RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question

2002-09-27 Thread Jim Rooth
] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question >Thanks Scott, I meant to say SPAMHEADERS in lieu of BADHEADERS...to ya'll I was RFC ignorant...you had to figure the rest of the ignorance out on your own...LOL Me thinks you have been spending too much time around a truck stop a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question

2002-09-26 Thread John Tolmachoff
>Thanks Scott, I meant to say SPAMHEADERS in lieu of BADHEADERS...to ya'll I was RFC ignorant...you had to figure the rest of the ignorance out on your own...LOL Me thinks you have been spending too much time around a truck stop again Jim. The diesel fumes are getting to you again. :-)> John To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question

2002-09-26 Thread Jim Rooth
Perry Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 16:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question >So far I've been very happy with JunkMail. I'm only running a few tests and >it's catching a lot of spam and porn. However, I'm noticing the oc

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question

2002-09-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
>So far I've been very happy with JunkMail. I'm only running a few tests and >it's catching a lot of spam and porn. However, I'm noticing the occasional >legitimate email from badly formatted clients. For example, JunkMail caught >a confirmation email from an online service that one of my co-work

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question

2002-09-26 Thread Jim Rooth
al Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Troy Hilton Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 15:53 To: Declude Junkmail Forum (E-mail) Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question Hello All, So far I've been very happy with JunkMail. I'm only running

[Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question

2002-09-26 Thread Troy Hilton
Hello All, So far I've been very happy with JunkMail. I'm only running a few tests and it's catching a lot of spam and porn. However, I'm noticing the occasional legitimate email from badly formatted clients. For example, JunkMail caught a confirmation email from an online service that one of my

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] badheaders test

2002-09-25 Thread Troy Hilton
>Can anyone shed any light on exactly what the BADHEADERS test checks for? It checks for E-mail headers that are broken (non-RFC-compliant). There are a number of different things that it looks for. OK. >I've got a client that is sending me legitimate emails but it's failing the >BADHEADERS te

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] badheaders test

2002-09-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Can anyone shed any light on exactly what the BADHEADERS test checks for? It checks for E-mail headers that are broken (non-RFC-compliant). There are a number of different things that it looks for. >I've got a client that is sending me legitimate emails but it's failing the >BADHEADERS test

[Declude.JunkMail] badheaders test

2002-09-25 Thread Troy Hilton
Hello all, Can anyone shed any light on exactly what the BADHEADERS test checks for? I've got a client that is sending me legitimate emails but it's failing the BADHEADERS test and I can't see why. Thanks. Troy D. Hilton SofWerks LLC. [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses