half Of
> ISPHuset Nordic
> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 10:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER
> didn't work for me me
>
>
> Is it possibble to set an iprange in IFBYPASS ?
>
> So that all 128 ips
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER
> didn't work for me me
>
> IPBYPASS is great except for the 20 entry limitation. ATT,
> where many of my clients and myself have mailboxes that
> forward to my IMail server has 23 mail forwarde
ltiple hop scanning"?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Bramble
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER
&g
Matthew Bramble
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER
didn't work for me me
George,
The suggestion by Andrew to rename the test BONDEDSENDER-DYNA would
definitely prevent it from scanning prior hops. I find
there were other ways to handle the valid mail.
> >
> >George
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-----
> >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> >>Robert Grosshandler
> >>Sent: Friday, Dece
OTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDER
didn't work for me me
Negative weights on last hop only?
How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail
server)?
Rob
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
e the valid mail.
George
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Robert Grosshandler
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 6:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The first time BONDEDSENDE
I meant negative weights on last hop for the RBL's. There are only a
few popular ones out there. Gateways should be IPBYPASsed.
Matt
Robert Grosshandler wrote:
Negative weights on last hop only?
How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail
server)?
Rob
---
[T
Negative weights on last hop only?
How would that affect a gateway (or e-mail that goes to a backup mail
server)?
Rob
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declu
Andrew,
I think you have a very good idea, in fact, all negative weight tests
should probably be limited to just the last hop since they are typically
designed to only apply to the last hop.
It might be a good idea for Scott to limit BONDEDSENDER to the last hop
by default, and maybe give us a
Check out these received lines:
Received: from h24-87-101-24.vs.shawcable.net [24.87.101.24] by
mail.bentall.com
(SMTPD32-8.02) id A3A4A8B007C; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:20:20 -0800
Received: from ebay.com (lore.ebay.com [66.135.195.181])
by h24-87-101-24.vs.shawcable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
11 matches
Mail list logo
