RE: [Declude.Virus] scanning timeout value

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yes, IMail was processing mail through that period. We started receiving messages at our desktops that did not contain any declude headers, and that was my first indication that something was wrong. The log even shows SMTP refusals based on entries in my kill.lst file, so I'm guessing that IMail

RE: [Declude.Virus] scanning timeout value

2003-01-22 Thread John Shacklett
Nope, no c:\declude.gpx files, I looked for those first. And I agree with your conclusion about what happened, I just wish I had looked at the task manager to see if there were a boatload of smtp32.exe processes sitting in limbo. I'll bet there were. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [Declude.Virus] server-based encryption

2003-01-22 Thread Declude Forum
That would be ideal. But is it feasible? If so, don't forget to include me on the royalties! :) -Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]

[Declude.Virus] log expansion

2003-01-22 Thread John Shacklett
I loaded 1.66 and the copy of fpcmd.exe from out of fp-win_312d_m.exe on Monday morning. Since then my log files have grown dramatically, mostly from the inclusion of countless lines like these: 01/20/2003 12:55:00 Q37e6146 Could not find parse string Infection in report.txt 01/20/2003 12:55:01 Q3

Re: [Declude.Virus] log expansion

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
I loaded 1.66 and the copy of fpcmd.exe from out of fp-win_312d_m.exe on Monday morning. Since then my log files have grown dramatically, mostly from the inclusion of countless lines like these: 01/20/2003 12:55:00 Q37e6146 Could not find parse string Infection in report.txt 01/20/2003 12:55:01

RE: [Declude.Virus] server-based encryption

2003-01-22 Thread Jonathan
I actually don't think it'd be too bad .. the keys would be stored on the mail server, the program you call would find the body, encrypt it, pass declude a return true, or however it's handled, and away it goes out to the world. You are, of course, assuming that the user isn't using webmail, an

RE: [Declude.Virus] log expansion

2003-01-22 Thread John Shacklett
Yep. I changed the name of the old one and dropped the new one right in its place. I'm going to get a fresh copy of 3.12D and repeat the install, and do some more Eicar testing and get this right. Thanks for the insights. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: [Declude.Virus] log expansion

2003-01-22 Thread R. Scott Perry
Yep. I changed the name of the old one and dropped the new one right in its place. I'm going to get a fresh copy of 3.12D and repeat the install, and do some more Eicar testing and get this right. If you want, you can use the debug mode ("LOGLEVEL DEBUG") until at least one E-mail is scanned,

RE: [Declude.Virus] log expansion

2003-01-22 Thread John Shacklett
I think I have things back to normal. I'm writing this off to a buggered fpcmd.exe file. As soon as I reinstalled f-prot, things started working properly. I even caught a klez by happenstance in the middle of the eicars, all with both scanners, so I'm going home. -Original Message- From: [