Does anyone know if there's a valid X-note header that can be placed in the
message body that will cause Outlook to automatically route emails to the
Junk-email folder?
I wanted to use this approach rather than tagging the subject line and
relying on users to build their own rules in Outlook.
Thx
I know this belongs on the IMAIL forum but I'm not subscribed there --
apologies in advance.
Does anyone know of a way to globally disable the information manager so I
can prevent users from setting up auto-responders?
Thx
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsub
Sorry about the Off-Topic question...
I use Imail/Declude as a gateway system only for a large Exchange org.
To avoid the dictionary attacks, we do some scripting magic to put the
Exchange SMTP addresses in the Imail Alias setup.
Here's the problem. Our Exchange org has two domains associated wit
Has anyone ever tried to inject an Outlook/Exchange IMF SCL value into the
header with Declude?
The header looks like this:
x-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-receiver: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SCL: 7 93.4%
Basically I wanted to see if I could use this as an action to force spam
into the Outlook junkmail f
cessing the next
> E-mail until it drops again, but if the CPU is at 50% for the
> last 5 seconds, the wait should be 0.
>
> So anyway, I would just leave your threads in an area that
> could be impractical for your server to handle and just hope
> that it stays stable under heavy
Just moved to 3.05.22 and my server's can't keep up with the queue (but they
can with 2.06).
Threads=20 CPU's fine.
Anyway, I set Declude logs to debug and I'm seeing this for every message.
Anyone know why Declude would check the country so many times?
12/12/2005 12:14:26.837 qaf8501fe351b.
I've always wondered why Declude can't use IIS SMTP as its MTA?
Seems like a pretty big market for the people who want a gateway only system
-- or even Exchange.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Sanford Whiteman
> Sent: Saturday
Here
in San Diego?
David,
Just for follow-up.
As I posted earlier we reverted back to 2.6 from 3.6.11 and 99% of these
"headers in the body" messages are gone.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, Oc
I'm posting this to give as much information as possible, not to put the
guys at declude in a bad light. They're doing a great job and we love their
product!
Something either wrong with all 4 of our servers or there's a big problem in
3.x
I've got 4 Dell PE 1650's dual proc. 1.4Ghz machines with
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 1:45 PM
> > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DecludeProc cras
he new
> >architecture, but Declude says it's not connected.)
> >
> >The headers are "bad" when they make it to Declude, and
> Declude doesn't
> >handle them right.
> >
> >Fortunately, in our setup, they all still get treated as
> v
I'm not 100% sure if people aren't noticing Decludeproc crashing.
The installer sets the service recovery to restart in 0 seconds.
So, would a few of you mind checking your System event logs and look for
Event ID 7031 and 26. I want to triple check that I'm the only one getting
these.
Here's what
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 (on Friday) I've been receiving
hundreds of complaints of spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the
messages but it's moving the SMTP headers to the body of the
email. This results in user's Outlook rules not firing on the
subject
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 I've been receiving hundreds of complaints of
spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the messages but it's
moving the SMTP headers to the body of the email. This results in user's
Outlook rules not firing on the subject line keywor
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 (on Friday) I've been receiving hundreds of
complaints of spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the messages but it's
moving the SMTP headers to the body of the email. This results in user's
Outlook rules not firing on the subject
Ever since I went to 3.05.10 (now on 3.05.11) I've been receiving hundreds
of complaints of spam making it to my users.
After inspection, Declude is subject line marking the messages but it's
moving the SMTP headers to the body of the email. This results in user's
Outlook rules not firing on the su
Now that the declude "engine" runs as a service, do you need to restart the
decludeproc service when making changes to global.cfg?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The
I
think this has been covered before but does anyone have any ideas on how to
restrict message size with Gateway only configs?
I'm
trying to prevent the 20mb message attachments from bogging down the
system.
Using
IMAIL
eriod? If after an extended run period, I'd say that
there is a buffer overflow in Declude.
- Original Message -
From:
Mark
Smith
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 4:40
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludepr
ripped it on my 2K3 server.
>
> Darrell
>
>
> --
> --
> Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for
> Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring,
> SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integratio
Sorry for the OT post but I'm looking for a telnet Windows PINE mail type
client.
We have a number of users who need to access email via a 2400baud SAT phone.
So we're looking to put up a PINE mail windows based solution where the
users would telnet in to read email, and the PINE server would conn
Any
word from Declude on the issue in 3.05.5 that fills up the /templogs
folder?
To
recap, if Concatenate logs is turned on AND the decludeproc service crashes,
declude "forgets" about the temp. logs. (Concatenate Log Threshold is reset to
0).
This
results in the /templog eventually grow
g.
>
>
> Kevin Bilbee
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Smith
>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:39 AM
>> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
>> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL
Just tested it here and it's working.
I even dumped my whole /review folder into the /proc folder and it processed
them fine. That would crash at will in the past.
Any word on the log file issue that I reported?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
hard time writing logs to the folder. System
slows down, queues build up...
Darrel -- hint -- monitor the \templogs and \proc\work folder too. :)
-Original Message-----
From: Mark Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 2:40 PM
To: 'Declude.JunkMail@declude.co
My servers are constantly crashing because of this bug!
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
As a web hosting company, we put an SMTP server listening on a different TCP
port.
We instruct users to modify their SMTP settings in their mail client to use
this port.
The server listens on this port but relays on 25.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does setting PROCESSES (in the 2.0.6 notes) contradict with THREADS (in the
3.0 notes)?
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-a
bump your threads up to 25 or so. Watch
the proc directory, decludeproc.exe in task manager, and the logs. Do you
see the logs just stop and the decludeproc.exe at zero % cpu for a period of
time even through there are messages in the proc directory?
Darrell
Mark Smith writes:
> FYI
> I&#x
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG
Integration, and Log Parsers.
Mark Smith writes:
> There's a folde
FYI
I'm seeing the same thing.
Dell PE 2650's 1.4Ghz Dual Proc 2GB RAM.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Lewis-Waller
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:48 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude
There's a folder in the \proc folder called "review"
I've
got messages building up in it but not sure what they
are.
We upgraded 4 of our inbound gateway server to 3.0.5 yesterday.
This morning our HP Open View alarms on all 4 went off reporting the
following similar errors:
HELP!
>From the Event Log:
Event Type: Error
Event Source: Service Control Manager
Event Category: None
Event ID: 7031
Date:
Charles,
We use this on our inbound servers and it's been wonderful.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 4:29 PM
To: DLAnalyzer Support
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declude que
> Note - messages _returned to the queue with this switch ON will not be
scanned for a virus
Meaning messages that are returned from a JM hold action and not the declude
overflow right?
IOW Declude Virus will only scan the messages that aren't deleted by
Junkmail BUT if JM has a hold action, De
Assuming we wanted to setup a Sat-Sun DOW test with a weight of 2 for the
message hitting on the weekend, I guess we would use:
DOW dow 6 7 2 0
Correct?
Having said that, does anyone have any metrics on what days more spam comes
in?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for vi
I'll be the first to admit that I don't keep up on the reading of this list
so I'm sure this has been discussed before.
Additionally, I did some searching on these topics but the Mail Archive
system is spitting back too many results to be effective these days.
So that brings me to my point...
The n
IPSwitch says that Small Business Server is ok for this purpose.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OT] RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 6.3 Actin
I'll be the first to admit that I don't keep up on the reading of this list
so I'm sure this has been discussed before.
Additionally, I did some searching on these topics but the Mail Archive
system is spitting back too many results to be effective these days.
So that brings me to my point...
The n
What is the default action in Junkmail?
Is there a way to defaine a default action?
For example, all but 3 of my tests use the action WARN but I specify 50
tests with the action WARN.
Rather than 'syncing' all of these tests in GLOBAL and DEFAULT it would be
easier to just omit and use the 'defaul
You can if you're server's running W2003.
Use the /console switch in the WTS client.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
> Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 2:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [D
Anyone else having problems with the %TESTDOMAIN% not working?
When I use it in my X-NOTE headers it spits out the string to launch Message
Sniffer.
X-Note: Zone Used for DNS Based Tests: e:\IMail\Sniffer\d{message sniffer
exe name}.exe {key placed here}
X-Note: filter [1.79i4] for SPAM & virus.
nkMail] Online FTP site with Declude Files...
>
> ftp.xyz.com/imail where xyz.com is Kami's domain
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 3:19 PM
> Subj
I believe that it was Kami who had his \declude folder exposed via FTP so
you could pull his tests.
Anyone remember the URL and is this still online?
Thanks!
Mark
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMai
Gotcha... I knew that part,.. Just was looking where to put the string
definition.
By default it's just SPAM:
So I thought it went on its own line in the global.cfg and not tabed after
the SUBJECT action.
Is there a single line in the global.cfg to change the string for all
SUBJECT actions (withou
Forgive me because I haven't been on the list for some time...
The "Action File"? Are the action definitions now being configured in
individual files?
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004
Quick question...
What's the string in the global.cfg to change the string stamped in the
subject line action?
I need to change it from the standard SPAM: string to something else.
...checked mail-archive and the manual but it's no in there.
Thanks!
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by
Well,
Had to revert back to 8.05, rebuild the LDAP database and then re-upgrade.
Odd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 12:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.Ju
I've tried everything but I can't get the new Open LDAP service to start.
I'm NOT running AD or any other LDAP services on this server.
I've changed the port and the damn thing just hangs. Nothing in the Event
logs.
Also my Imail system admin program now has all of the First and Last name
fields g
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns4858
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMa
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
> eServices For You
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 10:27 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
If I'm only using imail as a gateway for Exchange and only one domain is
being forwarded to, wouldn't it make sense to disable the DNS cache and
Queue manager.
In the remote case the receiving Exchange server is put on the skip list
that would mean that all email would stop.
Right?
---
[This E-m
Wonder what this will be about?
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/040309/95882_1.html
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsub
I'm in the process of building a 4 server inbound MX gateway system for our
Exchange 2003 environment.
Imail/Declude will run on 4 even priority MX relayers and will act as edge
virus and spam detection.
Our organization receives about 350,000-400,000 inbound messages a day so
we're estimating abo
I'm working on an Exchange 2003 roll out where I'll use Imail and Junkmail
as a spam filter/relay/"edge antivirus scanner".
Imail will not host any domains and only act as a gateway relayer for the
domains that are hosted in the Exchange namespace.
I don't think that I'll need Imail Professional s
Does it happen with all user accounts on the same machine?
If not, try deleting the profile and re-creating.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerod Bennett
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Decl
Incorrect 1024-65535 are the random TCP ACK ports.
Just do a netstat -an and you'll see TCP 0.0.0.0:{GT 5000) LISTENING
Also, only a state based firewall will allow the TCP back channel ports by
default.
An access list in a router will need to have GT 1024 explicitly told to pass
the back channel
Dan,
Or you can pay me to host your Junkmail/Virus scanning for your Exchange
server.
We have lots of customers we do that for. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 4:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PRO
Look on the Ipswitch site for using iMail as a Gateway.
There's an article on it.
HINT: Use the HOSTS file.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
Scott,
Are the additions in the 1.77i release for SKIPIFWEIGHT and MAXWEIGHT
included in 1.78 beta?
Just want to make sure I don't break my Gibberish tests. :)
Thanks!
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
> Scott Perry
> Sent: W
I've been running MS DNS since NT 4.0.
W2003's DNS is much better but I've NEVER had a problem with any MS DNS.
You're being told BIND is much better by a bunch of guys who drink Mountain
Dew until 4:30am, hang around the Com-Sci lab, grow long beards, ride those
sit-down/fold up bikes, wear Birke
Matt,
Thanks for the response.
I did that but the newest file is just
2.0.1
I guessed you might have posted at:
http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/gibberish/Gibberish_v2-1-0.txt
but that spit back a 404
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matt,
Just going through some saved items and wanted to follow up on this.
Is 2.0.1 your latest version or is there a newer one?
Mark
-0-
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Bramble
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:52 AM
>
Scott,
Sorry if this has been answered 1000 times but I haven't had
much time to read the group lately.
Is 1.77 beta stable (for a beta)?
I remember seeing something about some log file issues.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail c
Sorry if this has been answered 1000 times but I haven't had much time to
read the group lately.
Is 1.77 beta stable (for a beta)?
I remember seeing something about some log file issues.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
2003.
It's MUCH more secure than 2000 because many services are not enabled by
default which is the case in 2000.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 12:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
we probably would have gone the other way,
> choosing a known cost at the outsourcing company vs. an
> unknown cost for maintenance, support and training in-house...
>
> Andrew Colbeck
> Technical Specialist
> Bentall Capital LP
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (604) 661-5047
>
>
Partition? D: is where
> Imail and Declude are installed and your log files for
> Declude write to the d:\Imail\Declude\Spamlogs? Out of
> curiosity are you Maximum SMTP Processes set to 30? Are you
> using Hardware Raid or software Raid?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Kris
>
&g
Sorry Two drives in RAID 1 (Mirrored)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
> Tolmachoff (Lists)
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 10:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail - DecludeJunkmail/Virus Gateway
Kris,
We have four inbound MX relayers for our Exchange 2003 system.
The inbound MX relayers run iMail/Junkmail and each have an equal preference
level in the MX records.
Each of these servers are ONLY relayers.
They're Dell Poweredge 1650's
Dual Processor 1.2Ghz, 1GB RAM
3x36GB drives in RAID 0 (
We gave up Brightmail and use Junkmail for an upstream filter on our inbound
edge relayers.
Mark E. Smith
Systems and Technology Manager
Associated Press Broadcast Technology
1825 K Street NW Suite 800
Washington, D.C. USA
Phone: +1-202-736-9657 (GMT -05:00)
Fax: +1-707-202-3957
http://www.enps.co
4 logs into a SQL server.
>From there I can just search for the message and change the rules
accordingly.
Before I start on this project, has anyone already done something like this?
Mark Smith
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
-
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/08/1849245&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=
128&tid=172&tid=95
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
ay relayer, there's no need to run IIS.
There's no issue with more than 10 concurrent sessions so why waste the
Server license when we can just use a workstation license?
Mark Smith
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joh
How does (or doesn't it) AUTOWHITELIST work with a Gateway situation?
We use iMail/Junkmail simply as a spam solution to MSFT Exchange 2003.
My hunch is that it doesn't work because the users won't have a local login.
Then again, I could write an application to extract contacts from a given
users
8CD0118; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 05:40:51 -0500
Received: from msmithd800xp [162.83.21.69] by popmail.domain2.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.03) id A0AF8330208; Fri, 05 Dec 2003 05:40:47 -0500
From: "Mark Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
BTW,
I forwarded this issue to a colleague, Sue Moser of Slipstick Systems
http://www.slipstick.com and Windows magazine contributor.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
> Scott Perry
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:19 PM
>
Sniffer's well worth the $300.00 per year.
That breaks down to less than $1.00 per day.
It catches content that some RBLs don't catch.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Keith Anderson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:28 AM
FWIW, I run many more tests than this -- about 30 total plus the internal
Declude tests, External Sniffer, and Declude Virus.
Message load is about 150,000 messages per day on a dual 2.8 Ghz.
No performance hits noticed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Go for Checkpoint's 25 user/IP option.
You can buy two Nokia IP350's on Ebay for $400.00 each.
Blows Sonicwall, Watchguard and anything else outtta' the water.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee
> Sent: Sunday, November 1
Is there any way to filter based on character set, code page, etc?
I'm getting swamped with tons of Cirilic spam lately and it's passing my
RBL's recently.
I can't filter by code word or phrase and the MAILFROM field is random.
Any thoughts?
Here's a sample
-0-
ETOpJa8Lj9twl9fIQ
Продам или сда
Title: Message
I
just have "Relay for Addresses"
I
include my local Internal DMZ's subnet so I can relay off of various ASP
scripts, etc.
All
of my users must authenticate in order to relay.
-Original Message-From: Keith Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
Title: Message
Duuuh.. Why didn't I think of that.
FWIW,
if you just put Weight: %WEIGHT% in the header then you might be breaking
RFC's.
There
should be an X- before your "Weight" line which will denote a comment
line.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
Title: Message
Is
there any way to place the total weight in the SMTP header?
Something like:
X-DECLUDE-WEIGHT: yyy
No.
They're not coming back.
Read the mail archives.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> James R. Skivers
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OSRELAY
>
>
> Does anybody
Cox cable I'll bet.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Harvy
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM
>
>
> Who's Cox?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > F
Is anyone using Alligate http://www.alligate.com ?
I'm using message sniffer and was looking at adding alligate also.
I'd appreciate any feedback..
Mark
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing lis
t;
>
> Andy Schmidt wrote:
>
> >Here is the replacements that I'm using (marked up red) with the
> >results for the last few hours:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Best Regards
> >Andy Schmidt
> >
> >
> >-Original M
Anyone have any recommendations on what to replace:
#OSDUL ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.3
5 0
#OSFORM ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.8
5 0
#OSLIST ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.7
5 0
#OSRELAY
I've seen it to.
Additionally http://relays.osirusoft.com isn't responding and emails are
being bounced.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Schick
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 8:14 PM
> To: Declude. JunkMail (E-mail)
> Subject
Just installed Imail 8 and was wondering what the consensus about the
default DNS blackslists are?
Are most junkmail/sniffer users leaving these enabled or disabling them?
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Ju
Are there any issues with Junkmail/Virus and iMail version 8.0?
We're planning on the upgrade next week and didn't want to break
anything. :)
Thanks!
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
If this isn't the easiest way to get valid email addresses for spammers!
-0-
> -Original Message-
> From: Hacking Emails
> [mailto:ijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijnijn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:25 AM
To:
Subject: Just send the email address u wa
Has the addition of the TMDA test been discussed with Junkmail/Imail?
http://tmda.net
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by F-Proto Virus Scanner]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.
Proverb
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Smith
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spews is incompetent (well,
> overzealous
Here Here!
I'm not defending them at all but they really should use something other
then that kiddy farm newsgroup to communicate with.
I really think that's half of their perception problem.
Of course their guerilla tactics don't help!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
Same thing happened to us... You're preaching to the choir on that one.
FWIW, the way we got around it was to work with our ISP and had them
grant us a /29 subnet that wasn't listed on SPEWS.
We then multinetted that network and placed two SMTP servers on it as
gateways/smarthosts.
I've lowered O
I'm not sure I understand what you want to do.
The ASP code is just done through the Request.ServerVariables
Collection.
I'm not sure I understand the requirement for the .exe
Have you ever used API's before?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
This shouldn't fail REVDNS as there is a REVDNS entry. Maybe HELOBOGUS.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Rooth
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] No reverse dns
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
