PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(lists)
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:49 AM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
As Andrew pointed out, you did not read the fine print.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
As Andrew pointed out, you did not read the fine print.
John T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Douglas Cohn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:50 PM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus
al Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Douglas Cohn
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 8:50 PM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
>
> F-prot is $50 for 10 licenses per year. $5 per machine
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
Changed when they released the new version. About 3 months back. Check the
archives of this list. We were complaining about it. We dumped using their
product and just use the AVG built into Declude.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Mess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: declude.virus@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
>
> When did their licensing change? F-Prot used to be extremely
> reasonable.
>
> Don
>
>
When did their licensing change? F-Prot used to be extremely reasonable.
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Bilbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 6
Read the license. It may be co
Read the license. It may be compatible but the licensing is expensive.
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Dodell
> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 7:26 PM
> To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.Virus]
]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
> "C:\Program Files\FSI\F-Prot\FP-Updater\Updater.exe" /run /quit
Problem wih above is that when there is a new fprot version, the virus def
update will fail I use the batch upgrade as a backup for these situations.
-
CTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:09 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
> "Problem wih above is that when there is a new fprot version, the virus
def
> update will fail"
>
> I have never experienced that problem. Not even with the latest vers
"Problem wih above is that when there is a new fprot version, the virus def
update will fail"
I have never experienced that problem. Not even with the latest version
3.15. This updates the virus defs regardless of version, and has never
failed once in the two years we have been running F-Prot..
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 4:58 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
> This is the command we run from task manager and have for some time with
no
> issues.
>
> "C:\Program Files\FSI\F-Prot\FP-Updater\
6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
will it run through task manager if called?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Porter
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Porter
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
I don't log out of the email server. I simply lock the console. The Updater
will still run and the system still requires a password to get back t
] On Behalf Of Mike Hyslip
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot Version 3.15 w/Declude
will it run through task manager if called?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J Porter
Sent: Friday
I have set declude to call fprot version 3.14b and c, just in case
i just moved to a new server and have plenty of unused power
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-
I submitted a sample winmail.dat and command line which illistrated the problem to
F-prot at their request. It was probably too late to put a fix in the current
version, but may be in the next one.
> I have moved back to F-Prot 3.14b as more of these errors started showing
> up.
---
[This E-mail
I have moved back to F-Prot 3.14b as more of these errors started showing
up.
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Don Hickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
> Spoke too
released the other day.
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Don Hickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
> Ok I took up the Guinea Pig slack, and installed the latest ve
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
> Actually, F-Prot released a new version of 3.14c (3.14c previously errored
> on winmail.dat files) on Monday. Haven't tried it out yet. Has anyone
>
Actually, F-Prot released a new version of 3.14c (3.14c previously errored
on winmail.dat files) on Monday. Haven't tried it out yet. Has anyone
taken on the task of being a guinea pig...?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Grosshandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version 3.12d released
>
>
> Same here, running well and picking up the W32/MTX.9244.worm.A virus...
>
> Kendra Customer Support
> http://www.kendra.com/support
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 425-397-7911
> Th
Same here, running well and picking up the W32/MTX.9244.worm.A virus...
Kendra Customer Support
http://www.kendra.com/support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
425-397-7911
This Email was scanned for viruses
Junk Email filtered ISP
> Luis Arango
> - Original Message -
> From: "Panda Consulting S.A - Lui
I just installed so far so good..
Luis Arango
- Original Message -
From: "Panda Consulting S.A - Luis Alberto Arango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 1:18 PM
Subject: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version 3.12d released
> Hi F-Prot users.
> I just g
: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
Dan Star wrote:
> Per the F-prot FAQ, the updater can be started from command line using
switches.
> So use AT to schedule it and keep the server logged off. Haven't tried
this yet as
> Sounds like the best answer for anti-virus protection, even with the
issues pointed out by John, are to log in and lock the console.
IMO, not so. Using all other Windows based scanners, McAfee, Symantec,
Sophos, etc. and the DOS version of F-Prot do not require any one to be
logged in. Again, I
Actually it's just about opposite of that. Since Declude calls F-Prot directly you
don't need to be logged in for it to work. The scheduler in the Windows version only
runs if you are logged in.
I haven't have any problems with being logged in with the screen locked so that's how
I've handled
Dan Star wrote:
> Per the F-prot FAQ, the updater can be started from command line using switches.
> So use AT to schedule it and keep the server logged off. Haven't tried this yet as
> I log in everday to the mail server.
I haven't tried the AT with the command line either, but several people h
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
>
> > I got the Windows version and turned off the real-time protector. Use
> > the built-in updater every 12 hours.
> >
>
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lynn
> Ritchie
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
>
>
> Hello
>
> As I don't have the
ading
anyway.
Jim Matuska Jr.
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Lynn Ritchie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot versio
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
Hello
As I don't have the DOS version I'm not familiar with it, but we are
having a similar discussion here regarding the windows version. Assuming
that servers should never be left logged in, how do you get the Windows
versions of
John Tolmachoff wrote:
> > ... just have to remember to leave the server logged in or
> the updates don't work.
>
> Red flag on play. Penalty time out. (For you Football
> fans.)
>
> Servers should never be left logged in.
>
> As I am not familiar with the Windows version, I do not know how the u
> ... just have to remember to leave the server logged in or
the updates don't work.
Red flag on play. Penalty time out. (For you Football
fans.)
Servers should never be left logged in.
As I am not familiar with the Windows version, I do not know how the updater
works, but in DOS, we have a bat
ohn Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot version
> I got the Windows version and turned off the real-time protector. Use
> the built-in updater every 12 hours.
>
> John C.
>
I got the Windows version and turned off the real-time protector. Use
the built-in updater every 12 hours.
John C.
Mark Smith wrote:
I'm adding F-Prot as a virus detector in addition to CA.
Which version of F-Prot should I buy/install Windows or DOS?
Thanks!
---
[This E-mail scanned for virus
on 12/12/02 11:05 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
> I'm adding F-Prot as a virus detector in addition to CA.
> Which version of F-Prot should I buy/install Windows or DOS?
We use the Windows version. The included scheduler automatically checks
every X number of hours for new anti-virus definitions. We set
doh.
I guess some things are just too easy .. thanks. I'll blame it on being
tired on a Sunday morning ;)
I thought the F-Prot executable was being updated by that wget script you
wrote a while back, but it looks like I'm still running 3.12.
Jonathan
At 12:54 PM 3/24/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>
Scan any file(even a nonexistent file), the version number is in the banner of
the output - or - run without any parameters, and it should be displayed in
the top banner of the UI.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, Mar
38 matches
Mail list logo
