RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Kami Razvan
Killion Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails Ok thanks, but what does a user who sends this type of ext get from our server? Is there some sort of eml file I need to add? Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Chad Killion
] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails Chad: This is what we have in our virus.cfg file. No regrets and no apologies for blocking them. We think of this as a fact of life... BANEXT asp BANEXT bas BANEXT bat BANEXT CEO BANEXT chm

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Kami Razvan
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Killion Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 4:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails What is the best way to exclude these in your opinion??? Can Declude do it, or Imail

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Chad Killion
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails With Declude Virus. In the Virus.cfg file, for each banned extension, you have a line like so

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
TECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Killion > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 1:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails > > What is the best way to exclude these in your opinion??? Can Declude do it, > or Imail? &

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Chad Killion
www.eservicesforyou.com > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Killion > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails > > We

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.Virus- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Killion > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails > > We have never filtered EXE before

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Well, I have upgraded to 3.14, but still see TONS of these viruses getting through. Please help if you can... Have you checked to see that: [1] They actually have an .exe (or similar) attachment? [2] The attachment is not 0 bytes? [3] The attachment is complete, and not truncated? Any E-mails th

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Greg Foulks
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Newland Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails I would suggest a notification to users telling them that as of X date, the e-mail system will no longer accep

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
t and that'll be the end of it. Sometimes it's good to be the administrator.. Hahaha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Killion Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus]

Re: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Jason Newland
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:36 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails > We have never filtered EXE before, so it would just cause too many problems > to do this now. We have well over 25 thousand customers using this server, >

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Chad Killion
Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell LaRock Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails Chad, Is there any reason why you can't filter on common virus extensi

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Darrell LaRock
lf Of Chad Killion Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails Well, I have upgraded to 3.14, but still see TONS of these viruses getting through. Please help if you can... Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROT

RE: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails

2003-10-02 Thread Chad Killion
: Re: [Declude.Virus] MS Security Patch Emails > No wonder I'm still getting slammed with systems trying to send this virus > to my users. This was a big thread back in July. F-Prot was only catching the Blaster worm if it tried to run (Desktop Real Time). But it was not detected in the