RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say "NO" !

f the XML structure (parsing of regular expressions is very fast) provided by the MS XML object parser. MS has put a lot of effort into the efficiency of the XML object parser because they use it so often! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Ori

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] XML? Just Say "NO" !

method: Notepad or XML object. Also, viewing an XML file in IE is very easy to pick out the data you want to view. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of decjunkmail Sent

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Multiple Threat Lookup Database test for Declude JunkMail

learn the industry and perhaps try out new ideas, that's how technology advances. But don't do it from an ivory tower! Scott has always been in the trenches with the rest of us. I would like to see the new management get a little "dirty" with us, too. Todd Holt Xidix Techn

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: New Multiple Threat Lookup Database test for Declude JunkMail

I hope that corporate bureaucracy is not introduced into an otherwise smooth running product. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, July 09, 20

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Injunction against SpamCop

erstanding of email technology (and its costs). 6. How pervasive the public feels the problem is. IMHO: The only thing that will stop spam is when enough lawmakers have enough spam sent to them to cause enough frustration! Then they will understand the problem. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Country Code for Palestine?

That’s interesting… I thought their country code would be more representative of Palenstine.  Perhaps “.ter” for terrorists! ;)   Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] Wildcards in sender blacklist

I found some discussions of this last year and I wanted to see if anything had changed: Are wildcards supported in the sender blacklists? For example: @mail*.rapiddealsbyemail.com @mail*.emailcourrier.com @relay*.reunion.com @*xxx* Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Cosmic 419er lost in space

I say let him pay for the transgressions of his brethren in Lagos! ;) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 1:20 PM To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Internet Usage Monitoring

Monster.com?? LOL -Just kidding. Can the PIX log to a syslog server? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:43 PM

RE: [HOLD weight]RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: %RND_SUBJECTS (This worries me!)

if it exists, the text of the entry is not reliable. This is why I suggest not giving the type of RDNS entry much credibility, but certainly check if the RDNS exists!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: %RND_SUBJECTS (This worries me!)

To reiterate my message to Len, because I think its appropriate here also: I'm sure that blocks a lot of SPAM, but why stop there...you should just shut down all of your internet connectivity and you would stop 100% of the SPAM. Now that's a filter to be proud of!! :) Todd

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: %RND_SUBJECTS (This worries me!)

I also forgot to mention that I can't contact Adrian to arrange a whitelist (should any of our users need to send to his users) because my messages will be blacklisted. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Raid Controller

people bashing the M$ people.     Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:02 PM To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] test

Pong... Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Madscientist Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] test ping

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] new dow and hour tests

What would be a good use for these tests? Or what is the motivation behind there creation? I don't understand what kind of Spam would be caught with them. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA 702.319.4349 www.xidix.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How do they do it?

I noticed something similar when I added a new user to an existing domain and within 24 hours that account had SPAM traffic. Junkmail was catching it, but I'm not sure how the spammers found the address that quickly. Is this similar to Joe's issue? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT- Getting a URL de-listed on AOL

“he'll probably use his AOL account to do his mailings (if they allow the volume)”   AOL will stop them from coming in, but not from going out!!   AOL and Earthlink are 2 of the biggest SPAM sources we see.  I wish they would practice what they preach!  ;)   Todd Holt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Challenge/Response with Declude

challenging the obvious good or obvious bad messages, then reducing the number of challenge messages to something less than 5% of the messages. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Ju

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Manual

Title: Message I agree with this approach.  It would separate the BETA users from the curious RELEASE users (who probably should wait for the release).   Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349   -Original Message- From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

1. Place negative weight tests first. 2. While testing effectiveness of a single test, place it first or turn off the stop processing flag for a period of time. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

f the available scoping options (system/domain/user)? This is also more consistent with the existing .junkmail options such as HEADER, WARN, DELETE, HOLD... Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAI

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

BadHeaders, Routing, etc) only. Again, it may seem small, but limiting the necessary processing and network access in any way can add up. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

I have seen here repeatedly: A way to combine test failures into a single outcome.  For example, a test called DefinitelyDelete defined as failed Sniffer and failed Spamcop and failed Badheaders.   Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Clarification

processing early on most messages. (Over 90% of our delete weight messages failed Sniffer and either BadHeaders or SpamCop) I would like to save the processing time if those push the weight into the delete range. I could make sure to place the negative weight tests first. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail Evaluation

Yes. Imail! Go with Declude, you won't be sorry. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Spencer Salva > Sent: Tuesday, J

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does Diskeeper Help on an imail server

full version! You'll be very happy with it. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Omar K. > Sent: Wednesday, January 14,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does Diskeeper Help on an imail server

uring this window and the impact to our customers is negligible. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Bohen > Sent:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF setup wizard output

OK, thanks. We have a hosted DNS and I'm getting the entries done now. I'll let you know. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF setup wizard output

It would appear that I could this single line in the zone file: v=spf1 ip4:208.57.224.88 -all and that would specify that all valid mail from the domain originates from this IP address. Is this correct? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF setup wizard output

for my domain is allowed to be sent from). Or am I missing something here? We only send mail from 1 IP address. Can I just specify that 1 address? I want to specify that all mail for this domain (Xidix.com) is sent from a single IP address (208.57.224.88). What am I missing in this picture? Todd Ho

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

I'm just giving you a hard time, John. I appreciate your effort to collate some data on the subject. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Windows Server 2003

John, Are you saying that small servers are not reliable?? :)) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (List

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test order

e admin to correctly configure the order of the tests. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Friday, Dece

[Declude.JunkMail] Test order

Are the tests performed in the order listed in the global.cfg? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

I found the whitelist auth in the archives. Sorry. I still want to know how to stop performing tests after a certain weight level. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PRO

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

I have been looking for the syntax for this entry. Can you publish it? My understanding is that this will whitelist anyone that has authenticated for SMTP. Is that correct? Also, what is the entry to stop performing tests if the weight reaches a certain level? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

d, would you? Well I scan all emails, both directions. It's a violation of our TOS to send spam and I want to stop it. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

able. 4. They are pointing fingers at us "little guys" as the problem. How many spam have you received from an AOL account? I can only speak for myself, but none of those apply to me. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Origina

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

Jason, I think I have been convinced to push this issue with MPower. First I hope that John's contact can help me out, but I will also forward the RFC to them. Thanks for the debate! :) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

> In the meantime, why not relay your outbound mail through your ISP? Obviously you have never relayed your outbound mail through an ISP! If you had, you would not suggest that course of action. :) Currently, I have no problems. I hope that I can keep it this way! Todd Holt Xidix Technolog

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 10:43 PM > To: [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

Not much comfort to those admins that are being blocked by AOL when their servers are setup correctly. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Does anyone not have Reverse DNS?

in building a tool that looks for the same things that I would look for by hand, in the content, not the context. I think we need more out of the box thinking like this. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RR.COM

I truly think they do this to keep the smaller players looking bad to their customers. "If you can't get mail to AOL, what kind of mail server are you running? Come to AOL where the mail always gets to AOL!" Now that is monopolistic! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

ly the biggest players have a voice.  This would probably mean that AOL, Earthlink, RR, Hotmail, etc would be on the governing council…and it would be interpreted to their greatest competitive advantage…and nothing would have changed! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xid

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] RR.COM

spam. Difficult thing to do!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sheldon Koehler > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:2

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] AOL and Reverse DNS

like Jim Barksdale and Scott McNealy.  And the MS bashers just fall in line.  Lemmings. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt Sent: Tuesday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virginia Indicts Two Men On Spam Charges

nment for help. They don't want to get into the political mess this could cause. Thanks to the work of Scott, I have a great tool for this battle. And thanks to everyone else here, I have a place to educate myself on how to fight this battle. Fight the good fight, people!!! Todd

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virginia Indicts Two Men On Spam Charges

problem without spending a lot of money or effort on a problem they see as a nuisance. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Virginia Indicts Two Men On Spam Charges

I applaud there efforts, but... $2500 a piece will deter no one!!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick Samarel

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

That sounds reasonable. You wrote of a process to compile a whitelist (implemented as negative weight on a blacklist). Does this process "walk" to all of the includes and their include, etc. to create the whitelist file? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust

but at the same time minimizes the effectiveness. What am I missing here? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb > Sent: W

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude virus hanging...

Thanks all for your help. I upgraded to 1.76i and the problem is solved. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Land

[Declude.JunkMail] Declude virus hanging...

?? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 virus1.cfg Description: Binary data

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Capital One

ROFLOL! :) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nick > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] What next?

LOL! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Purtell > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTE

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: OE contacts to Outlook

Does anyone have a process to move Outlook Express 6.0 contacts and messages to Outlook 2000?   Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349   --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incoming email being blacklisted when not in the blacklist file not in the blacklist file

these statements correct? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 10:16 AM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Incoming email being blacklisted when not in the blacklist file not in the blacklist file

Is there any way to define it as "ends with" logic? Are there any wildcard chars available for this? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL P

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] JM log entry missing

Oh. Never thought of that. I found it in the virus log. It ha been quarantinedby virus. Thanks for the info. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- &g

[Declude.JunkMail] JM log entry missing

Using LogLevel=MID, should there be at least one entry for each message that is received (except IMail killed messages)? If not, what would be the conditions to cause no entry in the log file for a particular message? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

Thanks for the info. I think we will be upgrading to 8.x to take advantage of the wildcarded kill.lst. Thanks to everyone for their input. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PRO

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

@abcdef.com will catch @.abcdef.com? It would seem to imply a wildcard between the @ and the rest of the domain name. Is that true? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Ju

[Declude.JunkMail] Sender blacklists

Can sender blacklists support wildcards? ie. @*.abcdef.com Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Parks > Sent: Thursday

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: WinME not resolving DNS

Believe me, that is my first instinct also!! But I'm trying to do a favor for a good client and I don't want to insult him by telling him that his computer sucks! Even though it's the truth! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: WinME not resolving DNS

No. But I thought that rebooting the machine flushed the DNS cache and I did reboot it. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kri

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: WinME not resolving DNS

, but his machine will not resolve DNS. If I go to a web server that I know the address of, I can browse that site just fine. Does anyone know why it won't resolve DNS queries? Are there any specific configs I should check. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidi

[Declude.JunkMail] Wildcard kill list entries

Can the kill file contain wild card entries? For example: @*ps01.net Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Understanding Imail, junkmail, virus logs

Thanks for the info. Your always a wealth of information! :) Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > S

[Declude.JunkMail] Understanding Imail, junkmail, virus logs

ndicate my understanding. Please comment on any incorrect statements. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Pe

[Declude.JunkMail] Understanding Imail logs document

A link to this was posted recently. Can someone please repost the link? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

Yes. Soil-tech.com is a local domain that we host and Tony is a valid user on that domain. It almost appears that Imail is seeing his OutlookExpress as a mail server, not a authenticated mail client. Any other suggestions? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com

[Declude.JunkMail] Reading junkmail log files

Is there white paper on reading the junkmail log files? Like the one that someone created on reading IMail logs. Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Dictionary attacks --- anyone have any solutions.

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 24.234.126.165 ID: What would cause this? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Sniifer

See http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail%40declude.com/msg11972.html Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wesley

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: google.com not returning correctly

Thank you to everyone that pointed me in the right direction. It was the Trojan.QHosts virus. The McAfee removal instructions took care of the problem. Thanks again for everyone's help. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: google.com not returning correctly

the same DNS servers through the same router. This problem also appears when trying to use www.altavista.com, but www.yahoo.com, www.lycos.com seem fine. Has anyone seen this before? Could this be a virus, spyware, etc? Thanks in advance for any help. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] MS Customer Assistance SPAM

spam (not detect it to begin with). For the time it saves me in admin, I can generate much more than $300/yr in additional revenue using that saved time!! You really owe it to yourself to look at www.sortmonster.com/messagesniffer. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hurah!

Don't worry, with the politics of the situation and the money to be made, it will return. Just wait. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

.  Silly me!   Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 3:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

So they don't have to pay for all registrations? I don't understand this. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mat

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

it, to prevent the letter from being returned to me? Now those would be useful!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com 702.319.4349 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Happy days are here again...

.com and .net domain names are currently registered and how much VeriSlime pays for each domain registration? This could be enough money to pay for the all of the proposed expansions, redesigns, etc, that are on the drawing board!!! Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Interim release to detect wildcard DNS entries (aka VERISCAM)

Where can I download the interim release? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:42 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Some good info on the Verislime coup

to sue me as the email provider for not insuring his privacy? Tell me the lawyers won't have a field day with that. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PR

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries

(hopefully very few), but important false positives.  I hope no one is deleting messages that contain points from this test.   Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV  USA www.xidix.com   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DYNAMIC - 09/17/2003 - A new filter to detect IP'd reverse DNS entries

positive rate (IMHO) is too high as it will lump all of the SDSL connections in with the SPAM sources.   Can this filter distinguish between ADSL and SDSL? If not, is this acceptable? Is the filter doing this? Are there any unique instructions for doing this?   Any thoughts?   Todd

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] A slight increase in spam not getting caught thanks to Network Solutions

unregistered domains resolve to this range: 64.94.110.x??? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Anderson > Sent: Monday, September 15, 200

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Email addresses on a company webpage?

With all this talk of email addresses on web pages... What is the best way to obfuscate them? HTML (how is this done?)? Java (how is this done?)? Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Ju

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: National Do Not Call Registry

ockets than the poor users. Combined with the golden rule of capitalism: "He who has the gold makes the rules.", results in what we have today. I think that the do not call list will result in a new call list worth $$MM. Todd Holt Xidix Technologies, Inc Las Vegas, NV USA www.xidix

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: The Titian Key Product to Remove Spam.. patent pending?

But wait, there’s more!!!  If you order today, we will include absolutely free…the amazing Ginzu SPAM knife.  It never needs sharpening and can slice the fat off your SPAM messages just as easy as that!  It slices…it dices…it even makes julienne fries!!   Blah, blah, blah Ginger…   ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient

Have these people never heard of the "sent items" folder? I know people do this a lot, but it is not necessary (IMHO) and generates extra mail traffic. We have tried very hard to teach our people to use the "sent items" so we don't have a huge problem with marking these as spam. <$.02> This metho

[Declude.JunkMail] Catching SPAM when the sender = recipient

I have noticed that many spammers in recent months have begun to use the recipients email as the senders email. Can this be trapped by the current tests or should I request a new test to cover this? The only legitimate mail that would pass this test would be users sending mail to themselves and f

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for feedback

LOL. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Looking for feedback >One of these days i'll take a typing class.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] FromFile Usage Report- Image`fx

What was used to create this report? Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-owner@;declude.com]On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] FromFile Usage Report- Image`fx Report ID Version 1.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNSReport claims domain not supporting abuse account, but it does

I'm still confused about this... I have a domain, xidix.com, and it has a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account and an [EMAIL PROTECTED] account. If someone sends email to either of those addresses, they will not be rejected. What else do I need to setup to be RFC compliant? Todd -Original Message

[Declude.JunkMail] DNSReport claims domain not supporting abuse account, but it does

DNS Reports at: http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=xidix.com claims: WARNING: One or more of your mailservers does not accept mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailservers are expected by RFC2142 to accept mail to abuse. mail.speakeasy.net's abuse response: >>> RCPT TO: <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question

Adding the XSENDER option took care of my problem. Thanks to Tom and Scott for your help on this problem and especially to Tom for all the effort on SpamReview! Paypal donation on the way! Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwar

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Review kill.lst problem question

Oops. My bad. I had the XSENDER commented out. I just uncommented it and set it to ON. I'll let you know in a little while when I get some junkmail. Thanks, Todd -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Schwarz (by way of "R. Scott Perry" <[

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Oh gosh!

Title: Message I should get a copy and SPAM them back!!  They shouldn't be able to tell who is doing it!   Then, if someone does get upset at me (because my SPAM was not anonymous), I can sue them for deceptive trade practices.  :-)  LOL   Todd -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PR

  1   2   >