[Declude.Virus] More CPL Vulnerabilities

2004-10-01 Thread Bob McGregor
Since upgrading to 1.80 I am seeing many more Invalid CPL Vulnerabilities. Is this just timing or is there something different for these vulnerabilities? The interesting thing about these is that they are coming from spoofed senders multiple deliveries at a time. --- [This E-mail was scanned

Re: [Declude.Virus] More CPL Vulnerabilities

2004-10-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Since upgrading to 1.80 I am seeing many more Invalid CPL Vulnerabilities. Is this just timing or is there something different for these vulnerabilities? The interesting thing about these is that they are coming from spoofed senders multiple deliveries at a time. The Invalid CPL Vulnerability

Re: [Declude.Virus] More CPL Vulnerabilities

2004-10-01 Thread Bob McGregor
strange since I had the interim versions, many of them. I do not remember seeing this vulnerability especially being spoofed. I wonder though: I added a vulnerability.eml and have ONLYSENDIFVIRUSNAMEHAS JPEG Vulnerability I assumed that the virusname would have to have JPEG Vulnerability, both

Re: [Declude.Virus] More CPL Vulnerabilities

2004-10-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
I wonder though: I added a vulnerability.eml and have ONLYSENDIFVIRUSNAMEHAS JPEG Vulnerability I assumed that the virusname would have to have JPEG Vulnerability, both words, is this the case? Correct. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced