Darrell,
I will need to check with the engineers and get back to you as to where we
are with the multi-processor environment, although I am pretty sure this
version should work with multi-processors, as I know that the delay between
threads should have been reduced.
David
-Original Message--
Sorry, I am just getting my head back into Declude/Imail/etc from Katrina.
Is 3.0+ ok for single processor systems?
John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:38 PM
To: Declude.V
David,
Any progress on the issues we seen under multi-processor environments?
Darrell
David Barker writes:
If you are running the Declude Beta please upgrade to 3.0.3.8 and send
feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David B
www.declude.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing l
Darin,
I would suggest maybe trying 1.0.6 instead of the beta. I have no
measurable delay moving from one message to another; it's
instantaneous. Even in the IMail Forum which I have messages going
back to 1/1/2004, everything happens instantly. I am not on a laptop,
and my system is only s
According to the Thunderbird web page and download
filename, Thunderbird has a 1.5.1 beta 1. Check the website.
However, when I installed it, it said it was installing 1.4.
Startup speed for Thunderbird is way faster than OE
at just a few seconds compared to 20-30 seconds for OE, however
If you are running the Declude Beta please upgrade to 3.0.3.8 and send
feedback to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David B
www.declude.com
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives
Darin,
I'm confused. FireFox, the Web browser is at 1.5.1 beta, but
Thunderbird, the E-mail client, is at 1.0.6.
I'm also not clear on what you mean regarding speed. I am very happy,
and it seems to me that an empty OE or Outlook is much slower to
launch, and Thunderbird seems faster when t
Just loaded it (1.5.1 beta). Seems to be
almost identical to OE for the way I use it...except slower. Speed is one
of the reasons I use OE instead of Outlook. :(
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Matt
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:07 PM
Su
Thunderbird just simply works. My only complaint is that the spell
checker sucks and has serious problems if you are off by more than one
letter. For the type of work that we do, it is definitely a better
application. The E-mail is stored in plain text files so you can
search it that way, an
Also, any emails that are mime/base64 encoded should be mime decoded by the
AV scanner. I know mcafee has that option which we enable.
Darrell
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail
Plain text would be my preference as well, to see
headers and message at once.
Hmmm...may have to try Thunderbird
again. It seemed to be missing some features I liked in OE the last time I
tried it. I would use Outlook, but it still experiences too
many failures in communicating with the
Hmm, works fine in Thunderbird/Netscape, or at least I can see it as
plain text.
It seems from Pete's MIME headers that he intended for the message to
just simply be attached and viewable as the original message. If he
changed the extension to .eml that should work. I'm not sure whether
or n
Declude can handle normally nestled attachments. I know of one bug
however where there was a malformed virus that E-mail clients
understood, but Declude apparently didn't decode properly. The issue
was that the base64 encoding was longer than the normal size. It
wasn't an issue except for ba
Yep... banning 1.msg wouldn't be a good idea unless we can get Pete to
change the name of his attachments. I myself would prefer them not to be
named .msg (.txt would be _great_) as I can't open them directly in OE that
way. I have to save them to disk in order to see which false positive I
repor
My bad. I was not banning eml and msg. I realized that as I was getting AOL
feedbacks. What I was banning was 1.msg as there was a virus reported to be
using that.
Sniffer responds to false positives and in doing so, renames the request to
1.msg as an attachment to the response.
John T
eServices
With Declude 1.82, we haven't had any trouble with decoding and blocking
viruses or banned attachments in attached .eml or .msg files. We wouldn't
block them separately because of all of forwarded messages sent as
attachments, both by us, AOL feedback loops, and by our users.
Darin.
- Origi
What are others thoughts on blocking eml and msg attachments?
If there is an eml or msg attachment which that has a executable or virus
attachment, will Declude properly decode it and will it be scanned for
viruses and banned attachments?
John T
eServices For You
---
This E-mail came from the D
17 matches
Mail list logo
