RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS and HELOBOGUS

2003-09-04 Thread Agid, Corby
, September 02, 2003 4:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS and HELOBOGUS We only white list after emailing the user and the mail admin. It is in their best interest to fix the RDNS and HELO bogus issues. Attached is the email I send to them. Why should I slow

[Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS and HELOBOGUS

2003-09-02 Thread Agid, Corby
Hello, We get a lot of false postives from sites that fail two of three simple tests such as REVDNS, HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS which combined have just enough weight (10 to12 ), to get tagged as spam. I have been whitelisting as I learn about them, which seems to be approx one to three

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS and HELOBOGUS

2003-09-02 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS and HELOBOGUS Hello, We get a lot of false postives from sites that fail two of three simple tests such as REVDNS, HELOBOGUS and BADHEADERS which combined have just enough weight (10 to12 ), to get tagged as spam. I have been whitelisting as I learn about them, which

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] REVDNS and HELOBOGUS

2003-09-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
I reduced the scores of those test's. Messages that fail BAHDEADERS seem to often fail HELOBOGUS in my experience. It would be good to know the error code returned by the BADHEADERS test because this shouldn't be failed by most mailing applications (even automated ones). If you look in your