Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-07-15 Thread Mailing Lists
Bill,   does that mean days, weeks, months?   I dont know if you are aware but we reported this many many months ago, before 2.0.6 was released.   We have a real problem with customers trying to explain that we cannot guarantee mail delivery because of Declude. So customers will rightfully as

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] [Declude.Virus] Brief Update

2005-07-13 Thread Mailing Lists
Also I hope the issue of orphaned emails is being addressed with Declude and SM.   This is a real pain, we had to go to back to Declude 2.0.5.76 because 2.0.6 release would break up the hdr and eml files (so you would get orphaned hdr in the /proc and .eml in the spool). 2.0.5.76 doesnt chec

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail

2005-04-28 Thread Mailing Lists
Moved 3 installs from Imail to SM/DECLUDE. Wish I would have done it sooner. - Original Message - From: "Robert Grosshandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:22 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 8.2 / smartermail Ok -- time for the question again. Thumbs up o

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and SmarterMail

2005-02-07 Thread Mailing Lists
Is anyone using Declude and SmarterMail? Can you share your experience? We need to migrate off from Imail to SM and were waiting for SM support in Declude and wanted to test drive them before we made the move. Since there is no trial for Declude  for SM I wanted to get some feedback from cus

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude & SmarterMail

2005-01-05 Thread Mailing Lists
Has anywone been beta testing SmarterMail and Declude?   If so how is it working for you?   We never got the beta working, so curious to know if this is working for anyone.     Peter

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Mailing Lists
Smartermail I think we should all expect a little slower resolution to issues with a beta product over the holidays...people do want to spend time with families after all... Darin.     - Original Message - From: Mailing Lists To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Mailing Lists
an issue and it is more> appropriate to manage the process in this way.> > I hope this clarifies the position.> > Barry> > > -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mailing Lists> Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 12:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Smartermail

2004-12-29 Thread Mailing Lists
Where is the beta download, it seems like it was removed last week from download section. We signed up for beta testing, though SM and Declude didnt work at all for us. According to Scott it was a known issue and new version was to be uploaded that day. Am I missing something, I am really anxio

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail move, and some complaining

2004-12-23 Thread Mailing Lists
More than a nice gesture I think it is necessary for Declude survival. That is unless Ipswitch ICS is now a huge success ): While many will remain on Imail for years to come, I doubt ICS will be a good revenue stream for Declude or other similar products. Would Declude have decided to charge fo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude on SmarterMail

2004-12-23 Thread Mailing Lists
Scott, you should have a record because I even have a tkt # - it is IGG-76544 dated 12/20/04. I got the autoresponse but thats it. FYI, tried this on 2 dev servers with same results (I renamed host name of the second server when it did not work on first), both with the same executable so maybe

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude on SmarterMail

2004-12-22 Thread Mailing Lists
Sent this previous email a couple of days back but since it is a beta I guess email support is not supported. So declude team, app does not work yet on SmarterMail. Not sure if it is an installer issue because I was unable to get any info in regards to Declude ans SM. No logs generated, so look

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail

2004-11-08 Thread Mailing Lists
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support for it ): PV - Original Message - From: "David Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:26 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail Any word on whether Declud

Re: Re[4]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Mailing Lists
ginal Message - From: "sbsi lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:12 PM Subject: Re[4]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS Hey PV, Thanks for the feedback. My issue on changing - j

Re: Re[2]: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Mailing Lists
it will work in a high-volume environment. And I think ME also has an Imail migration util. PV - Original Message - From: "sbsi lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:28 PM Subject: Re[2]: CBL:RE

Re: CBL:RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Ipswitch ICS

2004-10-26 Thread Mailing Lists
That is exactly the point, and in my experience with Ipswitch when a fix is found they just ask to upgrade to their newest version rather than updating their older releases. Now this worked fine for us in the old days (i.e. prior to ICS). So let us assume that in February 2005 I have a 1) valid

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN?

2004-06-25 Thread Mailing Lists
Title: OT- Anyone know about this latest "attack" reported by CNN? http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/download_ject.mspx - Original Message - From: Sharyn Schmidt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 8:43 AM Subject: [Declud