The END function means END the filter and do not add any of the points for
that filter. If the END condition is met it is as if the filter never ran.
David B
www.declude.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006
Can we request a STOP function that woul dstop the filter and exit with the
current weight?
- Original Message -
From: David Barker
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14
201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:06 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:42 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Importance: High
Wow - really? When was that changed? I know
]
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 4:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Importance: High
Wow - really? When was that changed? I
] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
The END function means END the filter and do not add any of the points for
that filter. If the END condition is met it is as if the filter never ran.
David B
www.declude.com
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Importance: High
me too.
I thought the purpose of the end function was so that if the email reaches a
certain weight
] On Behalf Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Importance: High
me too.
I thought the purpose of the end function was so that if the email reaches a
certain weight
Of Craig
Edmonds
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Importance: High
me too.
I thought the purpose of the end function was so that if the email reaches a
certain weight, like 50
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:53 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Andy,
The post says it's actually set up right now so that:
[1] the E-mail
)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 7:42 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Importance: High
Wow - really? When
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
END still works the way Scott intended it to work, ENDs the filter at that
point with no fail.
No need to add STOP.
John T
eServices For You
Life is a succession of lessons
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Was never changed. Look at the directives. END means end the filter. What you
should have been using is MAXWEIGHT at the top, or STOPATFIRSTHIT.
John T
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Was never changed. Look at the directives. END means end the filter. What
you should have been using is MAXWEIGHT at the top, or STOPATFIRSTHIT.
John T
eServices For You
Life is a succession of lessons which
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 11:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
END still works the way Scott intended it to work, ENDs the filter
, November 17, 2006 9:29 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Hi John,
Was never changed.
Please read the URL I posted:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg14009.html
As you can tell
Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:29 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Hi John,
Was never changed.
Please read the URL I posted:
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Why the requirement of single filter?
I have different combo filters created like this:
ComboFilterA
REM If testa and testb fail, and if testc or testd fail, add 10
ENDONFIRSTHIT
, 2006 10:48 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Why the requirement of single filter?
Clarity? It's easier for me to follow a logic, if it's enclosed in a SINGLE
source document (= filter).
If the logical
] *On Behalf Of
*John T (Lists)
*Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2006 12:57 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14
flushes WEIGHT?
Why the requirement of single filter?
I have different combo filters created like
, November 17, 2006 10:48 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Why the requirement of single filter?
Clarity? It's easier for me to follow a logic, if it's enclosed in a SINGLE
source document (= filter
Emerson (1802-1882)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy
Schmidt
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 2:13 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Hi John
)
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 05:52 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
OK, I understand that better but you will always be better off grouping each
intent into a different combo filter. Then, you can even have
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Andy Schmidt
*Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2006 2:13 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14
flushes WEIGHT?
Hi John:
What is the logic of the second part
@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter 'END' statement in 4.3.14 flushes
WEIGHT?
Andy,
Taking your original filter, this is what you would do (note the NOTCONTAINS
line in the second filter):
# ADD-WEIGHT
TESTSFAILED 7 CONTAINS SNIFFER
TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS SNIFFER-SCAMS
TESTSFAILED 1
25 matches
Mail list logo
