AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fail safe-- ideas
> To make this closer to a failsafe, we can have your program check the
weight
> already assigned to the configured match, if its above X weight, it would
> trigger a configurable alert (off site email, event log, log fi
> To make this closer to a failsafe, we can have your program check the
weight
> already assigned to the configured match, if its above X weight, it would
> trigger a configurable alert (off site email, event log, log file...etc)
But what about this scenario: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends a message to
[
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 2:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fail safe-- ideas
> Not sure how doable is this or if it can be exploited by spammers, but as
a
> fai
> Not sure how doable is this or if it can be exploited by spammers, but as
a
> fail safe, cant we setup a certain FROM and TO email accounts on a domain
> which we know any email going between those two accounts (from doesn't
have
> to be an email account on server) is 99.99% never spam?
>
> This
Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fail safe-- ideas
>In Declude JM perhaps it is not a bad idea to have some fail safe
>options. For example..
There are quite a few. :)
> I made a blank entry in our database whi
lf Of Kami Razvan
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 4:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fail safe-- ideas
Hi Scott:
I ran it and it appears to be working. When ran manually the report shows
that it has detected an infected file.
I also attached the virus.cfg for your revi
. Scott Perry
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fail safe-- ideas
>In Declude JM perhaps it is not a bad idea to have some fail safe
>options. For example..
There are quite a few. :)
> I made a blank entry in our database which en
In Declude JM perhaps it is not a bad idea to have some fail safe
options. For example..
There are quite a few. :)
I made a blank entry in our database which ended up as:
BODY 20 CONTAINS
& it was blank after contains.. a number of emails failed this test by the
time I found out about it.
