Isn't the mailfrom in this case [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not the vigara part? Chuck
is looking for a way to filter based on the "name" attached to the address
and not the specific address proper, isn't that right Chuck?
I'm butting in here because I'm trying to capture something similar using
the sa
Where does the .HDB file need to end up? I'm not familiar with that
extension.
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Wednesday, 21 February 2007 1:08 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Image spam
Declude and
Why wouldn't the defaults in the upgrade be to
mimic the current behavior? That's potentially a major change from trying to
maintain backwards compatibility, isn't it? If the upgrade is adding new
switches, then the default switch shouldn't shouldn't radically alter the
status quo.
From: [
I'm going through the exact same situation with CBL this week. If you go
into the Advanced section of the SMTP service properties, there's a box to
fill with the text of your HELO response text.
The problem I'm having with them is that even though I already only have
"only one HELO/EHLO hostname",
ail-archive.com/imail_forum@list.ipswitch.com/msg106753.html
Darrell
---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail,
mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI
integration, MRTG Integration, and Log P
I've
discovered that my mailserver has been listed on CBL. I asked to be delisted,
and they complied, but I'm right back on *SNAP* just like that. Assuming for the
moment that I'm not at risk for the vulnerability covered by MS06-040, and that
nothing infected me before I loaded that patch,
Thank you, Sandy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Friday, 21 July 2006 2:49 AM
To: John Shacklett
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Razor
> Do you need SA or something similar to invoke Razor or does it come
>
I'd like to break the flow of the current discussion and circle back a
number of posts to ask a question.
I'm not familiar with either Razor or Cloudmark and Bill's mention of that
service caught me unprepared. How does Razor fit into your analysis? Do you
need SA or something similar to invoke Ra
that's
setting things in disarray, it's being logged at log_level mid.
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude EVA]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just
It's updating virus signatures just fine.
What's missing is that AVG doesn't ever actually DETECT viruses. I've submitted
several examples of DEBUG log output showing known viruses [including but not
limited to EICAR tests from the Virus test page at declude.com] being passed as
clean by AVG
Actually, Matt, it's worse than that. I have made
several observations about issues I'm having with the current release [for
example: built-in AVG does NOT work for me, not ever, not even once; newest
release version has a virus logging change that broke my daily activity summary
report scri
Matt, I did get a reply from Gerry earlier and I
resubmitted my earlier support email to him, and he indicated they would
escalate things, but that's it.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MattSent: Monday, 05
June 2006 4:29 PMTo: declude.junkmail@declude.comSub
5 q18de1b3b00b21c63.smd Cumulative action(s)
>> taken on this email = NO ACTIONS WERE TAKEN
>>
>> So it seems to me that something is whitelisting this type of message
>> but I don't know what.
>>
>> Following my logfiles arround 400 spam each one with a fi
e.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No action taken
I'm seeing the same thing. However the headers show all of the tests failed
and the score - well above my delete weight.
John C
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Se
This morning I'm seeing a flood of stock spam with scores that are more than
double my delete weight getting through with "no action taken". I'm looking
at one right now with a score of 67, and in my scheme we delete at 30.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Yes, David, I understand, and thanks for the reply, but
[A] that's a passive process that requires that I remember to go out every
day and look at the release notes and see if there's been any addition, plus
[B] we've jumped from 4.1.0 to 4.2.3 [and from 3.1.0 to apparently 3.1.0??].
So that's n
Hi. Following along with the theme of the week, I've been using Declude
since 1.10.
I can't say this strongly enough: nothing frustrates me more than being
caught unawares by new versions and new functionality. Every time I read a
post that starts with "hey, I was just on the site and noticed a ne
Well, the home.com remark was meant to be comic relief, but Mike's comment
drills right to the point of my question. The information in the old spool
view page made delivery failures very visual, and I actively managed the
server hosts file based on that knowledge. Now it feels like I'm flying
comp
invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: "John Shacklett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 4:12 PM
Subject
Here's my second off-topic question. Thank you again for all the great
suggestions on handling the port forwarding question on Wednesday and for
all the great discussion that spun off of that original thread.
Question two:
I'm making the jump from Imail 6 on NT4 clear up to Imail 2006.03 on
2kSer
rection for this resource".
You don't have to create any pages for this site, it will take anything to
that old URL as well as any sub-directory of it and redirect it to your new
webmail site.
Matt
John Shacklett wrote:
>I'm making the jump to a new mailserver this weekend, an
I'm making the jump to a new mailserver this weekend, and I've hit two
snags. I know that the answers to both of these questions are in the
archives, but the search feature on the list archive appears to be broken
currently. My apologies to all, both for the OT question as well as for
reasking.
Qu
I'm in a fairly unique position in that I actually have a brand new system
sitting on the bench as part of our LONG delayed migration away from
NT4/Imail6 and into the new millennium. So timing is everything, and a
Version 3/Version 4 decision had to be made in fairly short order to be
considered a
Sorry this is so late.
We've used stunnel for a while now, it also was simple to setup and seems
flawless in operation.
JS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 30 September 2005 6:09 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@dec
The Declude staff let me know that v3 won't work on WinNT, so I think I
can't delay the inevitable any longer.
Just for fun, has anyone tried the v3 beta with IMail6 on WinNT?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent:
Sorry to waste DJM bandwidth.
I just realized that I stopped receiving Imail_Forum Digests on April 26th.
I've tried to re-subscribe, but is this just me, or have they somehow
scrambled their Digests?
Thanks.
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffic
pproach
...except to note that it is one more aspect of the conversion of Declude
from something unique to just another product.
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscrib
Is there a service on the website where we can look up
our complete current software licensing information and expiration dates of
current Service Agreements?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry
SimpsonSent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:10 AMTo:
[EMAIL
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: IP block tool
John,
What is the IP range?
Dan
- Original Message -----
From: "John Shacklett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:35 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT:
nularity I
want. Can anyone recommend a tool to quickly look up IP Range assignments
that works more strongly than SamSpade?
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17568.html
I remember this conversation vividly, but I think it crashed on the rocks
quickly. Maybe we need a posse of VB types delegated with the charge of
trying to contact Tom again and see if his offer is still good.
-Original Message-
Has anyone tried to construct dummy SPF records locally for domains that are
not your own in order to outsmart SPF records in the real world that permit
spammers junk to pass?
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
There is a theory which states that
Sanford Whiteman
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:19 PM
To: John Shacklett
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: tmp file residue
> Can someone remind me of some critical part of program alias care
> and feeding that I've forgotten?
You've found it yourself: it's the rem
file behind in the SPOOL directory after
the program alias fires off the proper CMD batch.
Can someone remind me of some critical part of program alias care and
feeding that I've forgotten?
--
John Shacklett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.continentaloffice.com
There is a theory
We get a fair amount of SPACE subjects from our webmail users. Imail's
webmail interface gets upset if you try and send an email with both a blank
subject and a blank body [for example, an unsubscribe message to an address
that does all of the processing based on the To: address alone], so a
spaceb
Roger, this version works on my NT4 machine like a champ. Thanks again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Eriksson
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Updated SURBL filter script
I had a problem with Sniffer earlier this week that turned out to be a
corrupt update. There was a consistent error in the log for the time period
when that botched update was in place. I've noted since then that several
others have complained of similar issues with their sniffer updates,
although
I know this suggestion was kind of tongue-in-cheek, but we did exactly this
for one of our Marketing wonderboys. After 3 days, just three days, he came
into my office waving his white handkerchief and begging for mercy. The
message was sent better than any discussion could have, technical or not.
"text to columns" using a space as the delimiter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, 30 December 2003 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Sorting log
Importance: High
Any ideas on the
I think this might be on http://www.ahbl.org/using.php in the rhsbl section.
I have been trying
AHBL-DOMAINSrhsbl rhsbl.ahbl.org * 5 0
for a couple of days, but I don't have any stats to share today.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
crafted blacklists, and joint/private efforts at
blacklists, and nothing else in the arsenal.
Thanks for listening, see you next week.
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They say that genius is 99 percent perspiration and 1 percent inspira
I'm not very good with these unix tools in general, but my set of unxutils
doesn't include usort, and if I try using sort instead, I get a steady
stream of errors from gawk.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Thursday, 20 Novemb
I posted a question two weeks ago asking if anyone knew a way to calculate
the amount of time it takes for individual messages to clear the entire
receive/virusscan/junkmailscan/deliver process, and this exactly why I
asked. My system doesn't have any filters quite as large as 140kb, or even
70k, b
I was rereading
Pete's ideas about holding messages in limited circumstances to allow virus
scanning and spam testing to catch up with new threats, and I started asking
myself "what delay is 'normal' now".
What kinds of methodology are people using to time things?
--
J
Doesn't the installed.bin file contain the current version number?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, 13 October 2003 3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ERROR: SOMEONE CRUMBLED MY MAGIC COOK
And I'm seeing more and more of these messages with the text section crafted
cleverly to try and avoid blocks, and with more and more of them with these
text sections large enough to defeat scanning of the message proper by the
usual battery of content-based tests. I think Kami pointed this out
rec
I had a
funny thing happen over the weekend, I had more items in spool/virus than in
spool/spam at one point. I'm speechless.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Todd - Smart
MailSent: Tuesday, 02 September 2003 8:33 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROT
So long as Bill didn't pick fights with all of us and drive us all off the
list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] If a tree falls in the
The eerie stillness was nerve wracking. I wondered who would cave in first.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 11:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Is the list down?
Anyone on?
>Did you enter
>
>example.com
>
>OR
>
>@example.comexample.com
>
>in your SPAMDOMAINS list? The second (with your domain, of course) should
>prevent the false inclusion of mailing lists with your domain on the left.>
>side of the return address.
I have a separate issue with SMTP AUTH which is
>The new SPAMDOMAINS test would also be useful, *if* everyone sending mail
>with a return address on your domain would be doing so from an IP that has
>a reverse DNS entry that matches your domain.
>
>-Scott
The struggle I'm having with putting m
to
know more.
Thanks,
Satyr
-
To be removed from our very large data base please send a blank email with
the word "Remove" in the subject line to any of the following addresses or
all of them just to make sure:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PRO
|> >Are you sure that the line in your sd.txt file is exactly
|> >"msn.com hotmail.com" (no spaces or other characters after
|>"hotmail.com")?
|>
|>Yes. I copied that line and pasted it exactly and I double checked the
|>whitespace before I composed my questions.
|
|One last thing to check: I
>Are you sure that the line in your sd.txt file is exactly
>"msn.com hotmail.com" (no spaces or other characters after
"hotmail.com")?
Yes. I copied that line and pasted it exactly and I double checked the
whitespace before I composed my questions.
>Are you sure that you are not running an o
t appears that something failed to connect somewhere in processing. I'm
guessing that message should have reached 23 points.
I'm going to comb the log for more instances of SPAMDOMAINS and see what
else is happening, but this little bit was unsettling.
--
John Shacklett
---
[This E-ma
Maybe the declude -diag output could be tweaked to give a quick count of
whitelist lines.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, 31 May 2003 2:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist after
It constantly occurs to me, as it has to many others who have mentioned this
previously, that what we really need is a FAQ compilation that covers
customization and best-practices for various situations and integration of
the add-on tools and who knows what else. "Search the archives" hasn't
proven
Yes, me too please.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Friday, 28 February 2003 9:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Analyzer - Comments Needed
> I have a beta available and I am looking for i
While we're beating this into the ground like a tentpeg:
including, or specifically excluding, $default$.junkmail?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, 17 January 2003 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Dec
I'm subscribed to the digest version and didn't receive yesterday's digest
either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2003 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail Forum Lis
Well, I did only say "tempted". I have been pretty heavy handed knocking off
/24 blocks however.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
Sent: Tuesday, 14 January 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] O
My current question goes in the opposite direction. I'm tempted to blacklist
the entire IP range held by rackspace.com. It seems that every third item in
my HOLD folder lately comes from an address in rackspace.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Here's my take on why I endorse John's request. I understand Dan's
suggestion and agree with its intent, I just don't want to raise my log
level yet. I'm a MID loglevel person, and happy to be there otherwise.
When Declude calls my IPFILE test and nabs a message for failing, the
logfile line inclu
Our CFO, who has "never given his email address out to ANYONE!" fills out
every reader reply card for a free trade magazine, belongs to the board of
something called the Financial Executives Institute, and answers every
telephone survey-research phone call that crosses his desk. I suspect your
Veep
Title: Message
I think
that misses the point of this thread: If I'm bouncing [or rejecting outright]
mail from a host or domain, then they have no appeal recourse unless I can open
up a safe channel for _SOME_ mail to flow through.
On the
other hand, I have abuse@mydomains and postmaster@
We just
reclaimed an old domain name. We had it for a couple of years, then it expired
and some bandits in the Philippines grabbed it and held it hostage, and when it
expired again we grabbed it back. The day, and I mean the very day, that I put
that domain in as an alias for our primary dom
I am a private company, we have an Acceptable Use Policy, I have the backing
of Upper Management, I've sent hate mail to our users warning them of dire
consequences, I understand the issue and the steps required to deal with it.
What I'm working on now is enforcement. This isn't Johnny Cochran, thi
I like Spam Review, and I use it every single day.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2002 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] 3rd Party Hold Readers
I've seen
I'd love to give your program a try.
Written between the lines of the post I first started this thread with: I
have a nagging problem with porn and I have been charged with cleaning it
up. My challenge is that the stuff I'm seeing is stuff that my local users
are sharing among themselves, so I'm
Is the late-lamented "never made it out of beta" ADULT test completely gone
now?
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is it that if someone tells you there are 1 billion stars in the
universe,
you will believe them,
but if someone t
ckflag.exe %WEIGHT%
%MAILFROM%" 0 0
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why is it that if someone tells you there are 1 billion stars in the
universe,
you will believe them,
but if someone tells you a wall has wet paint
you will have to touc
See? I said that file didn't look right.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, 05 November 2002 11:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More on: %COUNTRYCHAIN%
> >> [Unkno
I was just in the process of composing EXACTLY the same response when
Roger's reply came through. This here all_list.dat file looks odd to me, but
who am I to judge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Tuesda
I think this is a situation where IMHO doesn't apply. Many people do many
things that I/we might consider foolish or wasteful or worse, but that's not
the job. Our CFO got up at an all-staff training session on email care and
feeding and announced to the group that "sending yourself a BCC: is the o
I understand the thought process there, but I don't agree. I have noticed a
number of bulk mailers, the big commercial ones I guess, that have static
and steady IPs. I have an ipfile for those. I also notice a variety of
"domains" that I find rather transient, and I fromfile those. When I scan my
s
I suspected that was the interpretation, but I don't think there are enough
of these lines then. Let me do some math.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2002 5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
:38:28 Qce29136 R6 Message OK
10/16/2002 16:38:28 Qce29136 L7 Message OK
They only show up sporadically. I'm using a LOGLEVEL MID setting.
I know I've read the answer before and I can't seem to find the right search
term to unearth the answer in the archives.
--
I get email that talks about situations like that all the time, describing
mythical joys and riches beyond belief. I call it "spam", and I'm looking
for something that helps me control it. Do you have any suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]O
That's what I thought. I just reread the "Suggestion" posts again and I
understand now that the extra functionality being requested is the
To:/From:/Subject: part.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, 10 October 2
I'm having a memory failure here. What does the LOG_OK setting in the
global.cfg file control and what are its options, or do I have a line left
in mine from the deep dark recesses of Declude past?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Shacklett
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SpamReview Request - Delete All
Importance: Low
The buttons don't seem that useful to me, but I would like to mention that
The buttons don't seem that useful to me, but I would like to mention that I
still see the problem where clicking an existing button too quickly in
succession makes SpamReview bomb with an error box that says "Run-time error
'55': File already open".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Right, but isn't that the power of the filter tests? I use a complete list
of ccTLD codes that I downloaded from IANA and I jiggled the individual
weights based on the kind of mail I process here, but I wouldn't imagine
that my weight choices would be appropriate for anyone else anywhere else.
--
My profound apologies to one and all. I'm not having a good morning [I had
an afternoon of hooky planned for the golf course, and it's not going to
happen after all], so I'm making bad decisions.
I could send the headers, but here are two lines from the declude log that
are more to the point:
07
I thought I had a handle on all this, but this message from Timothy got
snagged by my MYFILTER filter test, which is looking for "Saf-E Mail" in the
body and applying punitive weights, but I received a message in my own
personal Inbox overnight from Saf-E which didn't trip the word filter, or
HELO
This is where I shop for new features:
http://www.declude.com/relnotes.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Darin T. Cox
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there a feature list for the JunkMail be
I'm getting similar messages for OUTBOUND messages from users of my own
domain.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Helpdesk
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Could you explain HELOBOGUS?
S
Tom, what is the format for the filters?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish List
I'm already doing this. I have a program on the serv
they
just sit there. Very well done indeed. Seems like we had a problem similar
to this a couple of dozen versions ago? Anyway, I've been pushing these
critters out manually, but I'll let the next one sit and see if it
eventually goes out on its own. Maybe on the next queue run?
--
John
http://www.moed.uscourts.gov/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Holt
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam/Unsolicited Faxes
Everyone should advertise whatever it is that you d
I tried
to download this a few moments ago, and got an empty zip file. Would someone
else try this and let me know what you get, please?
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
MacLeanSent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 8:44 PMTo:
[EMAIL
I have a
6.06 installation, and I have a combination of differently-sized subnets in my
local address table, and I have never seen this happen. For example, my IMail
server itself sits in a 255.255.255.240 netmask.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I had a similar sort of morning, got the sniffer demo, and I've been
watching the mailserver slowly die. My declude log for today has a lot of
"external program didn't respond in an hour so skip it" messages, so I
commented sniffer back out of my global.cfg. Took a while, but all the gunk
in the q
I tried to do exactly this with a fromfile list of TLDs a couple of weeks
ago, but crashed miserably on the rocks of .co matching to .com as well. A
way to weight individual countries differently would be even better.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
That makes sense. I was thinking about the question that was posed the other
day about having a foreign domains test, so I made a fromfile list of
foreign top-level domains. But .co for Colombia catches all of the .com
addresses. Back to the drawing board.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
.co", will it still block mail from
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? I think I read this to mean there was an implied
wildcard to the left of whatever is listed, but not to the right; is this a
correct interpretation?
--
John Shacklett
www.continentaloffice.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PRO
Scott helped me sort out what was exactly the same problem with my YAHOO
test in my global.cfg last week.
This isn't exactly a "me too" though; since fixing the glitch, all of my
previously reported WEIGHT inconsistencies seems to be gone as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
I'm getting the weight just fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Grant Griffith
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review Update v1.0.7
Noticed after updating to v1.0.12 t
Just the one, as near as I can tell.
I sent you a pile of examples, once upon a time.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] header con
d I get mail
in my SPAM folder that got held but doesn't have the WARN header.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Heath
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:34 AM
To: John Shacklett
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] header confus
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
