RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
If you are going to allow all of your outgoing ranges, what is the purpose of having Hijack? John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey M Donley > Sent: Tuesd

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have had a continuing problem with Hijack. I have several business customers with 25 plus work stations, these customers are getting caught in hijack on outgoing mails. I have added ALLOWIP entries for all the customers with no success. It seems as though declude reads hijack cfg for a certain n

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not working on internal customers

2004-06-22 Thread Nick Hayer
On 22 Jun 2004 at 7:07, Jeffrey M Donley wrote: Hi Jeff, So in your hijack.cfg file you have ALLOWIP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and in the HOLDx dir hijack is retaining emails from the allowip addresses? If that is the case I suggest stopping and restarting declude console to reset hijack; if that doesn'

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've been using SMTP32.exe (not the daemon). I just wanted to check because every time I make the change it stops delivery (even after I roll the SMTP service within Imail, which does start up successfully). The key here is that both IMail and Declude must be set up properly: [1] IMail needs t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ? > In regards to the web messaging possible trap, Do I really need to up > the limits for hijack? > > It's always been

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
> >Anyone thinking about this needs to consider the following: > > > >If you have 1000 users using web mail, it is very likely that just normal > >usage of those users will trigger the hold values. > > That is a good point -- I don't know offhand how IMail handles this > situation (specifically, w

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Really dumb questions? Is the syntax of renamed files case sensitive? No. Does the Daisychain call go within the hijack.cfg file or another config file? It can go in any of the Declude .cfg files. Does the Daisychain call need quotes or simply just a call out? It should not have any quotes in t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Should I be using the SMTP32.exe or the SMTPd32.exe for this process? It *must* be SMTP32.exe (SMTPd32.exe is the "SMTP Daemon", the service which accepts incoming E-mail, as opposed to the process that delivers the E-mail). -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for vir

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
Really dumb questions? Is the syntax of renamed files case sensitive? Does the Daisychain call go within the hijack.cfg file or another config file? Does the Daisychain call need quotes or simply just a call out? Sorry for the dumb questions, but these spammers keep creating new accounts (found

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Anyone thinking about this needs to consider the following: If you have 1000 users using web mail, it is very likely that just normal usage of those users will trigger the hold values. That is a good point -- I don't know offhand how IMail handles this situation (specifically, what Received: hea

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
> In regards to the web messaging possible trap, Do I really need to up > the limits for hijack? > > It's always been my understanding that web messaging shouldn't send out > as much email as frequently than an email client (Outlook, etc.) It depends on how many Web Mail users you have. If you a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread Brian Cunningham
email as frequently than an email client (Outlook, etc.) Thoughts? Thanks. b -Original Message- From: John Tolmachoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ? Importance: High Wait, the D

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack Not Working ?

2003-03-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
Wait, the DAISYCHAIN option has a big effect on any one hosting lots of users using Web Mail. Anyone thinking about this needs to consider the following: If you have 1000 users using web mail, it is very likely that just normal usage of those users will trigger the hold values. If you are going

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've got you up until the "DAISYCHAIN ipsmtp.exe" point. Do you want me to rename the two files and then add the daisychain line above to the config file of hijack? That is correct. > Will renaming declude.exe to smtp32.exe cause problems with junkmail or virus? No. > Do I need to rename or

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
I checked the W log files and it looks like they are coming in through web messaging (god knows how they are sending that much email through web messaging) under several IP's ranging from Nigeria to Israel. I blocked those IP's within Imail "Control Access". Ah, that explains what is going on.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
And the log files have not held anything today. Everything went through as "OK" with juat a couple not local users. Note that Declude Hijack allows unlimited E-mail to local users, and doesn't count that towards a user's quota. But I see that [EMAIL PROTECTED] now has about 300 outgoing spam me

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread Brian Cunningham
w has about 300 outgoing spam messages in the queue. Help! Thanks. b -Original Message- From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ? >We've got a locked down pu

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HiJack Not Working ?

2003-03-26 Thread R. Scott Perry
We've got a locked down public Imail server where anyone can register for a free email, but all users have to authenticate before relaying mail. We've also got Declude with HiJack in order to stop spammers from using our system But somehow we've got registered users sending hundreds of message