We had this problem several times and have now forbid our offices from
using Exchange. It took down not only our server, but several major
insurance companies mail servers as well. It was a disaster. I can't
believe this bug didn't make more press. It's a huge issue (for
Exchange servers th
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 9:53 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
> and threading is fun, you pretty much have everything in
> place to communicate back and forth between processes.
> allo
>RSP> "...allow E-mails that are being processed to communicate with one
>another"
>
>Curious. How do emails communicate with each other?
Just to clarify, it's not the actual E-mails themselves doing the
communicating , but the code that is processing each E-mail. By
having Declude run as a s
L PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
There would be a main service thread witch would monitor the
status off all the worker threads..
basically, if the design were kept the way it is now (ie, declude called
on each delivery of a email)
> and threading is fun, you pretty much have everything in
> place to communicate back and forth between processes.
> allowing many instances of declude to talk to each other.
That's what I mean.
Maybe this will allow us also to have/create new functionality. For example
(I don't know if I'm t
owing many instances of declude to talk to
each other.
- Original Message -
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
RSP> "...allow E-mails that are being processed to comm
RSP> "...allow E-mails that are being processed to communicate with one
another"
Curious. How do emails communicate with each other?
Darin.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Junk
Declude as a multi-threaded service sound very promising.
I agree. :)
It is something that I had wanted to see in Declude for a long time, and
was a logical progression for Declude, that will take care of many
issues. It should increase performance, and at the same time allow
E-mails that
Behalf Of William
> Stillwell
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:51 AM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
>
>
> I upgraded before there was a "Known" problem.
>
> However since I only delivery around 5K /msgs Day, I don&
arkus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:32 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
Its been over 2.5 months to fix a problem that is mission
cri
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:40 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
I've running Imail 8.15 and the Declude 1.82 here and everything is
running
fine.
Do you realy need Imail 8.2?
Declude as a multi-threaded service sound very promising.
Markus
-Original
; Heimir Eidskrem
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 3:32 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
>
>
> Its been over 2.5 months to fix a problem that is mission
> critical for many of us.
> Pleased with the result?
> Sorry bu
pace.
Regards,
Mike Hardrick
TNWEB LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 08:32
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
Its been over 2.5 months to fix a pro
I think there just waiting for everyone's support to expire..
- Original Message -
From: "Heimir Eidskrem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
Its been over 2.5 months to fix a problem tha
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:32 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
I just noticed that it was posted June 5.
Whats the deal?
2.5 months later and no update?
Bring back Scott please.
This is not good enough
com
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
>Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:32 AM
>To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
>
>I just noticed that it was po
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Heimir Eidskrem
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:32 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] IMail 8.02
I just noticed that it was posted June 5.
Whats the deal?
2.5 months later and no update?
Bring back Scott please.
This is not good enough
Heimir Eidskrem <> wrote on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:32 AM:
> I just noticed that it was posted June 5.
>
> Whats the deal?
> 2.5 months later and no update?
>
> Bring back Scott please.
> This is not good enough.
>
You're not the only one that has gotten fed up with the post-Scott
Declude
I just noticed that it was posted June 5.
Whats the deal?
2.5 months later and no update?
Bring back Scott please.
This is not good enough.
Heimir Eidskrem wrote:
> Well, good to know.
> I spent this weekend troubleshooting this problem.
> Our SMTP process would blow up then the SMTP becomes
Well, good to know.
I spent this weekend troubleshooting this problem.
Our SMTP process would blow up then the SMTP becomes unresponsive.
Almost like tar pitting.
I wish I had known this Friday :(
I hope this is the number 1 priority for them.
Heimir
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Declude
Declude posted this a couple weeks back and are still working on testing the
new version that resolves the issues with 8.2x
http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24792.html
Darrell
--
DLAnalyzer - Comprehensive reporting for Declude Junkmail and Virus
-- Original Message --
From: Dan Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>What is the suggested configuration for iMail 8.02's anti-spam features
>when using Declude? Or should it just iMail anti-spam be disabled?
I use a combination of both ... I have all of the IP4 te
Greetings
I currently run Imail 8 and Declude Junkmail. I turned on the statistical
filtering in Imail because as far as I knew declude did not have a similar
test. I catch equal amounts of spam with both tests. The annoying part is
having to maintain two whitelists and check two locations for fal
23 matches
Mail list logo
