t's a risk worth
taking.
Best Regards
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 02:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...
> I agree completly w
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Frolick
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...
Scott,
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short
Have you thought about using Declude Console as a short term dns cache
for Declude?
This is something that we have been thinking about doing for some time.
However, if the DNS server is on the local network, there would be little
benefit from doing this (as the local DNS server will cache the in
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...
Scott:
Thank you for your response. Since we started doing this (almost a
week) I
have noticed several
Scott:
Thank you for your response. Since we started doing this (almost a week) I
have noticed several "real-life" behavior from our server.
What we used to see:
- When a list was hitting our server I was seeing many Declude.exe processes
at the same time - one after another taking 100% of CPU
> I agree completly with scott ,and would like to add that
> deleting mail only with rbl test does not mean anything.
Today I've read an article on a german website (c't computer magazine)
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/hob-27.05.03-000/
In short there's the information that the big freem
Yep, now that I think about it, I think you did. That was a few days ago, a
lot of brain cells must have evaporated since then ;)
On 05/27/03 7:59pm you wrote...
>> Scott, does IMail do it's ip4r checking after the whole message is
>> received and the connection terminated or does chec
> Scott, does IMail do it's ip4r checking after the whole message is
> received and the connection terminated or does check on the
> HELO/EHLO and send an error code back to the remote server?
Hey, didn't I already answer this? :)
-Sandy
Sanford W
Scott, does IMail do it's ip4r checking after the whole message is received
and the connection terminated or does check on the HELO/EHLO and send an error
code back to the remote server?
IMail v8 runs the spam tests after the whole E-mail is received. Each ip4r
test is run one after another (Dec
Scott, does IMail do it's ip4r checking after the whole message is received
and the connection terminated or does check on the HELO/EHLO and send an error
code back to the remote server?
If it does that latter, the remote timeout settings may be a concern. I have
been tracking the tarpitting feat
t;R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] observation to share...
>We have been moving our IP4R tests from Declude to IMail (version 8) and
>are finding it more and more effective.
>
&
We have been moving our IP4R tests from Declude to IMail (version 8) and
are finding it more and more effective.
This has the added benefit to delete emails before they reach Declude.
we have added over 60 of the IP4R tests to IMail and checked the options
for REVDNS, Verify email, and the HEL
12 matches
Mail list logo
