RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Harry vanderzand
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer Harry - When I upgraded a few years ago to the Declude "suite", it came with it and w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Harry vanderzand
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:55 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer Harry - When I upgraded a few years ago to the Declude "suite", it came w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Todd Richards
upgraded too!) So the first thing I guess you should do is make sure you actually have HiJack? Todd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry vanderzand Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 7:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-12 Thread Harry vanderzand
4S1 519-741-1222 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Richards Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:01 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer Hi Harry - HiJack will do what you need to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-11 Thread declude
eclude.com Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:25 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer I have a situation where a client's computer in their network got infected by a spammer and 100,000 email got send out over the weekend It sure caused a big me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-11 Thread Todd Richards
had to test it on a real threat. But it's good to know that it does the job it should. Todd From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry vanderzand Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 8:26 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelist au

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelist auth and spammer infested computer

2008-08-11 Thread Harry vanderzand
I have a situation where a client's computer in their network got infected by a spammer and 100,000 email got send out over the weekend It sure caused a big mess. How can I prevent this when I am using "whitelist auth" or do I need to turn that off"? I have all the latest software fro

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist auth not working

2006-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just noticed that "whitelist auth" has stopped workng I know it was working before, bat that may be before our declude upgrade curently imail 8.15 and declude 4.3 i wasn't following the list lately, and can't find something recent in the archive has anyone reported a problem with "whitelist

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2006-05-04 Thread Kelly Scotto
Title: Whitelist Auth Looks like all our users are failing the cmdspace test. From the manual it seems I can use the "Whitelist Auth" to bypass this test for our users only. Can somebody show an example if this, I am not sure how to set it up. Kelly Scotto Assistant Netw

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-17 Thread Scott Fisher
One benefit is that all the outgoing emails wouldn't go through Junkmail scanning, which should be a good reduction in CPU time. - Original Message - From: "Travis Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [Declud

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-17 Thread Travis Sullivan
Travis, "My only wish is that we could setup the global.cfg file to fire the tests in the order we choose." This is on our development wishlist. David B www.declude.com That is exactly why you guys are among the best company we have ever worked with in our nearing 10 year history oh..

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-17 Thread David Barker
: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH >I have 7.11 :-( > And don't plan on upgrading...so the Whitelist AUTH is useless to me? > > Richard Farris Yes, that is correct. That is a new feature in imail 8+

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-17 Thread Travis Sullivan
I have 7.11 :-( And don't plan on upgrading...so the Whitelist AUTH is useless to me? Richard Farris Yes, that is correct. That is a new feature in imail 8+ I don't see it as that big of a benefit really. With combo filters, good use of declude pro's content scanning (headers, body, subject

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-17 Thread Darin Cox
Yeahhhpp. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 2:56 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH I have 7.11 :-( And don't plan on upgrading...so the Whitelist AUTH is useless to me?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-17 Thread Richard Farris
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:03 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH No you are absolutly correct - whitelist auth requires Imail version 8.x. Darrell Check out http://www.inv

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-15 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
bound through your server then yes, they will be whitelisted. Darin. - Original Message - From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 8:09 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH In my Global file I have WHITELISTAUTH I th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-14 Thread Darin Cox
AIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:23 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH I believe you have to be running Imail 8.0 or higher as well. Someone correct me if I'm wrong here. > Are your customers authenticating? If they are, you have that

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-14 Thread gbirdsall
listed. > > Darin. > > > - Original Message - > From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 8:09 PM > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH > > > In my Global file I have > WHITELISTAUTH > &

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-14 Thread Darin Cox
14, 2005 8:09 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH In my Global file I have WHITELISTAUTH I thought this would keep my customers own email from being trapped in the spamreview..but I still see my outgoing customers email held...do I have it right? Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2005-11-14 Thread Richard Farris
In my Global file I have WHITELISTAUTH I thought this would keep my customers own email from being trapped in the spamreview..but I still see my outgoing customers email held...do I have it right? Richard Farris Ethixs Online 1.270.247. Office 1.800.548.3877 Tech Support "Crossroads t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

2003-12-19 Thread nick
>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:13 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth? >> >> I have been looking for the syntax for this entry. Can you publish >it? >> My understanding is that this will whitelist anyone that has >>

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

2003-12-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
I still want to know how to stop performing tests after a certain weight level. Unfortunately, that isn't possible. There are a number of problems with this (negative weights that would have been added after processing stops, the order of tests, etc.).

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
TECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Holt > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 11:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth? > > I have been looking for the syntax for this entry. Can you publish it? > My understanding is that

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth?

2003-12-19 Thread Todd Holt
I have been looking for the syntax for this entry. Can you publish it? My understanding is that this will whitelist anyone that has authenticated for SMTP. Is that correct? Also, what is the entry to stop performing tests if the weight reaches a certain level? Thanks, Todd Holt Xidix Technolog

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-12-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
Ok, question on behalf of those using AutoWhite for Declude: Would it be possible to add a configuration so that certain tests will still run with "PREWHITELIST ON" in the Global.cfg? That is very unlikely. The whole point of PREWHITELIST ON is to save CPU time, by not running any tests when E-m

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-12-15 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
ilto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:25 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH > > clude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. > Declude Virus: C

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-12-15 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH > > > >Question, when using this in the Global.cfg and Imail 8.x, do the tests > >still run and no action, or does it cause tests not to run? > > With "PREWHITELIST ON", the tests will not be run

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-12-15 Thread Doug Anderson
ROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:25 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH > > >Question, when using this in the Global.cfg and Imail 8.x, do the tests > >still run and no action, or does it cause tests not to run? > > With "PREWHITELIST ON", the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-12-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
Question, when using this in the Global.cfg and Imail 8.x, do the tests still run and no action, or does it cause tests not to run? With "PREWHITELIST ON", the tests will not be run (for WHITELIST AUTH). Otherwise, they will be run. -Scott ---

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-12-15 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Question, when using this in the Global.cfg and Imail 8.x, do the tests still run and no action, or does it cause tests not to run? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail ca

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth ??

2003-11-28 Thread Kevin Bilbee
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth ?? > > > What this options does ?? > > WHITELIST AUTH > > Can't find it on the manual.. > > Thanks > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth ??

2003-11-28 Thread Alejandro Valenzuela
What this options does ?? WHITELIST AUTH Can't find it on the manual.. Thanks --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-10-09 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH > > > >Does this work if the use has their mail client configured with a different > >from and reply to address than that which they authenticate with? > > It works any time that the user authenticates. If IM

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-10-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
Does this work if the use has their mail client configured with a different from and reply to address than that which they authenticate with? It works any time that the user authenticates. If IMail allows the user to authenticate with a different address than they are sending from, Declude Junk

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH

2003-10-09 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Does this work if the use has their mail client configured with a different from and reply to address than that which they authenticate with? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http:/

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH logging

2003-09-23 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I has worked for me at LOGLEVEL high. We are 1.76. Kevin Bilbee > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 5:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH logging

2003-09-23 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, can you please add "whitelisted authenticated user" to the log at LOGLEVEL MID. This was done yesterday (at LOGLEVEL LOW). I'm not sure why it was only recording at the debug level with the initial release. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: T

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH logging

2003-09-22 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, can you please add "whitelisted authenticated user" to the log at LOGLEVEL MID. I could not even get a log entry for authenticated users at the LOGLEVEL HIGH setting. In order to see the following log entry, I had to set the log to LOGLEVEL DEBUG: Skipping E-mail from authenticated user [

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
age- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth > > Hi; > > I am using: > > X-Note: T

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread Kami Razvan
double check.. Regards, Kami -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 8:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth >The global.cfg has: > >AUTOWHITELIST

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
The global.cfg has: AUTOWHITELIST ON PREWHITELIST ON WHITELIST AUTH I thought with Whitelist auth the users that authenticate will have their emails whitelisted. That is correct. Are you using IMail v8 and the latest interim release of Declude? In this case one user's email to another user

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelist Auth

2003-09-18 Thread Kami Razvan
Title: Message Scott: Hope all is well.   The global.cfg has:   AUTOWHITELIST  ONPREWHITELIST  ONWHITELIST  AUTH   I thought with Whitelist auth the users that authenticate will have their emails whitelisted.  In this case one user's email to another user (within the same organization) ha

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH / HABEAS

2003-09-17 Thread Markus Gufler
> You would have to check with Ipswitch to be sure. My > understanding is that > they started including the information in the Q*.SMD file > with v7.10, but > haven't confirmed it. It is definitely there for v8.x. This is the content of an v7.15 queue file sent from an authenticated user:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH / HABEAS

2003-09-17 Thread Matthew Bramble
I'm using IMail 7.13 at the moment and this is what I get for a message that I AUTHed: QC:\IMail\spool\D94de0163018e1cda.SMD Higaia.com We:\mail.igaia.com E0, S<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NRCPT TO: R Doesn't look to be in there. Maybe I should upgrade my version and try again? I see absolutely no reas

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH / HABEAS

2003-09-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
Hmmm. So WHITELIST AUTH does not work with IMail 7.x? You would have to check with Ipswitch to be sure. My understanding is that they started including the information in the Q*.SMD file with v7.10, but haven't confirmed it. It is definitely there for v8.x. Why is it enabled by default in th

[Declude.JunkMail] WHITELIST AUTH / HABEAS

2003-09-17 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
Hmmm.  So WHITELIST AUTH does not work with IMail 7.x?  Why is it enabled by default in the latest global.cfg and there are no comments indicating that it works only with IMail 8?  I just upgraded from 1.69 to 1.75 yesterday, and incorporated the changes in the default global.cfg and $defaul