Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway

@declude.com Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway You might need WHITELIST from .xx.com  (the smtp sender address looks to be in the fromat [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway

You might need WHITELIST from .xx.com  (the smtp sender address looks to be in the fromat [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: Harry Vanderzand To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 10:17 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway

D] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:18 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg Yet somehow it got marked as spam

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway

: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway have an addres that I have whitelisted   WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg   Yet somehow it got marked as spam   There was a match in a filter file   How is this possible?   Should whitelisting not take

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted address getting trapped anyway

have an addres that I have whitelisted   WHITELIST FROM @.com in global.cfg   Yet somehow it got marked as spam   There was a match in a filter file   How is this possible?   Should whitelisting not take precedence?   See headers below   Received: from mailface.roving.com [63.251.135.7

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not

It likely means that the sender also uses Declude and scans outgoing email. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan DuncanSent: Monday, June 06, 2005 3:05 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not

uncan Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:57 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not Here are the headers from a message that was forwarded to my spam email account.  It shows that it’s whitelisted but it was still caught.   X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not

: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:57 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not Here are the headers from a message that was forwarded to my spam email account.  It shows that it’s whitelisted but it was still caught.   X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted but not

Here are the headers from a message that was forwarded to my spam email account.  It shows that it’s whitelisted but it was still caught.   X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1] X-Declude-Spoolname: D5E8705DC5A1F.GSC X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 2.0.6 (http://www.declu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted[0]

Nevermind! Is it Friday yet? - Original Message - From: Jay Calvert To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 1:17 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted[0] Hi all,   We tag email with the subject tag "SPAM*-" when email ge

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted[0]

We tag email with the subject tag "SPAM*-" when email gets a score of higher than 10. What happened here. It says that it was whitelisted but it still tagged with "SPAM*-" What happened here is that someone got an E-mail with "*SPAM" in the subject, and replied to it: Subject: RE: *SPAM -FW:

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted[0]

Hi all,   We tag email with the subject tag "SPAM*-" when email gets a score of higher than 10.   What happened here.  It says that it was whitelisted but it still tagged with "SPAM*-"     Message Headers.     Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>From: "Eddie Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru Richard, In my experience it is not a good idea to whitelist the postmaster account for the exact reasons you posted below. If you have the postmaster account whitelisted any incoming spam with multiple recipients listed

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

-- > From: "Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:44 PM > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru > > > > Andy, > > > > This works because the action on th

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

gt; Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:44 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru > Andy, > > This works because the action on the "Postmaster" test is ROUTETO back to the > postmaster. > > How it works > [1] Lowers the weight of the email by 10

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

1 934-3414 x20 (Business) Fax:+1 201 934-9206 http://www.HM-Software.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 02:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whiteliste

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

OTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru > > > Richard, > > This is a common problem especially when deali

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

m: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru Richard, This is a common problem especially when dealing with postmaster account. Most people

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

Richard, This is a common problem especially when dealing with postmaster account. Most people whitelist postmaster and because spammers know this they often include a postmaster address because they know the message (even to the other recipients) will be delivered. I posted awhile back on what

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

On 19 May 2004 at 9:04, Richard Farris wrote: Kinda - there is a test called BYPASSWHITELIST http://www.mail- archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17561.html Hope this helps! -Nick Hayer > > I have noticed that some of the spam getting thru is because a I have > several in my whitelist and eve

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted- getting thru

I have noticed that some of the spam getting thru is because a I have several in my whitelist and even though it is not addressed to them it sends it on because the whitelisted email is in the CC or BCC...   Isn't there any way to whitelist only if it is addressed to that person in the To: b

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

tsky, MCSE, CISSPSystem EngineerTime Inc. Information Technology[5957 F27C 9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1] - Original Message - From: Todd To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 5:33 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted? I have spam that

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

I have spam that is getting through.  The headers show Whitelisted (0) .  From: "Terrell Vann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Terrell Vann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: LOw Cost Som@, X(a)[EMAIL PROTECTED], Valï(u)m, Viagr@ Di3t Pills Many M3ds kyrqbxh Date: Sun, 18 Jan

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

9C71 E9A7 274A 0447 C9B9 75A4 9B41 D4D1] - Original Message - From: "andyb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted HI, I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

es. Thanks, Andy - Original Message - From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:46 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted Andy, Habeas has not been compromised. Since Saturday, a spammer has been

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

I have been reporting as they come up. Thanks, Andy - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted > > >I'm getting spam, an

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

This was whitelisted as it is/was part of the default config file... - Original Message - From: "Rick Klinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:25 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted Fwiw.. I would never whi

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

s list for more discussion and sample configurations that have shared. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: andyb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted HI

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

HABEAS habeas x x -5 0 Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of andyb Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted HI, I'm getting spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

I got that this morning as well. I commented out the HABEAS test. - Original Message - From: "andyb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted > HI, > > I'm getti

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP: 68.57.145.231 ID: Here is the change in Global.cfg: #WHITELIST HABEAS HABEAS habeas x x -5 0 Bill > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb > Sent: Tuesday, J

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted > > > HI, > > I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of > HABEAS... He

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

> These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised? More like spammers are forging habeas headers and challenging habeus' ability to prosecute. Larry Craddock --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here are the headers. These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised? Yes; the pharmacourt.biz spammers have infringed on the Habeas intellectual property rights. Habeas is going after them. Until thi

[Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted

HI, I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here are the headers. These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised? Comments Please. thanks, Andy Received: from cs78191007.pp.htv.fi [62.78.191.7] by thumpernet.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id A0E1130

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

At 06:04 AM 1/12/2004, R. Scott Perry wrote: The Habeas headers are a legal means of whitelisting E-mail. In this case, a spam illegally used the Habeas headers -- something that the people that are behind Habeas have been waiting years for. Now is the true test of Habeas -- if they go after t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

Cool ... I'll report it right now. - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:04 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted? > > >Well I'm not sure how I mis

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

Well I'm not sure how I missed this ... but here's the *rest* of the header info: ... X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Now what do I do? Have you reported it yet? The Habeas headers are a legal m

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

al Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:27 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted? > > >Ok I admit I'm pretty weak in the area of tweaking declude but why was this > >whi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

Ok I admit I'm pretty weak in the area of tweaking declude but why was this whitelisted? I have three whitelist lines in my global.cfg ... they are WHITELIST HABEAS and 2 WHITELIST[EMAIL PROTECTED] lines ... What does the Declude JunkMail log file say? Is one of those two WHITELIST lines

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted?

Ok I admit I'm pretty weak in the area of tweaking declude but why was this whitelisted? I have three whitelist lines in my global.cfg ... they are WHITELIST HABEAS and 2 WHITELIST[EMAIL PROTECTED] lines ... Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:44:57 +0400 X-Mailer: PIPEX NetMail 2.2.0-pre13 MIME-Ve

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted

The IP of our secondary mail server is 67.17.218.70. I received a message that had its IP put in as the hostname. So Declude saw this IP and whitelisted. I'll type a couple lines of the headers: Received: from secmail.crescentdigital.com [67.17.218.70] by mail.crescentdigital.com with

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted

Hello, One of our clients has been forwarding e-mails that have made it through the cracks and found something interesting. I have our network whitelisted, and have the secdns entry so that it checks the ip of the originating server when it comes through the sec mail server. But to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted - why?

>any chance that the "FROM hm-software.com" whitelist picked up on the >Return-Path: ><36-809-hm-software.com?[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >? Yes, it definitely would. "WHITELIST FROM hm-software.com" should whitelist any E-mail with "hm-software.com"

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted - why?

> WHITELIST FROM hm-software.com Change it to: WHITELIST FROM @hm-software.com I believe this will do what you need. At least I hope so as this is what I have been doing... Sheldon Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com Ten Forward Communications360-457-

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisted - why?

Scott,   any chance that the "FROM hm-software.com" whitelist picked up on the Return-Path: <36-809-hm-software.com?[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?   Obviously, the intent is to ONLY whitelist things that END with "hm-software.com".   WHITELIST ANYWHERE [EMAIL PROTECTED]WHITELIST IP 63.107.174.WHITELIST