opening each individual file. I suppose that if the spam tests are configured and tested

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] adult content test?

2002-01-20 Thread Dan Spangenberg
Where would we put ADULT, in both global.cfg file and the $default$.junkmail file or just the latter? One other item. I am slowly trying a few of the junkmail tests set to hold. What is the best method for sorting through those held messages? Is it just best to use explorer and view each one of t